出典(authority):フリー百科事典『ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』「2012/11/13 14:51:49」(JST)
「My Generation/Understand」 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
YUI の シングル | ||||
収録アルバム | I LOVED YESTERDAY | |||
A面 | My generation Understand |
|||
リリース | 2007年6月13日 | |||
規格 | マキシシングル | |||
ジャンル | J-POP | |||
レーベル | STUDIOSEVEN Recordings | |||
ゴールド等認定 | ||||
|
||||
チャート最高順位 | ||||
|
||||
YUI シングル 年表 | ||||
|
『My Generation/Understand』(マイジェネレーション/アンダースタンド)は、日本のシンガーソングライター・YUIが2007年6月13日に発売の9作目のシングル。初回のみ「特殊コーティングジャケット」仕様。キャッチコピーは「制服脱ぎ捨てた16のアタシに負けたくないから…」。
前作『CHE.R.RY』から3ヵ月後発売のニューシングル。自身初の両A面シングルでもある。 このシングルは両A面表記である。しかし、「Understand」は公式サイトではカップリング扱いになっている[1]。この作品で自身初のオリコンシングルチャート1位を獲得した。
[ヘルプ] |
|
|
この「My Generation/Understand」は、シングルに関連する書きかけ項目です。加筆、訂正などして下さる協力者を求めています(P:音楽/PJ 楽曲)。 |
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (June 2010) |
Understanding (also called intellection) is a psychological process related to an abstract or physical object, such as a person, situation, or message whereby one is able to think about it and use concepts to deal adequately with that object. Understanding is a relation between the knower and an object of understanding. Understanding implies abilities and dispositions with respect to an object of knowledge sufficient to support intelligent behavior.[1]
An understanding is the limit of a conceptualization. To understand something is to have conceptualized it to a given measure.
Contents
|
This section is in a list format that may be better presented using prose. You can help by converting this section to prose, if appropriate. Editing help is available. (September 2011) |
This section is written like a personal reflection or essay rather than an encyclopedic description of the subject. Please help improve it by rewriting it in an encyclopedic style. (September 2011) |
It is difficult to define understanding. If we use the term concept as above, the question then arises as to what is a concept? Is it an abstract thing? Is it a brain pattern or a rule? Whatever definition is proposed, we can still ask how it is that we understand the thing that is featured in the definition: we can never satisfactorily define a concept, still less use it to explain understanding. It may be more convenient to use an operational or behavioural definition, that is, to say that "somebody who reacts appropriately to x understands x". For example, one understands Swahili if one correctly obeys commands given in that language. This approach, however, may not provide an adequate definition. A computer can easily be programmed to react appropriately to commands, but there is a disagreement as to whether or not the computer understands the language (see the Chinese room argument).
According to the independent socionics researcher Rostislav Persion:
In the cognitive model presented by MBTI, the process of introverted thinking (Ti) is thought to represent understanding through cause and effect relationships or correlations. One can construct a model of a system by observing correlations between all the relevant properties (e.g. The output of a NAND gate relative to its inputs). This allows the person to generate truths about the system and then to apply the model to demonstrate his or her understanding. A mechanic for example may randomly, or algorithmically probe the inputs and outputs of a black box to understand the internal components through the use of induction. INTP, ISTP, ESTP, and ENTP all use Ti and are usually the best of the 16 types at understanding their material environment in a bottom-up manner. These types may enjoy mechanics and digital electronics because of the 1 to 1 correlation between cause and effect relationships in these fields. Understanding is not limited to these types however as other types demonstrate an identical process, although in other planes of reality; ie. Social, Theological and Aesthetic. A potential reason for the association of understanding with the former personality types is due to a social phenomenon for asymmetrical distribution of gratification. In the field of engineering, engineers probe or study the inputs and outputs of components to understand their functionality. These components are then combined based on their functionality (similar to computer programming) to create a larger, more complex system. This is the reason why engineers attempt to subdivide ideas as deep as possible to obtain the lowest level of knowledge. This makes their models more detailed and flexible. It may be useful to know the formulas that govern an ideal gas, but to visualise the gas as being made up of small moving particles, which are in turn made up of even smaller particles, is true understanding. People who are understanding (through the use of Ti) usually value objects and people based on usefulness, as opposed to the people who use extroverted thinking (Te) who view people or things as having a worth. In order to test one's understanding it is necessary to present a question that forces the individual to demonstrate the possession of a model, derived from observable examples of that model's production or potential production (in the case that such a model did not exist beforehand). Rote memorization can present an illusion of understanding, however when other questions are presented with modified attributes within the query, the individual cannot create a solution due to a lack of a deeper representation of reality.
Another significant[citation needed] point of view holds that knowledge is the simple awareness of bits of information. Understanding is the awareness of the connection between the individual pieces of this information. It is understanding which allows knowledge to be put to use. Therefore, understanding represents a deeper level than simple knowledge.
Gregory Chaitin, a noted computer scientist, propounds a view that comprehension is a kind of data compression.[2] In his essay "The Limits of Reason", he argues that understanding something means being able to figure out a simple set of rules that explains it. For example, we understand why day and night exist because we have a simple model—the rotation of the earth—that explains a tremendous amount of data—changes in brightness, temperature, and atmospheric composition of the earth. We have compressed a large amount of information by using a simple model that predicts it. Similarly, we understand the number 0.33333... by thinking of it as one-third. The first way of representing the number requires an infinite amount of memory; but the second way can produce all the data of the first representation, but uses much less information. Chaitin argues that comprehension is this ability to compress data.
The concepts of comprehension, thought and understanding are also used in the short science fiction story Understand by Ted Chiang.
In Catholicism and Anglicanism, understanding is one of the Seven gifts of the Holy Spirit.
Look up understanding in Wiktionary, the free dictionary. |
|
|
全文を閲覧するには購読必要です。 To read the full text you will need to subscribe.
リンク元 | 「100Cases 13」「find」「appreciate」「prove」「realize」 |
拡張検索 | 「misunderstanding」「understandable」 |
関連記事 | 「understanding」 |
find / -name "a*.*"
.