出典(authority):フリー百科事典『ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』「2016/06/09 07:26:27」(JST)
この項目では、肺胞領域炎症による急性呼吸不全について説明しています。肺未成熟による新生児呼吸不全については「新生児呼吸窮迫症候群」をご覧ください。 |
急性呼吸窮迫症候群 | |
---|---|
両下肺野を中心に広範な浸出液を示すARDSのX線写真
|
|
分類及び外部参照情報 | |
ICD-10 | J80 |
ICD-9 | 518.5, 518.82 |
DiseasesDB | 892 |
MedlinePlus | 000103 |
eMedicine | med/70 |
Patient UK | 急性呼吸窮迫症候群 |
MeSH | D012128 |
急性呼吸窮迫症候群 (きゅうせいこきゅうきゅうはくしょうこうぐん、acute respiratory distress syndrome, ARDS) とは、臨床的に重症の状態の患者に突然起こる呼吸不全の一種である。特に発症前後の状態を急性肺傷害 (acute lung injury, ALI) と言う。本項では二つをまとめて述べる。
かつては成人呼吸促迫症候群 (adult respiratory distress syndrome) と呼ばれた。これは超未熟児における新生児呼吸窮迫症候群(RDS)と区別するためであるが、本症は未成年にも見られるため、現在はこの呼称は使われない。
敗血症、大量輸血、重症肺炎、胸部外傷、肺塞栓、人工呼吸、純酸素吸入、急性膵炎等で重症の患者に突然起こる。その初期段階における病態生理は様々であるが、最終的に発症に至る経緯及び治療法は同じである。
心不全による肺水腫に合併することもあるが、本症はより重症であり、明確に鑑別されなければならない。
こうした背景のある患者においては、腫瘍壊死因子やインターロイキン1・6・8が血流中に放出されている。肺は体内を循環する血液が必ず通る臓器であるため、その影響を受けやすい。好中球が誘引され、肺組織において活性酸素やプロテアーゼを放出して肺胞毛細血管上皮や肺胞上皮組織を傷害する。肺に定着した好中球はさらにG-CSFやGM-CSFを放出し、局所の炎症反応を増幅する。こうして血管透過性が増し、間質さらには肺胞内まで血性の滲出液で満たされてしまう。
換気血流不均衡と死腔の増大により、CO2の呼出には通常より多くの換気が必要となる。しかし初期には滲出液で満たされた肺胞が、そして後期には線維化した肺がコンプライアンスの低下(肺の硬化)をもたらし、高い圧での人工呼吸が必要となる。
肺胞の毛細血管は換気が悪いと収縮し、換気の良い部位の血流を増大させる作用がある。しかし本症においては、肺の多くの部位で換気が悪くなるため、それらの部位の毛細血管が収縮し、肺高血圧症をもたらす。
集中治療室に収容中の患者の15%、人工呼吸を受けている患者の20%に起こる。
酸素飽和度と動脈血酸素分圧が急激に低下する。北米・ヨーロッパコンセンサス会議 (NAECC) は、P/F比 =(動脈血酸素分圧 / mmHg)÷(吸入気の酸素分率 / %)が200以下のものをARDS、300以下のものをALIと定めた。この定義でALIの患者の4人に1人が、7日以内にARDSへと発展する[2]。他に数値で表すべき診断基準は未だ定まっていない[3]。
臨床的には、頻呼吸と1回換気量の低下、肺水腫が起きる。胸部X線上は著明な滲出液を認める。
気管挿管を行い、人工呼吸管理が必要である。大量の気道分泌物によって肺胞虚脱や細気管支の閉塞が起きるため、高いPEEPにて管理する。集中治療室管理が必要である。
心不全を合併していなければ、肺動脈カテーテルの適応ではないと考えられている。
現在、以下の治療法が研究されている。
治療開始の早さが予後を決定する。死亡率は4割程度であるが、背景にある疾患と本症による呼吸不全とが互いに増悪し合ってのものが多い。酸素が持つ細胞傷害作用が肺の線維化を助長するため、数日経っても人工呼吸器の酸素濃度を50%まで下げられなかった患者は予後が悪い。
本症の回復を見た症例では、線維化はある程度は可逆的であり、呼吸器系の後遺症は軽度なものが残る。重度の低酸素症を経験した場合は高次脳機能障害が残ることもある。
この項目は、医学に関連した書きかけの項目です。この項目を加筆・訂正などしてくださる協力者を求めています(プロジェクト:医学/Portal:医学と医療)。 |
|
|
Acute respiratory distress syndrome | |
---|---|
Chest x-ray of patient with ARDS
|
|
Classification and external resources | |
Specialty | Critical care medicine |
ICD-10 | J80 |
ICD-9-CM | 518.5, 518.82 |
DiseasesDB | 892 |
MedlinePlus | 000103 |
eMedicine | article/165139 |
Patient UK | Acute respiratory distress syndrome |
MeSH | D012128 |
[edit on Wikidata]
|
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), previously known as respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), adult respiratory distress syndrome, or shock lung, is a medical condition occurring in critically ill patients characterized by widespread inflammation in the lungs. ARDS is not a particular disease, rather it is a clinical phenotype which may be triggered by various pathologies such as trauma, pneumonia and sepsis.
The hallmark of ARDS is diffuse injury to cells which form the alveolar barrier, surfactant dysfunction, activation of the innate immune response, and abnormal coagulation.[1] In effect, ARDS results in impaired gas exchange within the lungs at the level of the microscopic alveoli.
The syndrome is associated with a high mortality rate between 20 and 50%.[2] The mortality rate with ARDS varies widely based on severity, the patient's age, and the presence of other underlying medical conditions.
Although the terminology of "adult respiratory distress syndrome" has at times been used to differentiate ARDS from "infant respiratory distress syndrome" in neonates, international consensus is that "acute respiratory distress syndrome" is the best moniker because ARDS can affect those of all ages.[3]
The signs and symptoms of ARDS often begin within two hours of an inciting event, but can occur after 1–3 days. Signs and symptoms may include shortness of breath, fast breathing, and a low oxygen level in the blood.[4][5] A chest x-ray frequently demonstrates generalized infiltrates or opacities in both lungs,[6] which represent fluid accumulation in the lungs.
Other signs and symptoms that occur in people with ARDS may be associated with the underlying disease process. For example, those with ARDS from sepsis may have low blood pressure and fever, while a person with pneumonia may have a cough.
The predisposing factors of ARDS are numerous and assorted. Common causes of ARDS include sepsis, pneumonia, trauma, multiple blood transfusions, babesiosis, lung contusion, aspiration of stomach contents, and drug abuse or overdose.[5][6] Other causes of ARDS include burns, pancreatitis, near drowning, or the inhalation of chemical irritants such as smoke, phosgene, or chlorine gas.
Some cases of ARDS are linked to large volumes of fluid used during post-trauma resuscitation.[7]
Persons with ARDS typically are short of breath, with arterial blood gas findings consistent with low oxygenation and imaging findings suggestive of a diffuse, alveolar infiltrative process. Diagnostic criteria for ARDS have evolved over time, in step with an increasing understanding of both the pathophysiology and the limits of diagnostic capability in general practice. The international consensus criteria for ARDS were most recently updated in 2012 and are known as the "Berlin definition".[8][9] In addition to generally broadening the diagnostic thresholds, other notable changes from the prior 1994 consensus criteria[3] include discouraging the term "acute lung injury," and defining grades of ARDS severity according to degree of hypoxemia (see history).
According to the 2012 Berlin definition, ARDS is characterized by:
The 2012 "Berlin criteria" are a modification of the prior 1994 criteria:[10][3]
With these 1994 criteria, arterial blood gas analysis and chest X-ray were required for formal diagnosis. Although severe hypoxemia is generally included, the appropriate threshold defining abnormal PaO
2 has never been systematically studied. A severe oxygenation defect is not synonymous with ventilatory support. Any PaO
2 below 100 (generally saturation less than 100%) on a supplemental oxygen fraction of 50% meets criteria for ARDS. This can easily be achieved by high flow oxygen supplementation without ventilatory support.
Medical imaging is key to diagnosis. While a chest x-ray is often ordered as a first-line test, CT scanning showing a bilateral infiltrative process may also be helpful. Lung ultrasound, performed at the point of care, is becoming increasingly adopted in critical care medicine and aids in the diagnosis of ARDS as well, accurately distinguishing among the various causes of acute respiratory failure. Ultrasound findings suggestive of ARDS, as opposed to cardiogenic pulmonary edema, include:
ARDS is a form of noncardiogenic pulmonary edema provoked by an acute injury to the lungs that results in flooding of the lungs' microscopic air sacs responsible for the exchange of gases such as oxygen and carbon dioxide with capillaries in the lungs.[12] Additional common findings in ARDS include partial collapse of the lungs (atelectasis) and low levels of oxygen in the blood (hypoxemia). However, in ARDS, these changes are not due to heart failure. The clinical syndrome is associated with pathological findings including pneumonia, eosinophilic pneumonia, cryptogenic organizing pneumonia, acute fibrinous organizing pneumonia, and diffuse alveolar damage (DAD). Of these, the pathology most commonly associated with ARDS is DAD, which is characterized by a diffuse inflammation of lung tissue. The triggering insult to the tissue usually results in an initial release of chemical signals and other inflammatory mediators secreted by local epithelial and endothelial cells.
Neutrophils and some T-lymphocytes quickly migrate into the inflamed lung tissue and contribute in the amplification of the phenomenon. Typical histological presentation involves diffuse alveolar damage and hyaline membrane formation in alveolar walls. Although the triggering mechanisms are not completely understood, recent research has examined the role of inflammation and mechanical stress.
This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (October 2013) |
Inflammation, such as that caused by sepsis, causes endothelial dysfunction, fluid leakage from the capillaries and impaired drainage of fluid from the lungs. Elevated inspired oxygen concentration often becomes necessary at this stage, and may facilitate a 'respiratory burst' in immune cells. In a secondary phase, endothelial dysfunction causes cells and inflammatory exudate to enter the alveoli. This pulmonary edema increases the thickness of the alveolo-capillary space, increasing the distance the oxygen must diffuse to reach blood, which impairs gas exchange leading to hypoxia, increases the work of breathing and eventually induces fibrosis of the airspace.
Edema and decreased surfactant production by type II pneumocytes may cause whole alveoli to collapse or to completely flood. This loss of aeration contributes further to the right-to-left shunt in ARDS. Similar to a traditional right-to-left shunt which refers to blood passing from the right side of the heart to the left side, thus bypassing oxygenation, lung right-to-left shunting occurs within the lungs. As the alveoli contain progressively less gas, the blood flowing through the alveolar capillaries is progressively less oxygenated, resulting in massive intrapulmonary shunting. The collapse of alveoli and small airways interferes with the process of normal gas exchange. It is common to see patients with a PaO
2 of 60 mmHg (8.0 kPa) despite mechanical ventilation with 100% inspired oxygen.
The loss of aeration may follow different patterns depending upon the nature of the underlying disease and other factors. These are usually distributed to the lower lobes of the lungs, in their posterior segments, and they roughly correspond to the initial infected area. In sepsis or trauma-induced ARDS, infiltrates are usually more patchy and diffuse. The posterior and basal segments are always more affected, but the distribution is even less homogeneous. Loss of aeration also causes important changes in lung mechanical properties that are fundamental in the process of inflammation amplification and progression to ARDS in mechanically ventilated patients.
Mechanical ventilation is an essential part of the treatment of ARDS. As loss of aeration and the underlying disease progress, the end tidal volume grows to a level incompatible with life. Thus, mechanical ventilation is initiated to relieve respiratory muscles of their work and to protect the usually obtunded patient's airways. However, mechanical ventilation may constitute a risk factor for the development—or the worsening—of ARDS.[10] Aside from the infectious complications arising from invasive ventilation with tracheal intubation, positive-pressure ventilation directly alters lung mechanics during ARDS. When these techniques are used the result is higher mortality through barotrauma.[10]
In 1998, Amato et al. published a paper showing substantial improvement in the outcome of patients ventilated with lower tidal volumes (Vt) (6 mL·kg−1).[10][13] This result was confirmed in a 2000 study sponsored by the NIH.[14] Both studies were widely criticized for several reasons, and the authors were not the first to experiment with lower-volume ventilation, but they increased the understanding of the relationship between mechanical ventilation and ARDS.
This form of stress is thought to be applied by the transpulmonary pressure (gradient) (Pl) generated by the ventilator or, better, its cyclical variations. The better outcome obtained in patients ventilated with lower Vt may be interpreted as a beneficial effect of the lower Pl.
The way Pl is applied on alveolar surface determines the shear stress to which lung units are exposed. ARDS is characterized by a usually inhomogeneous reduction of the airspace, and thus by a tendency towards higher Pl at the same Vt, and towards higher stress on less diseased units. The inhomogeneity of alveoli at different stages of disease is further increased by the gravitational gradient to which they are exposed and the different perfusion pressures at which blood flows through them.
The different mechanical properties of alveoli in ARDS may be interpreted as having varying time constants—the product of alveolar compliance × resistance.
Slow alveoli are said to be "kept open" using PEEP, a feature of modern ventilators which maintains a positive airway pressure throughout the whole respiratory cycle. A higher mean pressure cycle-wide slows the collapse of diseased units, but it has to be weighed against the corresponding elevation in Pl/plateau pressure. Newer ventilatory approaches attempt to maximize mean airway pressure for its ability to "recruit" collapsed lung units while minimizing the shear stress caused by frequent openings and closings of aerated units.
Mechanical ventilation can exacerbate the inflammatory response in patients with ARDS by including cyclic tidal alveolar hyperinflation and/or recruiting/derecruiting.[15] Stress index is measured during constant-flow assist-control mechanical ventilation without changing the baseline ventilatory pattern. Identifying the steadiest portion of the inspiratory flow (F) waveform fit the corresponding portion of the airway pressure (Paw) waveform in the following power equation:
Paw = a × tb + c where the coefficient b—the Stress Index—describes the shape of the curve. The Stress Index depict a constant compliance if the value is around 1, an increasing compliance during the inspiration if the value is below 1, and a decreasing compliance if the value is above 1. Ranieri, Grasso, et al. set a strategy guided by the stress index with the following rules:
Alveolar hyperinflation in patients with focal ARDS ventilated with the ARDSnet protocol is attenuated by a physiologic approach to PEEP setting based on the stress index measurement.[16]
If the underlying disease or injurious factor is not removed, the quantity of inflammatory mediators released by the lungs in ARDS may result in a systemic inflammatory response syndrome or sepsis if there is lung infection.[10] The evolution towards shock or multiple organ dysfunction syndrome follows paths analogous to the pathophysiology of sepsis. This leads to the impaired oxygenation which is the central problem of ARDS, as well as to respiratory acidosis—which is often caused by ventilation techniques such as permissive hypercapnia, which attempt to limit ventilator-induced lung injury in ARDS. The result is a critical illness in which the 'endothelial disease' of severe sepsis or SIRS is worsened by the pulmonary dysfunction, which further impairs oxygen delivery.
Acute respiratory distress syndrome is usually treated with mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit (ICU). Mechanical ventilation is usually delivered through oro-tracheal intubation, or by tracheostomy whenever prolonged ventilation (≥2 weeks) is deemed inevitable. The possibilities of non-invasive ventilation are limited to the very early period of the disease or to prevention in individuals with atypical pneumonias, lung contusion, or major surgery patients, who are at risk of developing ARDS. Treatment of the underlying cause is imperative. Appropriate antibiotic therapy must be administered as soon as microbiological culture results are available. Empirical therapy may be appropriate if local microbiological surveillance is efficient.
The origin of infection, when surgically treatable, must be operated on. When sepsis is diagnosed, appropriate local protocols should be enacted. Commonly used supportive therapy includes particular techniques of mechanical ventilation and pharmacological agents whose effectiveness with respect to the outcome has not yet been proven.
The overall goal is to maintain acceptable gas exchange and to minimize adverse effects in its application. The parameters PEEP (positive end-expiratory pressure, to maintain maximal recruitment of alveolar units), mean airway pressure (to promote recruitment and predictor of hemodynamic effects) and plateau pressure (best predictor of alveolar overdistention) are used.[17]
Conventional therapy aimed at tidal volumes (Vt) of 12–15 ml/kg (where the weight is ideal body weight rather than actual weight). Recent studies have shown that high tidal volumes can overstretch alveoli resulting in volutrauma (secondary lung injury). The ARDS Clinical Network, or ARDSNet, completed a trial that showed improved mortality when ventilated with a tidal volume of 6 ml/kg compared to the traditional 12 ml/kg. Low tidal volumes (Vt) may cause hypercapnia and atelectasis[10] because of their inherent tendency to increase physiologic shunt. Physiologic dead space cannot change as it is ventilation without perfusion. A shunt is perfusion without ventilation.
Low tidal volume ventilation was the primary independent variable associated with reduced mortality in the NIH-sponsored ARDSnet trial of tidal volume in ARDS. Plateau pressure less than 30 cm H
2O was a secondary goal, and subsequent analyses of the data from the ARDSnet trial and other experimental data demonstrate that there appears to be no safe upper limit to plateau pressure; regardless of plateau pressure, patients fare better with low tidal volumes.[18]
No particular ventilator mode is known to improve mortality in Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).[citation needed]
Some practitioners favor airway pressure release ventilation when treating ARDS. Well documented advantages to APRV ventilation[19] include: decreased airway pressures, decreased minute ventilation, decreased dead-space ventilation, promotion of spontaneous breathing, almost 24-hour-a-day alveolar recruitment, decreased use of sedation, near elimination of neuromuscular blockade, optimized arterial blood gas results, mechanical restoration of FRC (functional residual capacity), a positive effect on cardiac output[20] (due to the negative inflection from the elevated baseline with each spontaneous breath), increased organ and tissue perfusion and potential for increased urine output secondary to increased kidney perfusion.
A patient with ARDS, on average, spends between 8 and 11 days on a mechanical ventilator; APRV may reduce this time significantly and conserve valuable resources.
This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (October 2013) |
Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is used in mechanically ventilated patients with ARDS to improve oxygenation. In ARDS, three populations of alveoli can be distinguished. There are normal alveoli which are always inflated and engaging in gas exchange, flooded alveoli which can never, under any ventilatory regime, be used for gas exchange, and atelectatic or partially flooded alveoli that can be "recruited" to participate in gas exchange under certain ventilatory regimens. The recruitable alveoli represent a continuous population, some of which can be recruited with minimal PEEP, and others which can only be recruited with high levels of PEEP. An additional complication is that some alveoli can only be opened with higher airway pressures than are needed to keep them open, hence the justification for maneuvers where PEEP is increased to very high levels for seconds to minutes before dropping the PEEP to a lower level. PEEP can be harmful; high PEEP necessarily increases mean airway pressure and alveolar pressure, which can damage normal alveoli by overdistension resulting in DAD. A compromise between the beneficial and adverse effects of PEEP is inevitable.
The 'best PEEP' used to be defined as 'some' cmH
2O above the lower inflection point (LIP) in the sigmoidal pressure-volume relationship curve of the lung. Recent research has shown that the LIP-point pressure is no better than any pressure above it, as recruitment of collapsed alveoli—and more importantly the overdistension of aerated units—occur throughout the whole inflation. Despite the awkwardness of most procedures used to trace the pressure-volume curve, it is still used by some[who?] to define the minimum PEEP to be applied to their patients. Some new ventilators can automatically plot a pressure-volume curve.
PEEP may also be set empirically. Some authors[who?] suggest performing a 'recruiting maneuver'—a short time at a very high continuous positive airway pressure, such as 50 cmH
2O (4.9 kPa)—to recruit or open collapsed units with a high distending pressure before restoring previous ventilation. The final PEEP level should be the one just before the drop in PaO
2 or peripheral blood oxygen saturation during a step-down trial.
Intrinsic PEEP (iPEEP) or auto-PEEP—first described by John Marini of St. Paul Regions Hospital—is a potentially unrecognized contributor to PEEP in patients. When ventilating at high frequencies, its contribution can be substantial, particularly in patients with obstructive lung disease. iPEEP has been measured in very few formal studies on ventilation in ARDS patients, and its contribution is largely unknown. Its measurement is recommended in the treatment of ARDS patients, especially when using high-frequency (oscillatory/jet) ventilation.
of lung infiltrates in acute respiratory distress syndrome is non-uniform. Repositioning into the prone position (face down) might improve oxygenation by relieving atelectasis and improving perfusion. If this is done early in the treatment of severe ARDS, it confers a mortality benefit of 26% compared to supine ventilation.[21]
Several studies have shown that pulmonary function and outcome are better in patients that lost weight or pulmonary wedge pressure was lowered by diuresis or fluid restriction.[10]
An NIH-sponsored multicenter ARDSnet study of corticosteroids that ran from August 1997 to November 2003 titled LaSRS for ARDS demonstrated that despite an improvement in cardiovascular physiology, methylprednisone is not efficacious in treatment for ARDS.[22][23]
Inhaled nitric oxide (NO) potentially acts as selective pulmonary vasodilator which allows for more gas exchange. However, despite evidence of increased oxygenation status, there is no evidence that inhaled nitric oxide decreases morbidity and mortality in ARDS patients.[24] Furthermore, nitric oxide may cause kidney damage and is not recommended as therapy for ARDS regardless of severity.[25]
To date, no prospective controlled clinical trial has shown a significant mortality benefit of exogenous surfactant in adult ARDS.[10]
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is mechanically applied prolonged cardiopulmonary support. There are two types of ECMO: Venovenous which provides respiratory support and venoarterial which provides respiratory and hemodynamic support. Patients with ARDS who do not require cardiac support typically undergo venovenous ECMO. Multiple studies have shown the effectiveness of ECMO in acute respiratory failure.[26][27][28] Specifically, the CESAR (Conventional ventilatory support versus Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for Severe Acute Respiratory failure) trial[29] demonstrated that a group referred to an ECMO center demonstrated significantly increased survival compared to conventional management (63% to 47%).[30]
Since ARDS is an extremely serious condition which requires invasive forms of therapy it is not without risk. Complications to be considered are:[10]
The annual incidence of ARDS is 13-23 people per 100,000 in the general population.[31] Its incidence in the mechanically ventilated population in intensive care units is much higher. According to Brun-Buisson et al (2004), there is a prevalence of acute lung injury (ALI) of 16.1% percent in ventilated patients admitted for more than 4 hours.
Worldwide, severe sepsis is the most common trigger causing ARDS.[32] Other triggers include mechanical ventilation, sepsis, pneumonia, Gilchrist's disease, circulatory shock, aspiration, trauma—especially pulmonary contusion—major surgery, massive blood transfusions,[33] smoke inhalation, drug reaction or overdose, fat emboli and reperfusion pulmonary edema after lung transplantation or pulmonary embolectomy. Pneumonia and sepsis are the most common triggers, and pneumonia is present in up to 60% of patients and may be either causes or complications of ARDS. Alcohol excess appears to increase the risk of ARDS.[34] Diabetes was originally thought to decrease the risk of ARDS, but this has shown to be due to an increase in the risk of pulmonary edema.[35][36] Elevated abdominal pressure of any cause is also probably a risk factor for the development of ARDS, particularly during mechanical ventilation.[citation needed]
The death rate varies from 25–40% in centers using up-to-date ventilatory strategies and up to 58% in all centers.[37][38][39][40]
Acute respiratory distress syndrome was first described in 1967 by Ashbaugh et al.[10][41] Initially there was no clearly established definition, which resulted in controversy regarding the incidence and death of ARDS.
In 1988, an expanded definition was proposed, which quantified physiologic respiratory impairment.
In 1994, a new definition was recommended by the American-European Consensus Conference Committee (AECC).[10][3] It is simple to use and it recognizes that severity of pulmonary injury varies.[42] ARDS was defined as the ratio of arterial partial oxygen tension (PaO
2) as fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO
2) below 200 mmHg in the presence of bilateral infiltrates on the chest x-ray. These infiltrates may appear similar to those of left ventricular failure, but the cardiac silhouette appears normal in ARDS. Also, the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure is normal (less than 18 mmHg) in ARDS, but raised in left ventricular failure. A PaO
2/FiO
2 ratio less than 300 mmHg with bilateral infiltrates indicates acute lung injury (ALI). Although formally considered different from ARDS, ALI is usually a precursor to ARDS.[citation needed]
In 2012, the Berlin Definition of ARDS was devised by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, and was endorsed by the American Thoracic Society and the Society of Critical Care Medicine. These recommendations were an effort to both update classification criteria in order to improve clinical usefulness, and to clarify terminology. Notably, the Berlin guidelines discourage the use of the term "acute lung injury" or ALI, as the term was commonly being misused to characterize a less severe degree of lung injury. Instead, the committee proposes a classification of ARDS severity as mild, moderate or severe according to arterial oxygen saturation.[43] The Berlin definitions represent the current international consensus guidelines for both clinical and research classification of ARDS.
The Wikibook Intensive Care Medicine has a page on the topic of: ARDS |
|
|
全文を閲覧するには購読必要です。 To read the full text you will need to subscribe.
国試過去問 | 「110I059」「102G042」「111E057」「114B024」「097H019」「098H018」 |
リンク元 | 「急性呼吸促迫症候群」「特発性肺線維症」「卵巣過剰刺激症候群」「急性間質性肺炎」「レジオネラ症」 |
関連記事 | 「AR」「ARD」 |
E
※国試ナビ4※ [110I058]←[国試_110]→[110I060]
※国試ナビ4※ [102G041]←[国試_102]→[102G043]
E
※国試ナビ4※ [111E056]←[国試_111]→[111E058]
C
※国試ナビ4※ [114B023]←[国試_114]→[114B025]
A
※国試ナビ4※ [097H018]←[国試_097]→[097H020]
D
※国試ナビ4※ [098H017]←[国試_098]→[098H019]
発生率(%) | 死亡率(%) | |
敗血症 | 41 | 50 |
大量輸血 | 36 | 35 |
肺挫傷 | 22 | 12 |
胃内容誤嚥 | 22 | 21 |
多発骨折 | 11 | 9 |
薬物過量 | 9 | 4 |
全ての高リスク状態 | 26 | 19 |
経過 | 酸素化 | 単純胸部X線 | 肺動脈楔入圧 | |
ALI | 急性 | PaO2/FIO2≦300mmHg | 両側性の浸潤影 | ≦18mmHg or 理学的に左房圧上昇を認めない |
ARDS | 急性 | PaO2/FIO2≦200mmHg | 両側性の浸潤影 | ≦18mmHg or 理学的に左房圧上昇を認めない |
Oxygenation will be maintained in the target ranges using the following PEEP/FiO2 combinations: | |||||||||||||||
FiO2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1 | 1 |
PEEP(cmH2O) | 5 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 16 | 18 | 18 | 20-24 |
臨床診断名 | IPF | NSIP | BOOP/COP |
病理組織像 | UIP | OP | |
発症様式 | 慢性 | 慢性/亜急性 | 亜急性 |
BALF所見 | リンパ球± | CD8↑ | CD8↑ |
予後 | 不良 | 良好(時に不良) | 良好 |
分布 | 斑状,不均質, 胸膜下・小葉辺縁 | びまん性,均質 | 小葉中心性 |
時相 | 多様 | 均質 | 均質 |
間質への細胞浸潤 | 少ない | 通常多い | やや多い |
胞隔の炎症 | 軽度,斑状 | びまん性,多彩 | 軽度 |
線維芽細胞巣 | 多数 | まれ | なし |
肺胞内マクロファージ集積 | 巣状 | 巣状 | なし |
肺胞腔内線維化 | まれ | しばしば | 多数 |
顕微鏡的蜂巣肺(肺胞虚説) | 高頻度 | 通常なし(一部に認める) | なし |
硝子膜 | なし | なし | なし |
臨床診断名 | AIP |
病理組織像 | DAD |
分布 | びまん性,均質 |
時相 | 均質 |
間質への細胞浸潤 | 少ない |
胞隔の炎症 | なし |
線維芽細胞巣 | びまん性,間質 |
肺胞内マクロファージ集積 | なし |
肺胞腔内線維化 | しばしば |
顕微鏡的蜂巣肺(肺胞虚説) | なし |
硝子膜 | 高頻度 |
.