出典(authority):フリー百科事典『ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』「2016/09/22 02:33:40」(JST)
CSS
このページは曖昧さ回避のためのページです。一つの語句が複数の意味・職能を有する場合の水先案内のために、異なる用法を一覧にしてあります。お探しの用語に一番近い記事を選んで下さい。このページへリンクしているページを見つけたら、リンクを適切な項目に張り替えて下さい。 |
Filename extension | .css |
---|---|
Internet media type | text/css |
Developed by |
|
Initial release | December 17, 1996; 19 years ago (1996-12-17) |
Type of format | Style sheet language |
Standards |
|
Cascading Style Sheets |
---|
|
Comparisons |
|
Web design |
|
|
|
HTML | |||
---|---|---|---|
|
|||
Comparisons | |||
|
|||
|
Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) is a style sheet language used for describing the presentation of a document written in a markup language.[1] Although most often used to set the visual style of web pages and user interfaces written in HTML and XHTML, the language can be applied to any XML document, including plain XML, SVG and XUL, and is applicable to rendering in speech, or on other media. Along with HTML and JavaScript, CSS is a cornerstone technology used by most websites to create visually engaging webpages, user interfaces for web applications, and user interfaces for many mobile applications.[2]
CSS is designed primarily to enable the separation of document content from document presentation, including aspects such as the layout, colors, and fonts.[3] This separation can improve content accessibility, provide more flexibility and control in the specification of presentation characteristics, enable multiple HTML pages to share formatting by specifying the relevant CSS in a separate .css file, and reduce complexity and repetition in the structural content.
Separation of formatting and content makes it possible to present the same markup page in different styles for different rendering methods, such as on-screen, in print, by voice (via speech-based browser or screen reader), and on Braille-based tactile devices. It can also display the web page differently depending on the screen size or viewing device. Readers can also specify a different style sheet, such as a CSS file stored on their own computer, to override the one the author specified.
Changes to the graphic design of a document (or hundreds of documents) can be applied quickly and easily, by editing a few lines in the CSS file they use, rather than by changing markup in the documents.
The CSS specification describes a priority scheme to determine which style rules apply if more than one rule matches against a particular element. In this so-called cascade, priorities (or weights) are calculated and assigned to rules, so that the results are predictable.
The CSS specifications are maintained by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). Internet media type (MIME type) text/css
is registered for use with CSS by RFC 2318 (March 1998). The W3C operates a free CSS validation service for CSS documents.[4]
CSS has a simple syntax and uses a number of English keywords to specify the names of various style properties.
A style sheet consists of a list of rules. Each rule or rule-set consists of one or more selectors, and a declaration block.
In CSS, selectors declare which part of the markup a style applies to by matching tags and attributes in the markup itself.
Selectors may apply to:
Classes and IDs are case-sensitive, start with letters, and can include alphanumeric characters and underscores. A class may apply to any number of instances of any elements. An ID may only be applied to a single element.
Pseudo-classes are used in CSS selectors to permit formatting based on information that is not contained in the document tree. One example of a widely used pseudo-class is :hover
, which identifies content only when the user "points to" the visible element, usually by holding the mouse cursor over it. It is appended to a selector as in a:hover
or #elementid:hover
. A pseudo-class classifies document elements, such as :link
or :visited
, whereas a pseudo-element makes a selection that may consist of partial elements, such as ::first-line
or ::first-letter
.[5]
Selectors may be combined in many ways to achieve great specificity and flexibility.[6] Multiple selectors may be joined in a spaced list to specify elements by location, element type, id, class, or any combination thereof. The order of the selectors is important. For example, div .myClass {color: red;}
applies to all elements of class myClass that are inside div elements, whereas .myClass div {color: red;}
applies to all div elements that are in elements of class myClass.
The following table provides a summary of selector syntax indicating usage and the version of CSS that introduced it.[7]
Pattern | Matches | First defined in CSS level |
---|---|---|
E | an element of type E | 1 |
E:link | an E element is the source anchor of a hyperlink of which the target is not yet visited (:link) or already visited (:visited) | 1 |
E:active | an E element during certain user actions | 1 |
E::first-line | the first formatted line of an E element | 1 |
E::first-letter | the first formatted letter of an E element | 1 |
.c | all elements with class="c" | 1 |
#myid | the element with id="myid" | 1 |
E.warning | an E element whose class is "warning" (the document language specifies how class is determined) | 1 |
E#myid | an E element with ID equal to "myid" | 1 |
E F | an F element descendant of an E element | 1 |
* | any element | 2 |
E[foo] | an E element with a "foo" attribute | 2 |
E[foo="bar"] | an E element whose "foo" attribute value is exactly equal to "bar" | 2 |
E[foo~="bar"] | an E element whose "foo" attribute value is a list of whitespace-separated values, one of which is exactly equal to "bar" | 2 |
E[foo|="en"] | an E element whose "foo" attribute has a hyphen-separated list of values beginning (from the left) with "en" | 2 |
E:first-child | an E element, first child of its parent | 2 |
E:lang(fr) | an element of type E in language "fr" (the document language specifies how language is determined) | 2 |
E::before | generated content before an E element's content | 2 |
E::after | generated content after an E element's content | 2 |
E > F | an F element child of an E element | 2 |
E + F | an F element immediately preceded by an E element | 2 |
E[foo^="bar"] | an E element whose "foo" attribute value begins exactly with the string "bar" | 3 |
E[foo$="bar"] | an E element whose "foo" attribute value ends exactly with the string "bar" | 3 |
E[foo*="bar"] | an E element whose "foo" attribute value contains the substring "bar" | 3 |
E:root | an E element, root of the document | 3 |
E:nth-child(n) | an E element, the n-th child of its parent | 3 |
E:nth-last-child(n) | an E element, the n-th child of its parent, counting from the last one | 3 |
E:nth-of-type(n) | an E element, the n-th sibling of its type | 3 |
E:nth-last-of-type(n) | an E element, the n-th sibling of its type, counting from the last one | 3 |
E:last-child | an E element, last child of its parent | 3 |
E:first-of-type | an E element, first sibling of its type | 3 |
E:last-of-type | an E element, last sibling of its type | 3 |
E:only-child | an E element, only child of its parent | 3 |
E:only-of-type | an E element, only sibling of its type | 3 |
E:empty | an E element that has no children (including text nodes) | 3 |
E:target | an E element being the target of the referring URI | 3 |
E:enabled | a user interface element E that is enabled | 3 |
E:disabled | a user interface element E that is disabled | 3 |
E:checked | a user interface element E that is checked (for instance a radio-button or checkbox) | 3 |
E:not(s) | an E element that does not match simple selector s | 3 |
E ~ F | an F element preceded by an E element | 3 |
A declaration block consists of a list of declarations in braces. Each declaration itself consists of a property, a colon (:
), and a value. If there are multiple declarations in a block, a semi-colon (;
) must be inserted to separate each declaration.[8]
Properties are specified in the CSS standard. Each property has a set of possible values. Some properties can affect any type of element, and others apply only to particular groups of elements.[9]
Values may be keywords, such as "center" or "inherit", or numerical values, such as 200px (200 pixels), 50vw (50 percent of the viewport width) or 80% (80 percent of the window width). Color values can be specified with keywords (e.g. "red"), hexadecimal values (e.g. #FF0000, also abbreviated as #F00), RGB values on a 0 to 255 scale (e.g. rgb(255, 0, 0)
), RGBA values that specify both color and alpha transparency (e.g. rgba(255, 0, 0, 0.8)
), or HSL or HSLA values (e.g. hsl(000, 100%, 50%)
, hsla(000, 100%, 50%, 80%)
).[10]
Before CSS, nearly all presentational attributes of HTML documents were contained within the HTML markup. All font colors, background styles, element alignments, borders and sizes had to be explicitly described, often repeatedly, within the HTML. CSS lets authors move much of that information to another file, the style sheet, resulting in considerably simpler HTML.
For example, headings (h1
elements), sub-headings (h2
), sub-sub-headings (h3
), etc., are defined structurally using HTML. In print and on the screen, choice of font, size, color and emphasis for these elements is presentational.
Before CSS, document authors who wanted to assign such typographic characteristics to, say, all h2
headings had to repeat HTML presentational markup for each occurrence of that heading type. This made documents more complex, larger, and more error-prone and difficult to maintain. CSS allows the separation of presentation from structure. CSS can define color, font, text alignment, size, borders, spacing, layout and many other typographic characteristics, and can do so independently for on-screen and printed views. CSS also defines non-visual styles, such as reading speed and emphasis for aural text readers. The W3C has now deprecated the use of all presentational HTML markup.[11]
For example, under pre-CSS HTML, a heading element defined with red text would be written as:
<h1><font color="red"> Chapter 1. </font></h1>
Using CSS, the same element can be coded using style properties instead of HTML presentational attributes:
<h1 style="color: red;"> Chapter 1. </h1>
An "external" CSS file, as described below, can be associated with an HTML document using the following syntax:
<link href="path/to/file.css" rel="stylesheet">
An internal CSS code can be typed in the head section of the code. The coding is started with the style tag. For example,
<style>
CSS information can be provided from various sources. These sources can be the web browser, the user and the author. The information from the author can be further classified into inline, media type, importance, selector specificity, rule order, inheritance and property definition. CSS style information can be in a separate document or it can be embedded into an HTML document. Multiple style sheets can be imported. Different styles can be applied depending on the output device being used; for example, the screen version can be quite different from the printed version, so that authors can tailor the presentation appropriately for each medium.
The style sheet with the highest priority controls the content display. Declarations not set in the highest priority source are passed on to a source of lower priority, such as the user agent style. This process is called cascading.
One of the goals of CSS is to allow users greater control over presentation. Someone who finds red italic headings difficult to read may apply a different style sheet. Depending on the browser and the web site, a user may choose from various style sheets provided by the designers, or may remove all added styles and view the site using the browser's default styling, or may override just the red italic heading style without altering other attributes.
Priority | CSS Source Type | Description |
---|---|---|
1 | Importance | The ‘!important ’ annotation overwrites the previous priority types |
2 | Inline | A style applied to an HTML element via HTML ‘style’ attribute |
3 | Media Type | A property definition applies to all media types, unless a media specific CSS is defined |
4 | User defined | Most browsers have the accessibility feature: a user defined CSS |
5 | Selector specificity | A specific contextual selector (#heading p ) overwrites generic definition |
6 | Rule order | Last rule declaration has a higher priority |
7 | Parent inheritance | If a property is not specified, it is inherited from a parent element |
8 | CSS property definition in HTML document | CSS rule or CSS inline style overwrites a default browser value |
9 | Browser default | The lowest priority: browser default value is determined by W3C initial value specifications |
Specificity refers to the relative weights of various rules.[12] It determines which styles apply to an element when more than one rule could apply. Based on specification, a simple selector (e.g. H1) has a specificity of 1, class selectors have a specificity of 1,0, and ID selectors a specificity of 1,0,0. Because the specificity values do not carry over as in the decimal system, commas are used to separate the "digits"[13] (a CSS rule having 11 elements and 11 classes would have a specificity of 11,11, not 121).
Thus the following rules selectors result in the indicated specificity:
Selectors | Specificity |
---|---|
H1 {color: white;} | 1 |
P EM {color: green;} | 2 |
.grape {color: red;} | 1,0 |
P.bright {color: blue;} | 1,1 |
P.bright EM.dark {color: yellow;} | 2,2 |
#id218 {color: brown;} | 1,0,0 |
style=" " | 1,0,0,0 |
Consider this HTML fragment:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<style>
#xyz { color: red; }
</style>
</head>
<body>
<p id="xyz" style="color: blue;"> To demonstrate specificity </p>
</body>
</html>
In the above example, the declaration in the "style" attribute overrides the one in the style element because it has a higher specificity.
Inheritance is a key feature in CSS; it relies on the ancestor-descendant relationship to operate. Inheritance is the mechanism by which properties are applied not only to a specified element, but also to its descendants.[12] Inheritance relies on the document tree, which is the hierarchy of XHTML elements in a page based on nesting. Descendant elements may inherit CSS property values from any ancestor element enclosing them. In general, descendant elements inherit text-related properties, but box-related properties are not inherited. Properties that can be inherited are color, font, letter-spacing, line-height, list-style, text-align, text-indent, text-transform, visibility, white-space and word-spacing. Properties that cannot be inherited are background, border, display, float and clear, height, and width, margin, min- and max-height and -width, outline, overflow, padding, position, text-decoration, vertical-align and z-index.
Inheritance prevents certain properties from being declared over and over again in a style sheet, allowing the software developers to write less CSS. It enhances faster-loading of web pages by users and enables the clients to save money on bandwidth and development costs.
Given the following style sheet:
h1 {
color: pink;
}
Suppose there is an h1 element with an emphasizing element (em) inside:
<h1>
This is to <em>illustrate</em> inheritance
</h1>
If no color is assigned to the em element, the emphasized word "illustrate" inherits the color of the parent element, h1. The style sheet h1 has the color pink, hence, the em element is likewise pink.
Whitespace between properties and selectors is ignored. This code snippet:
body{overflow:hidden;background:#000000;}
is functionally equivalent to this one:
body {
overflow: hidden;
background: #000000;
}
One common way to format CSS for readability is to indent each property and give it its own line.
CSS 2.1 defines three positioning schemes:
There are four possible values of the position
property. If an item is positioned in any way other than static
, then the further properties top
, bottom
, left
, and right
are used to specify offsets and positions.
The float
property may have one of three values. Absolutely positioned or fixed items cannot be floated. Other elements normally flow around floated items, unless they are prevented from doing so by their clear
property.
clear:left
), right (clear:right
) or both sides (clear:both
).[14][15]CSS was first proposed by Håkon Wium Lie on October 10, 1994.[16] At the time, Lie was working with Tim Berners-Lee at CERN.[17] Several other style sheet languages for the web were proposed around the same time, and discussions on public mailing lists and inside World Wide Web Consortium resulted in the first W3C CSS Recommendation (CSS1)[18] being released in 1996. In particular, Bert Bos' proposal was influential; he became co-author of CSS1 and is regarded as co-creator of CSS.[19]
Style sheets have existed in one form or another since the beginnings of Standard Generalized Markup Language (SGML) in the 1980s, and CSS was developed to provide style sheets for the web.[20] One requirement for a web style sheet language was for style sheets to come from different sources on the web. Therefore, existing style sheet languages like DSSSL and FOSI were not suitable. CSS, on the other hand, let a document's style be influenced by multiple style sheets by way of "cascading" styles.[20]
As HTML grew, it came to encompass a wider variety of stylistic capabilities to meet the demands of web developers. This evolution gave the designer more control over site appearance, at the cost of more complex HTML. Variations in web browser implementations, such as ViolaWWW and WorldWideWeb,[21] made consistent site appearance difficult, and users had less control over how web content was displayed. The browser/editor developed by Tim Berners-Lee had style sheets that were hard-coded into the program. The style sheets could therefore not be linked to documents on the web.[22] Robert Cailliau, also of CERN, wanted to separate the structure from the presentation so that different style sheets could describe different presentation for printing, screen-based presentations, and editors.[21]
Improving web presentation capabilities was a topic of interest to many in the web community and nine different style sheet languages were proposed on the www-style mailing list.[20] Of these nine proposals, two were especially influential on what became CSS: Cascading HTML Style Sheets[16] and Stream-based Style Sheet Proposal (SSP).[19][23] Two browsers served as testbeds for the initial proposals; Lie worked with Yves Lafon to implement CSS in Dave Raggett's Arena browser.[24][25][26] Bert Bos implemented his own SSP proposal in the Argo browser.[19] Thereafter, Lie and Bos worked together to develop the CSS standard (the 'H' was removed from the name because these style sheets could also be applied to other markup languages besides HTML).[17]
Lie's proposal was presented at the "Mosaic and the Web" conference (later called WWW2) in Chicago, Illinois in 1994, and again with Bert Bos in 1995.[17] Around this time the W3C was already being established, and took an interest in the development of CSS. It organized a workshop toward that end chaired by Steven Pemberton. This resulted in W3C adding work on CSS to the deliverables of the HTML editorial review board (ERB). Lie and Bos were the primary technical staff on this aspect of the project, with additional members, including Thomas Reardon of Microsoft, participating as well. In August 1996 Netscape Communication Corporation presented an alternative style sheet language called JavaScript Style Sheets (JSSS).[17] The spec was never finished and is deprecated.[27] By the end of 1996, CSS was ready to become official, and the CSS level 1 Recommendation was published in December.
Development of HTML, CSS, and the DOM had all been taking place in one group, the HTML Editorial Review Board (ERB). Early in 1997, the ERB was split into three working groups: HTML Working group, chaired by Dan Connolly of W3C; DOM Working group, chaired by Lauren Wood of SoftQuad; and CSS Working group, chaired by Chris Lilley of W3C.
The CSS Working Group began tackling issues that had not been addressed with CSS level 1, resulting in the creation of CSS level 2 on November 4, 1997. It was published as a W3C Recommendation on May 12, 1998. CSS level 3, which was started in 1998, is still under development as of 2014.
In 2005 the CSS Working Groups decided to enforce the requirements for standards more strictly. This meant that already published standards like CSS 2.1, CSS 3 Selectors and CSS 3 Text were pulled back from Candidate Recommendation to Working Draft level.
The CSS 1 specification was completed in 1996. Microsoft's Internet Explorer 3[17] was released in that year, featuring some limited support for CSS. IE 4 and Netscape 4.x added more support, but it was typically incomplete and had many bugs that prevented CSS from being usefully adopted. It was more than three years before any web browser achieved near-full implementation of the specification. Internet Explorer 5.0 for the Macintosh, shipped in March 2000, was the first browser to have full (better than 99 percent) CSS 1 support,[28] surpassing Opera, which had been the leader since its introduction of CSS support 15 months earlier. Other browsers followed soon afterwards, and many of them additionally implemented parts of CSS 2.
However, even when later 'version 5' browsers began to offer a fairly full implementation of CSS, they were still incorrect in certain areas and were fraught with inconsistencies, bugs and other quirks. The inconsistencies and variation in feature support made it difficult for designers to achieve a consistent appearance across browsers and platforms, leading to the use of workarounds such as CSS hacks and filters.
Problems with browsers' patchy adoption of CSS, along with errata in the original specification, led the W3C to revise the CSS 2 standard into CSS 2.1, which moved nearer to a working snapshot of current CSS support in HTML browsers. Some CSS 2 properties that no browser successfully implemented were dropped, and in a few cases, defined behaviors were changed to bring the standard into line with the predominant existing implementations. CSS 2.1 became a Candidate Recommendation on February 25, 2004, but CSS 2.1 was pulled back to Working Draft status on June 13, 2005,[29] and only returned to Candidate Recommendation status on July 19, 2007.[30]
In addition to these problems, the .css
extension was used by a software product used to convert PowerPoint files into Compact Slide Show files,[31] so some web servers served all .css
[32] as mime type application/x-pointplus
[33] rather than text/css
.
CSS has various levels and profiles. Each level of CSS builds upon the last, typically adding new features and typically denoted as CSS 1, CSS 2, CSS 3, and CSS 4. Profiles are typically a subset of one or more levels of CSS built for a particular device or user interface. Currently there are profiles for mobile devices, printers, and television sets. Profiles should not be confused with media types, which were added in CSS 2.
The first CSS specification to become an official W3C Recommendation is CSS level 1, published on December 17, 1996. Håkon Wium Lie and Bert Bos are credited as the original developers.[34][35] Among its capabilities are support for
The W3C no longer maintains the CSS 1 Recommendation.[36]
CSS level 2 specification was developed by the W3C and published as a recommendation in May 1998. A superset of CSS 1, CSS 2 includes a number of new capabilities like absolute, relative, and fixed positioning of elements and z-index, the concept of media types, support for aural style sheets (which were later replaced by the CSS 3 speech modules)[37] and bidirectional text, and new font properties such as shadows.
The W3C no longer maintains the CSS 2 recommendation.[38]
CSS level 2 revision 1, often referred to as "CSS 2.1", fixes errors in CSS 2, removes poorly supported or not fully interoperable features and adds already implemented browser extensions to the specification. To comply with the W3C Process for standardizing technical specifications, CSS 2.1 went back and forth between Working Draft status and Candidate Recommendation status for many years. CSS 2.1 first became a Candidate Recommendation on February 25, 2004, but it was reverted to a Working Draft on June 13, 2005 for further review. It returned to Candidate Recommendation on 19 July 2007 and then updated twice in 2009. However, because changes and clarifications were made, it again went back to Last Call Working Draft on 7 December 2010.
CSS 2.1 went to Proposed Recommendation on 12 April 2011.[39] After being reviewed by the W3C Advisory Committee, it was finally published as a W3C Recommendation on 7 June 2011.[40]
CSS 2.1 was planned as the first and final revision of level 2—but low priority work on CSS 2.2 began in 2015.
Unlike CSS 2, which is a large single specification defining various features, CSS 3 is divided into several separate documents called "modules". Each module adds new capabilities or extends features defined in CSS 2, preserving backward compatibility. Work on CSS level 3 started around the time of publication of the original CSS 2 recommendation. The earliest CSS 3 drafts were published in June 1999.[41]
Due to the modularization, different modules have different stability and statuses.[42] As of June 2012, there are over fifty CSS modules published from the CSS Working Group.,[41] and four of these have been published as formal recommendations:
Some modules have Candidate Recommendation (CR) status and are considered moderately stable. At CR stage, implementations are advised to drop vendor prefixes.[43]
Module | Specification title | Status | Date |
---|---|---|---|
css3-background | CSS Backgrounds and Borders Module Level 3 | Candidate Rec. | 000000002014-09-01-0000Sep 2014 |
css3-box | CSS basic box model | Working Draft, | 000000002007-08-01-0000Aug 2007 |
css-cascade-3 | CSS Cascading and Inheritance Level 3 | Candidate Rec. | 000000002013-10-01-0000Oct 2013 |
css3-color | CSS Color Module Level 3 | Recommendation | 000000002011-06-01-0000Jun 2011 |
css3-content | CSS3 Generated and Replaced Content Module | Working Draft | 000000002003-05-01-0000May 2003 |
css-fonts-3 | CSS Fonts Module Level 3 | Candidate Rec. | 000000002013-10-01-0000Oct 2013 |
css3-gcpm | CSS Generated Content for Paged Media Module | Working Draft | 000000002014-05-01-0000May 2014 |
css3-layout | CSS Template Layout Module | Working Draft | 000000002011-11-01-0000Nov 2011 |
css3-mediaqueries | Media Queries | Recommendation | 000000002012-06-01-0000Jun 2012 |
css3-multicol | Multi-column Layout | Candidate Rec. | 000000002011-04-01-0000Apr 2011 |
css3-page | CSS Paged Media Module Level 3 | Working Draft | 000000002013-03-01-0000Mar 2013 |
css3-selectors | Selectors Level 3 | Recommendation | 000000002011-09-01-0000Sep 2011 |
css3-ui | CSS Basic User Interface Module Level 3 (CSS3 UI) | Working Draft | 000000002012-01-01-0000Jan 2012 |
There is no single, integrated CSS4 specification,[45] because it is split into separate modules. However, there are "level 4" modules.[46]
Because CSS3 split the CSS language's definition into modules, the modules have been allowed to level independently. Most modules are level 3—they build on things from CSS 2.1. A few level-4 modules exist (such as Image Values,[47][48] Backgrounds & Borders,[49] or Selectors),[50] which build on the functionality of a preceding level-3 module. Other modules defining entirely new functionality, such as Flexbox, have been designated as "level 1".[51]
The CSS Working Group sometimes publishes “Snapshots”, a collection of whole modules and parts of other drafts that are considered stable, interoperably implemented and hence ready to use. So far, three such best current practices document have been published as Notes, in 2007,[52] 2010[53] and 2015.[54]
Because not all browsers correctly parse CSS code, developed coding techniques known as CSS hacks can either filter specific browsers or target specific browsers (generally both are known as CSS filters). The former can be defined as CSS filtering hacks and the latter can be defined as CSS targeting hacks. Both can be used to hide or show parts of the CSS to different browsers. This is achieved either by exploiting CSS-handling quirks or bugs in the browser, or by taking advantage of lack of support for parts of the CSS specifications. Using CSS filters, some designers have gone as far as delivering different CSS to certain browsers to ensure designs render as expected. Because very early web browsers were either completely incapable of handling CSS, or rendered CSS very poorly, designers today often routinely use CSS filters that completely prevent these browsers from accessing any of the CSS. Internet Explorer was the first browser to provide support for CSS, with IE 3.0, and increased progressively with each version.[55] By 2008, the first Beta of Internet Explorer 8 offered support for CSS 2.1 in its best web standards mode.
An example of a historically well-known CSS browser bug was the Internet Explorer box model bug, where box widths are interpreted incorrectly in several versions of the browser, resulting in blocks that are too narrow when viewed in Internet Explorer, but correct in standards-compliant browsers. The bug can be avoided in Internet Explorer 6 by using the correct doctype in (X)HTML documents. CSS hacks and CSS filters are used to compensate for bugs such as this, just one of hundreds of CSS bugs that have been documented in various versions of Netscape, Mozilla Firefox, Opera, and Internet Explorer (including Internet Explorer 7).[56]
Even when the availability of CSS-capable browsers made CSS a viable technology, the adoption of CSS was still held back by designers' struggles with browsers' incorrect CSS implementation and patchy CSS support. Even today, these problems continue to make the business of CSS design more complex and costly than it was intended to be, and cross-browser testing remains a necessity. Other reasons for the continuing non-adoption of CSS are: its perceived complexity, authors' lack of familiarity with CSS syntax and required techniques, poor support from authoring tools, the risks posed by inconsistency between browsers and the increased costs of testing.[citation needed][needs update]
Currently[when?] there is strong competition between the WebKit layout engine used in Apple Safari and Google Chrome, the similar KHTML engine used in KDE's Konqueror browser and Mozilla's Gecko layout engine used in Firefox — each of them is leading in different aspects of CSS.[clarification needed examples would be useful] As of August 2009, Internet Explorer 8, Firefox 2 and 3 have reasonably complete levels of implementation of CSS 2.1.[57][needs update]
Some noted limitations of the current capabilities of CSS include:
:hover
", is dynamic (equivalent of JavaScript "onmouseover") and has potential for abuse (e.g., implementing cursor-proximity popups),[62] but CSS has no ability for a client to disable it (no "disable"-like property) or limit its effects (no "nochange"-like values for each property).:first-letter
pseudo-element, one cannot target specific ranges of text without needing to utilize place-holder elements.margin-left: 10% – 3em + 4px;
). This would be useful in a variety of cases, such as calculating the size of columns subject to a constraint on the sum of all columns. Internet Explorer versions 5 to 7 support a proprietary expression() statement,[66] with similar functionality. This proprietary expression() statement is no longer supported from Internet Explorer 8 onwards, except in compatibility modes. This decision was taken for "standards compliance, browser performance, and security reasons".[66] However, a candidate recommendation with a calc() value to address this limitation has been published by the CSS WG[67] and has since been supported in all of the modern browsers.[68]column-count
module),[69] layouts with multiple columns can be complex to implement in CSS 2.1. With CSS 2.1, the process is often done using floating elements, which are often rendered differently by different browsers, different computer screen shapes, and different screen ratios set on standard monitors. All of the modern browsers support this CSS 3 feature in one form or another.[70]CSS facilitates publication of content in multiple presentation formats based on nominal parameters. Nominal parameters include explicit user preferences, different web browsers, the type of device being used to view the content (a desktop computer or mobile Internet device), the geographic location of the user and many other variables.
When CSS is used effectively, in terms of inheritance and "cascading", a global style sheet can be used to affect and style elements site-wide. If the situation arises that the styling of the elements should be changed or adjusted, these changes can be made by editing rules in the global style sheet. Before CSS, this sort of maintenance was more difficult, expensive and time-consuming.
class
, type or relationship to others. This is much more efficient than repeating style information inline for each occurrence of the element. An external stylesheet is usually stored in the browser cache, and can therefore be used on multiple pages without being reloaded, further reducing data transfer over a network.With a simple change of one line, a different style sheet can be used for the same page. This has advantages for accessibility, as well as providing the ability to tailor a page or site to different target devices. Furthermore, devices not able to understand the styling still display the content.
CSS frameworks are pre-prepared libraries that are meant to allow for easier, more standards-compliant styling of web pages using the Cascading Style Sheets language. CSS frameworks include Foundation, Blueprint, Bootstrap, Cascade Framework and Materialize. Like programming and scripting language libraries, CSS frameworks are usually incorporated as external .css sheets referenced in the HTML <head>
. They provide a number of ready-made options for designing and laying out the web page. Although many of these frameworks have been published, some authors use them mostly for rapid prototyping, or for learning from, and prefer to 'handcraft' CSS that is appropriate to each published site without the design, maintenance and download overhead of having many unused features in the site's styling.[71]
As the size of CSS resources used in a project increases, the development team needs to decide on a common methodology to keep them organized. The goals are ease of development, ease of collaboration during development and performance of the deployed stylesheets in the browser. Popular methodologies include OOCSS - Object Oriented CSS, ACSS - Atomic CSS, oCSS - organic Cascade Style Sheet, SMACSS - Scalable and Modular Architecture for CSS and BEM - Block, Element, Modifier.[72]
|access-date=
(help)|access-date=
(help)|access-date=
(help)|access-date=
(help)This section needs to be updated. Please update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. (July 2012) |
Wikibooks has a book on the topic of: Cascading Style Sheets |
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Cascading Style Sheets. |
Style sheet languages
|
|
---|---|
Modes |
|
Standard |
|
Non-standard |
|
|
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Products and standards |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Organizations |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Software |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Conferences |
|
Web browsers
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Authority control |
|
---|
全文を閲覧するには購読必要です。 To read the full text you will need to subscribe.
リンク元 | 「アレルギー性肉芽腫性血管炎」 |
関連記事 | 「CS」「C」 |
病態 | レイノー現象 | 抗核抗体 | リウマトイド因子 | 抗好中球細胞質抗体 | 皮疹 | 皮下結節 | 関節炎 | 筋炎 | 漿膜炎 | 自己抗体 |
MPO ANCA | ||||||||||
病理 | 壊死性血管炎 | 糸球体腎炎 | 間質性肺炎 | 心炎 | 唾液腺炎 | オニオンスキン病変 | ワイヤーループ病変 | ヘマトキシリン体 | LE細胞 | |
.