adj.

正確な、的確な

関: accurately、correct、correctly、exact、exactly、faithfully、nicely、precise、precisely

WordNet

conforming exactly or almost exactly to fact or to a standard or performing with total accuracy; "an accurate reproduction"; "the accounting was accurate"; "accurate measurements"; "an accurate scale"
(of ideas, images, representations, expressions) characterized by perfect conformity to fact or truth ; strictly correct; "a precise image"; "a precise measurement" (同)exact, precise
socially right or correct; "it isnt right to leave the party without saying goodbye"; "correct behavior" (同)right
make right or correct; "Correct the mistakes"; "rectify the calculation" (同)rectify, right
treat a defect; "The new contact lenses will correct for his myopia"
free from error; especially conforming to fact or truth; "the correct answer"; "the correct version"; "the right answer"; "took the right road"; "the right decision" (同)right
in accord with accepted standards of usage or procedure; "whats the right word for this?"; "the right way to open oysters" (同)right
in a precise manner; "she always expressed herself precisely" (同)incisively, exactly
indicating exactness or preciseness; "he was doing precisely (or exactly) what she had told him to do"; "it was just as he said--the jewel was gone"; "it has just enough salt" (同)exactly, just
just as it should be; "`Precisely, my lord, he said" (同)exactly, on_the_nose, on the dot, on the button
marked by strict and particular and complete accordance with fact; "an exact mind"; "an exact copy"; "hit the exact center of the target"
sharply exact or accurate or delimited; "a precise mind"; "specified a precise amount"; "arrived at the precise moment"
in an accurate manner; "the flower had been correctly depicted by his son"; "he guessed right" (同)right, aright
with few mistakes; "he works very accurately"
strictly correctly; "repeated the order accurately"
not exact; "an inaccurate translation"; "the thermometer is inaccurate"
in an inaccurate manner; "this student works rather inaccurately and sloppily"

PrepTutorEJDIC

『正確な』,的確な,精密な
『事実に合った』,『正しい』,正確な / 『標準(因習)に合った』,妥当な,適切な(proper) / 〈誤りなど〉'を'『訂正する』,…‘の'誤りを正す / …‘の'誤りに印をつける / (…で)〈人〉'を'罰する,しかる《+『名』+『for』+『名』》 / …'を'基準に合わせる,調整する,修正する
『正確に』,明確に,はっきり / きちょうめんに / かっきりと,ちょうど / 《人に同意して》全くそのとおり
《名紙の前にのみ用いて》(数量など)『正確な』,きっかりの;(物事が)そのままの,そっくりの / (人が)『厳密な』;(機械など)精密な / 〈事柄が〉…‘を'要求する / (人に)〈支払・服従など〉‘を'強要する,強いる《+『名』+『from』+『名』〈人〉》
『正確な』,的確な,明確な / 《名詞の前にのみ用いて》まさにその,当の / (必要量などに)ちょうどの / (人,考え・規則などか)厳格な,きちょうめんな
正しく,正確に;正確に言えば
正確に,精密に,綿密に
不正確な / まちがった

Wikipedia preview

出典(authority):フリー百科事典『ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』「2014/09/10 05:41:57」(JST)

wiki en

[Wiki en表示]

Accuracy is the proximity of measurement results to the true value; precision, the repeatability, or reproducibility of the measurement

In the fields of science, engineering, industry, and statistics, the accuracy of a measurement system is the degree of closeness of measurements of a quantity to that quantity's actual (true) value.^[1] The precision of a measurement system, related to reproducibility and repeatability, is the degree to which repeated measurements under unchanged conditions show the same results.^[1]^[2] Although the two words precision and accuracy can be synonymous in colloquial use, they are deliberately contrasted in the context of the scientific method.

A measurement system can be accurate but not precise, precise but not accurate, neither, or both. For example, if an experiment contains a systematic error, then increasing the sample size generally increases precision but does not improve accuracy. The result would be a consistent yet inaccurate string of results from the flawed experiment. Eliminating the systematic error improves accuracy but does not change precision.

A measurement system is considered valid if it is both accurate and precise. Related terms include bias (non-random or directed effects caused by a factor or factors unrelated to the independent variable) and error (random variability).

The terminology is also applied to indirect measurements—that is, values obtained by a computational procedure from observed data.

In addition to accuracy and precision, measurements may also have a measurement resolution, which is the smallest change in the underlying physical quantity that produces a response in the measurement.

In numerical analysis, accuracy is also the nearness of a calculation to the true value; while precision is the resolution of the representation, typically defined by the number of decimal or binary digits.

Quantification

In industrial instrumentation: Accuracy is the measurement tolerance, or transmission of the instrument and defines the limits of the errors made when the instrument is used in normal operating conditions, according to the book of industrial instrumentation Antonio Creus.

Ideally a measurement device is both accurate and precise, with measurements all close to and tightly clustered around the true value. The accuracy and precision of a measurement process is usually established by repeatedly measuring some traceable reference standard. Such standards are defined in the International System of Units (abbreviated SI from French: Système international d'unités) and maintained by national standards organizations such as the National Institute of Standards and Technology in the United States.

This also applies when measurements are repeated and averaged. In that case, the term standard error is properly applied: the precision of the average is equal to the known standard deviation of the process divided by the square root of the number of measurements averaged. Further, the central limit theorem shows that the probability distribution of the averaged measurements will be closer to a normal distribution than that of individual measurements.

With regard to accuracy we can distinguish:

the difference between the mean of the measurements and the reference value, the bias. Establishing and correcting for bias is necessary for calibration.
the combined effect of that and precision.

A common convention in science and engineering is to express accuracy and/or precision implicitly by means of significant figures. Here, when not explicitly stated, the margin of error is understood to be one-half the value of the last significant place. For instance, a recording of 843.6 m, or 843.0 m, or 800.0 m would imply a margin of 0.05 m (the last significant place is the tenths place), while a recording of 8,436 m would imply a margin of error of 0.5 m (the last significant digits are the units).

A reading of 8,000 m, with trailing zeroes and no decimal point, is ambiguous; the trailing zeroes may or may not be intended as significant figures. To avoid this ambiguity, the number could be represented in scientific notation: 8.0 × 10³ m indicates that the first zero is significant (hence a margin of 50 m) while 8.000 × 10³ m indicates that all three zeroes are significant, giving a margin of 0.5 m. Similarly, it is possible to use a multiple of the basic measurement unit: 8.0 km is equivalent to 8.0 × 10³ m. In fact, it indicates a margin of 0.05 km (50 m). However, reliance on this convention can lead to false precision errors when accepting data from sources that do not obey it.

Precision is sometimes stratified into:

Repeatability — the variation arising when all efforts are made to keep conditions constant by using the same instrument and operator, and repeating during a short time period; and
Reproducibility — the variation arising using the same measurement process among different instruments and operators, and over longer time periods.

Terminology of ISO 5725

According to ISO 5725-1, Accuracy consists of Trueness (proximity of measurement results to the true value) and Precision (repeatability or reproducibility of the measurement)

A shift in the meaning of these terms appeared with the publication of the ISO 5725 series of standards, which is also reflected in the 2008 issue of the "BIPM International Vocabulary of Metrology" (VIM), items 2.13 and 2.14. ^[1]

According to ISO 5725-1,^[3] the terms trueness and precision are both used to describe the accuracy of a measurement. Trueness refers to the closeness of the mean of the measurement results to the actual (true) value and precision refers to the closeness of agreement within individual results. Therefore, according to the ISO standard, the term "accuracy" refers to both trueness and precision.

ISO 5725-1 and VIM also avoid the use of the term "bias", previously specified in BS 5497-1,^[4] because it has different connotations outside the fields of science and engineering, as in medicine and law.

Accuracy according to BIPM and ISO 5725

Low accuracy: good trueness, poor precision

Low accuracy: poor trueness, good precision

In binary classification

Accuracy is also used as a statistical measure of how well a binary classification test correctly identifies or excludes a condition.

		Condition (as determined by "Gold standard")
	Total population	Condition positive	Condition negative	Prevalence = Σ Condition positive Σ Total population
Test outcome	Test outcome positive	True positive	False positive (Type I error)	Positive predictive value (PPV, Precision) = Σ True positive Σ Test outcome positive	False discovery rate (FDR) = Σ False positive Σ Test outcome positive
Test outcome	Test outcome negative	False negative (Type II error)	True negative	False omission rate (FOR) = Σ False negative Σ Test outcome negative	Negative predictive value (NPV) = Σ True negative Σ Test outcome negative
	Positive likelihood ratio (LR+) = TPR/FPR	True positive rate (TPR, Sensitivity, Recall) = Σ True positive Σ Condition positive	False positive rate (FPR, Fall-out) = Σ False positive Σ Condition negative	Accuracy (ACC) = Σ True positive + Σ True negative Σ Total population
	Negative likelihood ratio (LR−) = FNR/TNR	False negative rate (FNR) = Σ False negative Σ Condition positive	True negative rate (TNR, Specificity, SPC) = Σ True negative Σ Condition negative
	Diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) = LR+/LR−

That is, the accuracy is the proportion of true results (both true positives and true negatives) in the population. To make the context clear by the semantics, it is often referred to as the "Rand Accuracy". It is a parameter of the test.

On the other hand, precision or positive predictive value is defined as the proportion of the true positives against all the positive results (both true positives and false positives)

An accuracy of 100% means that the measured values are exactly the same as the given values.

Also see Sensitivity and specificity.

Accuracy may be determined from Sensitivity and Specificity, provided Prevalence is known, using the equation:

The accuracy paradox for predictive analytics states that predictive models with a given level of accuracy may have greater predictive power than models with higher accuracy. It may be better to avoid the accuracy metric in favor of other metrics such as precision and recall.^{[citation needed]} In situations where the minority class is more important, F-measure may be more appropriate, especially in situations with very skewed class imbalance.

Another useful performance measure is the balanced accuracy which avoids inflated performance estimates on imbalanced datasets. It is defined as the arithmetic mean of sensitivity and specificity, or the average accuracy obtained on either class:

If the classifier performs equally well on either class, this term reduces to the conventional accuracy (i.e., the number of correct predictions divided by the total number of predictions). In contrast, if the conventional accuracy is above chance only because the classifier takes advantage of an imbalanced test set, then the balanced accuracy, as appropriate, will drop to chance.^[5] A closely related chance corrected measure is:

^[6]

A direct approach to debiasing and renormalizing Accuracy is Cohen's kappa, whilst Informedness has been shown to be a Kappa-family debiased renormalization of Recall.^[7] Informedness and Kappa have the advantage that chance level is defined to be 0, and they have the form of a probability. Informedness has the stronger property that it is the probability that an informed decision is made (rather than a guess), when positive. When negative this is still true for the absolutely value of Informedness, but the information has been used to force an incorrect response.^[6]

In psychometrics and psychophysics

In psychometrics and psychophysics, the term accuracy is interchangeably used with validity and constant error. Precision is a synonym for reliability and variable error. The validity of a measurement instrument or psychological test is established through experiment or correlation with behavior. Reliability is established with a variety of statistical techniques, classically through an internal consistency test like Cronbach's alpha to ensure sets of related questions have related responses, and then comparison of those related question between reference and target population.^{[citation needed]}

In logic simulation

In logic simulation, a common mistake in evaluation of accurate models is to compare a logic simulation model to a transistor circuit simulation model. This is a comparison of differences in precision, not accuracy. Precision is measured with respect to detail and accuracy is measured with respect to reality.^[8]^[9]

In information systems

The concepts of accuracy and precision have also been studied in the context of data bases, information systems and their sociotechnical context. The necessary extension of these two concepts on the basis of theory of science suggests that they (as well as data quality and information quality) should be centered on accuracy defined as the closeness to the true value seen as the degree of agreement of readings or of calculated values of one same conceived entity, measured or calculated by different methods, in the context of maximum possible disagreement.^[10]

References

^ ^a ^b ^c JCGM 200:2008 International vocabulary of metrology — Basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM)
^ John Robert Taylor (1999). An Introduction to Error Analysis: The Study of Uncertainties in Physical Measurements. University Science Books. pp. 128–129. ISBN 0-935702-75-X.
^ BS ISO 5725-1: "Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and reults - Part 1: General principles and definitions.", pp.1 (1994)
^ BS 5497-1: "Precision of test methods. Guide for the determination of repeatability and reproducibility for a standard test method." (1979)
^ K.H. Brodersen, C.S. Ong, K.E. Stephan, J.M. Buhmann (2010). The balanced accuracy and its posterior distribution. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 3121-3124.
^ ^a ^b Powers, David M W (2007–2011). "Evaluation: From Precision, Recall and F-Measure to ROC, Informedness, Markedness & Correlation". Journal of Machine Learning Technologies 2 (1): 37–63.
^ Powers, David M. W. (2012). "The Problem with Kappa". Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL2012) Joint ROBUS-UNSUP Workshop.
^ John M. Acken, Encyclopedia of Computer Science and Technology, Vol 36, 1997, page 281-306
^ 1990 Workshop on Logic-Level Modelling for ASICS, Mark Glasser, Rob Mathews, and John M. Acken, SIGDA Newsletter, Vol 20. Number 1, June 1990
^ Ivanov, K. (1972). "Quality-control of information: On the concept of accuracy of information in data banks and in management information systems".

External links

Look up accuracy, or precision in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.

BIPM - Guides in metrology - Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM) and International Vocabulary of Metrology (VIM)
"Beyond NIST Traceability: What really creates accuracy" - Controlled Environments magazine
Precision and Accuracy with Three Psychophysical Methods
Guidelines for Evaluating and Expressing the Uncertainty of NIST Measurement Results, Appendix D.1: Terminology
Accuracy and Precision
Accuracy vs Precision — a brief, clear video by Matt Parker

UpToDate Contents

全文を閲覧するには購読必要です。 To read the full text you will need to subscribe.

1. 小児における急性中耳炎：診断 acute otitis media in children diagnosis
2. 胎児発育遅延：診断 fetal growth restriction diagnosis
3. 肺動脈カテーテル法：成人における血行動態値および波形の解釈 pulmonary artery catheterization interpretation of hemodynamic values and waveforms in adults
4. 凝固検査の臨床使用 clinical use of coagulation tests
5. 緩和ケアにおける包括的患者評価の概要 overview of comprehensive patient assessment in palliative care

English Journal

Key Signaling Events for Committing Mouse Pluripotent Stem Cells to the Germline Fate.

Wang JQ1, Cao WG2.
Biology of reproduction.Biol Reprod.2016 Dec;94(1):24. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.115.135095. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
The process of germline development carries genetic information and preparatory totipotency across generations. The last decade has witnessed remarkable successes in the generation of germline cells from mouse pluripotent stem cells, especially induced germline cells with the capacity for producing
PMID 26674564

Validation of the modified Japanese Triage and Acuity Scale-based triage system emphasizing the physiologic variables or mechanism of injuries.

Funakoshi H1, Shiga T2, Homma Y3, Nakashima Y4, Takahashi J5, Kamura H6, Ikusaka M7.
International journal of emergency medicine.Int J Emerg Med.2016 Dec;9(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12245-015-0097-9. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
BACKGROUND: The Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale is a valid triage system. The system was translated and implemented in the Japanese emergency departments (EDs) from 2012. This system was named the Japanese Triage and Acuity Scale; however, the validation studies of the Japanese Triage and Acuity Sc
PMID 26810318

SAXS Combined with UV-vis Spectroscopy and QELS: Accurate Characterization of Silver Sols Synthesized in Polymer Matrices.

Bulavin L1,2, Kutsevol N3, Chumachenko V4, Soloviov D5,6,7, Kuklin A8,9, Marynin A10.
Nanoscale research letters.Nanoscale Res Lett.2016 Dec;11(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s11671-016-1230-2. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
The present work demonstrates a validation of small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) combining with ultra violet and visible (UV-vis) spectroscopy and quasi-elastic light scattering (QELS) analysis for characterization of silver sols synthesized in polymer matrices. Polymer matrix internal structure an
PMID 26815604

Detecting ethanol and acetaldehyde by simple and ultrasensitive fluorimetric methods in compound foods.

Zachut M1, Shapiro F1, Silanikove N2.
Food chemistry.Food Chem.2016 Jun 15;201:270-4. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.01.079. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
There is a need for simple, accurate, and rapid analysis of ethanol (Eth) and acetaldehyde (AA) in a wide variety of beverages and foods. A novel enzymatic assay coupled to formation of fluorescent chromophore is presented. Eth detection was further improved by adding semicarbazide to the reaction m
PMID 26868576

Japanese Journal

ステガノグラフィを用いた第三者の仲介不要なセッション鍵共有方式

宮嵜仁志,福本真輝,奥村香保里,福田洋治,廣友雅徳,毛利公美,白石善明
情報処理学会研究報告. GN, [グループウェアとネットワークサービス] 2014-GN-90(21), 1-8, 2014-01-16
サービスの窓口で身分証明書を確認し,直接利用者の本人確認をされることがある.また,他者に見られないよう,間仕切りなどで他者の視線を遮ってやりとりをすることがある.これらはネットワーク上では,伝送するデータを通信セッションごとに異なるセッション鍵で暗号化することに対応する.利用者の直接的な本人確認をしたうえでセッション鍵を共有できればオンライン窓口を実現できる.本稿では,オブジェクトベース AKE …
NAID 110009658849

GPGPU-Assisted Subpixel Tracking Method for Fiducial Markers (Preprint)

Naoki Shibata,Shinya Yamamoto
情報処理学会論文誌 55(1), 2014-01-15
… With an aim to realizing highly accurate position estimation, we propose in this paper a method for efficiently and accurately detecting the 3D positions and poses of traditional fiducial markers with black frames in high-resolution images taken by ordinary web cameras. …
NAID 110009658419

タスクボードとオンラインストレージを用いたソフトウェア開発PBLのためのタスク記録支援環境の構築

高先修平,井垣宏,肥後芳樹,楠本真二
情報処理学会論文誌 55(1), 199-209, 2014-01-15
高度なソフトウェア技術者や高度ICT(Information and Communication Technology)人材の育成を目的として,ソフトウェア開発をテーマとしたPBL(Project Based Learning)と呼ばれる教育・学習手法が様々な形態で行われている.PBLでは,振り返りと呼ばれるプロジェクト中にあった問題の発見,原因の分析,対策の考案といった,プロジェクトを継続的に改 …
NAID 110009658396

A modified algorithm for accurate inverse Cholesky factorization

Yanagisawa Yuka,Ogita Takeshi,Oishi Shin'ichi
Nonlinear Theory and Its Applications, IEICE 5(1), 35-46, 2014
… Recently, Ogita and Oishi derived an iterative algorithm to calculate an accurate approximate inverse of the exact Cholesky factor for such matrices. … It is explained that the proposed algorithm gives more accurate results than the original one by a numerical analysis. …
NAID 130003386651