出典(authority):フリー百科事典『ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』「2013/02/11 17:55:10」(JST)
The equivalent absorbed radiation dose, usually shortened to equivalent dose, or formerly dose equivalent, is a computed average measure of the radiation absorbed by a fixed mass of biological tissue, that attempts to account for the different biological damage potential of different types of ionizing radiation. It is therefore a less fundamental quantity than the total radiation energy absorbed per mass (the absorbed dose), but is a more significant quantity for assessing the health risk of radiation exposure.
It is adequate for assessing risk due to external radiation fields that penetrate uniformly through the whole body, but needs further corrections when the field is applied only to part(s) of the body or when it is due to an internal source. A further quantity called effective dose can be calculated if the fractionation of radiation to different parts of the body is known, to take into account the varying sensitivity of different organs to radiation. Another quantity called committed dose is used when the radiation source has entered the body.
Equivalent dose is dimensionally a quantity of energy per unit of mass, and is measured in sieverts or rems.
Contents
|
| Radiation | Energy | WR (formerly Q) |
|---|---|---|
| x-rays, gamma rays, beta rays, muons |
1 | |
| neutrons | < 1 MeV | 2.5 + 18.2·e-[ln(E)]²/6 |
| 1 MeV - 50 MeV | 5.0 + 17.0·e-[ln(2·E)]²/6 | |
| > 50 MeV | 2.5 + 3.25·e-[ln(0.04·E)]²/6 | |
| protons, charged pions | 2 | |
| alpha rays, Nuclear fission products, |
20 |
The equivalent dose is calculated by multiplying the absorbed dose, averaged by mass over an organ or tissue of interest, by a radiation weighting factor appropriate to the type and energy of radiation. To obtain the equivalent dose for a mix of radiation types and energies, a sum is taken over all types of radiation energy dose.[1]
where
Thus for example, an absorbed dose of 1 Gy by alpha particles will lead to an equivalent dose of 20 Sv.
The radiation weighting factor represents the relative biological effectiveness of the radiation. It aims to correct the simple deposited energy of the radiation (a fundamental quantity with clear physical meaning) for different biological effect of different types of radiation. An equivalent dose of radiation is estimated to have the same biological effect as an equal amount of absorbed dose of gamma rays.
If the equivalent dose is uniform throughout the organism, it will be equal to the effective dose. Otherwise, a weighted average of HT will have to be taken to average out the radiation dose through the body while correcting for the different sensitivities of different tissues. See the article on effective dose for this calculation. In the case of non-uniform radiation, or radiation given to only part of the body, using the local equivalent dose alone would overstate the biological risks to the entire organism.
The concept of equivalent dose was developed in the 1950s.[2] In its 1990 recommendations, the ICRP revised the definitions of some radiation protection quantities, and provided new names for the revised quantities.[3] Some regulators, notably the International Committee for Weights and Measures (CIPM) and the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission continue to use the old terminology of quality factors and dose equivalent, even though the underlying calculations have changed.[4]
The SI unit of measure for equivalent dose is the sievert, defined as one Joule per kg.[5] In the United States the roentgen equivalent man (rem), equal to 0.01 sievert, is still in common use, although regulatory and advisory bodies are encouraging transition to sieverts.[6]
To quantify the radiation risk of a particular environment or activity, the dose rate is routinely posted in hazardous areas. This represents the dose received per unit time spent in the area, usually measured in millisievert per hour or millirem per hour. Although equivalent dose rates may be used for this purpose, these figures are normally posted as absorbed dose rates for each radiation type.
The similar-sounding dose equivalent can have slightly different definitions than equivalent dose, or it may refer to the same thing. Prior to 1990, the ICRP used the term "dose equivalent" to refer to the absorbed dose at a point multiplied by the quality factor at that point, where the quality factor was a function of linear energy transfer. (LET) By contrast, the ICRP's current definition of "equivalent dose" represents an average over an organ or tissue, and radiation weighting factors independent of LET are used instead of quality factors. Starting with the publication of ICRP 60, the ICRP stopped using the exact words "dose equivalent" alone in that order, but four similar quantities were defined:[3]
The International Committee for Weights and Measures (CIPM) and the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission continue to use the old terminology of quality factors and dose equivalent. The NRC quality factors are independent of linear energy transfer, though not always equal to the ICRP radiation weighting factors.[4] The NRC's definition of dose equivalent is "the product of the absorbed dose in tissue, quality factor, and all other necessary modifying factors at the location of interest." However, it is apparent from their definition of effective dose equivalent that "all other necessary modifying factors" excludes the tissue weighting factor.[7]
Cumulative equivalent dose due to external whole-body exposure is normally reported to nuclear energy workers in regular dosimetry reports. In the US, three different equivalent doses are typically reported:
全文を閲覧するには購読必要です。 To read the full text you will need to subscribe.
| リンク元 | 「DE」 |
| 関連記事 | 「equivalent」「do」「dose」「dosing」 |