出典(authority):フリー百科事典『ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』「2016/01/05 15:55:16」(JST)
| This scientific article needs additional citations to secondary or tertiary sources such as review articles, monographs, or textbooks. Please add references to provide context and establish notability for any primary research articles cited. (October 2015) |
Diesel exhaust is the gaseous exhaust produced by a diesel type of internal combustion engine, regardless of the fuel type or rate of consumption, or speed of engine operation (e.g., idling or at speed), and regardless of whether the engine is in an on-road vehicle, farm vehicle, locomotive, marine vessel, or stationary generator or other application.[not verified in body] The physical and chemical conditions that exist inside any such diesel engines under any conditions differ considerably from spark-ignition engines, because, by design, diesel engine power is not controlled by the air/fuel mixture (as in most gasoline engines), but rather it is directly controlled by the fuel supply.[1] For instance, diesel engines generally produce 28 times less carbon monoxide than gasoline engines, as diesels burn their fuel in excess air even at full load.[2][3]
However, the lean-burning nature of diesel engines and the high temperatures and pressures of the combustion process result in significant production of gaseous nitrogen oxides (NOx), an air pollutant that constitutes a unique challenge with regard to their reduction.[not verified in body] Total nitrogen oxides from petrol cars have decreased by around 96% through adoption of exhaust catalytic converters as of 2012, while diesel cars still produce nitrogen oxides at a similar level to those bought a decade and a half ago under real world tests; hence, diesel cars emit around 20 times more nitrogen oxides than petrol cars. Modern on-road diesel engines typically use selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR) systems to meet emissions laws, as other methods such as exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) cannot adequately reduce NOx to meet the newer standards applicable in many jurisdictions.[not verified in body]
Moreover, the fine particles (fine particulate matter) in diesel exhaust (e.g., soot, sometimes visible as opaque dark-colored smoke) has traditionally been of greater concern, as it presents different health concerns and is rarely produced in significant quantities by spark-ignition engines.[not verified in body] Diesel engines produce significant amounts of especially harmful particulate contaminants when running without enough oxygen to fully combust the fuel; when a diesel engine runs at idle, enough oxygen is usually present to burn the fuel completely. As a result of the particulate emissions, exhaust from diesel vehicles has been reported to be significantly more harmful than those from petrol vehicles.
Diesel exhausts have been known for their characteristic odors, which changed when the sulfur content of diesel fuel was reduced, and again when catalytic converters were introduced in exhaust systems.[not verified in body] Even so, diesel exhausts have always contained an array of inorganic and organic contaminants, varying in degree and concentration depending on fuel composition and engine running conditions. Moreover, diesel exhaust contaminants include substances listed as human carcinogens by the International Agency for Research on Cancer of the U.N.'s World Health Organization.
Diesel exhaust pollution is thought[by whom?] to account for around one quarter of the pollution in the air in previous decades,[when?] and a high share of sickness caused by automotive pollution.
| This section needs additional citations to secondary or tertiary sources such as review articles, monographs, or textbooks. Please add references to provide context and establish notability for any primary research articles cited. (October 2015) |
Diesel exhaust is the exhaust produced by a diesel type of internal combustion engine, regardless of the fuel or fuel use, or speed of engine operation (e.g., idling or at speed), and regardless of whether the engine is in an on-road vehicle, farm vehicle, locomotive, marine vessel, or stationary generator or other application.[citation needed] The physical and chemical conditions that exist inside any such diesel engines under any conditions differ considerably from spark-ignition engines; diesel engine power is directly controlled by the fuel supply, not by control of the air/fuel mixture as in conventional gasoline engines.[citation needed] As a result of these differences, diesel engines generally produce a different array of pollutants than spark-driven engines, differences that are sometimes qualitative (what pollutants are there, and what are not), but more often quantitative (how much of particular pollutants or pollutant classes are present in each). For instance, very little carbon monoxide is produced, in general, in diesel engines, as they burn their fuel in excess air even at full load.[4][better source needed][third-party source needed]
The lean-burning nature of diesel engines and the high temperatures and pressures of the combustion process result in significant production of gaseous nitrogen oxide air pollutants.[citation needed] While total nitrogen oxides from petrol cars have decreased by around 96% through adoption of exhaust catalytic converters (as of 2012), while diesel cars still produce nitrogen oxides at a similar level to those bought a decade and a half ago under real world tests; hence, resulting in diesel cars emit around 20 times more nitrogen oxides than petrol cars.[5][verification needed] [6][verification needed][better source needed] Auxiliary diesel systems designed to remediate the nitrogen oxide pollutants are described in a separate section below.
More critically, diesel exhaust contains fine particles (fine particulate matter, e.g., soot, sometimes visible as opaque dark-colored smoke), and this is of greater concern as it is rarely produced in significant quantities by spark-ignition engines,[citation needed] and the particulates present significant, distinct health concerns (see below). These especially harmful particulate contaminants are at their peak when such engines are run without sufficient oxygen to fully combust the fuel;[citation needed] when a diesel engine runs at idle, enough oxygen is usually present to burn the fuel completely.[7] (The oxygen requirement in non-idling engines is usually mitigated using turbocharging.[citation needed])
Diesel exhausts, long known for their characteristic smells, changed significantly with the reduction of sulfur content of diesel fuel, and again when catalytic converters were introduces in exhaust systems.[citation needed] Even so, diesel exhausts continue to contain an array of inorganic and organic pollutants, in various classes, and in varying concentrations (see below). Some components of diesel exhaust are listed as carcinogenic for humans by the IARC (part of the World Health Organization of the United Nations), as present in their List of IARC Group 1 carcinogens.[8][better source needed]
The following are classes of chemical compounds that have been found in diesel exhaust.[9][verification needed][dated info] [10][page needed][verification needed]
| Class of chemical contaminant | Note |
|---|---|
| antimony compounds | Toxicity similar to arsenic poisoning[citation needed] |
| beryllium compounds | IARC Group 1 carcinogens |
| chromium compounds | IARC Group 3 carcinogens |
| cobalt compounds | |
| cyanide compounds | |
| dioxins and dibenzofurans | |
| manganese compounds | |
| mercury compounds | IARC Group 3 carcinogens |
| nitrogen oxides | |
| polycyclic organic matter, including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) |
|
| selenium compounds | |
| sulfur compounds |
The following are classes of specific chemicals that have been found in diesel exhaust.[9][verification needed][dated info] [10][page needed][verification needed]
| Chemical contaminant | Note | Concentration, ppm |
|---|---|---|
| acetaldehyde | IARC Group 2B carcinogens | |
| acrolein | IARC Group 3 carcinogens | |
| aniline | IARC Group 3 carcinogens | |
| arsenic | IARC Group 1 carcinogens, endocrine disruptor[citation needed] |
|
| benzene | IARC Group 1 carcinogens | |
| biphenyl | Mild toxicity[citation needed] | |
| bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate | Endocrine disruptor[citation needed] | |
| 1,3-Butadiene | IARC Group 2A carcinogens | |
| cadmium | IARC Group 1 carcinogens, endocrine disruptor[citation needed] |
|
| chlorine | Byproduct of urea injection[citation needed] |
|
| chlorobenzene | "[L]ow to moderate" toxicity[this quote needs a citation] |
|
| cresol§ | ||
| dibutyl phthalate | Endocrine disruptor[citation needed] | |
| 1,8-dinitropyrene | Carcinogen[citation needed] | |
| ethylbenzene | ||
| formaldehyde | IARC Group 1 carcinogens | |
| inorganic lead | Endocrine disruptor[citation needed] | |
| methanol | ||
| methyl ethyl ketone | ||
| naphthalene | IARC Group 2B carcinogens | |
| nickel | IARC Group 2B carcinogens | |
| 3-Nitrobenzanthrone | Strongly carcinogenic[citation needed] | 0.6-6.6[citation needed] |
| 4-nitrobiphenyl | 2.2[citation needed] | |
| phenol | ||
| phosphorus | ||
| Pyrene | 3532–8002[citation needed] | |
| Benzo(e)pyrene | 487–946[citation needed] | |
| Benzo(a)pyrene | IARC Group 1 carcinogen | 208–558[citation needed] |
| Fluoranthene | 3399–7321[citation needed] | |
| propionaldehyde | ||
| styrene | IARC Group 2B carcinogens | |
| toluene | IARC Group 3 carcinogens | |
| xylene§ | IARC Group 3 carcinogens |
§Includes all regioisomers of this aromatic compound. See ortho-, meta-, and para-isomer descriptions at each compound's article.
| This section requires expansion with: a general introduction with citations that covers current international agreements and federal regulations in English-speaking countries, rather than continue this developing hodgepodge: significant sentences only with citations. (October 2015) |
| This section is empty. You can help by adding to it. (October 2015) |
| This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (October 2015) |
To rapidly reduce particulate matter from heavy-duty diesel engines in California, the California Air Resources Board created the Carl Moyer Program to provide funding for upgrading engines ahead of emissions regulations.[citation needed] In 2008 the California Air Resources Board also implemented the 2008 California Statewide Truck and Bus Rule which requires all heavy-duty diesel trucks and buses, with a few exceptions, that operate in California to either retrofit or replace engines in order to reduce diesel particulate matter.[citation needed] The US Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) issued a health standard in January 2001 designed to reduce diesel exhaust exposure in underground metal and nonmetal mines; on September 7, 2005, MSHA published a notice in the Federal Register proposing to postpone the effective date from January 2006 until January 2011.[citation needed]
Emissions from diesel vehicles have been reported to be significantly more harmful than those from petrol ones.[11][better source needed] Diesel combustion exhaust is a source of atmospheric soot and fine particles, which is a component of the air pollution implicated in human cancer,[12][13] heart and lung damage,[14] and mental functioning.[15] Moreover, diesel exhaust contains contaminants listed as carcinogenic for humans by the IARC (part of the World Health Organization of the United Nations), as present in their List of IARC Group 1 carcinogens.<[8][better source needed] Diesel exhaust pollution is thought[by whom?] to account for around one quarter of the pollution in the air in previous decades,[when?] and a high share of sickness caused by automotive pollution.[16][better source needed]
Exposure to diesel exhaust and diesel particulate matter (DPM) is an occupational hazard to truckers, railroad workers, and miners using diesel-powered equipment in underground mines. Adverse health effects have also been observed in the general population at ambient atmospheric particle concentrations well below the concentrations in occupational settings.
In March 2012, U.S. government scientists showed that underground miners exposed to high levels of diesel fumes have a threefold increased risk for contracting lung cancer compared with those exposed to low levels. The $11.5 million Diesel Exhaust in Miners Study (DEMS) followed 12,315 miners, controlling for key carcinogens such as cigarette smoke, radon, and asbestos. This allowed scientists to isolate the effects of diesel fumes.[17][18]
For over 10 years, concerns have been raised in the USA regarding children's exposure to DPM as they ride diesel-powered school buses to and from school.[19] In 2013, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) established the Clean School Bus USA initiative in an effort to unite private and public organizations in curbing student exposures.[20]
Diesel particulate matter (DPM), sometimes also called diesel exhaust particles (DEP), is the particulate component of diesel exhaust, which includes diesel soot and aerosols such as ash particulates, metallic abrasion particles, sulfates, and silicates. When released into the atmosphere, DPM can take the form of individual particles or chain aggregates, with most in the invisible sub-micrometre range of 100nanometers, also known as ultrafine particles (UFP) or PM0.1.
The main particulate fraction of diesel exhaust consists of fine particles. Because of their small size, inhaled particles may easily penetrate deep into the lungs. The rough surfaces of these particles makes it easy for them to bind with other toxins in the environment, thus increasing the hazards of particle inhalation.[7][verification needed]
A study of particulate matter (PM) emissions from transit buses running on ULSD and soybean biodiesel (B20) was reported by Omidvarborna and coworkers, where they conclude PM emissions appeared lower in cases of biodiesel use, where they were dependent on the engine model, cold and hot idle modes, and fuel type, and that heavy metals in PM emitted during hot idling were greater than those from cold idling; reasons for PM reduction in biodiesel emissions were suggested to result from the oxygenated structure of biodiesel fuel, as well as arising from changes in technology (including the use of a catalytic converter in this test system).[21]
Exposures have been linked with acute short-term symptoms such as headache, dizziness, light-headedness, nausea, coughing, difficult or labored breathing, tightness of chest, and irritation of the eyes and nose and throat[citation needed]. Long-term exposures can lead to chronic, more serious health problems such as cardiovascular disease, cardiopulmonary disease, and lung cancer.[12][13][22] Elemental carbon attributable to traffic was significantly associated with wheezing at age 1 and persistent wheezing at age 3 in the Cincinnati Childhood Allergy and Air Pollution Study birth cohort study.[23]
The NERC-HPA funded Traffic Pollution and Health in London project at King's College London is currently[when?] seeking to refine understanding of the health effects of traffic pollution.[24] Ambient traffic-related air pollution was associated with decreased cognitive function in older men.[15]
Mortality from diesel soot exposure in 2001 was at least 14,400 out of the German population of 82 million, according to the official report 2352 of the Umweltbundesamt Berlin (Federal Environmental Agency of Germany).[citation needed]
The study of nanoparticles and nanotoxicology is in its infancy, and health effects from nanoparticles produced by all types of diesel engines are still being uncovered. It is clear, that diesel health detriments of fine particle emissions are severe and pervasive. Although one study found no significant evidence that short-term exposure to diesel exhaust results in adverse extrapulmonary effects, effects that are correlated with an increase in cardiovascular disease,[25] a 2011 study in The Lancet concluded that traffic exposure is the single most serious preventable trigger of heart attack in the general public, as the cause of 7.4% of all attacks.[14] It is impossible to tell how much of this effect is due to the stress of being in traffic and how much is due to exposure to exhaust.[citation needed]
Since the study of the detrimental health effects of nanoparticles (nanotoxicology) is still in its infancy, and the nature and extent of negative health impacts from diesel exhaust continues to be discovered. There is little controversy, however, that the public health impact of diesels is higher than that of petrol-fuelled vehicles despite the wide uncertainties.[26]
| This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (October 2015) |
The types and quantities of nanoparticles can vary according to operating temperatures and pressures, presence of an open flame, fundamental fuel type and fuel mixture, and even atmospheric mixtures. As such, the resulting types of nanoparticles from different engine technologies and even different fuels are not necessarily comparable. One study has shown that the 95% of the volatile component of diesel nanoparticles is unburned lubricating oil.[27] Long-term effects still need to be further clarified, as well as the effects on susceptible groups of people with cardiopulmonary diseases.
Diesel engines can produce black soot (or more specifically diesel particulate matter) from their exhaust. The black smoke consists of carbon compounds that have not burned because of local low temperatures where the fuel is not fully atomized. These local low temperatures occur at the cylinder walls, and at the surface of large droplets of fuel. At these areas where it is relatively cold, the mixture is rich (contrary to the overall mixture which is lean). The rich mixture has less air to burn and some of the fuel turns into a carbon deposit. Modern car engines use a diesel particulate filter (DPF) to capture carbon particles and then intermittently burn them using extra fuel injected directly into the filter. This prevents carbon buildup at the expense of wasting a small quantity of fuel.
The full load limit of a diesel engine in normal service is defined by the "black smoke limit", beyond which point the fuel cannot be completely burned. As the "black smoke limit" is still considerably lean of stoichiometric, it is possible to obtain more power by exceeding it, but the resultant inefficient combustion means that the extra power comes at the price of reduced combustion efficiency, high fuel consumption and dense clouds of smoke. This is only done in high performance applications where these disadvantages are of little concern.
When starting from cold, the engine's combustion efficiency is reduced because the cold engine block draws heat out of the cylinder in the compression stroke. The result is that fuel is not burned fully, resulting in blue and white smoke and lower power outputs until the engine has warmed. This is especially the case with indirect injection engines, which are less thermally efficient. With electronic injection, the timing and length of the injection sequence can be altered to compensate for this. Older engines with mechanical injection can have mechanical and hydraulic governor control to alter the timing, and multi-phase electrically controlled glow plugs, that stay on for a period after start-up to ensure clean combustion; the plugs are automatically switched to a lower power to prevent their burning out.
Experiments in 2013 showed that diesel exhaust impaired bees' ability to detect the scent of oilseed rape flowers.[28]
| This section needs additional citations to secondary or tertiary sources such as review articles, monographs, or textbooks. Please add references to provide context and establish notability for any primary research articles cited. (October 2015) |
| This section may rely excessively on sources too closely associated with the subject, potentially preventing the article from being verifiable and neutral. Please help improve it by replacing them with more appropriate citations to reliable, independent, third-party sources. (October 2015) |
With emissions standards increasing, diesel engines are having to become more efficient and have less pollutants in their exhaust.[citation needed] For instance, light duty truck must now have NOx emissions less than 0.07 g/mile,[when?][citation needed] and in the U.S., by 2010, NOx emissions must be less than 0.03 g/mile.[citation needed] Moreover, in recent years the United States, Europe, and Japan have extended emissions control regulations from covering on-road vehicles to include farm vehicles and locomotives, marine vessels, and stationary generator applications.[29][subscription] Engineers have come up with two principle and distinct systems to all on-market products meet the U.S. 2010 emissions criteria,[citation needed][dated info] selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR), and exhaust gas recirculation (EGR). Both are in the exhaust system of diesel engines, and are further designed to promote efficiency.[citation needed]
Selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR) injects a reductant such as ammonia or urea — the latter aqueous, where it is known as diesel exhaust fluid, DEF) — into the exhaust of a diesel engine to convert nitrogen oxides (NOx) into gaseous dinitrogen and water. SNCR systems have been prototyped that reduce 90% of the NOx in the exhaust system, with commercialized systems being somewhat lower.[citation needed] SNCR systems do not necessarily need particulate matter (PM) filters; when SNCR and PM filters are combined, some engines have been shown to be 3-5% more fuel efficient.[citation needed] A disadvantage of the SNCR system, in addition to added upfront development cost (which can be offset by compliance and improved performance),[citation needed] is the need to refill the reductant, the periodicity of which varies with the miles driven, load factors, and the hours used.[30][full citation needed][better source needed][third-party source needed] The SNCR system is not as efficient at higher revolutions per minute (rpm).[citation needed] SNCR is being optimized to have higher efficiency with broader temperatures, to be more durable, and to meet other commercial needs.[29]
Exhaust gas recirculation (EGR), on diesel engines, can be used to achieve a richer fuel to air mixture and a lower peak combustion temperature. Both effects reduce NOx emissions, but can negatively impact efficiency and the production of soot particles. The richer mix is achieved by displacing some of the intake air, but is still lean compared to petrol engines, which approach the stoichiometric ideal. The lower peak temperature is achieved by a heat exchanger that removes heat prior to re-entering the engine, and works due to the exhaust gases' higher specific heat than air. With the greater soot production, EGR is often combined with a particulate matter (PM) filter in the exhaust.[31][full citation needed] In turbocharged engines, EGR needs a controlled pressure differential across the exhaust manifold and intake manifold, which can be met by such engineering as use of a variable geometry turbocharger,[citation needed] which has inlet guide vanes on the turbine to build exhaust backpressure in the exhaust manifold directing exhaust gas to the intake manifold.[31] It also requires additional external piping and valving, and so requires additional maintenance.[citation needed]
John Deere, the farm equipment manufacturer is implementing such a combined SNCR-EGR design, in a 9 liter "inline 6" diesel engine that involves both system types, a PM filter and additional oxidation catalyst technologies.[32][better source needed][third-party source needed] The combined system incorporates two turbochargers, the first on the exhaust manifold, with variable geometry and containing the EGR system; and a second a fixed geometry turbocharger. Recirculated exhaust gas and the compressed air from the turbochargers have separate coolers, and air merges before entering the intake manifold, and all subsystems are controlled by a central engine control unit that optimizes minimization of pollutants released in the exhaust gas.[32]
| This section requires expansion with: the further sourced content on such things as diesel particulate filters and use of alternate fuels, placed here with citations;: significant sentences only with citations, no more top-of-the-head content dumping. (October 2015) |
After a week-long meeting of international experts, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), which is part of the World Health Organization (WHO), today classified diesel exhaust as probably carcinogenic to humans (Group 1), based on enough evidence that exposure is associated with an increased risk of lung cancer.[better source needed]
Particulate matter air pollution contributes to lung cancer incidence in Europe.
全文を閲覧するには購読必要です。 To read the full text you will need to subscribe.
| リンク元 | 「ディーゼル排気」「automobile exhaust」「vehicle emission」 |
| 拡張検索 | 「diesel exhaust particle」 |
| 関連記事 | 「exhaust」 |