pseudo first order reaction

擬一次反応

Wikipedia preview

出典(authority):フリー百科事典『ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』「2019/05/24 03:05:14」(JST)

wiki en

[Wiki en表示]

The rate law or rate equation for a chemical reaction is an equation that links the reaction rate with the concentrations or pressures of the reactants and constant parameters (normally rate coefficients and partial reaction orders). For many reactions the rate is given by a power law such as

$r\;=\;k[\mathrm {A} ]^{x}[\mathrm {B} ]^{y}$

where [A] and [B] express the concentration of the species A and B (usually in moles per liter (molarity, M)). The exponents x and y are the partial orders of reaction for A and B and the overall reaction order is the sum of the exponents. These are often positive integers, but they may also be zero, fractional, or negative. The constant k is the reaction rate constant or rate coefficient of the reaction. Its value may depend on conditions such as temperature, ionic strength, surface area of an adsorbent, or light irradiation.

Elementary (single-step) reactions and reaction steps have reaction orders equal to the stoichiometric coefficients for each reactant. The overall reaction order, i.e. the sum of stoichiometric coefficients of reactants, is always equal to the molecularity of the elementary reaction. However complex (multi-step) reactions may or may not have reaction orders equal to their stoichiometric coefficients. This implies that the order and the rate equation of a given reaction cannot be reliably deduced from the stoichiometry and must be determined experimentally, since an unknown reaction mechanism could be either elementary or complex. When the experimental rate equation has been determined, it is often of use for deduction of the reaction mechanism.

The rate equation of a reaction with an assumed multi-step mechanism can often be derived theoretically using quasi-steady state assumptions from the underlying elementary reactions, and compared with the experimental rate equation as a test of the assumed mechanism. The equation may involve a fractional order, and may depend on the concentration of an intermediate species.

A reaction can also have an undefined reaction order with respect to a reactant if the rate is not simply proportional to some power of the concentration of that reactant; for example, one cannot talk about reaction order in the rate equation for a bimolecular reaction between adsorbed molecules:

$r=k{\frac {K_{1}K_{2}C_{A}C_{B}}{(1+K_{1}C_{A}+K_{2}C_{B})^{2}}}.\,$

Definition

Main article: Reaction rate

Consider a typical chemical reaction in which two reactants A and B combine to form a product C:

$\mathrm {A} +2\mathrm {B} \rightarrow 3\mathrm {C} .$

This can also be written

$0=-\mathrm {A} -2\mathrm {B} +3\mathrm {C} .$

The prefactors -1, -2 and 3 (with negative signs for reactants because they are consumed) are known as stoichiometric coefficients. One molecule of A combines with two of B to form 3 of C, so if we use the symbol [X] for the number of moles of chemical X,

$-{\frac {d[\mathrm {A} ]}{dt}}=-{\frac {1}{2}}{\frac {d[\mathrm {B} ]}{dt}}={\frac {1}{3}}{\frac {d[\mathrm {C} ]}{dt}}.$

If the reaction takes place in a closed system at constant temperature and volume, without a build-up of reaction intermediates, the reaction rate r is defined as

$r={\frac {1}{\nu _{i}}}{\frac {d[\mathrm {X} _{i}]}{dt}},$

where ν_i is the stoichiometric coefficient for chemical X_i.

The reaction rate has some functional dependence on the concentrations of the reactants,

$r=f\left([\mathrm {A} ],[\mathrm {B} ],\ldots \right),$

and this dependence is known as the rate equation or rate law. This law generally cannot be deduced from the chemical equation and must be determined by experiment.

Power laws

A common form for the rate equation is a power law:

$r=k[A]^{x}[B]^{y}\ldots$

The constant k is called the rate constant. The exponents, which can be fractional, are called partial orders of reaction and their sum is the overall order of reaction.

In a dilute solution, an elementary reaction (one having a single step with a single transition state) is empirically found to obey the law of mass action. This predicts that the rate depends only on the concentrations of the reactants, raised to the powers of their stoichiometric coefficients.

Determination of reaction order

Method of initial rates

The natural logarithm of the power-law rate equation is

$\ln r=\ln k+x\ln[A]+y\ln[B]+...$

This can be used to estimate the order of reaction of each reactant. For example, the initial rate can be measured in a series of experiments at different initial concentrations of reactant A with all other concentrations [B], [C], ... kept constant, so that

$\ln r=x\ln[A]+{\textrm {constant}}.$

The slope of a graph of $\ln r$ as a function of $\ln[A]$ then corresponds to the order x with respect to reactant A.

However, this method is not always reliable because

1. measurement of the initial rate requires accurate determination of small changes in concentration in short times (compared to the reaction half-life) and is sensitive to errors, and
2. the rate equation will not be completely determined if the rate also depends on substances not present at the beginning of the reaction, such as intermediates or products.

Integral method

The tentative rate equation determined by the method of initial rates is therefore normally verified by comparing the concentrations measured over a longer time (several half-lives) with the integrated form of the rate equation.

For example, the integrated rate law for a first-order reaction is

$\ \ln {[A]}=-kt+\ln {[A]_{0}}$,

where [A] is the concentration at time t and [A]₀ is the initial concentration at zero time. The first-order rate law is confirmed if $\ln {[A]}$ is in fact a linear function of time. In this case the rate constant $k$ is equal to the slope with sign reversed.

Method of flooding

The partial order with respect to a given reactant can be evaluated by the method of flooding (or of isolation) of Ostwald. In this method, the concentration of one reactant is measured with all other reactants in large excess so that their concentration remains essentially constant. For a reaction a·A + b·B → c·C with rate law: $r=k\cdot [{\rm {A}}]^{x}\cdot [{\rm {B}}]^{y}$, the partial order x with respect to A is determined using a large excess of B. In this case

$$

 
   
     
       r
       =
       
         k
         ′
       
       ⋅
       [
       
         
           A
         
       
       
         ]
         
           x
         
       
     
   
   {\displaystyle r=k'\cdot [{\rm {A}}]^{x}}
 

with $$

 
   
     
       
         k
         ′
       
       =
       k
       ⋅
       [
       
         
           B
         
       
       
         ]
         
           y
         
       
     
   
   {\displaystyle k'=k\cdot [{\rm {B}}]^{y}}
 

,

and x may be determined by the integral method. The order y with respect to B under the same conditions (with B in excess) is determined by a series of similar experiments with a range of initial concentration [B]₀ so that the variation of k' can be measured.

Zero order

For zero-order reactions, the reaction rate is independent of the concentration of a reactant, so that changing its concentration has no effect on the speed of the reaction. Thus, the concentration changes linearly with time. This may occur when there is a bottleneck which limits the number of reactant molecules that can react at the same time, for example if the reaction requires contact with an enzyme or a catalytic surface.

Many enzyme-catalyzed reactions are zero order, provided that the reactant concentration is much greater than the enzyme concentration which controls the rate, so that the enzyme is saturated. For example, the biological oxidation of ethanol to acetaldehyde by the enzyme liver alcohol dehydrogenase (LADH) is zero order in ethanol.

Similarly reactions with heterogeneous catalysis can be zero order if the catalytic surface is saturated. For example, the decomposition of phosphine (PH₃) on a hot tungsten surface at high pressure is zero order in phosphine which decomposes at a constant rate.

In homogeneous catalysis zero order behavior can come about from reversible inhibition. For example, ring-opening metathesis polymerization using third-generation Grubbs catalyst exhibits zero order behavior in catalyst due to the reversible inhibition that is occur between the pyridine and the ruthenium center.

First order

A first order reaction depends on the concentration of only one reactant (a unimolecular reaction). Other reactants can be present, but each will be zero order. The rate law for such a reaction is

$-{\frac {d[{\ce {A}}]}{dt}}=k[{\ce {A}}],$

The half-life is independent of the starting concentration and is given by $t_{1/2}={\frac {\ln {(2)}}{k}}$.

Examples of such reactions are:

• ${\ce {H2O2 (l) -> H2O (l) + 1/2O2 (g)}}$
• ${\ce {SO2Cl2 (l) -> SO2 (g) + Cl2 (g)}}$
• ${\ce {2N2O5 (g) -> 4NO2 (g) + O2 (g)}}$

In organic chemistry, the class of S_N1 (nucleophilic substitution unimolecular) reactions consists of first-order reactions. For example, in the reaction of aryldiazonium ions with nucleophiles in aqueous solution ArN₂⁺ + X⁻ → ArX + N₂, the rate equation is r = k[ArN₂⁺], where Ar indicates an aryl group.

Second order

A reaction is said to be second order when the overall order is two. The rate of a second-order reaction may be proportional to one concentration squared $r=k[A]^{2}\,$, or (more commonly) to the product of two concentrations $r=k[A][B]\,$. As an example of the first type, the reaction NO₂ + CO → NO + CO₂ is second-order in the reactant NO₂ and zero order in the reactant CO. The observed rate is given by $r=k[{{\ce {NO2}}}]^{2}\,$, and is independent of the concentration of CO.

For the rate proportional to a single concentration squared, the time dependence of the concentration is given by

${\frac {1}{{\ce {[A]}}}}={\frac {1}{{\ce {[A]0}}}}+kt$

The time dependence for a rate proportional to two unequal concentrations is

${\frac {{\ce {[A]}}}{{\ce {[B]}}}}={\frac {{\ce {[A]0}}}{{\ce {[B]0}}}}e^{({\ce {[A]0}}-{\ce {[B]0}})kt}$;

if the concentrations are equal, they satisfy the previous equation.

The second type includes nucleophillic addition-elimination reactions, such as the alkaline hydrolysis of ethyl acetate:

CH₃COOC₂H₅ + OH⁻ → CH₃COO⁻ + C₂H₅OH

This reaction is first-order in each reactant and second-order overall: r = k[CH₃COOC₂H₅][OH⁻]

If the same hydrolysis reaction is catalyzed by imidazole, the rate equation becomes r = k[imidazole][CH₃COOC₂H₅]. The rate is first-order in one reactant (ethyl acetate), and also first-order in imidazole which as a catalyst does not appear in the overall chemical equation.

Another well-known class of second-order reactions are the S_N2 (bimolecular nucleophilic substitution) reactions, such as the reaction of n-butyl bromide with sodium iodide in acetone:

CH₃CH₂CH₂CH₂Br + NaI → CH₃CH₂CH₂CH₂I + NaBr↓

This same compound can be made to undergo a bimolecular (E2) elimination reaction, another common type of second-order reaction, if the sodium iodide and acetone are replaced with sodium tert-butoxide as the salt and tert-butanol as the solvent:

CH₃CH₂CH₂CH₂Br + NaOt-Bu → CH₃CH₂CH=CH₂ + NaBr + HOt-Bu

Pseudo-first order

If the concentration of a reactant remains constant (because it is a catalyst, or because it is in great excess with respect to the other reactants), its concentration can be included in the rate constant, obtaining a pseudo–first-order (or occasionally pseudo–second-order) rate equation. For a typical second-order reaction with rate equation r = k[A][B], if the concentration of reactant B is constant then r = k[A][B] = k'[A], where the pseudo–first-order rate constant k' = k[B]. The second-order rate equation has been reduced to a pseudo–first-order rate equation, which makes the treatment to obtain an integrated rate equation much easier.

One way to obtain a pseudo-first order reaction is to use a large excess of one reactant (say, [B]≫[A]) so that, as the reaction progresses, only a small fraction of the reactant in excess (B) is consumed, and its concentration can be considered to stay constant. For example, the hydrolysis of esters by dilute mineral acids follows pseudo-first order kinetics where the concentration of water is present in large excess:

CH₃COOCH₃ + H₂O → CH₃COOH + CH₃OH

The hydrolysis of sucrose in acid solution is often cited as a first-order reaction with rate r = k[sucrose]. The true rate equation is third-order, r = k[sucrose][H⁺][H₂O]; however, the concentrations of both the catalyst H⁺ and the solvent H₂O are normally constant, so that the reaction is pseudo–first-order.

Summary for reaction orders 0, 1, 2, and n

Elementary reaction steps with order 3 (called ternary reactions) are rare and unlikely to occur. However, overall reactions composed of several elementary steps can, of course, be of any (including non-integer) order.

	Zero order	First order	Second order	nth order
Rate Law	$$ − d [ A ] / d t = k {\displaystyle -{d[{\ce {A}}]}/{dt}=k}	$$ − d [ A ] / d t = k [ A ] {\displaystyle -{d[{\ce {A}}]}/{dt}=k[{\ce {A}}]}	$$ − d [ A ] / d t = k [ A ] 2 {\displaystyle -{d[{\ce {A}}]}/{dt}=k[{\ce {A}}]^{2}}	$$ − d [ A ] / d t = k [ A ] n {\displaystyle -{d[{\ce {A}}]}/{dt}=k[{\ce {A}}]^{n}}
Integrated Rate Law	$$ [ A ] = [ A ] 0 − k t {\displaystyle {\ce {[A] = [A]0}}-kt}	$$ [ A ] = [ A ] 0 e − k t {\displaystyle {\ce {[A] = [A]0}}e^{-kt}}	$$ 1 [ A ] = 1 [ A ] 0 + k t {\displaystyle {\frac {1}{{\ce {[A]}}}}={\frac {1}{{\ce {[A]0}}}}+kt}	$$ 1 [ A ] n − 1 = 1 [ A ] 0 n − 1 + ( n − 1 ) k t {\displaystyle {\frac {1}{[{\ce {A}}]^{n-1}}}={\frac {1}{{\ce {[A]0}}^{n-1}}}+(n-1)kt} [Except first order]
Units of Rate Constant (k)	$$ M s {\displaystyle {\rm {\frac {M}{s}}}}	$$ 1 s {\displaystyle {\rm {\frac {1}{s}}}}	$$ 1 M ⋅ s {\displaystyle {\rm {\frac {1}{M\cdot s}}}}	$$ 1 M n − 1 ⋅ s {\displaystyle {\frac {1}{{\rm {M}}^{n-1}\cdot {\rm {s}}}}}
Linear Plot to determine k	[A] vs. t	$$ ln ⁡ ( [ A ] ) {\displaystyle {\ce {\ln([A])}}} vs. t	$$ 1 [ A ] {\displaystyle {\ce {{\frac {1}{[A]}}}}} vs. t	$$ 1 [ A ] n − 1 {\displaystyle {\ce {\frac {1}{[A]^{{\mathit {n}}-1}}}}} vs. t [Except first order]
Half-life	$$ t 1 2 = [ A ] 0 2 k {\displaystyle t_{\frac {1}{2}}={\frac {{\ce {[A]0}}}{2k}}}	$$ t 1 2 = ln ⁡ ( 2 ) k {\displaystyle t_{\frac {1}{2}}={\frac {\ln(2)}{k}}}	$$ t 1 2 = 1 k [ A ] 0 {\displaystyle t_{\frac {1}{2}}={\frac {1}{k{\ce {[A]0}}}}}	$$ t 1 2 = lim x → n 2 x − 1 − 1 ( x − 1 ) k [ A ] 0 x − 1 {\displaystyle t_{\frac {1}{2}}=\lim _{x\to n}{\frac {2^{x-1}-1}{(x-1)k{\ce {[A]0}}^{x-1}}}} [limit only necessary in first order]

Where M stands for concentration in molarity (mol · L⁻¹), t for time, and k for the reaction rate constant. The half-life of a first order reaction is often expressed as t_1/2 = 0.693/k (as ln2 = 0.693).

Fractional order

In fractional order reactions, the order is a non-integer, which often indicates a chemical chain reaction or other complex reaction mechanism. For example, the pyrolysis of acetaldehyde (CH₃CHO) into methane and carbon monoxide proceeds with an order of 1.5 with respect to acetaldehyde: r = k[CH₃CHO]^3/2. The decomposition of phosgene (COCl₂) to carbon monoxide and chlorine has order 1 with respect to phosgene itself and order 0.5 with respect to chlorine: r = k[COCl₂] [Cl₂]^1/2.

The order of a chain reaction can be rationalized using the steady state approximation for the concentration of reactive intermediates such as free radicals. For the pyrolysis of acetaldehyde, the Rice-Herzfeld mechanism is

Initiation

CH₃CHO → •CH₃ + •CHO

Propagation

•CH₃ + CH₃CHO → CH₃CO• + CH₄

CH₃CO• → •CH₃ + CO

Termination

2 •CH₃ → C₂H₆

where • denotes a free radical. To simplify the theory, the reactions of the •CHO to form a second •CH₃ are ignored.

In the steady state, the rates of formation and destruction of methyl radicals are equal, so that

${\frac {d[{{\ce {.CH3}}}]}{dt}}=k_{i}[{{\ce {CH3CHO}}}]-k_{t}[{{\ce {.CH3}}}]^{2}=0$,

so that the concentration of methyl radical satisfies

${\ce {[.CH3]\quad \propto \quad [CH3CHO]^{1/2}}}$.

The reaction rate equals the rate of the propagation steps which form the main reaction products CH₄ and CO:

$v={\frac {d[{\ce {CH4}}]}{dt}}=k_{p}{\ce {[.CH3][CH3CHO]}}\quad \propto \quad {\ce {[CH3CHO]^{3/2}}}$

in agreement with the experimental order of 3/2.

Complex laws

Mixed order

More complex rate laws have been described as being mixed order if they approximate to the laws for more than one order at different concentrations of the chemical species involved. For example, a rate law of the form $r=k_{1}[A]+k_{2}[A]^{2}$ represents concurrent first order and second order reactions (or more often concurrent pseudo-first order and second order) reactions, and can be described as mixed first and second order. For sufficiently large values of [A] such a reaction will approximate second order kinetics, but for smaller [A] the kinetics will approximate first order (or pseudo-first order). As the reaction progresses, the reaction can change from second order to first order as reactant is consumed.

Another type of mixed-order rate law has a denominator of two or more terms, often because the identity of the rate-determining step depends on the values of the concentrations. An example is the oxidation of an alcohol to a ketone by hexacyanoferrate (III) ion [Fe(CN)₆³⁻] with ruthenate (VI) ion (RuO₄²⁻) as catalyst. For this reaction, the rate of disappearance of hexacyanoferrate (III) is $$

 
   
     
       r
       =
       
         
           
             
               
                 [
                 Fe
                 
                   
                     (
                     CN
                     )
                   
                   
                     6
                   
                   
                     
                   
                 
                 ]
               
               
                 2
                 −
               
             
           
           
             
               k
               
                 α
               
             
             +
             
               k
               
                 β
               
             
             
               
                 
                   [
                   Fe
                   
                     
                       (
                       CN
                       )
                     
                     
                       6
                     
                     
                       
                     
                   
                   ]
                 
                 
                   2
                   −
                 
               
             
           
         
       
     
   
   {\displaystyle r={\frac {{\ce {[Fe(CN)6]^2-}}}{k_{\alpha }+k_{\beta }{\ce {[Fe(CN)6]^2-}}}}}
 

This is zero-order with respect to hexacyanoferrate (III) at the onset of the reaction (when its concentration is high and the ruthenium catalyst is quickly regenerated), but changes to first-order when its concentration decreases and the regeneration of catalyst becomes rate-determining.

Notable mechanisms with mixed-order rate laws with two-term denominators include:

• Michaelis-Menten kinetics for enzyme-catalysis: first-order in substrate (second-order overall) at low substrate concentrations, zero order in substrate (first-order overall) at higher substrate concentrations; and
• the Lindemann mechanism for unimolecular reactions: second-order at low pressures, first-order at high pressures.

Negative order

A reaction rate can have a negative partial order with respect to a substance. For example, the conversion of ozone (O₃) to oxygen follows the rate equation $r=k{\frac {{\ce {[O_3]^2}}}{{\ce {[O_2]}}}}$ in an excess of oxygen. This corresponds to second order in ozone and order (-1) with respect to oxygen.

When a partial order is negative, the overall order is usually considered as undefined. In the above example for instance, the reaction is not described as first order even though the sum of the partial orders is $$

 
   
     
       2
       +
       (
       −
       1
       )
       =
       1
     
   
   {\displaystyle 2+(-1)=1}
 

, because the rate equation is more complex than that of a simple first-order reaction.

Opposed reactions

A pair of forward and reverse reactions may occur simultaneously with comparable speeds. For example, A and B react into X and Y and vice versa (s, t, u, and v are the stoichiometric coefficients):

${\ce {{\mathit {sA}}+{\mathit {tB}}<=>{\mathit {uX}}+{\mathit {vY}}}}$

The reaction rate expression for the above reactions (assuming each one is elementary) can be expressed as:

$r=k_{1}[{\ce {A}}]^{s}[{\ce {B}}]^{t}-k_{2}[{\ce {X}}]^{u}[{\ce {Y}}]^{v}$

where: k₁ is the rate coefficient for the reaction that consumes A and B; k₂ is the rate coefficient for the backwards reaction, which consumes X and Y and produces A and B.

The constants k₁ and k₂ are related to the equilibrium coefficient for the reaction (K) by the following relationship (set r=0 in balance):

$k_{1}[{\ce {A}}]^{s}[{\ce {B}}]^{t}=k_{2}[{\ce {X}}]^{u}[{\ce {Y}}]^{v}$

$K={\frac {[{\ce {X}}]^{u}[{\ce {Y}}]^{v}}{[{\ce {A}}]^{s}[{\ce {B}}]^{t}}}={\frac {k_{1}}{k_{2}}}$

Concentration of A (A₀ = 0.25 mole/l) and B versus time reaching equilibrium k_f = 2 min⁻¹ and k_r = 1 min⁻¹

Simple example

In a simple equilibrium between two species:

${\ce {A <=> B}}$

Where the reactions starts with an initial concentration of A, ${\ce {[A]0}}$, with an initial concentration of 0 for B at time t=0.

Then the constant K at equilibrium is expressed as:

$K\ {\stackrel {\mathrm {def} }{=}}\ {\frac {k_{f}}{k_{b}}}={\frac {\left[{\ce {B}}\right]_{e}}{\left[{\ce {A}}\right]_{e}}}$

Where $[{\ce {A}}]_{e}$ and $[{\ce {B}}]_{e}$ are the concentrations of A and B at equilibrium, respectively.

The concentration of A at time t, $$

 
   
     
       [
       
         A
       
       
         ]
         
           t
         
       
     
   
   {\displaystyle [{\ce {A}}]_{t}}
 

, is related to the concentration of B at time t, $$

 
   
     
       [
       
         B
       
       
         ]
         
           t
         
       
     
   
   {\displaystyle [{\ce {B}}]_{t}}
 

, by the equilibrium reaction equation:

${\ce {[A]_{\mathit {t}}=[A]0-[B]_{\mathit {t}}}}$

Note that the term ${\ce {[B]0}}$ is not present because, in this simple example, the initial concentration of B is 0.

This applies even when time t is at infinity; i.e., equilibrium has been reached:

${\ce {[A]_{\mathit {e}}=[A]0-[B]_{\mathit {e}}}}$

then it follows, by the definition of K, that

$[{\ce {B}}]_{e}=x={\frac {k_{f}}{k_{f}+k_{b}}}{\ce {[A]0}}$

and, therefore,

$\ [{\ce {A}}]_{e}={\ce {[A]0}}-x={\frac {k_{b}}{k_{f}+k_{b}}}{\ce {[A]0}}$

These equations allow us to uncouple the system of differential equations, and allow us to solve for the concentration of A alone.

The reaction equation, given previously as:

$r=k_{1}[{\ce {A}}]^{s}[{\ce {B}}]^{t}-k_{2}[{\ce {X}}]^{u}[{\ce {Y}}]^{v}$

$-{\frac {d[{\ce {A}}]}{dt}}=k_{f}[{\ce {A}}]_{t}-k_{b}[{\ce {B}}]_{t}$

The derivative is negative because this is the rate of the reaction going from A to B, and therefore the concentration of A is decreasing. To simplify annotation, let x be $[{\ce {A}}]_{t}$, the concentration of A at time t. Let $x_{e}$ be the concentration of A at equilibrium. Then:

${\begin{aligned}-{\frac {d[{\ce {A}}]}{dt}}&={k_{f}[{\ce {A}}]_{t}}-{k_{b}[{\ce {B}}]_{t}}\\-{\frac {dx}{dt}}&={k_{f}x}-{k_{b}[{\ce {B}}]_{t}}\\&={k_{f}x}-{k_{b}({\ce {[A]0}}-x)}\\&={(k_{f}+k_{b})x}-{k_{b}{\ce {[A]0}}}\end{aligned}}$

Since:

$k_{f}+k_{b}=k_{b}{\frac {{\ce {[A]0}}}{x_{e}}}$

The reaction rate becomes:

${\frac {dx}{dt}}={\frac {k_{b}{\ce {[A]0}}}{x_{e}}}(x_{e}-x)$

which results in:

$\ln \left({\frac {{\ce {[A]0}}-[{\ce {A}}]_{e}}{[{\ce {A}}]_{t}-[{\ce {A}}]_{e}}}\right)=(k_{f}+k_{b})t$

A plot of the negative natural logarithm of the concentration of A in time minus the concentration at equilibrium versus time t gives a straight line with slope k_f + k_b. By measurement of A_e and B_e the values of K and the two reaction rate constants will be known.

Generalization of simple example

If the concentration at the time t = 0 is different from above, the simplifications above are invalid, and a system of differential equations must be solved. However, this system can also be solved exactly to yield the following generalized expressions:

$\left[{\ce {A}}\right]={\ce {[A]0}}{\frac {1}{k_{f}+k_{b}}}\left(k_{b}+k_{f}e^{-\left(k_{f}+k_{b}\right)t}\right)+{\ce {[B]0}}{\frac {k_{b}}{k_{f}+k_{b}}}\left(1-e^{-\left(k_{f}+k_{b}\right)t}\right)$

$\left[{\ce {B}}\right]={\ce {[A]0}}{\frac {k_{f}}{k_{f}+k_{b}}}\left(1-e^{-\left(k_{f}+k_{b}\right)t}\right)+{\ce {[B]0}}{\frac {1}{k_{f}+k_{b}}}\left(k_{f}+k_{b}e^{-\left(k_{f}+k_{b}\right)t}\right)$

When the equilibrium constant is close to unity and the reaction rates very fast for instance in conformational analysis of molecules, other methods are required for the determination of rate constants for instance by complete lineshape analysis in NMR spectroscopy.

Consecutive reactions

If the rate constants for the following reaction are $k_{1}$ and $k_{2}$; ${\ce {A -> B -> C}}$, then the rate equation is:

For reactant A: ${\frac {d[{\ce {A}}]}{dt}}=-k_{1}[{\ce {A}}]$

For reactant B: ${\frac {d[{\ce {B}}]}{dt}}=k_{1}[{\ce {A}}]-k_{2}[{\ce {B}}]$

For product C: ${\frac {d[{\ce {C}}]}{dt}}=k_{2}[{\ce {B}}]$

With the individual concentrations scaled by the total population of reactants to become probabilities, linear systems of differential equations such as these can be formulated as a master equation. The differential equations can be solved analytically and the integrated rate equations are

$[{\ce {A}}]={\ce {[A]0}}e^{-k_{1}t}$

$\left[{\ce {B}}\right]={\begin{cases}{\ce {[A]0}}{\frac {k_{1}}{k_{2}-k_{1}}}\left(e^{-k_{1}t}-e^{-k_{2}t}\right)+{\ce {[B]0}}e^{-k_{2}t}&k_{1}\neq k_{2}\\{\ce {[A]0}}k_{1}te^{-k_{1}t}+{\ce {[B]0}}e^{-k_{1}t}&{\text{otherwise}}\\\end{cases}}$

$\left[{\ce {C}}\right]={\begin{cases}{\ce {[A]0}}\left(1+{\frac {k_{1}e^{-k_{2}t}-k_{2}e^{-k_{1}t}}{k_{2}-k_{1}}}\right)+{\ce {[B]0}}\left(1-e^{-k_{2}t}\right)+{\ce {[C]0}}&k_{1}\neq k_{2}\\{\ce {[A]0}}\left(1-e^{-k_{1}t}-k_{1}te^{-k_{1}t}\right)+{\ce {[B]0}}\left(1-e^{-k_{1}t}\right)+{\ce {[C]0}}&{\text{otherwise}}\\\end{cases}}$

The steady state approximation leads to very similar results in an easier way.

Parallel or competitive reactions

Time course of two first order, competitive reactions with differing rate constants.

When a substance reacts simultaneously to give two different products, a parallel or competitive reaction is said to take place.

Two first order reactions

${\ce {A -> B}}$ and ${\ce {A -> C}}$, with constants $k_{1}$ and $k_{2}$ and rate equations $-{\frac {d[{\ce {A}}]}{dt}}=(k_{1}+k_{2})[{\ce {A}}]$  ; ${\frac {d[{{\ce {B}}}]}{dt}}=k_{1}[{{\ce {A}}}]$ and ${\frac {d[{\ce {C}}]}{dt}}=k_{2}[{\ce {A}}]$

The integrated rate equations are then $$

 
   
     
       [
       
         A
       
       ]
       =
       
         
           
             [
             A
             ]
           
           
             0
           
           
             
           
         
       
       
         e
         
           −
           (
           
             k
             
               1
             
           
           +
           
             k
             
               2
             
           
           )
           t
         
       
     
   
   {\displaystyle [{\ce {A}}]={\ce {[A]0}}e^{-(k_{1}+k_{2})t}}
 

; $$

 
   
     
       [
       
         B
       
       ]
       =
       
         
           
             k
             
               1
             
           
           
             
               k
               
                 1
               
             
             +
             
               k
               
                 2
               
             
           
         
       
       
         
           
             [
             A
             ]
           
           
             0
           
           
             
           
         
       
       (
       1
       −
       
         e
         
           −
           (
           
             k
             
               1
             
           
           +
           
             k
             
               2
             
           
           )
           t
         
       
       )
     
   
   {\displaystyle [{\ce {B}}]={\frac {k_{1}}{k_{1}+k_{2}}}{\ce {[A]0}}(1-e^{-(k_{1}+k_{2})t})}
 

and $$

 
   
     
       [
       
         C
       
       ]
       =
       
         
           
             k
             
               2
             
           
           
             
               k
               
                 1
               
             
             +
             
               k
               
                 2
               
             
           
         
       
       
         
           
             [
             A
             ]
           
           
             0
           
           
             
           
         
       
       (
       1
       −
       
         e
         
           −
           (
           
             k
             
               1
             
           
           +
           
             k
             
               2
             
           
           )
           t
         
       
       )
     
   
   {\displaystyle [{\ce {C}}]={\frac {k_{2}}{k_{1}+k_{2}}}{\ce {[A]0}}(1-e^{-(k_{1}+k_{2})t})}
 

.

One important relationship in this case is $$

 
   
     
       
         
           
             
               [
               B
               ]
             
           
           
             
               [
               C
               ]
             
           
         
       
       =
       
         
           
             k
             
               1
             
           
           
             k
             
               2
             
           
         
       
     
   
   {\displaystyle {\frac {{\ce {[B]}}}{{\ce {[C]}}}}={\frac {k_{1}}{k_{2}}}}
 

One first order and one second order reaction

This can be the case when studying a bimolecular reaction and a simultaneous hydrolysis (which can be treated as pseudo order one) takes place: the hydrolysis complicates the study of the reaction kinetics, because some reactant is being "spent" in a parallel reaction. For example, A reacts with R to give our product C, but meanwhile the hydrolysis reaction takes away an amount of A to give B, a byproduct: ${\ce {A + H2O -> B}}$ and ${\ce {A + R -> C}}$. The rate equations are: ${\frac {d[{\ce {B}}]}{dt}}=k_{1}{\ce {[A][H2O]}}=k_{1}'[{\ce {A}}]$ and ${\frac {d[{\ce {C}}]}{dt}}=k_{2}{\ce {[A][R]}}$. Where $k_{1}'$ is the pseudo first order constant.

The integrated rate equation for the main product [C] is $$

 
   
     
       
         
           [
           C
           ]
         
         
           =
         
         
           
             [
             R
             ]
           
           
             0
           
           
             
           
         
       
       
         [
         
           1
           −
           
             e
             
               −
               
                 
                   
                     k
                     
                       2
                     
                   
                   
                     k
                     
                       1
                     
                     ′
                   
                 
               
               
                 
                   
                     [
                     A
                     ]
                   
                   
                     0
                   
                   
                     
                   
                 
               
               (
               1
               −
               
                 e
                 
                   −
                   
                     k
                     
                       1
                     
                     ′
                   
                   t
                 
               
               )
             
           
         
         ]
       
     
   
   {\displaystyle {\ce {[C]=[R]0}}\left[1-e^{-{\frac {k_{2}}{k_{1}'}}{\ce {[A]0}}(1-e^{-k_{1}'t})}\right]}
 

, which is equivalent to $$

 
   
     
       ln
       ⁡
       
         
           
             
               
                 [
                 R
                 ]
               
               
                 0
               
               
                 
               
             
           
           
             
               
                 [
                 R
                 ]
               
               
                 0
               
               
                 
               
             
             
               −
             
             
               [
               C
               ]
             
           
         
       
       =
       
         
           
             
               k
               
                 2
               
             
             
               
                 
                   [
                   A
                   ]
                 
                 
                   0
                 
                 
                   
                 
               
             
           
           
             k
             
               1
             
             ′
           
         
       
       (
       1
       −
       
         e
         
           −
           
             k
             
               1
             
             ′
           
           t
         
       
       )
     
   
   {\displaystyle \ln {\frac {{\ce {[R]0}}}{{\ce {[R]0-[C]}}}}={\frac {k_{2}{\ce {[A]0}}}{k_{1}'}}(1-e^{-k_{1}'t})}
 

. Concentration of B is related to that of C through $$

 
   
     
       [
       
         B
       
       ]
       =
       −
       
         
           
             k
             
               1
             
             ′
           
           
             k
             
               2
             
           
         
       
       l
       n
       
         (
         
           1
           −
           
             
               
                 [
                 C
                 ]
               
               
                 
                   [
                   R
                   ]
                 
                 
                   0
                 
                 
                   
                 
               
             
           
         
         )
       
     
   
   {\displaystyle [{\ce {B}}]=-{\frac {k_{1}'}{k_{2}}}ln\left(1-{\frac {\ce {[C]}}{\ce {[R]0}}}\right)}
 

The integrated equations were analytically obtained but during the process it was assumed that $$

 
   
     
       
         
           
             [
             A
             ]
           
           
             0
           
           
             
           
         
       
       −
       
         
           [
           C
           ]
         
       
       ≈
       
         
           
             [
             A
             ]
           
           
             0
           
           
             
           
         
       
     
   
   {\displaystyle {\ce {[A]0}}-{\ce {[C]}}\approx {\ce {[A]0}}}
 

therefeore, previous equation for [C] can only be used for low concentrations of [C] compared to [A]₀

Stoichiometric reaction networks

The most general description of a chemical reaction network considers a number $N$ of distinct chemical species reacting via $R$ reactions. The chemical equation of the $j$-th reaction can then be written in the generic form

$s_{1j}{\ce {X}}_{1}+s_{2j}{\ce {X}}_{2}\ldots +s_{Nj}{\ce {X}}_{N}{\ce {->[k_{j}]}}\ r_{1j}{\ce {X}}_{1}+\ r_{2j}{\ce {X}}_{2}+\ldots +r_{Nj}{\ce {X}}_{N},$

which is often written in the equivalent form

$\sum _{i=1}^{N}s_{ij}{\ce {X}}_{i}{\ce {->[k_{j}]}}\sum _{i=1}^{N}\ r_{ij}{\ce {X}}_{i}.$

Here

$j$ is the reaction index running from 1 to $R$,

${\ce {X}}_{i}$ denotes the $i$-th chemical species,

$k_{j}$ is the rate constant of the $j$-th reaction and

$s_{ij}$ and $r_{ij}$ are the stoichiometric coefficients of reactants and products, respectively.

The rate of such reaction can be inferred by the law of mass action

$f_{j}([{\vec {\ce {X}}}])=k_{j}\prod _{z=1}^{N}[{\ce {X}}_{z}]^{s_{zj}}$

which denotes the flux of molecules per unit time and unit volume. Here ${\ce {[{\vec {X}}]=([X1],[X2],...,[X_{\mathit {N}}])}}$ is the vector of concentrations. Note that this definition includes the elementary reactions:

• zero order reactions

for which $s_{zj}=0$ for all $z$,

• first order reactions

for which $s_{zj}=1$ for a single $z$,

• second order reactions

for which $s_{zj}=1$ for exactly two $z$, i.e., a bimolecular reaction, or $s_{zj}=2$ for a single $z$, i.e., a dimerization reaction.

Each of which are discussed in detail below. One can define the stoichiometric matrix

$S_{ij}=r_{ij}-s_{ij},$

denoting the net extent of molecules of $i$ in reaction $j$. The reaction rate equations can then be written in the general form

${\frac {d[{\ce {X}}_{i}]}{dt}}=\sum _{j=1}^{R}S_{ij}f_{j}([{\vec {\ce {X}}}]).$

Note that this is the product of the stoichiometric matrix and the vector of reaction rate functions. Particular simple solutions exist in equilibrium, ${\frac {d[{\ce {X}}_{i}]}{dt}}=0$, for systems composed of merely reversible reactions. In this case the rate of the forward and backward reactions are equal, a principle called detailed balance. Note that detailed balance is a property of the stoichiometric matrix $S_{ij}$ alone and does not depend on the particular form of the rate functions $f_{j}$. All other cases where detailed balance is violated are commonly studied by flux balance analysis which has been developed to understand metabolic pathways.

General dynamics of unimolecular conversion

For a general unimolecular reaction involving interconversion of $N$ different species, whose concentrations at time $t$ are denoted by $X_{1}(t)$ through $X_{N}(t)$, an analytic form for the time-evolution of the species can be found. Let the rate constant of conversion from species $X_{i}$ to species $X_{j}$ be denoted as $k_{ij}$, and construct a rate-constant matrix $K$ whose entries are the $k_{ij}$.

Also, let $$

 
   
     
       X
       (
       t
       )
       =
       (
       
         X
         
           1
         
       
       (
       t
       )
       ,
       
         X
         
           2
         
       
       (
       t
       )
       ,
       .
       .
       .
       ,
       
         X
         
           N
         
       
       (
       t
       )
       
         )
         
           T
         
       
     
   
   {\displaystyle X(t)=(X_{1}(t),X_{2}(t),...,X_{N}(t))^{T}}
 

be the vector of concentrations as a function of time.

Let $$

 
   
     
       J
       =
       (
       1
       ,
       1
       ,
       1
       ,
       .
       .
       .
       ,
       1
       
         )
         
           T
         
       
     
   
   {\displaystyle J=(1,1,1,...,1)^{T}}
 

be the vector of ones.

Let $$

 
   
     
       I
     
   
   {\displaystyle I}
 

be the $$

 
   
     
       N
     
   
   {\displaystyle N}
 

×$$

 
   
     
       N
     
   
   {\displaystyle N}
 

identity matrix.

Let $$

 
   
     
       D
       i
       a
       g
     
   
   {\displaystyle Diag}
 

be the function that takes a vector and constructs a diagonal matrix whose on-diagonal entries are those of the vector.

Let $$

 
   
     
       
         
           
             
               L
             
           
           
             −
             1
           
         
       
     
   
   {\displaystyle \displaystyle {\mathcal {L}}^{-1}}
 

be the inverse Laplace transform from $$

 
   
     
       s
     
   
   {\displaystyle s}
 

to $$

 
   
     
       t
     
   
   {\displaystyle t}
 

.

Then the time-evolved state $$

 
   
     
       X
       (
       t
       )
     
   
   {\displaystyle X(t)}
 

is given by

$X(t)=\displaystyle {\mathcal {L}}^{-1}[(sI+Diag(KJ)-K^{T})^{-1}X(0)]$,

thus providing the relation between the initial conditions of the system and its state at time $t$.

See also

• Michaelis–Menten kinetics
• Molecularity
• Petersen matrix
• Reaction-diffusion equation
• Reactions on surfaces: rate equations for reactions where at least one of the reactants adsorbs onto a surface
• Reaction progress kinetic analysis
• Reaction rate
• Reaction rate constant
• Steady state approximation

References

Books cited

• Atkins, Peter; de Paula, Julio (2006). "The rates of chemical reactions". Atkins' Physical chemistry (8th ed.). W.H. Freeman. pp. 791–823. ISBN 0-7167-8759-8.
• Connors, Kenneth Antonio (1990). Chemical kinetics : the study of reaction rates in solution. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 9781560810063.
• Espenson, James H. (1987). Chemical kinetics and reaction mechanisms (2nd ed.). McGraw Hill. ISBN 9780071139496.
• Laidler, Keith James (1987). Chemical kinetics (3rd ed.). Harper & Row. ISBN 9780060438623.
• Tinoco Jr., Ignacio; Wang, James C. (1995). Physical chemistry : principles and applications in biological sciences (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall. ISBN 9780131865457.

External links

• Chemical kinetics, reaction rate, and order (needs flash player)
• Reaction kinetics, examples of important rate laws (lecture with audio).
• Rates of Reaction

UpToDate Contents

全文を閲覧するには購読必要です。 To read the full text you will need to subscribe.

• 1. 慢性偽性腸閉塞chronic intestinal pseudo obstruction [show details]
  … of an extrapyramidal reaction to this agent should be elicited prior to beginning therapy. There is no evidence that metoclopramide is effective in the long-term treatment of pseudo-obstruction . Patients …
• 2. T細胞性皮膚偽リンパ腫cutaneous t cell pseudolymphomas [show details]
  …early-stage mycosis fungoides ; CD30⁺ lymphomatoid drug reaction ; Drug reaction with the histologic features of a pseudo-B-cell lymphoma (uncommon) Lymphomatoid drug eruptions, including most cases …
• 3. 急性輸血反応が疑われる患者に対するアプローチapproach to the patient with a suspected acute transfusion reaction [show details]
  … possible to minimize the impact of the reaction. This topic describes our approach to determining the nature of a suspected acute reaction (ie, the type of reaction and likely causes) following transfusion …
• 4. 複数の分子を標的にするチロシンキナーゼ阻害薬により発現する手足皮膚反応hand foot skin reaction induced by multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors [show details]
  …after two weeks of treatment. If the reaction has not improved or has worsened, patients are treated in the same way as those with grade 3 rash . For grade 2 reaction that does not respond to treatment …
• 5. 造影剤投与後の急性反応の診断と治療diagnosis and treatment of an acute reaction to a radiologic contrast agent [show details]
  … previous severe reaction to the same type of contrast agent . Patients with a history of an allergic-like reaction to an iodinated contrast agent are not at increased risk for a reaction to a gadolinium-based …

English Journal

• Corrosion of carbon steel and the passivating properties of corrosion films formed under high-PT geothermal conditions.

• Mundhenk N, Knauss KG, Bandaru SRS, Wonneberger R, Devine TM.
• The Science of the total environment. 2019 Aug;677()307-314.
• Corrosion is a major obstacle to a safe implementation of geotechnical applications. Using a novel approach that includes vertical scanning interferometry (VSI) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) we discuss time-dependent carbon steel corrosion and film formation at geothermally releva
• PMID 31059874

• Electro-oxidation of amoxicillin trihydrate in continuous reactor by Ti/RuO anode.

• Kaur R, Kushwaha JP, Singh N.
• The Science of the total environment. 2019 Aug;677()84-97.
• Electro-oxidation (EO) of synthetic wastewater containing amoxicillin (AMT) antibiotic as a model pollutant was performed using dimensionally stable Ti/RuO electrodes in a continuous reactor set-up. Response surface methodology (RSM) was used for optimization of continuous EO process. Individual and
• PMID 31051385

• Photocatalytic Properties of Plasma-Synthesized Aluminum-Doped Zinc Oxide Nanopowder.

• Murali A, Sohn HY.
• Journal of nanoscience and nanotechnology. 2019 Aug;19(8)4377-4386.
• Nano-sized aluminum-doped zinc oxide (AZO) powder was synthesized by a dc thermal plasma process using aluminum nitrate and zinc nitrate as the precursors. The injected precursors were vaporized in the plasma flame followed by vapor-phase reaction and subsequent quenching of the vaporized precursors
• PMID 30913728

Japanese Journal

• 屈折率調整したTiO2坦持ビーズを用いた光触媒リアクターの開発に関する基礎的研究

• 醍醐 一貴,明賀 新,海野 徳幸,結城 和久,谷口 淳,関 洋治,佐竹 信一
• 熱工学コンファレンス講演論文集 2018(0), 0173, 2018
• … As a result, when changing the flow rate per reactor from 0.0125 L / min to 0.42 L / min, the pseudo first order reaction constant increased by 1.67 times. … Also, the Reynolds number in the reactor was calculated and the relation with the pseudo first order reaction constant was examined.</p> …
• NAID 130007637736

• Photocatalytic degradation of Linuron in aqueous solution with nanosized TiO₂ under sunlight irradiation

• Morisawa Satoshi,Fukusawa Mai,Tateishi Ikki,Katsumata Hideyuki,Kaneco Satoshi,Masuyama Kazuaki
• 科学・技術研究 7(2), 119-122, 2018
• … It was found that the primary photocatalytic decomposition reaction follows a pseudo-first order kinetic law. … During the photocatalytic degradation, the first-order rate constant k was 0.12 min-1. …
• NAID 130007599061

• Extraction and Esterification of Succinic Acid Using Aqueous Two-phase Systems Composed of Ethanol and Salts

• MATSUMOTO Michiaki,TATSUMI Masahiro
• Solvent Extraction Research and Development, Japan 25(2), 101-107, 2018
• … In a model experiment in the absence of water, succinic acid was successfully esterified with ethanol and the kinetics obeyed a pseudo-first-order consecutive reaction. … It was found that the water content was a key parameter in the esterification reaction.</p> …
• NAID 130006733830

Related Links

• Pseudo First Order Reaction: Order of reaction, Examples ...

Sometimes adults 'fake' being younger when they're actually way older. Isn't it? Did you know we can 'fake' in chemistry as well? Yes, a reaction whose order of reaction is actually more than one can 'fake' being a first order reaction.

• Pseudo-1st-order reactions - Chemistry LibreTexts

Half-Life in a Pseudo-1st Order reaction Half-life refers to the time required to decrease the concentration of a reactant by half, so we must solve for t. Here, \([B]\) will be the reactant in excess, and its concentration will stay ...

• Pseudo First Order Reaction with Examples - Chemical Kinetics

Learn about the concept of pseudo first order reaction, its examples, rate equation | pseudo first order reaction kinetics along with applications and more. ... In this section, we will learn about the pseudo first order of reaction and their ...

---

★リンクテーブル★

リンク元	「擬一次反応」
関連記事	「order」「pseudo」「reaction」「first」

「擬一次反応」

　　[★]

英

pseudo first order reaction

同

pseudo-first-order反応

酢酸エチルエステルの加水分解(CH3COOC2H5 + H2O →CH3COOH + C2H5OH)はふつう二次反応であるが、H2Oは反応系では過剰量存在するため、実質的に一次反応として近似できるような反応をいう。

「order」

　　[★]

• n.

• (生物)目

• of the order of ～: ほぼ～程度の

Body stores are of the order of 2-4mg, sufficient for 3-4 years if supplies are completely cut off.

　 　 　 　 　 　 　 　 　 　 　 　 　 　 　 　

「pseudo」

　　[★]

• n.

• 仮性、偽性、ニセ

関

counterfeit、false、mock、sham、spurious

　 　

「reaction」

　　[★]

• 反応

関

react、respond、response、responsive

　 　 　 　 　 　 　

「first」

　　[★]