Passive immunity is the transfer of active humoral immunity in the form of ready-made antibodies. Passive immunity can occur naturally, when maternal antibodies are transferred to the fetus through the placenta, and it can also be induced artificially, when high levels of antibodies specific to a pathogen or toxin (obtained from humans, horses, or other animals) are transferred to non-immune persons through blood products that contain antibodies, such as in immunoglobulin therapy or antiserum therapy.[1] Passive immunization is used when there is a high risk of infection and insufficient time for the body to develop its own immune response, or to reduce the symptoms of ongoing or immunosuppressive diseases.[2] Passive immunization can be provided when people cannot synthesize antibodies, and when they have been exposed to a disease that they do have immunity against.[3]
Contents
- 1 Naturally acquired passive immunity
- 2 Artificially acquired passive immunity
- 2.1 History and applications of artificial passive immunity
- 2.2 FDA licensed immunoglobulins
- 3 Passive transfer of cell-mediated immunity
- 4 Advantages and disadvantages of passive immunity
- 5 See also
- 6 References
Naturally acquired passive immunity
Maternal passive immunity is a type of naturally acquired passive immunity, and refers to antibody-mediated immunity conveyed to a fetus by its mother during pregnancy. Naturally acquired passive immunity can be provided during pregnancy, and through breast-feeding.[4] Maternal antibodies (MatAb) are passed through the placenta to the fetus by an FcRn receptor on placental cells. This occurs around the third month of gestation or pregnancy.[5] Immunoglobulin G (IgG) is the only antibody isotype that can pass through the placenta, and is the most common antibody of the five types of antibodies found in the body. IgG antibodies protects against bacterial and viral infections in fetuses.[5][6] Immunization is often required shortly following birth to prevent diseases in newborns such as tuberculosis, hepatitis B, polio, and pertussis, however, maternal antibodies can inhibit the induction of protective vaccine responses throughout the first year of life. This effect is usually overcome by secondary responses to booster immunization.[7]
Passive immunity is also provided through colostrum, and the transfer of IgA antibodies found in breast milk that are transferred to the gut of the infant, protecting against bacterial infections, until the newborn can synthesize its own antibodies.[8] Maternal antibodies protect against some diseases more than others such as measles, rubella, and tetanus compared to the protection provided against polio, and pertussis.[9] Maternal passive immunity offers immediate protection, though only lasting four to six months after birth.[10]
Artificially acquired passive immunity
See also: Temporarily induced immunity
Artificially acquired passive immunity is a short-term immunization achieved by the transfer of antibodies, which can be administered in several forms; as human or animal blood plasma or serum, as pooled human immunoglobulin for intravenous (IVIG) or intramuscular (IG) use, as high-titer human IVIG or IG from immunized donors or from donors recovering from the disease, and as monoclonal antibodies (MAb). Passive transfer is used to prevent disease or used prophylactically in the case of immunodeficiency diseases, such as hypogammaglobulinemia.[11][12] It is also used in the treatment of several types of acute infection, and to treat poisoning.[2] Immunity derived from passive immunization lasts for a few weeks to three to four months.[13][14] There is also a potential risk for hypersensitivity reactions, and serum sickness, especially from gamma globulin of non-human origin.[8] Passive immunity provides immediate protection, but the body does not develop memory, therefore the patient is at risk of being infected by the same pathogen later unless they acquire active immunity or vaccination.[8]
History and applications of artificial passive immunity
A vial of diphtheria antitoxin, dated 1895
In 1888 Emile Roux and Alexandre Yersin showed that the clinical effects of diphtheria were caused by diphtheria toxin and, following the 1890 discovery of an antitoxin-based immunity to diphtheria and tetanus by Emil Adolf von Behring and Kitasato Shibasaburō, antitoxin became the first major success of modern therapeutic immunology.[15][16] Shibasaburo and von Behring immunized guinea pigs with the blood products from animals that had recovered from diphtheria and realized that the same process of heat treating blood products of other animals could treat humans with diphtheria.[17] By 1896, the introduction of diphtheria antitoxin was hailed as "the most important advance of the [19th] Century in the medical treatment of acute infective disease".[18]
Prior to the advent of vaccines and antibiotics, specific antitoxin was often the only treatment available for infections such as diphtheria and tetanus. Immunoglobulin therapy continued to be a first line therapy in the treatment of severe respiratory diseases until the 1930s, even after sulfonamides were introduced.[12]
This image is from the Historical Medical Library of The College of Physicians of Philadelphia. This displays the administration of diphtheria antitoxin from horse serum to young child, dated 1895.
In 1890 antibody therapy was used to treat tetanus, when serum from immunized horses was injected into patients with severe tetanus in an attempt to neutralize the tetanus toxin, and prevent the dissemination of the disease. Since the 1960s, human tetanus immune globulin (TIG) has been used in the United States in unimmunized, vaccine-naive or incompletely immunized patients who have sustained wounds consistent with the development of tetanus.[12] The administration of horse antitoxin remains the only specific pharmacologic treatment available for botulism.[19] Antitoxin also known as heterologous hyperimmune serum is often also given prophylactically to individuals known to have ingested contaminated food.[20] IVIG treatment was also used successfully to treat several victims of toxic shock syndrome, during the 1970s tampon scare.
Antibody therapy is also used to treat viral infections. In 1945, hepatitis A infections, epidemic in summer camps, were successfully prevented by immunoglobulin treatment. Similarly, hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) effectively prevents hepatitis B infection. Antibody prophylaxis of both hepatitis A and B has largely been supplanted by the introduction of vaccines; however, it is still indicated following exposure and prior to travel to areas of endemic infection.[21]
In 1953, human vaccinia immunoglobulin (VIG) was used to prevent the spread of smallpox during an outbreak in Madras, India, and continues to be used to treat complications arising from smallpox vaccination. Although the prevention of measles is typically induced through vaccination, it is often treated immuno-prophylactically upon exposure. Prevention of rabies infection still requires the use of both vaccine and immunoglobulin treatments.[12]
During a 1995 Ebola virus outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo, whole blood from recovering patients, and containing anti-Ebola antibodies, was used to treat eight patients, as there was no effective means of prevention, though a treatment was discovered recently in the 2013 Ebola epidemic in Africa. Only one of the eight infected patients died, compared to a typical 80% Ebola mortality, which suggested that antibody treatment may contribute to survival.[22] Immune globulin or immunoglobulin has been used to both prevent and treat reactivation of the herpes simplex virus (HSV), varicella zoster virus, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), and cytomegalovirus (CMV).[12]
FDA licensed immunoglobulins
The following immunoglobulins are the immunoglubulins currently approved for use for infectious disease prophylaxis and immunotherapy, in the United States.[23]
FDA approved products for passive immunization and immunotherapy
| Disease |
Product |
Source |
Use |
| Botulism |
Specific equine IgG |
horse |
Treatment of wound and food borne forms of botulism, infant
botulism is treated with human botulism immune globulin (BabyBIG). |
| Cytomegalovirus (CMV) |
hyper-immune IVIG |
human |
Prophylaxis, used most often in kidney transplant patients. |
| Diphtheria |
Specific equine IgG |
horse |
Treatment of diphtheria infection. |
| Hepatitis A, measles |
Pooled human Ig |
human serum |
Prevention of Hepatitis A and measles infection,
treatment of congenital or acquired immunodeficiency. |
| Hepatitis B |
Hepatitis B Ig |
human |
Post-exposure prophylaxis, prevention in high-risk infants
(administered with Hepatitis B vaccine). |
ITP, Kawasaki disease,
IgG deficiency |
Pooled human IgG |
human serum |
Treatment of ITP and Kawasaki disease,
prevention/treatment of opportunistic infection with IgG deficiency. |
| Rabies |
Rabies Ig |
human |
Post-exposure prophylaxis (administered with rabies vaccine). |
| Tetanus |
Tetanus Ig |
human |
Treatment of tetanus infection. |
| Vaccinia |
Vaccinia Ig |
human |
Treatment of progressive vaccinia infection
including eczema and ocular forms (usually resulting from
smallpox vaccination in immunocompromised individuals). |
| Varicella (chicken-pox) |
Varicella-zoster Ig |
human |
Post-exposure prophylaxis in high risk individuals. |
Passive transfer of cell-mediated immunity
The one exception to passive humoral immunity is the passive transfer of cell-mediated immunity, also called adoptive immunization which involves the transfer of mature circulating lymphocytes. It is rarely used in humans, and requires histocompatible (matched) donors, which are often difficult to find, and carries severe risks of graft-versus-host disease.[2] This technique has been used in humans to treat certain diseases including some types of cancer and immunodeficiency. However, this specialized form of passive immunity is most often used in a laboratory setting in the field of immunology, to transfer immunity between "congenic", or deliberately inbred mouse strains which are histocompatible.
Advantages and disadvantages of passive immunity
An individual's immune response of passive immunity is "faster than a vaccine" and can instill immunity in an individual that does not "respond to immunization", often within hours or a few days. Another advantage to passive immunity is that maternal antibodies that are passed to the newborn during nursing boosts the newborn's immune system having lasting effects on the baby's health such as decreased risk of obesity.[17][24]
A disadvantage to passive immunity is that producing antibodies in a laboratory is expensive and difficult to do. In order to produce antibodies for infectious diseases, there is a need for possibly thousands of human donors to donate blood or immune animals' blood would be obtained for the antibodies. Patients who are immunized with the antibodies from animals may develop serum sickness due to the proteins from the immune animal and develop serious allergic reactions.[25] Antibody treatments can be time consuming and are given through an intravenous injection or IV, while a vaccine shot or jab is less time consuming and has less risk of complication than an antibody treatment. Passive immunity is effective, but ephemeral (lasting a short amount of time).[17]
See also
- Immunity (medical)
- Active immunity
References
- ^ "Vaccines: Vac-Gen/Immunity Types". www.cdc.gov. Retrieved 2015-11-20.
- ^ a b c Microbiology and Immunology On-Line Textbook: USC School of Medicine
- ^ "Passive Immunization - Infectious Diseases". Merck Manuals Professional Edition. Retrieved 2015-11-12.
- ^ Kalenik, Barbara; Sawicka, Róża; Góra-Sochacka, Anna; Sirko, Agnieszka (2014-01-01). "Influenza prevention and treatment by passive immunization". Acta Biochimica Polonica 61 (3): 573–587. ISSN 1734-154X. PMID 25210721.
- ^ a b Coico, R., Sunshine, G., and Benjamin, E. (2003). "Immunology: A Short Course." Pg. 48.
- ^ "Immunoglobulins". WebMD. Retrieved 2015-11-20.
- ^ Lambert, Paul-Henri, Margaret Liu and Claire-Anne Siegrist Can successful vaccines teach us how to induce efficient protective immune responses? (Full text-html) Nature Medicine 11, S54 - S62 (2005).
- ^ a b c Janeway, Charles; Paul Travers; Mark Walport; Mark Shlomchik (2001). Immunobiology; Fifth Edition. New York and London: Garland Science. ISBN 0-8153-4101-6. .
- ^ "Centers for Disease Control and Prevention" (PDF).
- ^ "Natural Passive Immunity - Boundless Open Textbook". Boundless. Retrieved 2015-11-12.
- ^ "prophylactically".
- ^ a b c d e Keller, Margaret A. and E. Richard Stiehm Passive Immunity in Prevention and Treatment of Infectious Diseases Clinical Microbiology Reviews, October 2000, p. 602-614, Vol. 13, No. 4
- ^ Immunity Types from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Page last updated: May 19, 2014
- ^ Baxter, David (2007-12-01). "Active and passive immunity, vaccine types, excipients and licensing". Occupational Medicine 57 (8): 552–556. doi:10.1093/occmed/kqm110. ISSN 0962-7480. PMID 18045976.
- ^ Dolman, C.E. (1973). "Landmarks and pioneers in the control of diphtheria.". Can. J. Public Health 64: 317–36.
- ^ Silverstein, Arthur M. (1989) History of Immunology (Hardcover) Academic Press. Note: The first six pages of this text are available online at: (Amazon.com easy reader)
- ^ a b c "Passive Immunization — History of Vaccines". www.historyofvaccines.org. Retrieved 2015-11-20.
- ^ (Report) (1896). "Report of the Lancet Special Commission on the relative strengths of diphtheria antitoxic serums". Lancet 148 (3803): 182–95. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(01)72399-9.
- ^ Shapiro, Roger L. MD; Charles Hatheway, PhD; and David L. Swerdlow, MD Botulism in the United States: A Clinical and Epidemiologic Review Annals of Internal Medicine. 1 August 1998 Volume 129 Issue 3 Pages 221-228
- ^ "Centers of Disease Control and Prevention" (PDF).
- ^ Casadevall, A., and M. D. Scharff. 1995. Return to the past: the case for antibody-based therapies in infectious diseases. Clin. Infect. Dis. 21:150-161
- ^ Mupapa, K., M. Massamba, K. Kibadi, K. Kivula, A. Bwaka, M. Kipasa, R. Colebunders, and J. J. Muyembe-Tamfum on behalf of the International Scientific and Technical Committee. 1999. Treatment of Ebola hemorrhagic fever with blood transfusions from convalescent patients. J. Infect. Dis. 179(Suppl.):S18-S23
- ^ Samuel Baron MD (1996) Table 8-2. U.S. Licensed Immunoglobulin For Passive Immunization Medical Microbiology Fourth Edition The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
- ^ "Breastfeeding Overview". WebMD. Retrieved 2015-11-20.
- ^ "Centers for Disease Control and Prevention" (PDF).
|
Immunology: lymphocytic adaptive immune system and complement
|
|
| Lymphoid |
| Antigens |
- Antigen presentation/Professional APCs: Dendritic cell
- Macrophage
- B cell
- Immunogen
|
|
| Antibodies |
- Antibody
- Monoclonal antibodies
- Polyclonal antibodies
- Autoantibody
- Microantibody
- Polyclonal B cell response
- Allotype
- Isotype
- Idiotype
|
|
Immunity vs.
tolerance |
- action: Immunity
- Autoimmunity
- Alloimmunity
- Allergy
- Hypersensitivity
- Inflammation
- Cross-reactivity
- inaction: Tolerance
- Central
- Peripheral
- Clonal anergy
- Clonal deletion
- Tolerance in pregnancy
- Immunodeficiency
|
|
| Immunogenetics |
- Affinity maturation (Somatic hypermutation
- Clonal selection)
- V(D)J recombination
- Junctional diversity
- Immunoglobulin class switching
- MHC/HLA
|
|
|
| Lymphocytes |
- Cellular (T cell)
- Humoral (B cell)
- NK cell
|
|
| Substances |
- Cytokines
- Opsonin
- Cytolysin
|
|
