出典(authority):フリー百科事典『ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』「2015/07/01 13:21:35」(JST)
この項目では、近代社会における職業について説明しています。日本の近代以前の政治家については「能吏」をご覧ください。 |
この記事には複数の問題があります。改善やノートページでの議論にご協力ください。
|
政治家(せいじか)とは、職業として政治に携わっている者のことである[要出典]。
政治家とは、古代の君主、領主、閣僚、議員のほか、古代におけるあらゆる政体、地位、勢力、信任あるいは戦争による勝利に基づき権力を掌握した人々、または執政にあたった人々を指す。
近代以降の代表民主政治のもとでの政治家は、なんらかの「代表」である、ということによって正当性を賦与されている。
マックス・ヴェーバーは、「政治家の本領は『党派性』と『闘争』である」と指摘している。
ヴェーバーは、『職業としての政治[1]』政治家にクオリティ(Qualitäten)として次の三つを挙げている[2][3][4]。
中華人民共和国の建国者となった毛沢東は「政治家が大衆に接するときに生じやすい有害な不作為」を1937年発表の論文のなかで触れ、次のように例示している[5]。
この節は全て独自研究に基づいて記述されています。検証と出典の追加を行って、記事の改善にご協力ください。(2014年11月) |
この節に書かれている記述は全て出典の明記がなされていません。出典の追加を行い、記事の改善にご協力ください。(2014年11月) |
ウィキメディア・コモンズには、政治家に関連するカテゴリがあります。 |
This article may require copy editing for grammar, style, cohesion, tone, or spelling. You can assist by editing it. (June 2015) |
Part of a series on |
Politics |
---|
Primary topics
|
Political systems
|
Academic disciplines
|
Public administration
|
Policy
|
Organs of government
|
Related topics
|
Subseries
|
Politics portal |
|
A politician, political leader, or political figure (from Classical Greek πόλις, "polis") is a person who is involved in influencing public policy and decision making. This includes people who hold decision-making positions in government, and people who seek those positions, whether by means of election, inheritance, coup d'état, appointment, conquest, or other means. They create or propose laws and policies. Politics is not limited to governance through public office. Political offices may also be held in corporations. In civil uprisings, politicians may be called freedom fighters. In media campaigns, politicians are often referred to as activists.
People who are politically active, especially in party politics. A person holding or seeking political office whether elected or appointed, whether professionally or otherwise. Positions range from local offices to executive, legislative and judicial offices of state and national governments.[1][2] Some law enforcement officers, such as sheriffs, are considered politicians.[3][4]
Public choice theory involves the use of modern economic tools to study problems that are traditionally in the province of political science. (A more general term is "political economy", an earlier name for "economics" that evokes its practical and theoretical origins, but it should not be mistaken for the Marxian use of the same term.)
In particular, it studies the behavior of voters, politicians, and government officials as (mostly) self-interested agents and their interactions in the social system either as such or under alternative constitutional rules. These can be represented a number of ways, including standard constrained utility maximization, game theory, or decision theory. Public choice analysis has roots in positive analysis ("what is"), but is often used for normative purposes ("what ought to be"), to identify a problem or suggest how a system could be improved by changes in constitutional rules.[5] A key formulation of public choice theory is in terms of rational choice, the agent-based proportioning of scarce means to given ends. An overlapping formulation with a different focus is positive political theory. Another related field is social choice theory.
There are also Austrian variants of public choice theory (suggested by Mises,[6] Hayek, Kirzner, Lopez, and Boettke) in which it is assumed that bureaucrats and politicians are benevolent, but have access to limited information.
There have been some publishers who criticised politicians for being out of touch with the public. Areas of friction include the manner in which politicians speak, which have been described as too formal with too many euphemistic and metaphorical expressions, and is commonly perceived as an attempt to "obscure, mislead, and confuse".[7]
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Politicians. |
|
.