fraud

• 詐欺

関

deception、scam

　 　 　

WordNet

1. something intended to deceive; deliberate trickery intended to gain an advantage (同)fraudulence, dupery, hoax, humbug, put-on
2. intentional deception resulting in injury to another person
3. the act of deceiving (同)deceit, dissembling, dissimulation
4. a fraudulent business scheme (同)cozenage
5. fraud (as by use of forged documents or false claims or perjury) that misleads a court or jury and induces a finding for the one perpetrating the fraud
6. fraud that is presumed from the circumstances although the one who commits it need not have had any evil intent
7. use of the mails to defraud someone

PrepTutorEJDIC

1. 〈T〉詐欺,ごまかし, / 〈C〉詐欺行為,不正手段, / 〈C〉にせ物,まやかし物 / 〈C〉ぺてん師,くわせ者
2. 〈U〉だますこと,だまされること / 〈C〉策略,たくらみ
3. 悪だくみ,ぺてん / …‘を'だまし取る
4. (…を)〈人〉‘から'だまし取る,詐取する《+『名』〈人〉+『of』+『名』》
5. 詐欺の,いかさまの

Wikipedia preview

出典(authority):フリー百科事典『ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』「2017/07/09 04:12:48」(JST)

wiki en

[Wiki en表示]

Criminal law
Elements
Actus reus Mens rea Causation Concurrence
Scope of criminal liability
Complicity Corporate Vicarious
Severity of offense
Felony Infraction (also called Violation) Misdemeanor
Inchoate offenses
Attempt Conspiracy Incitement Solicitation
Offence against the person
Assassination Assault Battery Bigamy Criminal negligence False imprisonment Home invasion Homicide Kidnapping Manslaughter (corporate) Mayhem Murder corporate Negligent homicide Public indecency Rape Robbery Sexual assault
Crimes against property
Arson Blackmail Bribery Burglary Embezzlement Extortion False pretenses Fraud Larceny Payola Pickpocketing Possessing stolen property Robbery Smuggling Tax evasion Theft
Crimes against justice
Compounding Malfeasance in office Miscarriage of justice Misprision Obstruction Perjury Perverting the course of justice
Victimless crimes
Adultery Apostasy Blasphemy Buggery Providing contraception information (Comstock law) Dueling Fornication Gambling Incest Lewd and lascivious behavior Masturbation Creation of obscenity Prostitution Recreational drug use (including alcohol, when prohibited) Sale of sex toys Simulated child pornography Sodomy Suicide
Crimes against animals
Cruelty to animals Wildlife smuggling Bestiality
Defences to liability
Automatism Consent Defence of property Diminished responsibility Duress Entrapment Ignorantia juris non excusat Infancy Insanity Justification Mistake (of law) Necessity Provocation Self-defence
Other common-law areas
Contracts Evidence Property Torts Wills, trusts and estates
Portals
Criminal justice Law

Part of the common law series
Tort law
Intentional torts
Assault Battery False imprisonment Intentional infliction of emotional distress Transferred intent
Property torts
Trespass land chattels Conversion Detinue Replevin Trover
Defenses
Assumption of risk Comparative negligence Contributory negligence Consent Necessity Statute of limitations Self-defense Defense of others Defense of property Shopkeeper's privilege
Negligence
Duty of / standard of care Proximate cause Res ipsa loquitur Calculus of negligence Rescue doctrine Duty to rescue Negligent infliction of emotional distress Employment-related Entrustment Malpractice legal medical
Liability torts
Product liability Quasi-tort Ultrahazardous activity
Nuisance
Public nuisance Rylands v Fletcher
Dignitary torts
Defamation Invasion of privacy False light Breach of confidence Abuse of process Malicious prosecution Alienation of affections Criminal conversation Seduction Breach of promise
Economic torts
Fraud Tortious interference Conspiracy Restraint of trade
Liability and remedies
Last clear chance Eggshell skull Vicarious liability Volenti non fit injuria Ex turpi causa non oritur actio Neutral reportage Damages Injunction Torts and conflict of laws Joint and several liability Comparative responsibility Market share liability
Duty to visitors
Trespassers Licensees Invitees Attractive nuisance
Other common law areas
Contracts Criminal law Evidence Property Wills, trusts, and estates
Law portal

In law, fraud is deliberate deception to secure unfair or unlawful gain, or to deprive a victim of a legal right. Fraud itself can be a civil wrong (i.e., a fraud victim may sue the fraud perpetrator to avoid the fraud or recover monetary compensation), a criminal wrong (i.e., a fraud perpetrator may be prosecuted and imprisoned by governmental authorities) or it may cause no loss of money, property or legal right but still be an element of another civil or criminal wrong. The purpose of fraud may be monetary gain or other benefits, such as obtaining a driver's license or qualifying for a mortgage by way of false statements.

A hoax is a distinct concept that involves deliberate deception without the intention of gain or of materially damaging or depriving a victim.

As a civil wrong

In common law jurisdictions, as a civil wrong, fraud is a tort. While the precise definitions and requirements of proof vary among jurisdictions, the requisite elements of fraud as a tort generally are the intentional misrepresentation or concealment of an important fact upon which the victim is meant to rely, and in fact does rely, to the harm of the victim. Proving fraud in a court of law is often said to be difficult. That difficulty is found, for instance, in that each and every one of the elements of fraud must be proven, that the elements include proving the states of mind of the perpetrator and the victim, and that some jurisdictions require the victim to prove fraud by clear and convincing evidence.

The remedies for fraud may include rescission (i.e., reversal) of a fraudulently obtained agreement or transaction, the recovery of a monetary award to compensate for the harm caused, punitive damages to punish or deter the misconduct, and possibly others.

In cases of a fraudulently induced contract, fraud may serve as a defense in a civil action for breach of contract or specific performance of contract.

Fraud may serve as a basis for a court to invoke its equitable jurisdiction.

As a criminal offence

In common law jurisdictions, as a criminal offence, fraud takes many different forms, some general (e.g., theft by false pretense) and some specific to particular categories of victims or misconduct (e.g., bank fraud, insurance fraud, forgery). The elements of fraud as a crime similarly vary. The requisite elements of perhaps most general form of criminal fraud, theft by false pretense, are the intentional deception of a victim by false representation or pretense with the intent of persuading the victim to part with property and with the victim parting with property in reliance on the representation or pretense and with the perpetrator intending to keep the property from the victim.

By region

Canada

Section 380(1) of the Criminal Code provides the general definition for fraud in Canada:

380. (1) Every one who, by deceit, falsehood or other fraudulent means, whether or not it is a false pretence within the meaning of this Act, defrauds the public or any person, whether ascertained or not, of any property, money or valuable security or any service,

(a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to a term of imprisonment not exceeding fourteen years, where the subject-matter of the offence is a testamentary instrument or the value of the subject-matter of the offence exceeds five thousand dollars; or

(b) is guilty

(i) of an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years, or

(ii) of an offence punishable on summary conviction,

where the value of the subject-matter of the offence does not exceed five thousand dollars.

In addition to the penalties outlined above, the court can also issue a prohibition order under s. 380.2 (preventing a person from "seeking, obtaining or continuing any employment, or becoming or being a volunteer in any capacity, that involves having authority over the real property, money or valuable security of another person"). It can also make a restitution order under s. 380.3.

The Canadian courts have held that the offence consists of two distinct elements:

• A prohibited act of deceit, falsehood or other fraudulent means. In the absence of deceit or falsehood, the courts will look objectively for a "dishonest act"; and
• The deprivation must be caused by the prohibited act, and deprivation must relate to property, money, valuable security, or any service.

The Supreme Court of Canada has held that deprivation is satisfied on proof of detriment, prejudice or risk of prejudice; it is not essential that there be actual loss. Deprivation of confidential information, in the nature of a trade secret or copyrighted material that has commercial value, has also been held to fall within the scope of the offence.

United Kingdom

England, Wales, and Northern Ireland

The BBC World Service reported in 2012 that the estimated value lost through fraud in the UK was £66 billion ($100 billion) a year.

According to a review by the UK anti-fraud charity Fraud Advisory Panel (FAP) business fraud accounted for £144bn, while fraud against individuals was estimated at £9.7bn. The FAP has been particularly critical of the support available from the police to victims of fraud in the UK outside of London. Although victims of fraud are generally referred to the UK's national fraud and cyber crime reporting centre, Action Fraud, the FAP found that there was "little chance" that these crime reports would be followed up with any kind of substantive law enforcement action by UK authorities, according to the report.

In July 2016 it was reported that fraudulent activity levels in the UK increased in the 10 years to 2016 from £52 billion to £193bn. This figure would be a conservative estimate, since as the former commissioner of the City of London Police, Adrian Leppard, has said, only 1 in 12 such crimes are actually reported. Donald Toon, director of the NCA's economic crime command, stated in July 2016: "The annual losses to the UK from fraud are estimated to be more than £190bn". Figures released in October 2015 from the Crime Survey of England and Wales found that there had been 5.1 million incidents of fraud in England and Wales in the previous year, affecting an estimated one in 12 adults and making it the most common form of crime.

In July 2016 the Office for National Statistics (ONS) stated "Almost six million fraud and cyber crimes were committed last year in England and Wales and estimated there were two million computer misuse offences and 3.8 million fraud offences in the 12 months to the end of March 2016." Fraud affects one in ten people in the UK. According to the ONS most frauds relate to bank account fraud. These figures are separate from the headline estimate that another 6.3 million crimes (distinct from frauds) were perpetrated in the UK against adults in the year to March 2016.

Fraud is apparently low on the list UK law enforcement priorities. Controversially, the crime does not feature on a new "Crime Harm Index" published by the Office for National Statistics. Michael Levi, professor of criminology at Cardiff University, remarked in August 2016 that it was ‘deeply regrettable’ fraud is being left out of the first index despite being the most common crime reported to police in the UK. Professor Levi said ‘If you’ve got some categories that are excluded, they are automatically left out of the police’s priorities.’. The Chief of the National Audit Office (NAO), Sir Anyas Morse has also said “For too long, as a low-value but high-volume crime, online fraud has been overlooked by government, law enforcement and industry. It is now the most commonly experienced crime in England and Wales and demands an urgent response.”

Main article: Fraud Act 2006

The Fraud Act 2006 (c 35) is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It affects England and Wales and Northern Ireland. It was given Royal Assent on 8 November 2006, and came into effect on 15 January 2007.

The Act gives a statutory definition of the criminal offence of fraud, defining it in three classes—fraud by false representation, fraud by failing to disclose information, and fraud by abuse of position. It provides that a person found guilty of fraud is liable to a fine or imprisonment for up to twelve months on summary conviction (six months in Northern Ireland), or a fine or imprisonment for up to ten years on conviction on indictment. This Act largely replaces the laws relating to obtaining property by deception, obtaining a pecuniary advantage and other offences that were created under the Theft Act 1978.

Serious Fraud Office

The Serious Fraud Office (United Kingdom) is an arm of the Government of the United Kingdom, accountable to the Attorney-General.

National Fraud Authority

The National Fraud Authority (NFA) is the government agency co-ordinating the counter-fraud response in the UK.

CIFAS - The UK's Fraud Prevention Service

CIFAS - The UK's Fraud Prevention Service, is a not-for-profit membership association representing the private and public sectors. CIFAS is dedicated to the prevention of fraud, including staff fraud, and the identification of financial and related crime.

In July 2016 the BBC referred to a recently published CIFAS report which estimated the annual cost of fraud in the UK was £193bn - equal to nearly £3,000 per head of population.

A CIFAS study found that the number of reported cases of identity fraud jumped by 57 per cent between 2014 and 2015. Drawing from its reporting database of 261 organisations, CIFAS found that 148,463 people reported having their identity stolen in 2015, up from 94,492 the previous year. The rise of social media has been blamed. CIFAS has warned that social media sites such as Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn are becoming a “hunting ground” for fraudsters.

United States

The U.S. government's 2006 fraud review concluded that fraud is a significantly under-reported crime, and while various agencies and organizations were attempting to tackle the issue, greater co-operation was needed to achieve a real impact in the public sector. The scale of the problem pointed to the need for a small but high-powered body to bring together the numerous counter-fraud initiatives that existed.

To establish a claim of fraud, most jurisdictions in the United States require that each element be plead with particularity and be proved by a preponderance of the evidence, meaning that it is more likely than not that the fraud occurred. Some jurisdictions impose a higher evidentiary standard, such as Washington State's requirement that the elements of fraud be proved with clear, cogent, and convincing evidence (very probable evidence), or Pennsylvania's requirement that common law fraud be proved by clear and convincing evidence.

The measure of damages in fraud cases is computed using the "benefit of bargain" rule, which is the difference between the value of the property had it been as represented and its actual value. Special damages may be allowed if shown proximately caused by defendant's fraud and the damage amounts are proved with specificity. Many jurisdictions permit a plaintiff in a fraud case to seek punitive or exemplary damages.

According to Bloomberg, auto loan application fraud rates in the United States has been steadily rising over the past few years. This type of fraud expected to double from about $2-3 billion in 2015 to $4-6 billion in 2017.

Cost

The typical organization loses five percent of its annual revenue to fraud, with a median loss of $160,000. Frauds committed by owners and executives were more than nine times as costly as employee fraud. The industries most commonly affected are banking, manufacturing, and government.

Types of fraudulent acts

The highly decorated fake uniform worn by a man impersonating a "Marine" caught by two gunnery sergeants at Times Square in New York City, N.Y.

A possibly fraudulent "work from home" advertisement.

See also: Types of fraud

Fraud can be committed through many media, including mail, wire, phone, and the Internet (computer crime and Internet fraud). International dimensions of the web and ease with which users can hide their location, the difficulty of checking identity and legitimacy online, and the simplicity with which hackers can divert browsers to dishonest sites and steal credit card details have all contributed to the very rapid growth of Internet fraud. In some countries, tax fraud is also prosecuted under false billing or tax forgery. There have also been fraudulent "discoveries", e.g., in science, to gain prestige rather than immediate monetary gain.

Anti-fraud movements

Beyond laws that aim at prevention of fraud, there are also governmental and non-governmental organizations that aim to fight fraud. Between 1911 and 1933, 47 states adopted the so-called Blue Sky Laws status. These laws were enacted and enforced at the state level and regulated the offering and sale of securities to protect the public from fraud. Though the specific provisions of these laws varied among states, they all required the registration of all securities offerings and sales, as well as of every U.S. stockbroker and brokerage firm. However, these Blue Sky laws were generally found to be ineffective. To increase public trust in the capital markets the President of the United States, Franklin D. Roosevelt, established the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The main reason for the creation of the SEC was to regulate the stock market and prevent corporate abuses relating to the offering and sale of securities and corporate reporting. The SEC was given the power to license and regulate stock exchanges, the companies whose securities traded on them, and the brokers and dealers who conducted the trading.

Detection

A fraudulent Manufacturer's Suggested Retail Price on a speaker.

Further information: Data analysis techniques for fraud detection

For detection of fraudulent activities on the large scale, massive use of (online) data analysis is required, in particular predictive analytics or forensic analytics. Forensic analytics is the use of electronic data to reconstruct or detect financial fraud. The steps in the process are data collection, data preparation, data analysis, and the preparation of a report and possibly a presentation of the results. Using computer-based analytic methods Nigrini's wider goal is the detection of fraud, errors, anomalies, inefficiencies, and biases which refer to people gravitating to certain dollar amounts to get past internal control thresholds.

The analytic tests usually start with high-level data overview tests to spot highly significant irregularities. In a recent purchasing card application these tests identified a purchasing card transaction for 3,000,000 Costa Rica Colons. This was neither a fraud nor an error, but it was a highly unusual amount for a purchasing card transaction. These high-level tests include tests related to Benford's Law and possibly also those statistics known as descriptive statistics. These high-tests are always followed by more focused tests to look for small samples of highly irregular transactions. The familiar methods of correlation and time-series analysis can also be used to detect fraud and other irregularities. Forensic analytics also includes the use of a fraud risk-scoring model to identify high risk forensic units (customers, employees, locations, insurance claims and so on). Forensic analytics also includes suggested tests to identify financial statement irregularities, but the general rule is that analytic methods alone are not too successful at detecting financial statement fraud.

Notable fraudsters

• Gert Postel, German mailman who worked as a psychiatrist in different hospitals.
• Frank Abagnale Jr., U.S. impostor who wrote bad checks and falsely represented himself as a qualified member of professions such as airline pilot, doctor, attorney, and teacher. The film Catch Me If You Can is based on his life.
• John Bodkin Adams, British doctor and suspected serial killer, but only found guilty of forging wills and prescriptions.
• Eddie Antar, founder of Crazy Eddie, who has criminal convictions on 17 counts and about $1 billion worth of civil judgments against him stemming from fraudulent accounting practices at that company.
• Jordan Belfort, "The Wolf of Wall Street", who swindled over $200 million via a penny stock boiler room operation. The film "The Wolf of Wall Street" starring Leonardo DiCaprio is based on his life and fraudulent activity.
• Cassie Chadwick, who pretended to be Andrew Carnegie's illegitimate daughter to get loans.
• Columbia/HCA Medicare fraud. Columbia/HCA pleaded guilty to 14 felony counts and paid out more than $2 billion to settle lawsuits arising from the fraud. The company's board of directors forced then–Chairman and CEO Rick Scott to resign at the beginning of the federal investigation; Scott was subsequently elected Governor of Florida in 2010.
• Edward Davenport self-styled "Lord" nicknamed "Fast Eddie" and "Lord of Fraud" from 2005 to 2009 he was the "ringmaster" of a series of advance-fee fraud schemes that defrauded dozens of individuals out of millions of pounds. He is said to have made £34.5 million through his various frauds.
• Marc Dreier, Managing founder of Attorney firm Dreir LLP, a $700 million Ponzi scheme.
• Enric Durán defrauded Spanish banks and then gave away the loaned money to anti-growth organizations.
• Bernard Ebbers, founder of WorldCom, which inflated its asset statements by about $11 billion.
• Ramón Báez Figueroa, banker from the Dominican Republic and former President of Banco Intercontinental. He was sentenced on October 21, 2007 to 10 years in prison for a U.S. $2.2 billion fraud case that drove the Caribbean nation into economic crisis in 2003.
• Martin Frankel, former U.S. financier, convicted in 2002 of insurance fraud worth $208 million, racketeering and money laundering.
• Samuel Israel III, former hedge fund manager who ran the former fraudulent Bayou Hedge Fund Group, and faked suicide to avoid jail.
• Konrad Kujau, German fraudster and forger responsible for the "Hitler Diaries".
• Kenneth Lay, the American businessman who built energy company Enron. He was one of the highest paid CEOs in the U.S. until he was ousted as Chairman and convicted of fraud and conspiracy, although, as a result of his death, his conviction was vacated.
• Nick Leeson, English trader whose unsupervised speculative trading caused the collapse of Barings Bank.
• James Paul Lewis, Jr., ran one of the biggest ($311 million) and longest running Ponzi Schemes (20 years) in U.S. history.
• Gregor MacGregor, Scottish conman who tried to attract investment and settlers for the non-existent country of Poyais.
• Bernard Madoff, creator of a $65 billion Ponzi scheme – the largest investor fraud ever attributed to a single individual.
• Matt the Knife, American con artist, card cheat and pickpocket who, from the ages of approximately 14 through 21, bilked dozens of casinos, corporations and at least one Mafia crime family out of untold sums.
• Gaston Means, a professional conman during U.S. President Warren G. Harding's administration.
• Barry Minkow and the ZZZZ Best scam.
• Michael Monus, founder of Phar-Mor, which ultimately cost its investors more than $1 billion.
• F. Bam Morrison, who conned the town of Wetumka, Oklahoma by promoting a circus that never came.
• Lou Pearlman, former boy-band manager and operator of a $300 million Ponzi scheme using two shell companies.
• Frederick Emerson Peters, American impersonator who wrote bad checks.
• Thomas Petters is an American masquerading as a business man who turned out to be a con man and was the former CEO and chairman of Petters Group Worldwide. Petters resigned his position as CEO on September 29, 2008, amid mounting criminal investigations. He later was convicted for turning Petters Group Worldwide into a $3.65 billion Ponzi scheme and was sentenced to 50 years in federal prison.
• Charles Ponzi and the Ponzi scheme.
• Alves Reis, who forged documents to print 100,000,000 PTE in official escudo banknotes (adjusted for inflation, it would be worth about US$150 million today).
• John Rigas, cable television entrepreneur, cofounder of Adelphia Communications Corporation and owner of the Buffalo Sabres hockey team, defrauded investors of over $2 billion and was sentenced to a 12-year term in federal prison.
• Christopher Rocancourt, a Rockefeller impersonator who defrauded Hollywood celebrities.
• Scott W. Rothstein, a disbarred lawyer from Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, who perpetrated a Ponzi scheme which defrauded investors of over $1 billion.
• Michael Sabo, best known as a check, stocks and bonds forger. He became notorious in the 1960s throughout the 1990s as a "Great Impostor" with over 100 aliases, and earned millions from such.
• Alfredo Sáenz Abad who lied about bank loans, as a banker so that some customers to the bank went to prison. Later on he was sentenced to prison, but managed to get a pardon and kept his job.
• John Spano, a struggling businessman who faked massive success in an attempt to buy out the New York Islanders of the NHL.
• Allen Stanford Self-styled banker who sold fake certificates of deposit to people in many countries, raking in $7 billion to $8 billion over decades.
• John Stonehouse, the last Postmaster-General of the UK and MP who faked his death to marry his mistress.
• Kevin Trudeau, U.S. writer and billiards promoter, convicted of fraud and larceny in 1991, known for a series of late-night infomercials and his series of books about "Natural Cures "They" Don't Want You to Know About".
• Richard Whitney, who stole from the New York Stock Exchange Gratuity Fund in the 1930s.

Related

Apart from fraud, there are several related categories of intentional deceptions that may or may not include the elements of personal gain or damage to another individual:

• Obstruction of justice
• 18 U.S.C. § 704 which criminalizes false representation of having been awarded any decoration or medal authorized by Congress for the Armed Forces of the United States

See also

• Caper stories (such as The Sting)
• Contract fraud
• Corruption
• Cramming (fraud)
• Creative accounting
• Crimestoppers
• Deception
• Electoral fraud
• False Claims Act
• Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
• Financial crimes
• Forgery
• Fraud deterrence
• Fraud in the factum
• Fraud in parapsychology
• Fraud Squad (UK)
• Friendly fraud
• Front running
• Geneivat da'at
• Great Stock Exchange Fraud of 1814
• Guinness share-trading fraud, famous British business scandal of the 1980s
• Hoax
• Identity management
• Impersonator
• Internet fraud
• Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
• Interpol
• Journalism fraud
• Money laundering
• Mail and wire fraud
• Organized crime
• Placebo
• Phishing, attempt to fraudulently acquire sensitive information
• Police impersonation
• Political corruption
• Quackery
• Quatloos.com
• Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO)
• SAS 99
• Scam
• Secret profits
• Shell company
• Swampland in Florida
• The National Council Against Health Fraud
• Tobashi scheme, concealing financial losses
• U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
• United States Postal Inspection Service
• United States Secret Service
• White-collar crime

Further reading

• Fred Cohen Frauds, Spies, and Lies – and How to Defeat Them. ISBN 1-878109-36-7 (2006). ASP Press.
• Green, Stuart P. Lying, Cheating, and Stealing: A Moral Theory of White Collar Crime. Oxford University Press, 2006. ISBN 978-0199225804
• Review Fraud – Alex Copola Podgor, Ellen S. Criminal Fraud, (1999) Vol, 48, No. 4 American Law Review 1.
• The Nature, Extent and Economic Impact of Fraud in the UK. February, 2007.
• The Fraudsters – How Con Artists Steal Your Money(ISBN 978-1-903582-82-4) by Eamon Dillon, published September 2008 by Merlin Publishing

External links

• The dictionary definition of fraud at Wiktionary
• Association of Certified Fraud Examiners
• Immigration Marriage Fraud Amendments of 1986
• FBI Home page for fraud
• U.S. Department of Justice Fraud Section

UpToDate Contents

全文を閲覧するには購読必要です。 To read the full text you will need to subscribe.

• 1. 臓器売買、移植ツーリズム、および移植臓器の商業化 organ trafficking transplant tourism and transplant commercialism
• 2. 心因性紫斑病（ガードナーダイヤモンド症候群） psychogenic purpura gardner diamond syndrome
• 3. 病的賭博の概要 overview of gambling disorder
• 4. 認知症に関連する安全性および社会問題 safety and societal issues related to dementia
• 5. パーソナリティ障害患者との治療関係へのアプローチ approaches to the therapeutic relationship in patients with personality disorders

English Journal

• Soft-deodorization of virgin olive oil: Study of the changes of quality and chemical composition.

• Aparicio-Ruiz R1, Romero I2, García-González DL2, Oliver-Pozo C2, Aparicio R2.
• Food chemistry.Food Chem.2017 Apr 1;220:42-50. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.09.176. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
• The potential adulteration of extra virgin olive oil (EVOO) with soft-deodorized virgin olive oil (VOO) has raised the interest of researchers in investigating this fraud in recent years. The objective of this study was to determine chemical changes occurring after a soft-deodorization process in te
• PMID 27855920

• Authentication of virgin olive oil by a novel curve resolution approach combined with visible spectroscopy.

• Ferreiro-González M1, Barbero GF2, Álvarez JA3, Ruiz A3, Palma M2, Ayuso J3.
• Food chemistry.Food Chem.2017 Apr 1;220:331-336. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.10.015. Epub 2016 Oct 7.
• Adulteration of olive oil is not only a major economic fraud but can also have major health implications for consumers. In this study, a combination of visible spectroscopy with a novel multivariate curve resolution method (CR), principal component analysis (PCA) and linear discriminant analysis (LD
• PMID 27855908

• Ethyl esters versus fermentative organoleptic defects in virgin olive oil.

• Di Serio MG1, Giansante L1, Di Loreto G1, Faberi A2, Ricchetti L2, Di Giacinto L3.
• Food chemistry.Food Chem.2017 Mar 15;219:33-39. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.09.109. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
• The quality and genuineness of extra-virgin olive oils (EVOOs) were assessed following the methods and parameters of EU Commission Regulation N° 2568/91/EEC and subsequent modifications, which also set specific limits for fatty-acid ethyl esters (FAEEs). This study included a subset of EVOOs from a
• PMID 27765235

• Development of HPLC-ELSD method for determination of maltodextrin in raw milk.

• Moraes FS1, da Costa MP1, de Melo Silva VL1, de Barros Pinto Moreira RV1, de Barros RF1, Mársico ET1, Conte-Junior CA1, de Oliveira Silva AC2.
• Food chemistry.Food Chem.2017 Feb 15;217:346-51. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.08.096. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
• An analytical method was developed and validated for the determination of maltodextrin in raw milk, using high-performance liquid chromatography with evaporative light scattering detection. Maltodextrin content was evaluated in adulterated raw milk using a Supelcosil LC-NH2 (25cm×4.6mm) column and
• PMID 27664644

Japanese Journal

• 特殊詐欺少年に対する鑑別及び矯正教育の充実強化に向けた取組

• 刑政 128(5), 74-85, 2017-05
• NAID 40021182533

• すれ違い通信システムに対するインセンティブ計算方式の検討 (ネットワークシステム)

• 電子情報通信学会技術研究報告 = IEICE technical report : 信学技報 117(3), 73-76, 2017-04-20
• NAID 40021187694

• コーポレート・ガバナンスの観点からみた「監査白書2014」

• 愛知工業大学研究報告 = Bulletin of Aichi Institute of Technology (52), 107-116, 2017-03-31
• NAID 120006304380

• 第三者を用いた認証情報発行時の不正発行を防止するシステムアーキテクチャ (情報通信システムセキュリティ)

• 電子情報通信学会技術研究報告 = IEICE technical report : 信学技報 116(522), 195-200, 2017-03-13
• NAID 40021163757

Related Links

• Fraud - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In criminal law, a fraud is an intentional deception made for personal gain or to damage another individual; the related adjective is fraudulent. The specific legal definition varies by legal jurisdiction. Fraud is a crime, and also a civil law violation ...

• 不正商品情報ご提供窓口 - 任天堂ホームページ

---

★リンクテーブル★

リンク元	「詐欺」「scam」

「詐欺」

　　[★]

英

deception、fraud、scam

関

誤魔化し、欺き

「scam」

　　[★]

• 詐欺

関

deception、fraud