discriminating

• adj.

• 区別を示す、鑑別する、弁別的な、特徴的な。分析的な
• 鑑別力のある、違いの分かる、目の肥えた
• 差別的な

　 　

WordNet

1. showing or indicating careful judgment and discernment especially in matters of taste; "the discriminating eye of the connoisseur"
2. not discriminating (同)indiscriminating

PrepTutorEJDIC

1. 識別する力のある,鋭く見分ける;(…に)目が利く《+『in』+『名』(do『ing』)》 / 《名詞の前にのみ用いて》差別する

Wikipedia preview

出典(authority):フリー百科事典『ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』「2013/04/11 13:08:44」(JST)

wiki en

[Wiki en表示]

This article is about prejudicial treatment. For statistical discrimination, see linear discriminant analysis. For other uses, see wikt:discrimination.

Part of a series on
Discrimination
General forms Age Caste Class Color Genotype Height Language Looks Intelligence / mental type / neurology Race / ethnicity / nationality Rank Religion Sex  / Gender Sexuality Size Weight
Specific forms
Social AIDS stigma Ableism Adultism Anti-albinism Anti-communism Anti-homelessness Anti-intellectualism Anti-left handedness Anti-Masonry Antisemitism Audism Binarism Biphobia Cronyism Elitism (academic) Ephebiphobia Ethnocentrism Fatism Genderism Gerontophobia Handicapism Heteronormativity Heterophobia Heterosexism Homonegativity Homophobia Leprosy stigma Lesbophobia Misandry Misogyny Nepotism Pedophobia Reverse discrimination Sectarianism Shadeism Surdophobia Transphobia Xenophobia
Manifestations Blood libel Compulsory sterilization Cultural genocide Disability hate crime Economic Eliminationism Employment Ethnic cleansing Ethnic joke Ethnocide Forced conversion Freak show Gay bashing Gendercide Genocide (examples) Group libel Hate crime Hate group Hate speech Homeless dumping Housing Indian rolling LGBT hate crime Linguistic prescription Lynching Mortgage Name and shame Murder Music Occupational segregation Pogrom Purge Racist music Race war Religious persecution Scapegoating Segregation academies Slavery Slut-shaming Trans-bashing Victimization Wife selling Witch-hunt
Policies Segregation by age / race / religion / gender Age of candidacy Blood quantum "Cleanliness of blood" Apartheid Ethnocracy Gender roles Gerontocracy Ghetto benches Internment Jewish quota Jim Crow laws MSM blood donor controversy Numerus clausus (as religious or racial quota) Nuremberg Laws Racial quota Redlining Same-sex marriage (laws and issues prohibiting) Sodomy law Ugly law
Other forms Anthropocentrism Pregnancy Supremacism (Arab Black White)
Countermeasures Affirmative action Cultural assimilation Empowerment Human rights Multiculturalism Racial integration Social integration Toleration
Related topics Allophilia Anti-cultural sentiment Assimilation Bigotry Diversity Eugenics Multiculturalism Neurodiversity Oppression Police brutality Political correctness Prejudice Religious intolerance Religious persecution Speciesism Stereotypes
Discrimination portal

Discrimination is the prejudicial and/or distinguishing treatment of an individual based on their actual or perceived membership in a certain group or category, "in a way that is worse than the way people are usually treated." It involves the group's initial reaction or interaction, influencing the individual's actual behavior towards the group or the group leader, restricting members of one group from opportunities or privileges that are available to another group, leading to the exclusion of the individual or entities based on logical or irrational decision making.

Discriminatory traditions, policies, ideas, practices, and laws exist in many countries and institutions in every part of the world, even in ones where discrimination is generally looked down upon. In some places, controversial attempts such as quotas have been used to redress negative effects of discrimination—but have sometimes been called reverse discrimination themselves.

Etymology

The term discriminate appeared in the early 17th century in the English language. It is from the Latin discriminat- 'distinguished between', from the verb discriminare, from discrimen 'distinction', from the verb discernere. Since the American Civil War the term "discrimination" generally evolved in American English usage as an understanding of prejudicial treatment of an individual based solely on their race, later generalized as membership in a certain socially undesirable group or social category. "Discrimination" derives from Latin, where the verb discrimire' means "to separate, to distinguish, to make a distinction".

Definitions

Moral philosophers have defined discrimination as disadvantageous treatment or consideration. This is a comparative definition. An individual need not be actually harmed in order to be discriminated against. He or she just needs to be treated worse than others for some arbitrary reason. If someone decides to donate to help orphan children, but decides to donate less, say, to black children out of a racist attitude, he or she will be acting in a discriminatory way even though people he discriminates against are actually benefitted by having some money donated to them.

Based on realistic-conflict theory and social-identity theory, Rubin and Hewstone have highlighted a distinction among three types of discrimination:

1. Realistic competition is driven by self-interest and is aimed at obtaining material resources (e.g., food, territory, customers) for the in-group (e.g., favouring an in-group in order to obtain more resources for its members, including the self).
2. Social competition is driven by the need for self-esteem and is aimed at achieving a positive social status for the in-group relative to comparable out-groups (e.g., favouring an in-group in order to make it better than an out-group).
3. Consensual discrimination is driven by the need for accuracy and reflects stable and legitimate intergroup status hierarchies (e.g., favouring a high-status in-group because it is high status).

The United Nations stance on discrimination includes the statement: "Discriminatory behaviors take many forms, but they all involve some form of exclusion or rejection." International bodies United Nations Human Rights Council work towards helping ending discrimination around the world.

Types of discrimination

Age discrimination

Main article: Ageism

Ageism or age discrimination is discrimination and stereotyping based on the grounds of someone's age. It is a set of beliefs, norms, and values which used to justify discrimination and/or subordination based on someone's age. Ageism is most often directed towards old people, or adolescents and children.

Caste discrimination

See also: Caste

According to UNICEF and Human Rights Watch, caste discrimination affects an estimated 250 million people worldwide. Discrimination based on caste, as perceived by UNICEF, is prevalent mainly in parts of Asia (India, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Nepal, Japan) and Africa. Currently, there are an estimated 160 million Dalits or Scheduled Castes (formerly known as "untouchables") in India. In India the Ambedkar controversial cartoon issue rocked the parliament in May 2012 since it symbolized discrimination against castes.

Disability discrimination

Main article: Disability discrimination

Discrimination against people with disabilities in favor of people who are not is called ableism or disablism.^{[citation needed]} Disability discrimination, which treats non-disabled individuals as the standard of ‘normal living’, results in public and private places and services, education, and social work that are built to serve 'standard' people, thereby excluding those with various disabilities.^{[citation needed]}

In the United States, the Americans with Disabilities Act mandates the provision of equality of access to both buildings and services and is paralleled by similar acts in other countries, such as the Equality Act 2010 in the UK.^{[citation needed]}

Employment discrimination

Ethiopian Jews protest in Israel over non-employment of Ethiopian academics.

Main article: Employment discrimination

Denying someone employment, or disallowing one from applying for a job, is recognized as employment discrimination when the grounds for such an exclusion is not related to the requirements of the position, including such elements as age, disability, ethnicity, gender, gender identity, height, nationality, religion, sexual orientation, skin color, and weight.

The United States federal laws that protect against:

• Race, color and national origin discrimination include the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Executive Order Number 11478 among other numerous laws that protect people from race, color and national origin discrimination.
• Sex and gender discrimination include the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Equal Pay Act of 1963.
• age Discrimination include the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967.
• Physical and mental disability discrimination include the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.
• Religious discrimination include the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
• Military status discrimination include the Vietnam Era Veterans Readjustment Assistance Act of 1974

Most other western nations have similar laws protecting these groups.

Still unrelated to the requirements of the position, only 9% of Chief Financial Officers (CFOs) are women while they are over 60% among accountants and auditors. And yet those who reach a high responsibility position are paid on average 16% lower than their male colleagues. (According to a recent report, 2013)

Language discrimination

Main article: Linguistic discrimination

Diversity of language is protected and respected by most nations who value cultural diversity. However, people are sometimes subjected to different treatment because their preferred language is associated with a particular group, class or category. Commonly, the preferred language is just another attribute of separate ethnic groups. Discrimination exists if there is prejudicial treatment against a person or a group of people who speak a particular language or dialect.

Language discrimination is suggested to be labeled linguicism or logocism Anti-discriminatory and inclusive efforts to accommodate persons who speak different languages or cannot have fluency in the country's predominant or "official" language, is bilingualism such as official documents in two languages, and multiculturalism in more than two languages.^{[citation needed]}

Discrimination on the basis of nationality

Discrimination on the basis of nationality is usually included in employment laws (see below section for employment discrimination specifically). It is sometimes referred to as bound together with racial discrimination although it can be separate. It may vary from laws that stop refusals of hiring based on nationality, asking questions regarding origin, to prohibitions of firing, forced retirement, compensation and pay, etc., based on nationality.

Discrimination on the basis of nationality may show as a "level of acceptance" in a sport or work team regarding new team members and employees who differ from the nationality of the majority of team members.

Racial or ethnic discrimination

Main articles: Racism, Discrimination based on skin color, and Ethnic Penalty

An African-American child at a segregated drinking fountain on a courthouse lawn, North Carolina, 1938.

Racial discrimination differentiates individuals on the basis of real and perceived racial differences and has been official government policy in several countries, such as Papua New Guinea in the apartheid era.

In the United States, racial profiling of minorities by law-enforcement officials has been called racial discrimination. As early as 1866, the Civil Rights Act provided a remedy for intentional race discrimination in employment by private employers and state and local public employers.

The Civil Rights Act of 1871 applies to public employment or employment involving state action prohibiting deprivation of rights secured by the federal constitution or federal laws through action under color of law. Title VII is the principal federal statute with regard to employment discrimination prohibiting unlawful employment discrimination by public and private employers, labor organizations, training programs and employment agencies based on race or color, religion, gender, and national origin.

A racist sign on a beach in Durban under the South African apartheid laws (1989)

Title VII also prohibits retaliation against any person for opposing any practice forbidden by statute, or for making a charge, testifying, assisting, or participating in a proceeding under the statute. The Civil Rights Act of 1991 expanded the damages available in Title VII cases and granted Title VII plaintiffs the right to a jury trial. Title VII also provides that race and color discrimination against every race and color is prohibited.

Within the criminal justice system in the United States, minorities are convicted and imprisoned disproportionately when compared to the majority. In 1998, nearly one out of three black men between the ages of 20-29 were in prison or jail, on probation or parole on any given day in the United States. Native Americans make up about 2% of Canada's population, but account for 18% of the federal prison population as of 2000. According to the Australian government's June 2006 publication of prison statistics, Aborigines make up 24% of the overall prison population in Australia.

In 2004, Māori made up just 15% of the total population of New Zealand but 49.5% of prisoners. Māori were entering prison at 8 times the rate of non-Māori. A quarter of the people in England's prisons are from an ethnic minority. The Equality and Human Rights Commission found that five times more black people than white people per head of population in England and Wales are imprisoned. Experts and politicians said over-representation of black men was a result of decades of racial prejudice in the criminal justice system.

Discrimination against racially mixed people: The notion that people can be split into clean categories of race has turned into an unchallenged and non-debated assumption. People of more than one race are not only overlooked by society but often misjudged and represented. The assumption that race is immutable is deeply embedded in the social and legal construction of race today. Race is something created by society, yet society let's it determine much of our lives. People of mixed race are constantly subdued to judgment to be put in a category, this makes them easier to identify. By identifying where someone comes from, judgments can be made. Many applications and forms continue to allow only one box to be checked when it comes to race. Racially mixed people can also experience "otherness"- the feeling of not belonging to or being accepted by one group because you are part of another. For example- Not white enough to be white, not black enough to be black.

Religious discrimination

Main article: Religious discrimination

See also: Discrimination against atheists

Freedom of religion
Concepts Religious discrimination Religious persecution Separation of church and state
Status by country Afghanistan Albania Algeria Andorra Angola Armenia Austria Azerbaijan Bahrain Bangladesh Belarus Belgium Benin Bhutan Botswana Brunei Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burma Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Colombia Comoros Croatia Cyprus DR Congo Ecuador Egypt France Georgia Germany India Indonesia Iran Iraq Israel Italy Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kuwait Laos Lebanon Malaysia Maldives Mauritania Mongolia Nepal North Korea Northern Cyprus Oman Palestinian territories Pakistan Panama Paraguay China (PRC) Philippines Qatar Russia Saudi Arabia Singapore South Africa South Korea Sri Lanka Sudan Syria Taiwan Tajikistan Thailand Turkey Turkmenistan UAE United Kingdom United States Uzbekistan Vietnam Yemen
Religious persecution Ahmadiyya Alevism Atheism Bahá'í Buddhism Catholicism Christianity (sentiment) Falun Gong Hinduism (anti-Hinduism) Islam Shi'a Islamophobia Judaism (religious antisemitism) Jehovah's Witness Mormonism Neopaganism Protestantism Rastafari Zoroastrianism
Religion portal

Religious discrimination is valuing or treating a person or group differently because of what they do or do not believe or because of their feelings towards a given religion. For instance, the indigenous Christian population of Balkans (known as "rayah" or "protected flock") lived under the Ottoman Kanun–i–Rayah. The word is sometimes translated as 'cattle' rather than 'flock' or 'subjects' to emphasize the inferior status of the rayah.

Restrictions upon Jewish occupations were imposed by Christian authorities. Local rulers and church officials closed many professions to Jews, pushing them into marginal roles considered socially inferior, such as tax and rent collecting and moneylending, occupations only tolerated as a "necessary evil". The number of Jews permitted to reside in different places was limited; they were concentrated in ghettos and were not allowed to own land.

In a 1979 consultation on the issue, the United States commission on civil rights defined religious discrimination in relation to the civil rights guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Whereas religious civil liberties, such as the right to hold or not to hold a religious belief, are essential for Freedom of Religion (in the United States secured by the First Amendment), religious discrimination occurs when someone is denied " the equal protection of the laws, equality of status under the law, equal treatment in the administration of justice, and equality of opportunity and access to employment, education, housing, public services and facilities, and public accommodation because of their exercise of their right to religious freedom."

Reverse discrimination

Main article: Reverse discrimination

Students protesting against racial quotas in Brazil: "Quer uma vaga? Passe no vestibular!" ("Do you want a university place? Be successful in the entrance exam!")

Some attempts at antidiscrimination have been criticized as reverse discrimination. In particular, minority quotas (for example, affirmative action) discriminate against members of a dominant or majority group. In its opposition to race preferences, the American Civil Rights Institute's Ward Connerly stated, "There is nothing positive, affirmative, or equal about 'affirmative action' programs that give preference to some groups based on race." There are cases, however, such as the Noack v. YMCA case in U.S. Fifth Circuit Court, which include outright anti-male gender bias in a traditionally female work environment like childcare. That former employee claims to have suffered even physical assaults, and was allegedly also told to not hire too many blacks or men.^{[citation needed]}

Sex, gender, and gender-identity discrimination

Main article: Sexism

Though gender discrimination and sexism refers to beliefs and attitudes in relation to the gender of a person, such beliefs and attitudes are of a social nature and do not, normally, carry any legal consequences. Sex discrimination, on the other hand, may have legal consequences.

Though what constitutes sex discrimination varies between countries, the essence is that it is an adverse action taken by one person against another person that would not have occurred had the person been of another sex. Discrimination of that nature is considered a form of prejudice and in certain enumerated circumstances is illegal in many countries.

Sexual discrimination can arise in different contexts. For instance an employee may be discriminated against by being asked discriminatory questions during a job interview, or by an employer not hiring or promoting, unequally paying, or wrongfully terminating, an employee based on his or her gender.

Median weekly earnings of full-time wage and salary workers, by sex, race, and ethnicity, U.S., 2009.

In an educational setting there could be claims that a student was excluded from an educational institution, program, opportunity, loan, student group, or scholarship because of his or her gender. In the housing setting there could be claims that a person was refused negotiations on seeking a house, contracting/leasing a house or getting a loan based on his or her gender. Another setting where there have been claims of gender discrimination is banking; for example if one is refused credit or is offered unequal loan terms based on one’s gender. As with other forms of unlawful discrimination there are two types of sex discrimination – direct discrimination and indirect discrimination. Direct sex discrimination is fairly easy to spot – ‘Barmaid wanted’, but indirect sex discrimination, where an unnecessary requirement puts one sex at a disproportionate disadvantage compared to the opposite sex, is sometimes less easy to spot, although some are obvious – ‘Bar person wanted – must look good in a mini skirt’.

Another setting where there is usually gender discrimination is when one is refused to extend his or her credit, refused approval of credit/loan process, and if there is a burden of unequal loan terms based on one’s gender.

Socially, sexual differences have been used to justify different roles for men and women, in some cases giving rise to claims of primary and secondary roles.

While there are alleged non-physical differences between men and women, major reviews of the academic literature on gender difference find only a tiny minority of characteristics where there are consistent psychological differences between men and women, and these relate directly to experiences grounded in biological difference. However, there are also some psychological differences in regard to how problems are dealt with and emotional perceptions and reactions that may relate to hormones and the successful characteristics of each gender during longstanding roles in past primitive lifestyles.

Unfair discrimination usually follows the gender stereotyping held by a society.

The United Nations had concluded that women often experience a "glass ceiling" and that there are no societies in which women enjoy the same opportunities as men. The term "glass ceiling" is used to describe a perceived barrier to advancement in employment based on discrimination, especially sex discrimination.

In the United States in 1995, the Glass Ceiling Commission, a government-funded group, stated: "Over half of all Master’s degrees are now awarded to women, yet 95% of senior-level managers, of the top Fortune 1000 industrial and 500 service companies are men. Of them, 97% are white." In its report, it recommended affirmative action, which is the consideration of an employee's gender and race in hiring and promotion decisions, as a means to end this form of discrimination. In 2008, women accounted for 51% of all workers in the high-paying management, professional, and related occupations. They outnumbered men in such occupations as public relations managers; financial managers; and human resource managers.

The China's leading headhunter, Chinahr.com, reported in 2007 that the average salary for white-collar men was 44,000 yuan ($6,441), compared with 28,700 yuan ($4,201) for women.

The PwC research found that among FTSE 350 companies in the United Kingdom in 2002 almost 40% of senior management posts were occupied by women. When that research was repeated in 2007, the number of senior management posts held by women had fallen to 22%.

Transgender individuals, both male to female and female to male, often experience transphobic problems that often lead to dismissals, underachievement, difficulty in finding a job, social isolation, and, occasionally, violent attacks against them. Nevertheless, the problem of gender discrimination does not stop at transgender individuals or with women. Men are often the victim in certain areas of employment as men begin to seek work in office and childcare settings traditionally perceived as "women's jobs". One such situation seems to be evident in a recent case concerning alleged YMCA discrimination and a Federal Court Case in Texas.^{[citation needed]} The case actually involves alleged discrimination against both men and blacks in childcare, even when they pass the same strict background tests and other standards of employment. It is currently being contended in federal court, as of fall 2009.

Discrimination in slasher films is relevant. Gloria Cowan had a research group study on 57 different slasher films. Their results showed that the non-surviving females were more frequently sexual than the surviving females and the non-surviving males. Surviving as a female slasher victim was strongly associated with the absence of sexual behavior. In slasher films, the message appears to be that sexual women get killed and only the pure women survive. Slasher films reinforce the idea that female sexuality can be costly.

Legislation

Main article: List of anti-discrimination acts

Australia

• Sex Discrimination Act 1984

Canada

• Ontario Human Rights Code 1962
• Canadian Human Rights Act 1977

Hong Kong

• Sex Discrimination Ordinance (1996)

Israel

• Prohibition of Discrimination in Products, Services and Entry into Places of Entertainment and Public Places Law, 2000
• Employment (Equal Opportunities) Law, 1988
• Prohibition of libel law 1965.

Netherlands

• Article 137c, part 1 of Wetboek van Strafrecht prohibits insults towards a group because of its race, religion, sexual orientation (strait or gay), handicap (somatically, mental or psychiatric) in public or by speech, by writing or by a picture. Maximum imprisonment one year of imprisonment or a fine of the third category.
• Part 2 increases the maximum imprisonment to two years and the maximum fine category to 4, when the crime is committed as a habit or is committed by two or more persons.
• Article 137d prohibits provoking to discrimination or hate against the group described above. Same penalties apply as in artickle 137c.
• Article 137e part 1 prohibits publishing a discriminatory statement, other than in formal message, or hands over an object (that contains discriminatory information) otherwise than on his request. Maximum imprisonment is 6 months or a fine of the third cathegory.
• Part 2 increases the maximum imprisonment to one year and the maximum fine category to 4, when the crime is committed as a habit or committed by two or more persons.
• Article 137f prohibits supporting discriminatory activities by giving money or goods. Maximum imprisonment is 3 months or a fine of the second cathegory.

United Kingdom

• Equal Pay Act 1970 – provides for equal pay for comparable work
• Sex Discrimination Act 1975 – makes discrimination against women or men, including discrimination on the grounds of marital status, illegal in the workplace.
• Human Rights Act 1998 – provides more scope for redressing all forms of discriminatory imbalances

United States

• Equal Pay Act of 1963 – (part of the Fair Labor Standards Act) – prohibits wage discrimination by employers and labor organizations based on sex
• Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 – broadly prohibits discrimination in the workplace including hiring, firing, workforce reduction, benefits, and sexually harassing conduct
• Fair Housing Act of 1968 prohibited discrimination in the sale or rental of housing based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, familial status, or disability. The Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity is charged with administering and enforcing the Act.
• Pregnancy Discrimination Act, which amended Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 – covers discrimination based upon pregnancy in the workplace
• Violence Against Women Act

Sexual orientation discrimination

Protests in New York City against Uganda's Anti-Homosexuality Bill.

See also: Heterosexism, Heteronormativity, and Homophobia

One’s sexual orientation is a “predilection for homosexuality, heterosexuality, or bisexuality”. Like most minority groups, homosexuals and bisexuals are not immune to prejudice and discrimination from the majority group. They may experience hatred from others because of their sexual preferences; a term for such hatred based upon one’s sexual orientation is often called homophobia. Many continue to hold negative feelings towards those with non-heterosexual orientations and will discriminate against people who have them or are thought to have them.

In 2009, ILGA published a report based on research carried out by Daniel Ottosson at Södertörn University College, Stockholm, Sweden. This research found that of the 80 countries around the world that continue to consider homosexuality illegal, five carry the death penalty for homosexual activity, and two do in some regions of the country. In the report, this is described as "State sponsored homophobia". This happens in Islamic states, or in two cases regions under Islamic authority.

On February 5, 2005 the IRIN issued a reported titled "Iraq: Male homosexuality still a taboo." The article stated, among other things that honor killings by Iraqis against a gay family member are common and given some legal protection. In August 2009 Human Rights Watch published an extensive report detailing torture of men accused of being gay in Iraq, including the blocking of men's anuses with glue and then giving the men laxatives. In South Africa, same-sex unions are often condemned as "un-African." Research shows 86% of black lesbians from the Western Cape live in fear of sexual assault.

Further information: LGBT rights by country or territory

A number of countries, especially those in the Western world, have passed measures to alleviate discrimination against sexual minorities, including laws against anti-gay hate crimes and workplace discrimination. Some have also legalized same-sex marriage or civil unions in order to grant same-sex couples the same protections and benefits as opposite-sex couples. In 2011, the United Nations passed its first resolution recognizing LGBT rights.

Theories

Social theories such as Egalitarianism claim that social equality should prevail. In some societies, including most developed countries, each individual's civil rights include the right to be free from government sponsored social discrimination. Due to a belief in the capacity to perceive pain and/or suffering shared by all animals, 'abolitionist' or 'vegan' egalitarianism maintains that the interests of every individual (regardless its species), warrant equal consideration with the interests of humans, and that not doing so is "speciesist".

Conservative and anarcho-capitalist

In contrast, conservative writer and law professor Matthias Storme has claimed that the freedom of discrimination in human societies is a fundamental human right, or more precisely, the basis of all fundamental freedoms and therefore the most fundamental freedom. Author Hans-Hermann Hoppe, in an essay about his book Democracy: The God That Failed, asserts that a natural social order is characterized by increased discrimination. The views of the two aforementioned do not, of course, represent all people who either call themselves "conservative" or are so-called, for example, economist Thomas Sowell,who is "conservative", expounds no such radical or extreme sentiments.

Labeling theory

Discrimination, in labeling theory, takes form as mental categorization of minorities and the use of stereotype. This theory describes difference as deviance from the norm, which results in internal devaluation and social stigma that may be seen as discrimination. It is started by describing a 'natural' social order. It is distinguished between the fundamental principle of fascism and social democracy. The Nazis in 1930s-era Germany, the pre-1990 Apartheid government of South Africa used racial discriminatory agendas for their political ends. This practice continues with some present day governments.

State discrimination vs. free market discrimination

State discrimination

In politics, the dominating part of the population rules. Therefore, the worst discrimination in the history has been committed by states. For example, the anti-semitic practices of the Nazi-Germany would not have happened in free markets, because they would have caused losses.

However, government officials and politicians need not care about losses as much as companies, which decreases their incentive not to discriminate. For example, around 1900 African-Americans started to compete for jobs that had previously been all-white. Officials, voted in by white majorities, changed the hiring rules for the federal civil service. Photographs of applicants were made obligatory in civil service job applications, and hiring officials were given discretion to choose between the three top scoring applicants. The number of blacks in federal employment was kept artificially low for decades.

In early 20th century South Africa mine owners preferred hiring black workers because they were cheaper. Then the whites successfully persuaded the government to enact laws that highly restricted the black's rights to work (see Apartheid).

Similarly, to make more profits, producers secretly hired screenwriters who were on Senator Joseph McCarthy's blacklist, which mitigated the effects of the list.

When the "Jim Crow" racial segregation laws were enacted in the U.S., many companies disobeyed them for years, because the market automatically punishes companies that discriminate: they lose customers and get additional expenses. It took 15 years for the government to break down the resistance of the companies.

Markets punish the discriminator

The Nobel prize winning economist Gary Becker showed in his book The Economics of Discrimination (University of Chicago Press, 1957) how the markets automatically punish the companies that discriminate.

The profitability of the company that discriminates is decreased, and the loss is "directly proportional to how much the employer's decision was based on prejudice, rather than on merit." Indeed, choosing a worker with lower performance (in comparison to salary) causes losses proportional to the difference in performance. Similarly, the customers who discriminate against certain kinds of workers in favor of less effective ones have to pay more for their services, on average.

If a company discriminates, it typically loses profitability and market share to the companies that do not discriminate, unless the state limits free competition protecting the discriminators.

The above description of microeconmic theory results misses the ambivalent relations between discrimination and economic efficiency, as shown by the literature. First and in contradiction to the above text, Becker’s explanation, “discriminatory tastes,” was shown to be problematic because it implies discrimination is efficient. In other words, the very aim of the markets is to cater efficiently for the different "tastes" of all individuals, including customers, employees, employers, and firm owners (and discrimination happens within and between all these groups). If discrimination were just another "taste" then the markets were not to punish for it. Second, microeconomic theory turns to unusual method - explicit treatment of production functions - when it analyzes discrimination. And third, the very existence of discrimination in employment (defined as wages which differ from marginal product of the discriminated employees) at the long run, contradicts perfect competition and efficiency (which imply equality of wages and the said marginal product). Hence, the very existence of discrimination at the long run, contradicts the claim that the markets function well and punish the discriminators.

Scapegoats

Many people blame scapegoats for problems that are not their fault. This is common when two deprived ethnic groups compete with one another for economic rewards. This is normally directed against groups that are relatively powerless, because they make an easy target. It frequently involves projection, which is the unconscious attribution to the others of ones own desires or characteristics.

See also

Ableism Adultism Affirmative action Ageism Allport's scale Anti-discrimination law Apartheid Antiziganism Colorism Cultural assimilation Egalitarianism Equal opportunity

Equal rights Ethnic Penalty Genetic discrimination Genocide Heightism Homophobia Institutionalized discrimination Microaggression Persecution

Racial segregation Racism Reverse discrimination Second-class citizen Sexism Social conflict Speciesism Slavery State racism Statistical discrimination (economics) Stereotype Stigma management Transphobia

References

• Topics.law.cornell.edu
• Archive.eeoc.gov
• Introduction to Sociology. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2009. Print.

External links

• Legal definitions
  • Australia
  • Canada
  • Russia
  • US
• Employment Discrimination Laws in the United States
• Discrimination Laws in Europe
• Behavioral Biology and Racism
• Anti-Racism and Hate
• Age discrimination
• Speciesism

UpToDate Contents

全文を閲覧するには購読必要です。 To read the full text you will need to subscribe.

• 1. 小児における末梢のリンパ節腫脹：評価および診断的アプローチ peripheral lymphadenopathy in children evaluation and diagnostic approach
• 2. 慢性膵炎における超音波内視鏡検査 endoscopic ultrasound in chronic pancreatitis
• 3. 小児における緊急気道マネージメント：小児特有の検討事項 emergency airway management in children unique pediatric considerations
• 4. 炎症性腸疾患患者における過敏性腸症候群 irritable bowel syndrome in patients with inflammatory bowel disease
• 5. TTウイルスおよびその他のアネロウイルス tt virus and other anelloviruses

English Journal

• Metabolite profiling of pea roots in response to phosphate availability.

• Laparre J, Balzergue C, Rochange S, Ludwiczak P, Letisse F, Portais JC, Becard G, Puech-Pages V.
• Plant signaling & behavior.2011 Jun 1;6(6). [Epub ahead of print]
• PMID 21455026

• Quantifying muscle asymmetries in cervical dystonia with electrical impedance: A preliminary assessment.

• Lungu C, Tarulli AW, Tarsy D, Mongiovi P, Vanderhorst VG, Rutkove SB.
• Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology.2011 May;122(5):1027-31. Epub 2010 Oct 12.
• PMID 20943436

• Cues to intention: The role of movement information.

• Sartori L, Becchio C, Castiello U.
• Cognition.2011 May;119(2):242-52. Epub 2011 Feb 23.
• PMID 21349505

Japanese Journal

• The Chicken HS4 Insulator Element Does Not Protect the H19 ICR from Differential DNA Methylation in Yeast Artificial Chromosome Transgenic Mouse

• Okamura Eiichi,Matsuzaki Hitomi,Fukamizu Akiyoshi,Tanimoto Keiji,松﨑 仁美,深水 昭吉,谷本 啓司
• PLoS ONE 8(9), e73925, 2013-09
• … Because a randomly integrated H19 ICR fragment, when incorporated into the genome of transgenic mice (TgM), was allele-specifically methylated in somatic, but not in germ cells, it was suggested that allele-discriminating epigenetic signature, set within or somewhere outside of the Tg H19 ICR fragment in germ cells, was later translated into a differential DNA methylation pattern. …
• NAID 120005342716

• Suitability of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment versus the Mini-Mental State Examination in Detecting Vascular Cognitive Impairment.

• Ihara Masafumi,Okamoto Yoko,Takahashi Ryosuke
• Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases 22(6), 737-741, 2013-08
• … Z-scores were calculated to evaluate the discriminating ability of individual MMSE and MoCA-J subtest scores. …
• NAID 120005312060

• webコンテンツのジャンル推定に向いた実用的な2段階SVMの構築

• 松本 一貝,服部 元,小川 圭介,橋本 真幸
• 情報処理学会研究報告. 情報学基礎研究会報告 2013-IFAT-111(22), 1-3, 2013-07-15
• web サイトの内容や分野を表すジャンルコードを計算機で推定するジャンル推定技術がマーケティング分野で重要になってきている.一般的に同技術の場合,ジャンル推定に適した単語をあらかじめ求めておき,推定対象ページに現れるそれらの語の出現頻度を基とした特徴ベクトルでジャンル判定を行う.しかし必要な単語数は膨大で識別器の学習は通常困難である.そこで,情報量基準で選択した最小限の単語数でジャンル別 SVM …
• NAID 110009585864

• webコンテンツのジャンル推定に向いた実用的な2段階SVMの構築

• 松本 一貝,服部 元,小川 圭介,橋本 真幸
• 情報処理学会研究報告. データベース・システム研究会報告 2013-DBS-157(22), 1-3, 2013-07-15
• web サイトの内容や分野を表すジャンルコードを計算機で推定するジャンル推定技術がマーケティング分野で重要になってきている.一般的に同技術の場合,ジャンル推定に適した単語をあらかじめ求めておき,推定対象ページに現れるそれらの語の出現頻度を基とした特徴ベクトルでジャンル判定を行う.しかし必要な単語数は膨大で識別器の学習は通常困難である.そこで,情報量基準で選択した最小限の単語数でジャンル別 SVM …
• NAID 110009585830

Related Links

• discriminatingの意味・用例｜英辞郎 on the WEB：アルク

discriminating 【形】 識別力のある、目の肥えた、違いが分かる 際立った、特異... - アルクがお届けする進化するオンライン英和・和英辞書データベース。一般的な単語や連語から、イディオム、専門用語、スラングまで幅広く収録。

• Discriminating | Definition of discriminating by Merriam-Webster

: liking only things that are of good quality : able to recognize the difference between things that are of good quality and those that are not Full Definition of DISCRIMINATING 1: making a distinction : distinguishing <a discriminating mark>

• discriminatingの意味 - goo辞書 英和和英

discriminatingとは。意味や和訳。[形]1 区別[差別]する；分析的なa discriminating test分析試験.2 特徴ある；特異な；識別力のある；慧眼(けいがん)の，明敏な；鋭い審美眼[批評眼]のあるa discriminating featureきわだった特徴a ...

Related Pictures