WordNet

the quality of being believable or trustworthy (同)credibleness, believability
extend credit to; "dont trust my ex-wife; I wont pay her debts anymore"
something (as property) held by one party (the trustee) for the benefit of another (the beneficiary); "he is the beneficiary of a generous trust set up by his father"
the trait of believing in the honesty and reliability of others; "the experience destroyed his trust and personal dignity" (同)trustingness, trustfulness
a consortium of independent organizations formed to limit competition by controlling the production and distribution of a product or service; "they set up the trust in the hope of gaining a monopoly" (同)corporate trust, combine, cartel
have confidence or faith in; "We can trust in God"; "Rely on your friends"; "bank on your good education"; "I swear by my grandmothers recipes" (同)swear, rely, bank
allow without fear
a trustful relationship; "he took me into his confidence"; "he betrayed their trust" (同)trust
a state of confident hopefulness that events will be favorable; "public confidence in the economy"
a feeling of trust (in someone or something); "I have confidence in our team"; "confidence is always borrowed, never owned"
a secret that is confided or entrusted to another; "everyone trusted him with their confidences"; "the priest could not reveal her confidences"
loyalty or allegiance to a cause or a person; "keep the faith"; "they broke faith with their investors"
complete confidence in a person or plan etc; "he cherished the faith of a good woman"; "the doctor-patient relationship is based on trust" (同)trust
the quality of being incredible (同)incredibleness
credibility among young fashionable urban individuals (同)street cred, cred

PrepTutorEJDIC

信用できること,確実性
〈U〉(人の誠実さ・能力,物の性能などに対する)信頼,信任,信用《+in+名》 / 〈C〉信頼できる人(物) / 〈U〉『期待』,確信,希望 / 〈U〉委託,保管,管理;世話,保護 / 〈U〉(信頼にこたえる)義務,責任;(託された)責務 / 〈U〉(財産の)信託;〈C〉信託作産 / 〈C〉(市場を独占しようとする目的で結成された)企業合同,トラスト / 〈人・物事〉‘を'『信用する』,信頼する / …を当てにする,‘に'頼る(depend on) / 《trust+that節》…‘と'『期待する』,劾信する / 《trust+名+to+名》(人に)…‘を'『任せる』,委託する,信託する / 《trust+名+for+名》(…を)〈人〉‘に'信用貸しする,掛け売りする / (…を)信用する,信頼する《+in+名》 / (…を)当てにする《+to+名(doing)》 / 期待する,確信する(hope)
〈U〉《修飾語を伴って》『信頼』,信用,信任;(…を)信頼(信用)すること《+『in』+『名』》 / 〈U〉(自分の思想・能力・行動などに対する)『確信』,自信 / 〈C〉打ち明け話,秘密(secret) / =confidence game(trick)
〈U〉『信頼』,信用;確信,信念 / 〈U〉(…への)『信仰』,(…に対する)信心(belief)《+『in』+『名』》 / 〈C〉教義,信条(doctrine) / 〈U〉信義,誠実(sincerity) / 〈U〉誓約,約束
あてになるように,確実に
『あてにする』,たよる
信じられないこと,信用できないこと
(特に政治家の)言行不一致;(世間の)不信感

Wikipedia preview

出典(authority):フリー百科事典『ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』「2015/08/05 18:29:39」(JST)

wiki en

[Wiki en表示]

Credibility refers to the objective and subjective components of the believability of a source or message.

Traditionally, modern, credibility has two key components: trustworthiness and expertise, which both have objective and subjective components. Trustworthiness is based more on subjective factors, but can include objective measurements such as established reliability. Expertise can be similarly subjectively perceived, but also includes relatively objective characteristics of the source or message (e.g., credentials, certification or information quality).^[1] Secondary components of credibility include source dynamism (charisma) and physical attractiveness.

Credibility online has become an important topic since the mid-1990s. This is because the web has increasingly become an information resource. The Credibility and Digital Media Project @ UCSB^[2] highlights recent and ongoing work in this area, including recent consideration of digital media, youth, and credibility. In addition, the Persuasive Technology Lab^[3] at Stanford University has studied web credibility and proposed the principal components of online credibility and a general theory called Prominence-Interpretation Theory.^[4]

Journalistic credibility

According to the Society of Professional Journalists code of ethics, professional integrity is the cornerstone of a journalist's credibility.^[5]

Scientific credibility

Scientific credibility has been defined as the extent to which science in general is recognized as a source of reliable information about the world.^[6] The term has also been applied more narrowly, as an assessment of the credibility of the work of an individual scientist or a field of research. Here, the phrase refers to how closely the work in question adheres to scientific principles, such as the scientific method.^[7] The method most commonly used to assess the quality of science is peer review and then publication as part of the scientific literature.^[8] Other approaches include the collaborative assessment of a topic by a group of experts, this process can produce reviews such as those published by the Cochrane Collaboration,^[9] or the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.^[10]

The general public can give a great deal of weight to perceptions of scientific authority in their decisions on controversial issues that involve scientific research, such as biotechnology.^[11] However, both the credibility and authority of science is questioned by groups with non-mainstream views, such as some advocates of alternative medicine,^[12] or those who dispute the scientific consensus on a topic, such as AIDS denialists^[13]^[14] and evolution.

Street credibility

Often abbreviated street cred, whether someone's word on the street can be believed.^[15] Particularly important in hip-hop .

References

^ Flanagin and Metzger (2008), Digital media and youth: Unparalleled opportunity and unprecedented responsibility. In M. Metzger, & A. Flanagin (Editors), Digital media, youth, and credibility (pp. 5–28). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
^ Credibility.ucsb.edu
^ Captology.stanford.eu
^ Credibility.stanford.edu
^ SPJ.org (see Preamble)
^ Bocking, Stephen (2004). Nature's experts: science, politics, and the environment. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. p. 164. ISBN 0-8135-3398-8.
^ Alkin, Marvin C. (2004). Evaluation roots: tracing theorists' views and influences. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage. p. 134. ISBN 0-7619-2894-4.
^ Bocking, Stephen (2004). Nature's experts: science, politics, and the environment. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. p. 165. ISBN 0-8135-3398-8.
^ What is a Cochrane review The Cochrane Collaboration, Accessed 5 January 2009
^ Agrawala, S. (1998). "Structural and Process History of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change" (PDF). Climatic Change 39 (4): 621–642. doi:10.1023/A:1005312331477.
^ Brossard, Dominique; Nisbet, Matthew C. (2007). "Deference to Scientific Authority Among a Low Information Public: Understanding U.S. Opinion on Agricultural Biotechnology". International Journal of Public Opinion Research 19 (1): 24. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edl003. Lay summary.
^ O'callaghan, F.V.; Jordan, N. (2003). "Postmodern values, attitudes and the use of complementary medicine". Complementary Therapies in Medicine 11 (1): 28–32. doi:10.1016/S0965-2299(02)00109-7. PMID 12667972. ^{[dead link]}
^ Smith TC, Novella SP (August 2007). "HIV denial in the Internet era". PLoS Med. 4 (8): e256. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040256. PMC 1949841. PMID 17713982.
^ Epstein, Steven (1996). Impure science: AIDS, activism, and the politics of knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 0-520-21445-5.
^ "Definition of cred". Merriam-Webster. Retrieved 22 March 2014.

External links

Handbook of Management Scales: Credibility
College students’ news habits, preferences, and credibility perceptions

UpToDate Contents

全文を閲覧するには購読必要です。 To read the full text you will need to subscribe.

1. 安定した虚血性心疾患：血行再建術の適応 stable ischemic heart disease indications for revascularization
2. 児童虐待：社会的および法医学的問題 child abuse social and medicolegal issues
3. 痙攣発作およびてんかんを有する患者に対する自動車運転の制限 driving restrictions for patients with seizures and epilepsy
4. 刺鍼法 acupuncture
5. 小児における標準的な予防接種：親による接種控えと接種拒否 standard childhood vaccines parental hesitancy or refusal

English Journal

The oblique perspective: philosophical diagnostics of contemporary life sciences research.

Zwart H1.
Life sciences, society and policy.Life Sci Soc Policy.2017 Dec;13(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s40504-017-0047-9. Epub 2017 Mar 4.
PMID 28260172

Developing population models: A systematic approach for pesticide risk assessment using herbaceous plants as an example.

Schmolke A1, Kapo KE2, Rueda-Cediel P3, Thorbek P4, Brain R5, Forbes V3.
The Science of the total environment.Sci Total Environ.2017 Dec 1;599-600:1929-1938. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.116. Epub 2017 May 22.
PMID 28549368

Internet delivered cognitive behavior therapy for antenatal depression: A randomised controlled trial.

Forsell E1, Bendix M2, Holländare F3, Szymanska von Schultz B4, Nasiell J5, Blomdahl-Wetterholm M6, Eriksson C7, Kvarned S7, Lindau van der Linden J7, Söderberg E7, Jokinen J8, Wide K9, Kaldo V10.
Journal of affective disorders.J Affect Disord.2017 Oct 15;221:56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.06.013. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
PMID 28628768

The role of negative affect and message credibility in perceived effectiveness of smokeless tobacco health warning labels in Navi Mumbai, India and Dhaka, Bangladesh: A moderated-mediation analysis.

Mutti-Packer S1, Reid JL2, Thrasher JF3, Romer D4, Fong GT5, Gupta PC6, Pednekar MS7, Nargis N8, Hammond D9.
Addictive behaviors.Addict Behav.2017 Oct;73:22-29. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.04.002. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
PMID 28441573

Japanese Journal

レビューを対象とした信頼性判断支援システムの提案

伊木惇,亀井清華,藤田聡
情報処理学会論文誌 55(11), 2461-2475, 2014-11-15
ecサイトにおける商品のレビューは,商品購入の意思決定に大きく関わり,価値ある情報として注目されている.一方で,ステルスマーケティングを目的とした,レビュースパムと呼ばれる信頼性の低いレビューの投稿が問題となっている.既存研究では,レビューの文章などから,それらスパムを検知する取り組みが行われてきた.しかしながら依然として,すべてのスパムの検知は難しい.さらに,レビューを読むユーザ自身が判断するに …
NAID 110009843055

EUの環境リーダーシップと域内事情―ワシントン条約第15回締約国会議における大西洋クロマグロの場合

和達容子
長崎大学総合環境研究 17(1), 53-60, 2014-10-01
… The outcome of international negotiations there was disappointing and had a negative impact on the credibility of the EU at international level, and on confidence between the Member States. …
NAID 120005477110

提携研究機関誌からの論文紹介 The Advertising Research Foundation 『Journal of Advertising Research』より When Do Advertising Parodies Hurt? : The Power of Humor and Credibility In Viral Spoof Advertisements

SABRI OUIDADE,MICHEL GERALDINE
日経広告研究所報 48(5), 64-46, 2014-10
NAID 40020226943

自己組織化マップおよび対応分析による口コミ情報を用いた地域性特徴分析(<特集>情報経営への言語的アプローチ)

中岡伊織
日本情報経営学会誌 35(1), 87-95, 2014-09-30
… Second, each information is evaluated effectiveness using TF-IDF method and credibility using semantic orientations of words. …
NAID 110009862973