adj.

求心性の

関: afferent、concentric

WordNet

tending to move toward a center; "centripetal force"
of a nerve fiber or impulse originating outside and passing toward the central nervous system; "sensory neurons" (同)receptive, sensory
tending to unify (同)unifying
of nerves and nerve impulses; conveying sensory information from the sense organs to the CNS; "afferent nerves"; "afferent impulses"
having a common center; "concentric rings" (同)concentrical, homocentric
the acceleration toward the center that holds a satellite in elliptical orbit

PrepTutorEJDIC

中心に向かう,求心性の,求心力による
(神経・血管などが)求心性の(末梢(まっしょう)から中枢に向かうこと)
中心を同じくする,同心の

Wikipedia preview

出典(authority):フリー百科事典『ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』「2016/04/19 17:45:40」(JST)

wiki en

[Wiki en表示]

A centripetal force (from Latin centrum "center" and petere "to seek"^[1]) is a force that makes a body follow a curved path. Its direction is always orthogonal to the motion of the body and towards the fixed point of the instantaneous center of curvature of the path. Isaac Newton described it as "a force by which bodies are drawn or impelled, or in any way tend, towards a point as to a centre".^[2] In Newtonian mechanics, gravity provides the centripetal force responsible for astronomical orbits.

One common example involving centripetal force is the case in which a body moves with uniform speed along a circular path. The centripetal force is directed at right angles to the motion and also along the radius towards the centre of the circular path.^[3]^[4] The mathematical description was derived in 1659 by the Dutch physicist Christiaan Huygens.^[5]

1 Formula
2 Sources of centripetal force
3 Analysis of several cases
- 3.1 Uniform circular motion
- 3.2 Calculus derivation
  - 3.2.1 Derivation using vectors
  - 3.2.2 Example: The banked turn
- 3.3 Nonuniform circular motion
- 3.4 General planar motion
  - 3.4.1 Polar coordinates
  - 3.4.2 Local coordinates
    - 3.4.2.1 Alternative approach
    - 3.4.2.2 Example: circular motion
4 See also
5 Notes and references
6 Further reading
7 External links

Formula

The magnitude of the centripetal force on an object of mass m moving at tangential speed v along a path with radius of curvature r is:^[6]

where is the centripetal acceleration. The direction of the force is toward the center of the circle in which the object is moving, or the osculating circle (the circle that best fits the local path of the object, if the path is not circular).^[7] The speed in the formula is squared, so twice the speed needs four times the force. The inverse relationship with the radius of curvature shows that half the radial distance requires twice the force. This force is also sometimes written in terms of the angular velocity ω of the object about the center of the circle, related to the tangential velocity by the formula

so that

Expressed using the orbital period T for one revolution of the circle,

the equation becomes

^[8]

In particle accelerators, velocity can be very high (close to the speed of light in vacuum) so the same rest mass now exerts greater inertia (relativistic mass) thereby requiring greater force for the same centripetal acceleration, so the equation becomes:

where

is called the Lorentz factor.

Sources of centripetal force

A body experiencing uniform circular motion requires a centripetal force, towards the axis as shown, to maintain its circular path.

In the case of an object that is swinging around on the end of a rope in a horizontal plane, the centripetal force on the object is supplied by the tension of the rope. The rope example is an example involving a 'pull' force. The centripetal force can also be supplied as a 'push' force, such as in the case where the normal reaction of a wall supplies the centripetal force for a wall of death rider.

Newton's idea of a centripetal force corresponds to what is nowadays referred to as a central force. When a satellite is in orbit around a planet, gravity is considered to be a centripetal force even though in the case of eccentric orbits, the gravitational force is directed towards the focus, and not towards the instantaneous center of curvature.^[9]

Another example of centripetal force arises in the helix that is traced out when a charged particle moves in a uniform magnetic field in the absence of other external forces. In this case, the magnetic force is the centripetal force that acts towards the helix axis.

Analysis of several cases

Below are three examples of increasing complexity, with derivations of the formulas governing velocity and acceleration.

Uniform circular motion

Uniform circular motion refers to the case of constant rate of rotation. Here are two approaches to describing this case.

Calculus derivation

In two dimensions, the position vector , which has magnitude (length) and directed at an angle above the x-axis, can be expressed in Cartesian coordinates using the unit vectors and :^[10]

Assume uniform circular motion, which requires three things.

The object moves only on a circle.
The radius of the circle does not change in time.
The object moves with constant angular velocity around the circle. Therefore, where is time.

Now find the velocity and acceleration of the motion by taking derivatives of position with respect to time.

Notice that the term in parenthesis is the original expression of in Cartesian coordinates. Consequently,

negative shows that the acceleration is pointed towards the center of the circle (opposite the radius), hence it is called "centripetal" (i.e. "center-seeking"). While objects naturally follow a straight path (due to inertia), this centripetal acceleration describes the circular motion path caused by a centripetal force.

Derivation using vectors

Vector relationships for uniform circular motion; vector Ω representing the rotation is normal to the plane of the orbit with polarity determined by the right-hand rule and magnitude dθ /dt.

The image at right shows the vector relationships for uniform circular motion. The rotation itself is represented by the angular velocity vector Ω, which is normal to the plane of the orbit (using the right-hand rule) and has magnitude given by:

with θ the angular position at time t. In this subsection, dθ/dt is assumed constant, independent of time. The distance traveled dℓ of the particle in time dt along the circular path is

which, by properties of the vector cross product, has magnitude rdθ and is in the direction tangent to the circular path.

Consequently,

In other words,

Differentiating with respect to time,

Lagrange's formula states:

Applying Lagrange's formula with the observation that Ω • r(t) = 0 at all times,

In words, the acceleration is pointing directly opposite to the radial displacement r at all times, and has a magnitude:

where vertical bars |...| denote the vector magnitude, which in the case of r(t) is simply the radius r of the path. This result agrees with the previous section, though the notation is slightly different.

When the rate of rotation is made constant in the analysis of nonuniform circular motion, that analysis agrees with this one.

A merit of the vector approach is that it is manifestly independent of any coordinate system.

Example: The banked turn

Upper panel: Ball on a banked circular track moving with constant speed v; Lower panel: Forces on the ball

The upper panel in the image at right shows a ball in circular motion on a banked curve. The curve is banked at an angle θ from the horizontal, and the surface of the road is considered to be slippery. The objective is to find what angle the bank must have so the ball does not slide off the road.^[11] Intuition tells us that, on a flat curve with no banking at all, the ball will simply slide off the road; while with a very steep banking, the ball will slide to the center unless it travels the curve rapidly.

Apart from any acceleration that might occur in the direction of the path, the lower panel of the image above indicates the forces on the ball. There are two forces; one is the force of gravity vertically downward through the center of mass of the ball mg, where m is the mass of the ball and g is the gravitational acceleration; the second is the upward normal force exerted by the road perpendicular to the road surface ma_n. The centripetal force demanded by the curved motion is also shown above. This centripetal force is not a third force applied to the ball, but rather must be provided by the net force on the ball resulting from vector addition of the normal force and the force of gravity. The resultant or net force on the ball found by vector addition of the normal force exerted by the road and vertical force due to gravity must equal the centripetal force dictated by the need to travel a circular path. The curved motion is maintained so long as this net force provides the centripetal force requisite to the motion.

The horizontal net force on the ball is the horizontal component of the force from the road, which has magnitude |F_h| = m|a_n|sinθ. The vertical component of the force from the road must counteract the gravitational force: |F_v| = m|a_n|cosθ = m|g|, which implies |a_n|=|g| / cosθ. Substituting into the above formula for |F_h| yields a horizontal force to be:

On the other hand, at velocity |v| on a circular path of radius r, kinematics says that the force needed to turn the ball continuously into the turn is the radially inward centripetal force F_c of magnitude:

Consequently, the ball is in a stable path when the angle of the road is set to satisfy the condition:

or,

As the angle of bank θ approaches 90°, the tangent function approaches infinity, allowing larger values for |v|²/r. In words, this equation states that for faster speeds (bigger |v|) the road must be banked more steeply (a larger value for θ), and for sharper turns (smaller r) the road also must be banked more steeply, which accords with intuition. When the angle θ does not satisfy the above condition, the horizontal component of force exerted by the road does not provide the correct centripetal force, and an additional frictional force tangential to the road surface is called upon to provide the difference. If friction cannot do this (that is, the coefficient of friction is exceeded), the ball slides to a different radius where the balance can be realized.^[12]^[13]

These ideas apply to air flight as well. See the FAA pilot's manual.^[14]

Nonuniform circular motion

Velocity and acceleration for nonuniform circular motion: the velocity vector is tangential to the orbit, but the acceleration vector is not radially inward because of its tangential component a_θ that increases the rate of rotation: dω / dt = | a_θ| / R.

As a generalization of the uniform circular motion case, suppose the angular rate of rotation is not constant. The acceleration now has a tangential component, as shown the image at right. This case is used to demonstrate a derivation strategy based on a polar coordinate system.

Let r(t) be a vector that describes the position of a point mass as a function of time. Since we are assuming circular motion, let r(t) = R·u_r, where R is a constant (the radius of the circle) and u_r is the unit vector pointing from the origin to the point mass. The direction of u_r is described by θ, the angle between the x-axis and the unit vector, measured counterclockwise from the x-axis. The other unit vector for polar coordinates, u_θ is perpendicular to u_r and points in the direction of increasing θ. These polar unit vectors can be expressed in terms of Cartesian unit vectors in the x and y directions, denoted i and j respectively:^[15]

u_r = cosθ i + sinθ j

and

u_θ = -sinθ i + cosθ j.

One can differentiate to find velocity:

where ω is the angular velocity dθ/dt.

This result for the velocity matches expectations that the velocity should be directed tangentially to the circle, and that the magnitude of the velocity should be rω. Differentiating again, and noting that

we find that the acceleration, a is:

Thus, the radial and tangential components of the acceleration are:

and

where |v| = r ω is the magnitude of the velocity (the speed).

These equations express mathematically that, in the case of an object that moves along a circular path with a changing speed, the acceleration of the body may be decomposed into a perpendicular component that changes the direction of motion (the centripetal acceleration), and a parallel, or tangential component, that changes the speed.

General planar motion

Position vector r, always points radially from the origin.

Velocity vector v, always tangent to the path of motion.

Acceleration vector a, not parallel to the radial motion but offset by the angular and Coriolis accelerations, nor tangent to the path but offset by the centripetal and radial accelerations.

Kinematic vectors in plane polar coordinates. Notice the setup is not restricted to 2d space, but a plane in any higher dimension.

Polar unit vectors at two times t and t + dt for a particle with trajectory r ( t ); on the left the unit vectors u_ρ and u_θ at the two times are moved so their tails all meet, and are shown to trace an arc of a unit radius circle. Their rotation in time dt is dθ, just the same angle as the rotation of the trajectory r ( t ).

Polar coordinates

The above results can be derived perhaps more simply in polar coordinates, and at the same time extended to general motion within a plane, as shown next. Polar coordinates in the plane employ a radial unit vector u_ρ and an angular unit vector u_θ, as shown above.^[16] A particle at position r is described by:

where the notation ρ is used to describe the distance of the path from the origin instead of R to emphasize that this distance is not fixed, but varies with time. The unit vector u_ρ travels with the particle and always points in the same direction as r(t). Unit vector u_θ also travels with the particle and stays orthogonal to u_ρ. Thus, u_ρ and u_θ form a local Cartesian coordinate system attached to the particle, and tied to the path traveled by the particle.^[17] By moving the unit vectors so their tails coincide, as seen in the circle at the left of the image above, it is seen that u_ρ and u_θ form a right-angled pair with tips on the unit circle that trace back and forth on the perimeter of this circle with the same angle θ(t) as r(t).

When the particle moves, its velocity is

To evaluate the velocity, the derivative of the unit vector u_ρ is needed. Because u_ρ is a unit vector, its magnitude is fixed, and it can change only in direction, that is, its change du_ρ has a component only perpendicular to u_ρ. When the trajectory r(t) rotates an amount dθ, u_ρ, which points in the same direction as r(t), also rotates by dθ. See image above. Therefore, the change in u_ρ is

or

In a similar fashion, the rate of change of u_θ is found. As with u_ρ, u_θ is a unit vector and can only rotate without changing size. To remain orthogonal to u_ρ while the trajectory r(t) rotates an amount dθ, u_θ, which is orthogonal to r(t), also rotates by dθ. See image above. Therefore, the change du_θ is orthogonal to u_θ and proportional to dθ (see image above):

The image above shows the sign to be negative: to maintain orthogonality, if du_ρ is positive with dθ, then du_θ must decrease.

Substituting the derivative of u_ρ into the expression for velocity:

To obtain the acceleration, another time differentiation is done:

Substituting the derivatives of u_ρ and u_θ, the acceleration of the particle is:^[18]

As a particular example, if the particle moves in a circle of constant radius R, then dρ/dt = 0, v = v_θ, and:

where

These results agree with those above for nonuniform circular motion. See also the article on non-uniform circular motion. If this acceleration is multiplied by the particle mass, the leading term is the centripetal force and the negative of the second term related to angular acceleration is sometimes called the Euler force.^[19]

For trajectories other than circular motion, for example, the more general trajectory envisioned in the image above, the instantaneous center of rotation and radius of curvature of the trajectory are related only indirectly to the coordinate system defined by u_ρ and u_θ and to the length |r(t)| = ρ. Consequently, in the general case, it is not straightforward to disentangle the centripetal and Euler terms from the above general acceleration equation.^[20] ^[21] To deal directly with this issue, local coordinates are preferable, as discussed next.

Local coordinates

Local coordinate system for planar motion on a curve. Two different positions are shown for distances s and s + ds along the curve. At each position s, unit vector u_n points along the outward normal to the curve and unit vector u_t is tangential to the path. The radius of curvature of the path is ρ as found from the rate of rotation of the tangent to the curve with respect to arc length, and is the radius of the osculating circle at position s. The unit circle on the left shows the rotation of the unit vectors with s.

Local coordinates mean a set of coordinates that travel with the particle,^[22] and have orientation determined by the path of the particle.^[23] Unit vectors are formed as shown in the image at right, both tangential and normal to the path. This coordinate system sometimes is referred to as intrinsic or path coordinates^[24]^[25] or nt-coordinates, for normal-tangential, referring to these unit vectors. These coordinates are a very special example of a more general concept of local coordinates from the theory of differential forms.^[26]

Distance along the path of the particle is the arc length s, considered to be a known function of time.

A center of curvature is defined at each position s located a distance ρ (the radius of curvature) from the curve on a line along the normal u_n (s). The required distance ρ(s) at arc length s is defined in terms of the rate of rotation of the tangent to the curve, which in turn is determined by the path itself. If the orientation of the tangent relative to some starting position is θ(s), then ρ(s) is defined by the derivative dθ/ds:

The radius of curvature usually is taken as positive (that is, as an absolute value), while the curvature κ is a signed quantity.

A geometric approach to finding the center of curvature and the radius of curvature uses a limiting process leading to the osculating circle.^[27]^[28] See image above.

Using these coordinates, the motion along the path is viewed as a succession of circular paths of ever-changing center, and at each position s constitutes non-uniform circular motion at that position with radius ρ. The local value of the angular rate of rotation then is given by:

with the local speed v given by:

As for the other examples above, because unit vectors cannot change magnitude, their rate of change is always perpendicular to their direction (see the left-hand insert in the image above):^[29]

Consequently, the velocity and acceleration are:^[28]^[30]^[31]

and using the chain-rule of differentiation:

with the tangential acceleration

In this local coordinate system, the acceleration resembles the expression for nonuniform circular motion with the local radius ρ(s), and the centripetal acceleration is identified as the second term.^[32]

Extending this approach to three dimensional space curves leads to the Frenet–Serret formulas.^[33]^[34]

Alternative approach

Looking at the image above, one might wonder whether adequate account has been taken of the difference in curvature between ρ(s) and ρ(s + ds) in computing the arc length as ds = ρ(s)dθ. Reassurance on this point can be found using a more formal approach outlined below. This approach also makes connection with the article on curvature.

To introduce the unit vectors of the local coordinate system, one approach is to begin in Cartesian coordinates and describe the local coordinates in terms of these Cartesian coordinates. In terms of arc length s, let the path be described as:^[35]

Then an incremental displacement along the path ds is described by:

where primes are introduced to denote derivatives with respect to s. The magnitude of this displacement is ds, showing that:^[36]

(Eq. 1)

This displacement is necessarily a tangent to the curve at s, showing that the unit vector tangent to the curve is:

while the outward unit vector normal to the curve is

Orthogonality can be verified by showing that the vector dot product is zero. The unit magnitude of these vectors is a consequence of Eq. 1. Using the tangent vector, the angle θ of the tangent to the curve is given by:

and

The radius of curvature is introduced completely formally (without need for geometric interpretation) as:

The derivative of θ can be found from that for sinθ:

Now:

in which the denominator is unity. With this formula for the derivative of the sine, the radius of curvature becomes:

where the equivalence of the forms stems from differentiation of Eq. 1:

With these results, the acceleration can be found:

as can be verified by taking the dot product with the unit vectors u_t(s) and u_n(s). This result for acceleration is the same as that for circular motion based on the radius ρ. Using this coordinate system in the inertial frame, it is easy to identify the force normal to the trajectory as the centripetal force and that parallel to the trajectory as the tangential force. From a qualitative standpoint, the path can be approximated by an arc of a circle for a limited time, and for the limited time a particular radius of curvature applies, the centrifugal and Euler forces can be analyzed on the basis of circular motion with that radius.

This result for acceleration agrees with that found earlier. However, in this approach, the question of the change in radius of curvature with s is handled completely formally, consistent with a geometric interpretation, but not relying upon it, thereby avoiding any questions the image above might suggest about neglecting the variation in ρ.

Example: circular motion

To illustrate the above formulas, let x, y be given as:

Then:

which can be recognized as a circular path around the origin with radius α. The position s = 0 corresponds to [α, 0], or 3 o'clock. To use the above formalism, the derivatives are needed:

With these results, one can verify that:

The unit vectors can also be found:

which serve to show that s = 0 is located at position [ρ, 0] and s = ρπ/2 at [0, ρ], which agrees with the original expressions for x and y. In other words, s is measured counterclockwise around the circle from 3 o'clock. Also, the derivatives of these vectors can be found:

To obtain velocity and acceleration, a time-dependence for s is necessary. For counterclockwise motion at variable speed v(t):

where v(t) is the speed and t is time, and s(t = 0) = 0. Then:

where it already is established that α = ρ. This acceleration is the standard result for non-uniform circular motion.

Notes and references

^ Craig, John (1849). A new universal etymological, technological and pronouncing dictionary of the English language: embracing all terms used in art, science, and literature, Volume 1. Harvard University. p. 291. Extract of page 291
^ Newton, Isaac (2010). The principia : mathematical principles of natural philosophy. [S.l.]: Snowball Pub. p. 10. ISBN 978-1-60796-240-3.
^ Russelkl C Hibbeler (2009). "Equations of Motion: Normal and tangential coordinates". Engineering Mechanics: Dynamics (12 ed.). Prentice Hall. p. 131. ISBN 0-13-607791-9.
^ Paul Allen Tipler, Gene Mosca (2003). Physics for scientists and engineers (5th ed.). Macmillan. p. 129. ISBN 0-7167-8339-8.
^ P. Germain, M. Piau and D. Caillerie, ed. (2012). Theoretical and Applied Mechanics. Elsevier. ISBN 9780444600202.
^ Chris Carter (2001). Facts and Practice for A-Level: Physics. S.l.: Oxford University Press. p. 30. ISBN 978-0-19-914768-7.
^ Eugene Lommel and George William Myers (1900). Experimental physics. K. Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co. p. 63.
^ Colwell, Catharine H. "A Derivation of the Formulas for Centripetal Acceleration". PhysicsLAB. Retrieved 31 July 2011.
^ Theo Koupelis (2010). In Quest of the Universe (6th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. p. 83. ISBN 978-0-7637-6858-4.
^ A. V. Durrant (1996). Vectors in physics and engineering. CRC Press. p. 103. ISBN 978-0-412-62710-1.
^ Lawrence S. Lerner (1997). Physics for Scientists and Engineers. Boston: Jones & Bartlett Publishers. p. 128. ISBN 0-86720-479-6.
^ Arthur Beiser (2004). Schaum's Outline of Applied Physics. New York: McGraw-Hill Professional. p. 103. ISBN 0-07-142611-6.
^ Alan Darbyshire (2003). Mechanical Engineering: BTEC National Option Units. Oxford: Newnes. p. 56. ISBN 0-7506-5761-8.
^ Federal Aviation Administration (2007). Pilot's Encyclopedia of Aeronautical Knowledge. Oklahoma City OK: Skyhorse Publishing Inc. Figure 3–21. ISBN 1-60239-034-7.
^ Note: unlike the Cartesian unit vectors i and j, which are constant, in polar coordinates the direction of the unit vectors u_r and u_θ depend on θ, and so in general have non-zero time derivatives.
^ Although the polar coordinate system moves with the particle, the observer does not. The description of the particle motion remains a description from the stationary observer's point of view.
^ Notice that this local coordinate system is not autonomous; for example, its rotation in time is dictated by the trajectory traced by the particle. Note also that the radial vector r(t) does not represent the radius of curvature of the path.
^ John Robert Taylor (2005). Classical Mechanics. Sausalito CA: University Science Books. pp. 28–29. ISBN 1-891389-22-X.
^ Cornelius Lanczos (1986). The Variational Principles of Mechanics. New York: Courier Dover Publications. p. 103. ISBN 0-486-65067-7.
^ See, for example, Howard D. Curtis (2005). Orbital Mechanics for Engineering Students. Butterworth-Heinemann. p. 5. ISBN 0-7506-6169-0.
^ S. Y. Lee (2004). Accelerator physics (2nd ed.). Hackensack NJ: World Scientific. p. 37. ISBN 981-256-182-X.
^ The observer of the motion along the curve is using these local coordinates to describe the motion from the observer's frame of reference, that is, from a stationary point of view. In other words, although the local coordinate system moves with the particle, the observer does not. A change in coordinate system used by the observer is only a change in their description of observations, and does not mean that the observer has changed their state of motion, and vice versa.
^ Zhilin Li & Kazufumi Ito (2006). The immersed interface method: numerical solutions of PDEs involving interfaces and irregular domains. Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. p. 16. ISBN 0-89871-609-8.
^ K L Kumar (2003). Engineering Mechanics. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill. p. 339. ISBN 0-07-049473-8.
^ Lakshmana C. Rao, J. Lakshminarasimhan, Raju Sethuraman & SM Sivakuma (2004). Engineering Dynamics: Statics and Dynamics. Prentice Hall of India. p. 133. ISBN 81-203-2189-8.
^ Shigeyuki Morita (2001). Geometry of Differential Forms. American Mathematical Society. p. 1. ISBN 0-8218-1045-6.
^ The osculating circle at a given point P on a curve is the limiting circle of a sequence of circles that pass through P and two other points on the curve, Q and R, on either side of P, as Q and R approach P. See the online text by Lamb: Horace Lamb (1897). An Elementary Course of Infinitesimal Calculus. University Press. p. 406. ISBN 1-108-00534-9.
^ ^a ^b Guang Chen & Fook Fah Yap (2003). An Introduction to Planar Dynamics (3rd ed.). Central Learning Asia/Thomson Learning Asia. p. 34. ISBN 981-243-568-9.
^ R. Douglas Gregory (2006). Classical Mechanics: An Undergraduate Text. Cambridge University Press. p. 20. ISBN 0-521-82678-0.
^ Edmund Taylor Whittaker & William McCrea (1988). A Treatise on the Analytical Dynamics of Particles and Rigid Bodies: with an introduction to the problem of three bodies (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 20. ISBN 0-521-35883-3.
^ Jerry H. Ginsberg (2007). Engineering Dynamics. Cambridge University Press. p. 33. ISBN 0-521-88303-2.
^ Joseph F. Shelley (1990). 800 solved problems in vector mechanics for engineers: Dynamics. McGraw-Hill Professional. p. 47. ISBN 0-07-056687-9.
^ Larry C. Andrews & Ronald L. Phillips (2003). Mathematical Techniques for Engineers and Scientists. SPIE Press. p. 164. ISBN 0-8194-4506-1.
^ Ch V Ramana Murthy & NC Srinivas (2001). Applied Mathematics. New Delhi: S. Chand & Co. p. 337. ISBN 81-219-2082-5.
^ The article on curvature treats a more general case where the curve is parametrized by an arbitrary variable (denoted t), rather than by the arc length s.
^ Ahmed A. Shabana, Khaled E. Zaazaa, Hiroyuki Sugiyama (2007). Railroad Vehicle Dynamics: A Computational Approach. CRC Press. p. 91. ISBN 1-4200-4581-4.

External links

Notes from University of Winnipeg
Notes from Physics and Astronomy HyperPhysics at Georgia State University; see also home page
Notes from Britannica
Notes from PhysicsNet
NASA notes by David P. Stern
Notes from U Texas.
Analysis of smart yo-yo
The Inuit yo-yo
Kinematic Models for Design Digital Library (KMODDL)
Movies and photos of hundreds of working mechanical-systems models at Cornell University. Also includes an e-book library of classic texts on mechanical design and engineering.

UpToDate Contents

全文を閲覧するには購読必要です。 To read the full text you will need to subscribe.

1. 成人の皮膚筋炎および多発性筋炎の臨床症状と診断 clinical manifestations and diagnosis of adult dermatomyositis and polymyositis

English Journal

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound characteristics of breast cancer: correlation with prognostic factors.

Cao XL, Bao W, Zhu SG, Wang LH, Sun MH, Wang L, Men YM, Xue J.Author information Department of Ultrasound, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Yantai, People's Republic of China. Electronic address: cxl969@sina.com.AbstractThe purpose of the work described here was to investigate the correlation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) characteristics with prognostic factors in breast cancer. Forty-five consecutive breast cancer patients were studied with CEUS. All patients were diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma on the basis of biopsy or surgery results. Lack of blood perfusion of the tumor was identified in 2 cases; blood perfusion was observed in 43 cases. Enhancement was heterogeneous in 25 cases, and centripetal in 25 cases. A blood perfusion defect was present in 27 cases. Enhancement shape was irregular in 37 cases, margins were poorly defined in 34 cases, and penetrating vessels were present in 32 cases. Compared with the surrounding normal tissue, tumor tissue had faster rising times and times to peak and higher peak intensities and wash-in slopes; the differences between the two groups were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Compared with the interior of the tumor, the periphery had faster times to peak and higher peak intensities and wash-in slopes (p < 0.05). Heterogeneous enhancement, perfusion defect, centripetal enhancement and penetrating vessels were correlated with prognosis (p < 0.05). Overall, some CEUS characteristics of breast cancer were associated with prognostic factors that can predict breast cancer prognosis in vivo.
Ultrasound in medicine & biology.Ultrasound Med Biol.2014 Jan;40(1):11-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2013.08.014. Epub 2013 Oct 24.
The purpose of the work described here was to investigate the correlation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) characteristics with prognostic factors in breast cancer. Forty-five consecutive breast cancer patients were studied with CEUS. All patients were diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma
PMID 24207087

Macular pseudohole development after sustained- release dexamethasone intravitreal implant for  macular edema due to central retinal vein occlusion.

Di Antonio L, Toto L, Carpineto P, Mastropasqua A, De Nicola C, Mastropasqua L.Author information Department of Medicine and Science of Ageing, Ophthalmology Clinic, University "G. d'Annunzio" Chieti-Pescara - Italy.AbstractPurpose: To report a case of macular pseudohole (MPH) development after sustained-release dexamethasone intravitreal implant for chronic macular edema due to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). Methods: A 70-year-old man with cystoid macular edema (CME) due to CRVO underwent sustained-release dexamethasone intravitreal implant. En face optical coherence tomography (OCT) was performed before and after treatment.  Results: One month after dexamethasone intravitreal implant, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved from 1.0 to 0.5 logMAR. At 2 months, BCVA decreased from 0.5 to 1.3 logMAR. En face OCT detected the development of MPH due to exacerbation of centripetal vitreomacular transverse tractional forces on the overlying retina. Conclusions: Macular pseudohole seems to be a complication of intravitreal therapy in patients with coexisting vitreomacular traction. En face OCT gives useful information to understand the mechanism of MPH development after sustained-release dexamethasone intravitreal implant.
European journal of ophthalmology.Eur J Ophthalmol.2013 Nov 20;24(1):134-7. doi: 10.5301/ejo.5000317. Epub 2013 May 20.
Purpose: To report a case of macular pseudohole (MPH) development after sustained-release dexamethasone intravitreal implant for chronic macular edema due to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). Methods: A 70-year-old man with cystoid macular edema (CME) due to CRVO underwent sustained-release d
PMID 23709332

Disciplining and popularizing: Evolution and its publics from the modern synthesis to the present.

Smocovitis VB.Author information Department of Biology, The University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, United States; Department of History, The University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, United States. Electronic address: bsmocovi@ufl.edu.AbstractThis paper serves as an introduction to a special collection of papers exploring the centrifugal and centripetal forces in the process of disciplining and popularizing the science of evolution in the period preceding and after the modern synthesis of evolution.
Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences.Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci.2013 Nov 11. pii: S1369-8486(13)00126-X. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2013.10.001. [Epub ahead of print]
This paper serves as an introduction to a special collection of papers exploring the centrifugal and centripetal forces in the process of disciplining and popularizing the science of evolution in the period preceding and after the modern synthesis of evolution.Published by Elsevier Ltd.
PMID 24231185

An analytic model of the self-sealing mechanism of the succulent plant Delosperma cooperi.

Konrad W, Flues F, Schmich F, Speck T, Speck O.Author information Plant Biomechanics Group, Botanic Garden, Faculty of Biology, University of Freiburg, Schänzlestr. 1, D-79104 Freiburg i. Br., Germany; Department of Geosciences, Faculty of Science, University of Tübingen, Hölderlinstrasse 12, D-72074 Tübingen, Germany. Electronic address: wilfried.konrad@uni-tuebingen.de.AbstractAfter an injury, wound-sealing in leaves of the succulent plant Delosperma cooperi takes place by deformation and movement of the entire leaf within a time span of 30-60 min. In cross sections the almost cylindrical leaves reveal a centripetal arrangement of five different tissue types. Based on anatomical data and mechanical analyses of the five hulls, representing the different tissue layers, we present an analytical model describing the self-sealing process. The inclusion of viscoelastic aspects into the models enables to predict the temporal development of the self-sealing process. The formulation of the model in terms of closed functions facilitates: (i) sensitivity studies and (ii) the transfer of the model to technical systems which are based on non-biological materials.
Journal of theoretical biology.J Theor Biol.2013 Nov 7;336:96-109. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.07.013. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
After an injury, wound-sealing in leaves of the succulent plant Delosperma cooperi takes place by deformation and movement of the entire leaf within a time span of 30-60 min. In cross sections the almost cylindrical leaves reveal a centripetal arrangement of five different tissue types. Based on ana
PMID 23907028

Japanese Journal

Visualization of tumor-related blood vessels in human breast by photoacoustic imaging system with a hemispherical detector array

Scientific Reports 7, 2017-02-07
NAID 120005980817

小径ドリルにおける加工挙動評価とその解析 (特集切削現象の可視化技術)

Abrasive technology : 砥粒加工学会誌 : journal of the Japan Society for Abrasive Technology 61(2), 87-90, 2017-02
NAID 40021083365

Dahlモデルの2次元拡張と特性分析

精密工学会誌 83(6), 607-612, 2017
NAID 130005689970

求心式クロスフローろ過のケークレス条件の検討

粉体に関する討論会講演論文集 = Preprint of the Symposium on Powder Science and Technology 54, 47-50, 2016-09-12
NAID 40020958202

Related Pictures

★リンクテーブル★

リンク元	「afferent」「求心性」「concentric」

「afferent」

　　[★]

adj.

求心性の、求心の、輸入の

n.

求心路、求心性神経、求心性線維

関: afferent fiber、afferent fibre、afferent neuron、afferent pathway、afferents、centripetal、concentric、import、importation

「求心性」

　　[★]

英: afferent、concentric、centripetal
関: 求心、求心性神経、求心路、短縮性、同心性、輸入、求心性線維、同心円状

「concentric」

　　[★]

adj.

同一中心の、同心の、同心円状の。同軸を有する。集中的な

関: (adj.)eccentric 偏心の
関: afferent、centripetal、concentrically

[1] Craig, John (1849). A new universal etymological, technological and pronouncing dictionary of the English language: embracing all terms used in art, science, and literature, Volume 1. Harvard University. p. 291. Extract of page 291

[2] Newton, Isaac (2010). The principia : mathematical principles of natural philosophy. [S.l.]: Snowball Pub. p. 10. ISBN 978-1-60796-240-3.

[Hibbeler-3] Russelkl C Hibbeler (2009). "Equations of Motion: Normal and tangential coordinates". Engineering Mechanics: Dynamics (12 ed.). Prentice Hall. p. 131. ISBN 0-13-607791-9.

[Tipler0-4] Paul Allen Tipler, Gene Mosca (2003). Physics for scientists and engineers (5th ed.). Macmillan. p. 129. ISBN 0-7167-8339-8.

[5] P. Germain, M. Piau and D. Caillerie, ed. (2012). Theoretical and Applied Mechanics. Elsevier. ISBN 9780444600202.

[6] Chris Carter (2001). Facts and Practice for A-Level: Physics. S.l.: Oxford University Press. p. 30. ISBN 978-0-19-914768-7.

[7] Eugene Lommel and George William Myers (1900). Experimental physics. K. Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co. p. 63.

[8] Colwell, Catharine H. "A Derivation of the Formulas for Centripetal Acceleration". PhysicsLAB. Retrieved 31 July 2011.

[9] Theo Koupelis (2010). In Quest of the Universe (6th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. p. 83. ISBN 978-0-7637-6858-4.

[10] A. V. Durrant (1996). Vectors in physics and engineering. CRC Press. p. 103. ISBN 978-0-412-62710-1.

[Lerner-11] Lawrence S. Lerner (1997). Physics for Scientists and Engineers. Boston: Jones & Bartlett Publishers. p. 128. ISBN 0-86720-479-6.

[Schaum-12] Arthur Beiser (2004). Schaum's Outline of Applied Physics. New York: McGraw-Hill Professional. p. 103. ISBN 0-07-142611-6.

[Darbyshire-13] Alan Darbyshire (2003). Mechanical Engineering: BTEC National Option Units. Oxford: Newnes. p. 56. ISBN 0-7506-5761-8.

[FAA-14] Federal Aviation Administration (2007). Pilot's Encyclopedia of Aeronautical Knowledge. Oklahoma City OK: Skyhorse Publishing Inc. Figure 3–21. ISBN 1-60239-034-7.

[15] Note: unlike the Cartesian unit vectors i and j, which are constant, in polar coordinates the direction of the unit vectors u_r and u_θ depend on θ, and so in general have non-zero time derivatives.

[polar-16] Although the polar coordinate system moves with the particle, the observer does not. The description of the particle motion remains a description from the stationary observer's point of view.

[17] Notice that this local coordinate system is not autonomous; for example, its rotation in time is dictated by the trajectory traced by the particle. Note also that the radial vector r(t) does not represent the radius of curvature of the path.

[Taylor-18] John Robert Taylor (2005). Classical Mechanics. Sausalito CA: University Science Books. pp. 28–29. ISBN 1-891389-22-X.

[Lanczos-19] Cornelius Lanczos (1986). The Variational Principles of Mechanics. New York: Courier Dover Publications. p. 103. ISBN 0-486-65067-7.

[Curtis-20] See, for example, Howard D. Curtis (2005). Orbital Mechanics for Engineering Students. Butterworth-Heinemann. p. 5. ISBN 0-7506-6169-0.

[Lee-21] S. Y. Lee (2004). Accelerator physics (2nd ed.). Hackensack NJ: World Scientific. p. 37. ISBN 981-256-182-X.

[observer-22] The observer of the motion along the curve is using these local coordinates to describe the motion from the observer's frame of reference, that is, from a stationary point of view. In other words, although the local coordinate system moves with the particle, the observer does not. A change in coordinate system used by the observer is only a change in their description of observations, and does not mean that the observer has changed their state of motion, and vice versa.

[Ito-23] Zhilin Li & Kazufumi Ito (2006). The immersed interface method: numerical solutions of PDEs involving interfaces and irregular domains. Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. p. 16. ISBN 0-89871-609-8.

[Kumar-24] K L Kumar (2003). Engineering Mechanics. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill. p. 339. ISBN 0-07-049473-8.

[Rao-25] Lakshmana C. Rao, J. Lakshminarasimhan, Raju Sethuraman & SM Sivakuma (2004). Engineering Dynamics: Statics and Dynamics. Prentice Hall of India. p. 133. ISBN 81-203-2189-8.

[Morita-26] Shigeyuki Morita (2001). Geometry of Differential Forms. American Mathematical Society. p. 1. ISBN 0-8218-1045-6.

[osculating-27] The osculating circle at a given point P on a curve is the limiting circle of a sequence of circles that pass through P and two other points on the curve, Q and R, on either side of P, as Q and R approach P. See the online text by Lamb: Horace Lamb (1897). An Elementary Course of Infinitesimal Calculus. University Press. p. 406. ISBN 1-108-00534-9.

[Chen0-28] Guang Chen & Fook Fah Yap (2003). An Introduction to Planar Dynamics (3rd ed.). Central Learning Asia/Thomson Learning Asia. p. 34. ISBN 981-243-568-9.

[Gregory-29] R. Douglas Gregory (2006). Classical Mechanics: An Undergraduate Text. Cambridge University Press. p. 20. ISBN 0-521-82678-0.

[Whittaker-30] Edmund Taylor Whittaker & William McCrea (1988). A Treatise on the Analytical Dynamics of Particles and Rigid Bodies: with an introduction to the problem of three bodies (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 20. ISBN 0-521-35883-3.

[Ginsberg-31] Jerry H. Ginsberg (2007). Engineering Dynamics. Cambridge University Press. p. 33. ISBN 0-521-88303-2.

[Shelley-32] Joseph F. Shelley (1990). 800 solved problems in vector mechanics for engineers: Dynamics. McGraw-Hill Professional. p. 47. ISBN 0-07-056687-9.

[Andrews-33] Larry C. Andrews & Ronald L. Phillips (2003). Mathematical Techniques for Engineers and Scientists. SPIE Press. p. 164. ISBN 0-8194-4506-1.

[Chand-34] Ch V Ramana Murthy & NC Srinivas (2001). Applied Mathematics. New Delhi: S. Chand & Co. p. 337. ISBN 81-219-2082-5.

[curvature-35] The article on curvature treats a more general case where the curve is parametrized by an arbitrary variable (denoted t), rather than by the arc length s.

[Shabana-36] Ahmed A. Shabana, Khaled E. Zaazaa, Hiroyuki Sugiyama (2007). Railroad Vehicle Dynamics: A Computational Approach. CRC Press. p. 91. ISBN 1-4200-4581-4.

匿名

検索

案内

案内

centripetal