abnegate

　 　 　

WordNet

1. surrender (power or a position); "The King abnegated his power to the ministers"
2. deny or renounce; "They abnegated their gods"

PrepTutorEJDIC

1. 〈権利など〉'を'放棄する

Wikipedia preview

出典(authority):フリー百科事典『ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』「2014/02/12 15:38:28」(JST)

wiki en

[Wiki en表示]

For the politics of science/history and public policy, see Denialism. For other uses, see Denial (disambiguation).

Part of a series of articles on
Psychoanalysis
Concepts Psychosexual development Psychosocial development (Erikson) Unconscious Preconscious Consciousness Psychic apparatus Id, ego and super-ego Libido Drive Transference Countertransference Ego defenses Resistance Projection Denial
Important figures Alfred Adler Michael Balint Wilfred Bion Josef Breuer Nancy Chodorow Max Eitingon Erik Erikson Ronald Fairbairn Paul Federn Otto Fenichel Sándor Ferenczi Anna Freud Sigmund Freud Erich Fromm Harry Guntrip Karen Horney Edith Jacobson Ernest Jones Carl Jung Heinz Kohut Melanie Klein Jacques Lacan Ronald Laing Margaret Mahler Jacques-Alain Miller Sandor Rado Otto Rank Wilhelm Reich Joan Riviere Isidor Sadger Ernst Simmel Sabina Spielrein James Strachey Harry Stack Sullivan Susan Sutherland Isaacs Donald Winnicott
Important works The Interpretation of Dreams (1899) The Psychopathology of Everyday Life (1901) Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality (1905) Beyond the Pleasure Principle (1920) The Ego and the Id (1923)
Schools of thought Self psychology Lacanian Jungian Object relations Interpersonal Relational Ego psychology
Training Boston Graduate School of Psychoanalysis British Psychoanalytic Council British Psychoanalytical Society Columbia University Center for Psychoanalytic Training and Research International Psychoanalytical Association World Association of Psychoanalysis
Psychology portal

Denial, in ordinary English usage, is asserting that a statement or allegation is not true. The same word, and also abnegation, is used for a psychological defense mechanism postulated by Sigmund Freud, in which a person is faced with a fact that is too uncomfortable to accept and rejects it instead, insisting that it is not true despite what may be overwhelming evidence.

The subject may use:

• simple denial: deny the reality of the unpleasant fact altogether
• minimisation: admit the fact but deny its seriousness (a combination of denial and rationalization)
• projection: admit both the fact and seriousness but deny responsibility by blaming somebody or something else.

The concept of denial is particularly important to the study of addiction. The theory of denial was first researched seriously by Anna Freud. She classified denial as a mechanism of the immature mind, because it conflicts with the ability to learn from and cope with reality. Where denial occurs in mature minds, it is most often associated with death, dying and rape. More recent research has significantly expanded the scope and utility of the concept. Elisabeth Kübler-Ross used denial as the first of five stages in the psychology of a dying patient, and the idea has been extended to include the reactions of survivors to news of a death.

Many contemporary psychoanalysts treat denial as the first stage of a coping cycle. When an unwelcome change occurs, a trauma of some sort, the first impulse to disbelieve begins the process of coping. That denial, in a healthy mind, slowly rises to greater consciousness. Gradually becoming a subconscious pressure, just beneath the surface of overt awareness, the mechanism of coping then involves repression, while the person accumulates the emotional resources to fully face the trauma. Once faced, the person deals with the trauma in a stage alternately called acceptance or enlightenment, depending on the scope of the issue and the therapist's school of thought. After this stage, once sufficiently dealt with, or dealt with for the time being, the trauma must sink away from total conscious awareness again. Left metaphorically upon a back burner or put away in a cupboard, the process of sublimation involves a balance of neither quite forgetting nor quite remembering. This allows the trauma to re-emerge in consciousness if it involves an ongoing process such as a protracted illness. Or sublimation may begin the full resolution process, where the trauma finally sinks away into eventual forgetfulness. Occasionally this entire cycle has been referred to in modern parlance as denial, often confusing the full cycle with only one stage in the cycle.

Unlike some other defense mechanisms postulated by psychoanalytic theory (for instance, repression), the general existence of denial is fairly easy to verify, even for non-specialists. On the other hand, denial is one of the most controversial defense mechanisms, since it can be easily used to create unfalsifiable theories: anything the subject says or does that appears to disprove the interpreter's theory is explained, not as evidence that the interpreter's theory is wrong, but as the subject's being "in denial". However, researchers note that in some cases of corroborated child sexual abuse, the victims sometimes make a series of partial confessions and recantations as they struggle with their own denial and the denial of abusers or family members. Use of denial theory in a legal setting therefore must be carefully regulated and experts' credentials verified. "Formulaic guilt" simply by "being a denier" has been castigated by English judges and academics.The main objection is that denial theory is founded on the premise that that which the supposed denier is denying is truth. This usurps the judge (and/or jury) as triers of fact

The concept of denial is important in twelve-step programs, where the abandonment or reversal of denial forms the basis of the first, fourth, fifth, eighth and tenth steps. The ability to deny or minimize is an essential part of what enables an addict to continue his or her behavior despite evidence that—to an outsider—appears overwhelming. This is cited as one of the reasons that compulsion is seldom effective in treating addiction—the habit of denial remains.

When a family intervention is conducted to help a person engaged in self-destructive behavior such as alcohol or drug abuse to accept help for his problem, denial is sometimes reduced or eliminated altogether. This is not always necessary, however, for the intervention to be successful in having the person accept help.

Understanding and avoiding denial is also important in the treatment of various diseases. The American Heart Association cites denial as a principal reason that treatment of a heart attack is delayed. Because the symptoms are so varied, and often have other potential explanations, the opportunity exists for the patient to deny the emergency, often with fatal consequences. It is common for patients to delay mammograms or other tests because of a fear of cancer, even though this is clearly maladaptive. It is the responsibility of the care team, and of the nursing staff in particular, to train at-risk patients to avoid this behavior.

Types

Denial of fact

In this form of denial, someone avoids a fact by lying. This lying can take the form of an outright falsehood (commission), leaving out certain details to tailor a story (omission), or by falsely agreeing to something (assent, also referred to as "yessing" behavior). Someone who is in denial of fact is typically using lies to avoid facts they think may be painful to themselves or others.

Denial of responsibility

This form of denial involves avoiding personal responsibility by:

• blaming: a direct statement shifting culpability and may overlap with denial of fact
• minimizing: an attempt to make the effects or results of an action appear to be less harmful than they may actually be, or
• justifying: when someone takes a choice and attempts to make that choice look okay due to their perception of what is "right" in a situation.
• regression: when someone acts in a way unbecoming of their age (e.g. whining, temper tantrum, etc.)

Someone using denial of responsibility is usually attempting to avoid potential harm or pain by shifting attention away from themselves.

For example:

Troy breaks up with his girlfriend because he is unable to control his anger, and then blames her for everything that ever happened.

Denial of impact

Denial of impact involves a person's avoiding thinking about or understanding the harms of his or her behavior has caused to self or others, i.e. denial of the consequences. Doing this enables that person to avoid feeling a sense of guilt and it can prevent him or her from developing remorse or empathy for others. Denial of impact reduces or eliminates a sense of pain or harm from poor decisions.

Denial of cycle

Many who use this type of denial will say things such as, "it just happened". Denial of cycle is where a person avoids looking at their decisions leading up to an event or does not consider their pattern of decision making and how harmful behavior is repeated. The pain and harm being avoided by this type of denial is more of the effort needed to change the focus from a singular event to looking at preceding events. It can also serve as a way to blame or justify behavior (see above).

Denial of denial

This can be a difficult concept for many people to identify with in themselves, but is a major barrier to changing hurtful behaviors. Denial of denial involves thoughts, actions and behaviors which bolster confidence that nothing needs to be changed in one's personal behavior. This form of denial typically overlaps with all of the other forms of denial, but involves more self-delusion. Denial at this level can have significant consequences both personally and at a societal level.

DARVO

Harassment covers a wide range of offensive behaviour. It is commonly understood as behaviour intended to disturb or upset. In the legal sense, it is behaviour which is found threatening or disturbing.

DARVO is an acronym to describe a common strategy of abusers: Deny the abuse, then Attack the victim for attempting to make them accountable for their offense, thereby Reversing Victim and Offender. This may involve gaslighting and victim blaming.

Psychologist Jennifer Freyd writes:

...I have observed that actual abusers threaten, bully and make a nightmare for anyone who holds them accountable or asks them to change their abusive behavior. This attack, intended to chill and terrify, typically includes threats of law suits, overt and covert attacks on the whistle-blower's credibility, and so on. The attack will often take the form of focusing on ridiculing the person who attempts to hold the offender accountable. [...] [T]he offender rapidly creates the impression that the abuser is the wronged one, while the victim or concerned observer is the offender. Figure and ground are completely reversed. [...] The offender is on the offense and the person attempting to hold the offender accountable is put on the defense.

Recognizing denial

In politicized instances of denial such as climate change denial, AIDS/HIV denialism, Holocaust denial or denial of the Holodomor, research is necessary to establish the "truth". It is only on that basis that one can confirm the presence of denial or denialism. That research can only plausibly be carried out by experts. Those wishing to expose denialism must therefore refer to the opinions of experts. Denialism often involves questioning the expertise of self-declared experts, considering their possible bias, or considering the possible inherent bias of the system in which they work. For example one may question the objectivity of the peer-review system according to which academic research is accepted for publication in leading academic journals.

Even in this case, it is possible to recognize denial by an objective criterion based on Freud's original theory. Denial is associated with the defence mechanism of psychological repression of emotion. These emotions are released when the denial is identified or challenged. The emotion is then repressed again (it seems to disappear) and the topic is not discussed unless there is another challenge. In this way, the topic becomes taboo. This is an unusual behavioral pattern: normally, when a question is so important that people get emotional about it, those same people continue to discuss it until it is resolved or there is some progress toward a solution. The emotion motivates the search for a solution.

See also

• Climate change denial
• Closed circle
• Closeted
• Cognitive dissonance
• Confirmation bias
• Cover-up
• Gaslighting
• HIV/AIDS denialism
• Holocaust denial
• Lie
• Narcissistic defence sequences
• Non-apology apology
• Non-denial denial
• Polite fiction
• Psychological manipulation
• Self-deception
• Self-fulfilling prophecy
• The Politics of Denial

Notes

References

• Columbia Encyclopedia (2003).
• Davidhizar R, Poole V, Giger JN, Henderson M (June 1998). "When your patient uses denial". J Pract Nurs 48 (2): 10–4. PMID 9687661. 
• Living In Denial; Climate Change, Emotions, and Everyday Life by Kari Marie Norgaard March 2011 ISBN 9780262515856 MIT Press

English Journal

• From denial to recognition: attitudes toward Holocaust survivors from World War II to the present.

• Solomon Z.SourceSchool of Social Work, Tel Aviv University.
• Journal of traumatic stress.J Trauma Stress.1995 Apr;8(2):215-28.
• This paper discusses the complex attitudes of Israeli society and mental health professionals toward the survivors of the Nazi Holocaust. While the nascent state of Israel provided refuge for the Holocaust survivors and offered them a new identity and opportunity to rebuild their lives, it also dema
• PMID 7627438

• School-age pregnancy: why hasn't prevention worked?

• Males M.SourceOccidental College, Los Angeles, CA 90041-3384.
• The Journal of school health.J Sch Health.1993 Dec;63(10):429-32.
• Adolescent pregnancy or sexually transmitted disease (STD) reduction has not occurred, despite sexuality education and abstinence programs, and intensive publicity and community initiatives. An obstacle to adolescent pregnancy, STD, and childbearing prevention is the assumption that adolescent sexu
• PMID 8133647

• Vector population responses to control interventions.

• Schofield CJ.AbstractIn 1981, Kenyan authorities attempted eradication of tsetse (Glossina pallidipes) from the Lambwe valley, by sequential aerial spraying of endosulfan. Fly populations were reduced by over 99.9% in the main habitats, but recovered to their original levels within one year. In 1986, an Argentine research team attempted local elimination of domestic Triatominae (Triatoma infestans) in an area of Santiago del Estero. House infestation rates were reduced to an apparent zero, but recovered to pre-control levels in two years. In Sri Lanka, a combination of mosquito control with active case detection and treatment reduced malaria incidence to just 17 cases in 1964. Interruption of the programme then saw case incidence return to over 500,000 by 1969. These three examples-from African trypanosomiasis, South American Chagas disease and malaria-all illustrate the same process. Vector populations, infestation rates, and rates of disease transmission, can be reduced. The real problem is not in achieving the initial reduction, but in subsequently either driving the disease to extinction or maintaining it below acceptable levels. And this problem takes us beyond the simple analysis of interventions, into the complex realms of population behaviour set in its political, social and economic context. It seems that we have been too rarely concerned to plan and implement the long term surveillance and selective interventions that are required to translate initial gains into real success. In biological terms, we tend to ignore the complexity and robustness of vector populations and disease transmission cycles, especially their varied capacity to recover from interference. Moreover, in socio-political terms, a reduced problem-even one representing potential for future catastrophe-tends to claim less priority than present problems, even though premature redeployment of resources may abnegate gains already achieved. The problem is strongly compounded by methods of economic analysis where the benefits of avoiding future problems are strongly discounted in favour of short-term temporary gains. This paper seeks to open discussion on these long-term planning issues.
• Annales de la Societe belge de medecine tropicale.Ann Soc Belg Med Trop.1991;71 Suppl 1:201-17.
• In 1981, Kenyan authorities attempted eradication of tsetse (Glossina pallidipes) from the Lambwe valley, by sequential aerial spraying of endosulfan. Fly populations were reduced by over 99.9% in the main habitats, but recovered to their original levels within one year. In 1986, an Argentine resear
• PMID 1793271

Related Links

• abnegate - definition of abnegate by the Free Online Dictionary ...

tr.v. ab・ne・gat・ed, ab・ne・gat・ing, ab・ne・gates. 1. To give up (rights or a claim , for example); renounce. 2. To deny (something) to oneself: The minister abnegated the luxuries of life. ...

• Abnegate - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster ...

ab・ne・gat・edab・ne・gat・ing. Definition of ABNEGATE. transitive verb. 1. : deny, renounce <abnegated their God>. 2. : surrender, relinquish <abnegated her powers >. ? ab・ne・ga・tor \-?g?-t?r\ noun. See abnegate defined for kids ≫ ...

Related Pictures