ununhexium

Livermorium
	116Lv
	ununpentium ← livermorium → ununseptium
	Livermorium in the periodic table
Appearance
	unknown
General properties
Name, symbol, number	livermorium, Lv, 116
Pronunciation	/ˌlɪvərˈmɔəriəm/; LIV-ər-MOHR-ee-əm
Element category	unknown; but probably a poor metal
Group, period, block	16 (chalcogens), 7, p
Standard atomic weight	[293]
Electron configuration	[Rn] 5f14 6d10 7s2 7p4; (predicted); 2, 8, 18, 32, 32, 18, 6; (predicted)
History
Naming	after Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, itself named partly after Livermore, California
Discovery	Joint Institute for Nuclear Research and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (2000)
Physical properties
Phase	solid (predicted)
Density (near r.t.)	12.9 (predicted) g·cm−3
Melting point	637–780 K, 364–507 °C, 687–944 (extrapolated) °F
Boiling point	1035–1135 K, 762–862 °C, 1403–1583 (extrapolated) °F
Heat of fusion	7.61 (extrapolated) kJ·mol−1
Atomic properties
Oxidation states	2, 4 (predicted)
Ionization energies	1st: 723.6 (predicted) kJ·mol−1
	2nd: 1765.7–1852.5 (extrapolated) kJ·mol−1
Atomic radius	151 (predicted) pm
Covalent radius	162–166 (extrapolated) pm
Miscellanea
CAS registry number	54100-71-9
Most stable isotopes
	Main article: Isotopes of livermorium
	v; t; e; · ref

WordNet

a radioactive transuranic element (同)Uuh, element 116, atomic number 116

Wikipedia preview

出典(authority):フリー百科事典『ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』「2013/09/17 03:30:07」(JST)

wiki en

[Wiki en表示]

Livermorium is the synthetic superheavy element with the symbol Lv and atomic number 116. The name was adopted by IUPAC on May 30, 2012.^[2]

It is placed as the heaviest member of group 16 (VIA) although a sufficiently stable isotope is not known at this time to allow chemical experiments to confirm its position as a heavier homologue to polonium.

It was first detected in 2000. Since then, about 35 atoms of livermorium have been produced, either directly or as a decay product of ununoctium, belonging to the four neighbouring isotopes with masses 290–293. The most stable isotope known is livermorium-293 with a half-life of ~60 ms.

1 History
- 1.1 Unsuccessful synthesis attempts
- 1.2 Discovery
- 1.3 Naming
- 1.4 Current and future experiments
2 Nucleosynthesis
- 2.1 Cold fusion
- 2.2 Hot fusion
- 2.3 As decay product
- 2.4 Fission of compound nuclei with Z=116
3 Isotopes and nuclear properties
4 Chemical properties
- 4.1 Extrapolated chemical properties
  - 4.1.1 Oxidation states
  - 4.1.2 Chemistry
5 See also
6 References
7 External links

History[edit source | edit]

Unsuccessful synthesis attempts[edit source | edit]

In late 1998, Polish physicist Robert Smolańczuk published calculations on the fusion of atomic nuclei towards the synthesis of superheavy atoms, including ununoctium.^[4] His calculations suggested that it might be possible to make ununoctium and livermorium by fusing lead with krypton under carefully controlled conditions.^[4]

In 1999, researchers at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory made use of these predictions and announced the discovery of livermorium and ununoctium, in a paper published in Physical Review Letters,^[5] and very soon after the results were reported in Science.^[6] The researchers reported to have performed the reaction

86
36Kr + 208
82Pb → 293
118Uuo + n.

The following year, they published a retraction after researchers at other laboratories were unable to duplicate the results and the Berkeley lab itself was unable to duplicate them as well.^[7] In June 2002, the director of the lab announced that the original claim of the discovery of these two elements had been based on data fabricated by principal author Victor Ninov.^[8]^[9]

Discovery[edit source | edit]

On July 19, 2000, scientists at Dubna (JINR) detected a single decay from an atom of livermorium following the irradiation of a Cm-248 target with Ca-48 ions. The results were published in December 2000.^[10] This 10.54 MeV alpha-emitting activity was originally assigned to ²⁹²Lv due to the correlation of the daughter to previously assigned ²⁸⁸Fl. That assignment was later altered to ²⁸⁹Fl, and hence this activity was correspondingly changed to ²⁹³Lv. Two further atoms were reported by the institute during their second experiment between April–May 2001.^[11]

In the same experiment they also detected a decay chain which corresponded to the first observed decay of flerovium and assigned to ²⁸⁹Fl.^[11] This activity has not been observed again in a repeat of the same reaction. However, its detection in this series of experiments indicates the possibility of the decay of an isomer of livermorium, namely ^293bLv, or a rare decay branch of the already discovered isomer,^293aLv, in which the first alpha particle was missed. Further research is required to positively assign this activity.

The team repeated the experiment in April–May 2005 and detected 8 atoms of livermorium. The measured decay data confirmed the assignment of the discovery isotope as ²⁹³Lv. In this run, the team also observed ²⁹²Lv in the 4n channel for the first time.^[12]

In May 2009, the Joint Working Party reported on the discovery of copernicium and acknowledged the discovery of the isotope ²⁸³Cn.^[13] This implied the de facto discovery of livermorium, as ²⁹¹Lv (see below), from the acknowledgment of the data relating to the granddaughter ²⁸³Cn, although the actual discovery experiment may be determined as that above.

In 2011, the IUPAC evaluated the Dubna team results and accepted them as a reliable identification of element 116.^[14]

Naming[edit source | edit]

Livermorium is historically known as eka-polonium.^[15] Ununhexium (Uuh) was the temporary IUPAC systematic element name. Scientists usually refer to the element simply as element 116 (or E116). According to IUPAC recommendations, the discoverer or discoverers of a new element have the right to suggest a name.^[16]

The discovery of livermorium was recognized by JWG of IUPAC on 1 June 2011, along with that of flerovium.^[14] According to the vice-director of JINR, the Dubna team wanted to name element 116 moscovium, after the Moscow Oblast in which Dubna is located.^[17] However, the name livermorium and the symbol Lv were adopted on May 31, 2012^[2] after an approval process by the IUPAC.^[18] The name recognises the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, within the city of Livermore, California, USA, which collaborated with JINR on the discovery. The city in turn is named after the American rancher Robert Livermore, a naturalized Mexican citizen of English birth.

Current and future experiments[edit source | edit]

The team at Dubna have indicated plans to synthesize livermorium using the reaction between plutonium-244 and titanium-50. This experiment will allow them to assess the feasibility of using projectiles with Z > 20 required in the synthesis of superheavy elements in the eighth period (Z > 118). Although initially scheduled for 2008, the reaction looking at the synthesis of evaporation residues has not been conducted to date.^[19]

There are also plans to repeat the Cm-248 reaction at different projectile energies in order to probe the 2n channel, leading to the new isotope ²⁹⁴Lv. In addition, they have future plans to complete the excitation function of the 4n channel product, ²⁹²Lv, which will allow them to assess the stabilizing effect of the N=184 shell on the yield of evaporation residues.

Nucleosynthesis[edit source | edit]

Target-projectile combinations leading to Z=116 compound nuclei

The below table contains various combinations of targets and projectiles which could be used to form compound nuclei with atomic number 116. The table below provides cross-sections and excitation energies for hot fusion reactions producing livermorium isotopes directly. Data in bold represent maxima derived from excitation function measurements. The below table contains various targets-projectile combinations for which calculations have provided estimates for cross section yields from various neutron evaporation channels.

Target	Projectile	CN	Attempt result
²⁰⁸Pb	⁸²Se	²⁹⁰Lv^[20]	Failure to date
²³²Th	⁵⁸Fe	²⁹⁰Lv	Reaction yet to be attempted
²³⁸U	⁵⁴Cr	²⁹²Lv^[21]	Failure to date
²⁴⁴Pu	⁵⁰Ti	²⁹⁴Lv	Reaction yet to be attempted
²⁴⁸Cm	⁴⁸Ca	²⁹⁶Lv^[12]^[21]	Successful reaction
²⁴⁶Cm	⁴⁸Ca	²⁹⁴Lv^[12]^[21]	Reaction yet to be attempted
²⁴⁵Cm	⁴⁸Ca	²⁹³Lv^[22]^[21]	Successful reaction
²⁴⁹Cf	⁴⁰Ar	²⁸⁹Lv	Reaction yet to be attempted

Cold fusion[edit source | edit]

²⁰⁸Pb(⁸²Se,xn)^290−xLv

In 1998, the team at GSI attempted the synthesis of ²⁹⁰Lv as a radiative capture (x=0) product. No atoms were detected providing a cross section limit of 4.8 pb.

Hot fusion[edit source | edit]

This section deals with the synthesis of nuclei of livermorium by so-called "hot" fusion reactions. These are processes which create compound nuclei at high excitation energy (~40–50 MeV, hence "hot"), leading to a reduced probability of survival from fission. The excited nucleus then decays to the ground state via the emission of 3–5 neutrons. Fusion reactions utilizing ⁴⁸Ca nuclei usually produce compound nuclei with intermediate excitation energies (~30–35 MeV) and are sometimes referred to as "warm" fusion reactions. This leads, in part, to relatively high yields from these reactions.

²³⁸U(⁵⁴Cr,xn)^292−xLv

There are sketchy indications that this reaction was attempted by the team at GSI in 2006. There are no published results on the outcome, presumably indicating that no atoms were detected. This is expected from a study of the systematics of cross sections for ²³⁸U targets.^[23]

²⁴⁸Cm(⁴⁸Ca,xn)^296−xLv (x=3,4)

The first attempt to synthesise livermorium was performed in 1977 by Ken Hulet and his team at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). They were unable to detect any atoms of livermorium.^[24] Yuri Oganessian and his team at the Flerov Laboratory of Nuclear Reactions (FLNR) subsequently attempted the reaction in 1978 and were met by failure. In 1985, a joint experiment between Berkeley and Peter Armbruster's team at GSI, the result was again negative with a calculated cross-section limit of 10–100 pb.^[25]

In 2000, Russian scientists at Dubna finally succeeded in detecting a single atom of livermorium, assigned to the isotope ²⁹²Lv.^[10] In 2001, they repeated the reaction and formed a further 2 atoms in a confirmation of their discovery experiment. A third atom was tentatively assigned to ²⁹³Lv on the basis of a missed parental alpha decay.^[11] In April 2004, the team ran the experiment again at higher energy and were able to detect a new decay chain, assigned to ²⁹²Lv. On this basis, the original data were reassigned to ²⁹³Lv. The tentative chain is therefore possibly associated with a rare decay branch of this isotope. In this reaction, 2 further atoms of ²⁹³Lv were detected.^[12]

In an experiment run at the GSI between June-July 2010, scientists detected six atoms of livermorium; two atoms of ²⁹³116 and four atoms of ²⁹²116. They were able to confirm both the decay data and cross sections for the fusion reaction.

²⁴⁵Cm(⁴⁸Ca,xn)^293−x116 (x=2,3)

In order to assist in the assignment of isotope mass numbers for livermorium, in March–May 2003 the Dubna team bombarded a ²⁴⁵Cm target with ⁴⁸Ca ions. They were able to observe two new isotopes, assigned to ²⁹¹Lv and ²⁹⁰Lv.^[22] This experiment was successfully repeated in Feb–March 2005 where 10 atoms were created with identical decay data to those reported in the 2003 experiment.^[26]

As decay product[edit source | edit]

Livermorium has also been observed in the decay of ununoctium. In October 2006 it was announced that 3 atoms of ununoctium had been detected by the bombardment of californium-249 with calcium-48 ions, which then rapidly decayed into livermorium.^[26]

The observation of ²⁹⁰Lv allowed the assignment of the product to ²⁹⁴Uuo and proved the synthesis of ununoctium.

Fission of compound nuclei with Z=116[edit source | edit]

Several experiments have been performed between 2000–2006 at the Flerov laboratory of Nuclear Reactions in Dubna studying the fission characteristics of the compound nuclei ^296,294,290Lv. Four nuclear reactions have been used, namely ²⁴⁸Cm+⁴⁸Ca, ²⁴⁶Cm+⁴⁸Ca, ²⁴⁴Pu+⁵⁰Ti and ²³²Th+⁵⁸Fe. The results have revealed how nuclei such as this fission predominantly by expelling closed shell nuclei such as ¹³²Sn (Z=50, N=82). It was also found that the yield for the fusion-fission pathway was similar between ⁴⁸Ca and ⁵⁸Fe projectiles, indicating a possible future use of ⁵⁸Fe projectiles in superheavy element formation. In addition, in comparative experiments synthesizing ²⁹⁴Lv using ⁴⁸Ca and ⁵⁰Ti projectiles, the yield from fusion-fission was ~3x less for ⁵⁰Ti, also suggesting a future use in SHE production.^[27]

Isotopes and nuclear properties[edit source | edit]

Chronology of isotope discovery

Isotope	Year discovered	Discovery reaction
²⁹⁰Lv	2002	²⁴⁹Cf(⁴⁸Ca,3n)^[28]
²⁹¹Lv	2003	²⁴⁵Cm(⁴⁸Ca,2n)^[22]
²⁹²Lv	2004	²⁴⁸Cm(⁴⁸Ca,4n)^[12]
²⁹³Lv	2000	²⁴⁸Cm(⁴⁸Ca,3n)^[10]

Theoretical calculation in a quantum tunneling model supports the experimental data relating to the synthesis of ^293,292Lv.^[29]^[30]

Retracted isotope: ²⁸⁹Lv

In 1999, researchers at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory announced the synthesis of ²⁹³Uuo (see ununoctium), in a paper published in Physical Review Letters.^[5] The claimed isotope ²⁸⁹Lv decayed by 11.63 MeV alpha emission with a half-life of 0.64 ms. The following year, they published a retraction after other researchers were unable to duplicate the results.^[31] In June 2002, the director of the lab announced that the original claim of the discovery of these two elements had been based on data fabricated by the principal author Victor Ninov. As such, this isotope of livermorium is currently unknown.

Chemical properties[edit source | edit]

Extrapolated chemical properties[edit source | edit]

Oxidation states[edit source | edit]

Livermorium is projected to be the fourth member of the 7p series of non-metals and the heaviest member of group 16 (VIA) in the Periodic Table, below polonium. The group oxidation state of +6 is known for all the members apart from oxygen which lacks available d-orbitals for expansion and is limited to a maximum +2 state, exhibited in the fluoride OF₂. The +4 is known for sulfur, selenium, tellurium, and polonium, undergoing a shift in stability from reducing for S(IV) and Se(IV) to oxidizing in Po(IV). Tellurium(IV) is the most stable for this element. This suggests a decreasing stability for the higher oxidation states as the group is descended and livermorium should portray an oxidizing +4 state and a more stable +2 state. The lighter members are also known to form a −2 state as oxide, sulfide, selenide, telluride, and polonide.

Chemistry[edit source | edit]

The possible chemistry of livermorium can be extrapolated from that of polonium. It should therefore undergo oxidation to a dioxide, LvO₂, although a trioxide, LvO₃ is plausible, but unlikely. The stability of a +2 state should manifest itself in the formation of a simple monoxide, LvO. Fluorination will likely result in a tetrafluoride, LvF₄ and/or a difluoride, LvF₂; a hexafluoride, LvF₆, is possible but unlikely. Chlorination and bromination may well stop at the corresponding dihalides, LvCl₂ and LvBr₂. Oxidation by iodine should certainly stop at LvI₂ and may even be inert to this element.^{[citation needed]} The heavier livermorium dihalides are predicted to be linear, but the lighter ones are predicted to be bent.^[32]

References[edit source | edit]

^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Haire, Richard G. (2006). "Transactinides and the future elements". In Morss; Edelstein, Norman M.; Fuger, Jean. The Chemistry of the Actinide and Transactinide Elements (3rd ed.). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Science+Business Media. ISBN 1-4020-3555-1.
^ ^a ^b ^c "Element 114 is Named Flerovium and Element 116 is Named Livermorium". IUPAC. 30 May 2012.
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g Bonchev, Danail; Kamenska, Verginia (1981). "Predicting the Properties of the 113–120 Transactinide Elements". J. Phys. Chem. 85: 1177–1186.
^ ^a ^b Smolanczuk, R. (1999). "Production mechanism of superheavy nuclei in cold fusion reactions". Physical Review C 59 (5): 2634–2639. Bibcode:1999PhRvC..59.2634S. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.59.2634.
^ ^a ^b Ninov, Viktor; Gregorich, K.; Loveland, W.; Ghiorso, A.; Hoffman, D.; Lee, D.; Nitsche, H.; Swiatecki, W.; Kirbach, U.; Laue, C. et al. (1999). "Observation of Superheavy Nuclei Produced in the Reaction of 86Kr with 208Pb". Physical Review Letters 83 (6): 1104–1107. Bibcode:1999PhRvL..83.1104N. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.1104.
^ Service, R. F. (1999). "Berkeley Crew Bags Element 118". Science 284 (5421): 1751. doi:10.1126/science.284.5421.1751.
^ Public Affairs Department (2001-07-21). "Results of element 118 experiment retracted". Berkeley Lab. Retrieved 2008-01-18.
^ Dalton, R (2002). "Misconduct: The stars who fell to Earth". Nature 420 (6917): 728–729. Bibcode:2002Natur.420..728D. doi:10.1038/420728a. PMID 12490902.
^ Element 118 disappears two years after it was discovered. Physicsworld.com. Retrieved on 2012-04-02.
^ ^a ^b ^c Oganessian, Yu. Ts. (2000). "Observation of the decay of ^{292}116". Physical Review C 63: 011301. Bibcode:2001PhRvC..63a1301O. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.63.011301.
^ ^a ^b ^c "Confirmed results of the ²⁴⁸Cm(⁴⁸Ca,4n)²⁹²116 experiment", Patin et al., LLNL report (2003). Retrieved 2008-03-03
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Oganessian, Yu. Ts.; Utyonkov, V.; Lobanov, Yu.; Abdullin, F.; Polyakov, A.; Shirokovsky, I.; Tsyganov, Yu.; Gulbekian, G.; Bogomolov, S.; Gikal, B. N. et al. (2004). "Measurements of cross sections and decay properties of the isotopes of elements 112, 114, and 116 produced in the fusion reactions ^233,238U, ²⁴²Pu, and ²⁴⁸Cm+⁴⁸Ca". Physical Review C 70 (6): 064609. Bibcode:2004PhRvC..70f4609O. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.70.064609. edit
^ R.C.Barber; H.W.Gaeggeler;P.J.Karol;H. Nakahara; E.Verdaci; E. Vogt (2009). "Discovery of the element with atomic number 112" (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 81 (7): 1331. doi:10.1351/PAC-REP-08-03-05.
^ ^a ^b Barber, Robert C.; Karol, Paul J.; Nakahara, Hiromichi; Vardaci, Emanuele; Vogt, Erich W. (2011). "Discovery of the elements with atomic numbers greater than or equal to 113 (IUPAC Technical Report)". Pure and Applied Chemistry 83 (7): 1. doi:10.1351/PAC-REP-10-05-01.
^ The Search for New Elements: the Projects of Today in a Larger Perspective
^ Koppenol, W. H. (2002). "Naming of new elements(IUPAC Recommendations 2002)". Pure and Applied Chemistry 74 (5): 787. doi:10.1351/pac200274050787.
^ "Russian Physicists Will Suggest to Name Element 116 Moscovium". rian.ru. 2011. Retrieved 2011-05-08. : Mikhail Itkis, the vice-director of JINR stated: "We would like to name element 114 after Georgy Flerov – flerovium, and another one [element 116] – moscovium, not after Moscow, but after Moscow Oblast".
^ "News: Start of the Name Approval Process for the Elements of Atomic Number 114 and 116". International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry. Retrieved 22 February 2012.
^ Flerov Lab.
^ Feng, Zhao-Qing; Jin, Gen-Ming; Li, Jun-Qing; Scheid, Werner (2007). "Formation of superheavy nuclei in cold fusion reactions". Physical Review C 76 (4): 044606. arXiv:0707.2588. Bibcode:2007PhRvC..76d4606F. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.76.044606.
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d Feng, Z; Jin, G; Li, J; Scheid, W (2009). "Production of heavy and superheavy nuclei in massive fusion reactions". Nuclear Physics A 816: 33. arXiv:0803.1117. Bibcode:2009NuPhA.816...33F. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2008.11.003.
^ ^a ^b ^c Oganessian, Y. T.; Utyonkov, V.; Lobanov, Y.; Abdullin, F.; Polyakov, A.; Shirokovsky, I.; Tsyganov, Y.; Gulbekian, G.; Bogomolov, S.; Gikal, B. et al. (2004). "Measurements of cross sections for the fusion-evaporation reactions ²⁴⁴Pu(⁴⁸Ca,xn)^292−x114 and ²⁴⁵Cm(⁴⁸Ca,xn)^293−x116". Physical Review C 69 (5): 054607. Bibcode:2004PhRvC..69e4607O. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.69.054607. edit
^ "List of experiments 2000–2006"
^ Hulet, E. K.; Lougheed, R.; Wild, J.; Landrum, J.; Stevenson, P.; Ghiorso, A.; Nitschke, J.; Otto, R.; Morrissey, D.; Baisden, P.; Gavin, B.; Lee, D.; Silva, R.; Fowler, M.; Seaborg, G. (1977). "Search for Superheavy Elements in the Bombardment of ²⁴⁸Cm with ⁴⁸Ca". Physical Review Letters 39 (7): 385. Bibcode:1977PhRvL..39..385H. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.39.385.
^ Armbruster, P.; Agarwal, YK; Brüchle, W; Brügger, M; Dufour, JP; Gaggeler, H; Hessberger, FP; Hofmann, S; Lemmertz, P; Münzenberg, G et al. (1985). "Attempts to Produce Superheavy Elements by Fusion of 48Ca with 248Cm in the Bombarding Energy Range of 4.5–5.2 MeV/u". Physical Review Letters 54 (5): 406–409. Bibcode:1985PhRvL..54..406A. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.54.406. PMID 10031507.
^ ^a ^b <Please add first missing authors to populate metadata.>. Synthesis of the isotopes of elements 118 and 116 in the ²⁴⁹Cf and ²⁴⁵Cm+⁴⁸Ca fusion reactions.
^ see Flerov lab annual reports 2000–2006
^ see ununoctium
^ P. Roy Chowdhury, C. Samanta, and D. N. Basu (2006). "α decay half-lives of new superheavy elements". Phys. Rev. C 73: 014612. arXiv:nucl-th/0507054. Bibcode:2006PhRvC..73a4612C. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.73.014612.
^ C. Samanta, P. Roy Chowdhury and D.N. Basu (2007). "Predictions of alpha decay half lives of heavy and superheavy elements". Nucl. Phys. A 789: 142–154. arXiv:nucl-th/0703086. Bibcode:2007NuPhA.789..142S. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2007.04.001.
^ Ninov, V.; Gregorich, K.; Loveland, W.; Ghiorso, A.; Hoffman, D.; Lee, D.; Nitsche, H.; Swiatecki, W.; Kirbach, U.; Laue, C. et al. (2002). "Editorial Note: Observation of Superheavy Nuclei Produced in the Reaction of ⁸⁶Kr with ²⁰⁸Pb [Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1104 (1999)]". Physical Review Letters 89 (3): 039901. Bibcode:2002PhRvL..89c9901N. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.039901.
^ Van WüLlen, C.; Langermann, N. (2007). "Gradients for two-component quasirelativistic methods. Application to dihalogenides of element 116". The Journal of Chemical Physics 126 (11): 114106. Bibcode:2007JChPh.126k4106V. doi:10.1063/1.2711197. PMID 17381195. edit

External links[edit source | edit]

Wikimedia Commons has media related to: Livermorium

Livermorium at The Periodic Table of Videos (University of Nottingham)
CERN Courier – Second postcard from the island of stability
Livermorium at WebElements.com

Related Pictures

Chemical Element Tiles, Chemical Element Decorative Ceramic Tile Designs Ununhexium Stock Photos, Images, & Pictures | Shutterstock Element Krypton Periodic Table Stock Illustration 298532837 - Shutterstock Berkelium - Uses, Pictures, Characteristics, Properties, Periodic Table Ununhexium Meaning - YouTube Technical Data for the element Ununhexium in the Periodic Table

[Haire-1] Haire, Richard G. (2006). "Transactinides and the future elements". In Morss; Edelstein, Norman M.; Fuger, Jean. The Chemistry of the Actinide and Transactinide Elements (3rd ed.). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Science+Business Media. ISBN 1-4020-3555-1.

[IUPAC-names-114-116-2] "Element 114 is Named Flerovium and Element 116 is Named Livermorium". IUPAC. 30 May 2012.

[B.26K-3] ^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g Bonchev, Danail; Kamenska, Verginia (1981). "Predicting the Properties of the 113–120 Transactinide Elements". J. Phys. Chem. 85: 1177–1186.

[Smolanczuk-4] Smolanczuk, R. (1999). "Production mechanism of superheavy nuclei in cold fusion reactions". Physical Review C 59 (5): 2634–2639. Bibcode:1999PhRvC..59.2634S. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.59.2634.

[Ninov83.1104-5] Ninov, Viktor; Gregorich, K.; Loveland, W.; Ghiorso, A.; Hoffman, D.; Lee, D.; Nitsche, H.; Swiatecki, W.; Kirbach, U.; Laue, C. et al. (1999). "Observation of Superheavy Nuclei Produced in the Reaction of 86Kr with 208Pb". Physical Review Letters 83 (6): 1104–1107. Bibcode:1999PhRvL..83.1104N. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.1104.

[6] Service, R. F. (1999). "Berkeley Crew Bags Element 118". Science 284 (5421): 1751. doi:10.1126/science.284.5421.1751.

[7] Public Affairs Department (2001-07-21). "Results of element 118 experiment retracted". Berkeley Lab. Retrieved 2008-01-18.

[8] Dalton, R (2002). "Misconduct: The stars who fell to Earth". Nature 420 (6917): 728–729. Bibcode:2002Natur.420..728D. doi:10.1038/420728a. PMID 12490902.

[9] Element 118 disappears two years after it was discovered. Physicsworld.com. Retrieved on 2012-04-02.

[00Og01-10] Oganessian, Yu. Ts. (2000). "Observation of the decay of ^{292}116". Physical Review C 63: 011301. Bibcode:2001PhRvC..63a1301O. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.63.011301.

[03Pa01-11] "Confirmed results of the ²⁴⁸Cm(⁴⁸Ca,4n)²⁹²116 experiment", Patin et al., LLNL report (2003). Retrieved 2008-03-03

[04Og01-12] Oganessian, Yu. Ts.; Utyonkov, V.; Lobanov, Yu.; Abdullin, F.; Polyakov, A.; Shirokovsky, I.; Tsyganov, Yu.; Gulbekian, G.; Bogomolov, S.; Gikal, B. N. et al. (2004). "Measurements of cross sections and decay properties of the isotopes of elements 112, 114, and 116 produced in the fusion reactions ^233,238U, ²⁴²Pu, and ²⁴⁸Cm+⁴⁸Ca". Physical Review C 70 (6): 064609. Bibcode:2004PhRvC..70f4609O. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.70.064609. edit

[13] R.C.Barber; H.W.Gaeggeler;P.J.Karol;H. Nakahara; E.Verdaci; E. Vogt (2009). "Discovery of the element with atomic number 112" (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 81 (7): 1331. doi:10.1351/PAC-REP-08-03-05.

[jwr-14] Barber, Robert C.; Karol, Paul J.; Nakahara, Hiromichi; Vardaci, Emanuele; Vogt, Erich W. (2011). "Discovery of the elements with atomic numbers greater than or equal to 113 (IUPAC Technical Report)". Pure and Applied Chemistry 83 (7): 1. doi:10.1351/PAC-REP-10-05-01.

[15] The Search for New Elements: the Projects of Today in a Larger Perspective

[16] Koppenol, W. H. (2002). "Naming of new elements(IUPAC Recommendations 2002)". Pure and Applied Chemistry 74 (5): 787. doi:10.1351/pac200274050787.

[E114.26116-17] "Russian Physicists Will Suggest to Name Element 116 Moscovium". rian.ru. 2011. Retrieved 2011-05-08. : Mikhail Itkis, the vice-director of JINR stated: "We would like to name element 114 after Georgy Flerov – flerovium, and another one [element 116] – moscovium, not after Moscow, but after Moscow Oblast".

[IUPAC-18] "News: Start of the Name Approval Process for the Elements of Atomic Number 114 and 116". International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry. Retrieved 22 February 2012.

[19] Flerov Lab.

[FengColdFusion-20] Feng, Zhao-Qing; Jin, Gen-Ming; Li, Jun-Qing; Scheid, Werner (2007). "Formation of superheavy nuclei in cold fusion reactions". Physical Review C 76 (4): 044606. arXiv:0707.2588. Bibcode:2007PhRvC..76d4606F. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.76.044606.

[FengHotFusion-21] Feng, Z; Jin, G; Li, J; Scheid, W (2009). "Production of heavy and superheavy nuclei in massive fusion reactions". Nuclear Physics A 816: 33. arXiv:0803.1117. Bibcode:2009NuPhA.816...33F. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2008.11.003.

[04Og02-22] Oganessian, Y. T.; Utyonkov, V.; Lobanov, Y.; Abdullin, F.; Polyakov, A.; Shirokovsky, I.; Tsyganov, Y.; Gulbekian, G.; Bogomolov, S.; Gikal, B. et al. (2004). "Measurements of cross sections for the fusion-evaporation reactions ²⁴⁴Pu(⁴⁸Ca,xn)^292−x114 and ²⁴⁵Cm(⁴⁸Ca,xn)^293−x116". Physical Review C 69 (5): 054607. Bibcode:2004PhRvC..69e4607O. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.69.054607. edit

[23] "List of experiments 2000–2006"

[24] Hulet, E. K.; Lougheed, R.; Wild, J.; Landrum, J.; Stevenson, P.; Ghiorso, A.; Nitschke, J.; Otto, R.; Morrissey, D.; Baisden, P.; Gavin, B.; Lee, D.; Silva, R.; Fowler, M.; Seaborg, G. (1977). "Search for Superheavy Elements in the Bombardment of ²⁴⁸Cm with ⁴⁸Ca". Physical Review Letters 39 (7): 385. Bibcode:1977PhRvL..39..385H. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.39.385.

[25] Armbruster, P.; Agarwal, YK; Brüchle, W; Brügger, M; Dufour, JP; Gaggeler, H; Hessberger, FP; Hofmann, S; Lemmertz, P; Münzenberg, G et al. (1985). "Attempts to Produce Superheavy Elements by Fusion of 48Ca with 248Cm in the Bombarding Energy Range of 4.5–5.2 MeV/u". Physical Review Letters 54 (5): 406–409. Bibcode:1985PhRvL..54..406A. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.54.406. PMID 10031507.

[06og01-26] <Please add first missing authors to populate metadata.>. Synthesis of the isotopes of elements 118 and 116 in the ²⁴⁹Cf and ²⁴⁵Cm+⁴⁸Ca fusion reactions.

[27] see Flerov lab annual reports 2000–2006

[28] see ununoctium

[half-lifes-29] P. Roy Chowdhury, C. Samanta, and D. N. Basu (2006). "α decay half-lives of new superheavy elements". Phys. Rev. C 73: 014612. arXiv:nucl-th/0507054. Bibcode:2006PhRvC..73a4612C. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.73.014612.

[30] C. Samanta, P. Roy Chowdhury and D.N. Basu (2007). "Predictions of alpha decay half lives of heavy and superheavy elements". Nucl. Phys. A 789: 142–154. arXiv:nucl-th/0703086. Bibcode:2007NuPhA.789..142S. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2007.04.001.

[31] Ninov, V.; Gregorich, K.; Loveland, W.; Ghiorso, A.; Hoffman, D.; Lee, D.; Nitsche, H.; Swiatecki, W.; Kirbach, U.; Laue, C. et al. (2002). "Editorial Note: Observation of Superheavy Nuclei Produced in the Reaction of ⁸⁶Kr with ²⁰⁸Pb [Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1104 (1999)]". Physical Review Letters 89 (3): 039901. Bibcode:2002PhRvL..89c9901N. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.039901.

[32] Van WüLlen, C.; Langermann, N. (2007). "Gradients for two-component quasirelativistic methods. Application to dihalogenides of element 116". The Journal of Chemical Physics 126 (11): 114106. Bibcode:2007JChPh.126k4106V. doi:10.1063/1.2711197. PMID 17381195. edit

匿名

検索

案内

案内