WordNet

a correlation between two variables (e.g., between the number of electric motors in the home and grades at school) that does not result from any direct relation between them (buying electric motors will not raise grades) but from their relation to other v
a reciprocal relation between two or more things (同)correlativity
a statistical relation between two or more variables such that systematic changes in the value of one variable are accompanied by systematic changes in the other (同)correlational statistics

PrepTutorEJDIC

〈C〉(…間の)相互関係《+『between』+『名』》;(…との)関連《+『with』+『名』》 / 〈U〉《文》関連させること;相関関係にある状態 / 〈C〉相関グラフ
にせの,偽造の

Wikipedia preview

出典(authority):フリー百科事典『ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』「2015/11/16 19:53:22」(JST)

wiki en

An illustration of spurious correlation, this figure shows 500 observations of x/z plotted against y/z. The sample correlation is 0.53, even though x, y, and z are statistically independent of each other (i.e., the pairwise correlations between each of them are zero).

This figure shows the 500 observations of y/z plotted against x/z from above, this time with the z-values on a colour scale to highlight how dividing through by z induces spurious correlation.

Spurious correlation is a term coined by Karl Pearson to describe the correlation between ratios of absolute measurements that arises as a consequence of using ratios, rather than because of any actual correlations between the measurements.^[1]

The phenomenon of spurious correlation is one of the main motives for the field of compositional data analysis which deals with the analysis of variables that carry only relative information, such as proportions, percentages and parts-per-million.^[2]^[3]

Pearson's definition of spurious correlation is distinct from misconceptions about correlation and causality, or the term spurious relationship.

Illustration of spurious correlation

Pearson states a simple example of spurious correlation:^[1]

Select three numbers within certain ranges at random, say x, y, z, these will be pair and pair uncorrelated. Form the proper fractions x/y and z/y for each triplet, and correlation will be found between these indices.

The upper scatter plot on the right illustrates this example using 500 observations of x, y, and z. Variables x, y and z are drawn from normal distributions with means 10, 10, and 30, respectively, and standard deviations 1, 1, and 3 respectively, i.e.,

\begin{align} x,y & \sim N(10,1) \\ z & \sim N(30,9) \\ \end{align}

Even though x, y, and z are statistically independent (i.e., pairwise uncorrelated), the ratios x/z and y/z have a sample correlation of 0.53. This is because of the common divisor (z) and can be better understood if we colour the points in the scatter plot by the z-value. Trios of (x, y, z) with relatively large z values tend to appear in the bottom left of the plot; trios with relatively small z values tend to appear in the top right.

Approximate amount of spurious correlation

Pearson derived an approximation of the correlation that would be observed between two indices ( and ), i.e., ratios of the absolute measurements :

\rho = \frac{r_{12} v_1 v_2 - r_{14} v_1 v_4 - r_{23} v_2 v_3 + r_{34} v_3 v_4}{\sqrt{v_1^2 + v_3^2 - 2 r_{13} v_1 v_3} \sqrt{v_2^2 + v_4^2 - 2 r_{24} v_2 v_4}}

where is the coefficient of variation of , and the Pearson correlation between and .

This expression can be simplified for situations where there is a common divisor by setting , and are uncorrelated, giving the spurious correlation:

\rho_0 = \frac{v_3^2}{\sqrt{v_1^2 + v_3^2} \sqrt{v_2^2 + v_3^2}}.

For the special case in which all coefficients of variation are equal (as is the case in the illustrations at right),

Relevance to biology and other sciences

Pearson was^{[citation needed]} joined by Sir Francis Galton and Walter Frank Raphael Weldon in cautioning scientists to be wary of spurious correlation, especially in biology where it is common^{[citation needed]} to scale or normalize measurements by dividing them by a particular variable or total. The danger he saw was that conclusions would be drawn from correlations that are artifacts of the analysis method, rather than actual “organic” relationships.

However, it would appear that spurious correlation (and its potential to mislead) is not yet widely understood. In 1986 John Aitchison, who pioneered the log-ratio approach to compositional data analysis wrote:^[2]

It seems surprising that the warnings of three such eminent statistician-scientists as Pearson, Galton and Weldon should have largely gone unheeded for so long: even today uncritical applications of inappropriate statistical methods to compositional data with consequent dubious inferences are regularly reported.

More recent publications suggest that this lack of awareness prevails, at least in molecular bioscience.^[4]^[5]

References

^ ^a ^b Pearson, Karl (1897). "Mathematical Contributions to the Theory of Evolution—On a Form of Spurious Correlation Which May Arise When Indices Are Used in the Measurement of Organs". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 60: 489–498. doi:10.1098/rspl.1896.0076.
^ ^a ^b Aitchison, John (1986). The statistical analysis of compositional data. Chapman & Hall. ISBN 0-412-28060-4.
^ Pawlowsky-Glahn, Vera; Buccianti, Antonella, eds. (2011). Compositional Data Analysis: Theory and Applications. Wiley. ISBN 9780470711354.
^ Lovell, David; Müller, Warren; Taylor, Jen; Zwart, Alec; Helliwell, Chris (2011). "Chapter 14: Proportions, Percentages, PPM: Do the Molecular Biosciences Treat Compositional Data Right?". In Pawlowsky-Glahn, Vera; Buccianti, Antonella. Compositional Data Analysis: Theory and Applications. Wiley. ISBN 9780470711354.
^ Lovell, David; Pawlowsky-Glahn, Vera; Egozcue, Juan José; Marguerat, Samuel; Bähler, Jürg (16 March 2015). "Proportionality: A Valid Alternative to Correlation for Relative Data". PLoS Computational Biology. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004075.

UpToDate Contents

全文を閲覧するには購読必要です。 To read the full text you will need to subscribe.

1. T波（再分極）の交互脈：技術的側面 t wave repolarization alternans technical aspects
2. 自動血液分析装置 automated hematology instrumentation
3. 大赤血球症 macrocytosis
4. 血小板増加症患者に対するアプローチ approach to the patient with thrombocytosis
5. 好中球増多症の患者へのアプローチ approach to the patient with neutrophilia

English Journal

Comparing the performance of TD-DFT and SAC-CI methods in the description of excited states potential energy surfaces: An excited state proton transfer reaction as case study.

Savarese M1,2, Raucci U1, Fukuda R3,4, Adamo C5, Ehara M3,4, Rega N1,2, Ciofini I5.
Journal of computational chemistry.J Comput Chem.2017 May 30;38(14):1084-1092. doi: 10.1002/jcc.24780.
PMID 28409849

Causal inference between bioavailability of heavy metals and environmental factors in a large-scale region.

Liu Y1, Du Q2, Wang Q3, Yu H4, Liu J5, Tian Y4, Chang C6, Lei J7.
Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987).Environ Pollut.2017 Apr 27. pii: S0269-7491(16)32461-7. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.03.019. [Epub ahead of print]
PMID 28457732

Undesirable properties of the dimensionless normalisation for spatio-temporal variables.

Chia K1, Sangeux M2.
Gait & posture.Gait Posture.2017 Apr 19;55:157-161. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.04.014. [Epub ahead of print]
PMID 28448899

Performance Evaluation of Automated Impedance and Optical Fluorescence Platelet Counts Compared With International Reference Method in Patients With Thalassemia.

Tantanate C, Khowawisetsut L, Pattanapanyasat K.
Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.Arch Pathol Lab Med.2017 Apr 12. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2016-0222-OA. [Epub ahead of print]
CONTEXT: - Spurious platelet counts from automated methods have been reported in patients with abnormal red blood cells. However, there is no specific study regarding performance of platelet counts by automated methods in patients with thalassemia.OBJECTIVE: - To investigate the performance of autom
PMID 28402168

Japanese Journal

2-D Angles of Arrival Estimation Utilizing Two-Step Weighted <i>l</i><sub>1</sub>-Norm Penalty under Nested Coprime Array with Compressed Inter-Element Spacing