WordNet

a trust created by a court when it is judged that it was the intention of the parties to create a trust
extend credit to; "dont trust my ex-wife; I wont pay her debts anymore"
something (as property) held by one party (the trustee) for the benefit of another (the beneficiary); "he is the beneficiary of a generous trust set up by his father"
the trait of believing in the honesty and reliability of others; "the experience destroyed his trust and personal dignity" (同)trustingness, trustfulness
a consortium of independent organizations formed to limit competition by controlling the production and distribution of a product or service; "they set up the trust in the hope of gaining a monopoly" (同)corporate trust, combine, cartel
have confidence or faith in; "We can trust in God"; "Rely on your friends"; "bank on your good education"; "I swear by my grandmothers recipes" (同)swear, rely, bank
allow without fear

PrepTutorEJDIC

〈U〉(人の誠実さ・能力,物の性能などに対する)信頼,信任,信用《+in+名》 / 〈C〉信頼できる人(物) / 〈U〉『期待』,確信,希望 / 〈U〉委託,保管,管理;世話,保護 / 〈U〉(信頼にこたえる)義務,責任;(託された)責務 / 〈U〉(財産の)信託;〈C〉信託作産 / 〈C〉(市場を独占しようとする目的で結成された)企業合同,トラスト / 〈人・物事〉‘を'『信用する』,信頼する / …を当てにする,‘に'頼る(depend on) / 《trust+that節》…‘と'『期待する』,劾信する / 《trust+名+to+名》(人に)…‘を'『任せる』,委託する,信託する / 《trust+名+for+名》(…を)〈人〉‘に'信用貸しする,掛け売りする / (…を)信用する,信頼する《+in+名》 / (…を)当てにする《+to+名(doing)》 / 期待する,確信する(hope)
信頼する,信用する

Wikipedia preview

出典(authority):フリー百科事典『ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』「2015/07/22 14:18:02」(JST)

wiki en

A resulting trust (from the Latin 'resultare' meaning 'to jump back') is the creation of an implied trust by operation of law, where property is transferred to someone who pays nothing for it; and then is implied to have held the property for benefit of another person. The trust property is said to "result" back to the transferor (implied settlor). In this instance, the word 'result' means "in the result, remains with", or something similar to "revert" except that in the result the beneficial interest is held on trust for the settlor. Not all trusts whose beneficiary is also the settlor can be called resulting trusts. In common law systems, the resulting trust refers to a subset of trusts which have such outcome; express trusts which stipulate that the settlor is to be the beneficiary are not normally considered resulting trusts.^[1]

The beneficial interest results in the settlor, or if the settlor has died the property forms part of the settlor's estate (intestacy). It remains with the person and Re Vandervell case has proven that only the Beneficial interest disappears but not the beneficiary interest.

Closely Related Parties

Some jurisdictions may establish a rebuttable presumption of gift for property transfers between relatives. The presumption may operate as an affirmative defense to a petition to establish a resulting trust implied by operation of law.

The law presumes that it is legitimate to transfer property to a family member, particularly for a relative's support. But an unrelated transferee who receives substantial value without consideration is ordinarily presumed to hold the property in trust for benefit of the transferor. The rebuttable presumption of gift affects transfers between siblings, uncles, aunts, children, and grandchildren.

A notable exception to the presumption of gift is the transfer of property between husband and wife (transmutations). The marital exception to presumption of gift arises from the fiduciary duty that spouses owe to one another. Spouses have a special trusted relationship that imputes an obligation of utmost good faith and fair dealing. Accordingly, spouses are deemed incapable of transmutation except under specified circumstances, such as when making an EXPRESS DECLARATION of transmutation as by clear statement in a deed or other writing of substantial dignity.^[2]

Unlawful Purposes

In a common law system, a resulting trust law is a creation of the law of equity rather than of common law (in the strict sense). Accordingly, the laws of some jurisdictions might recognize equitable defenses such as laches, unclean hands, and the responsibility to do equity. Where a transferor has transferred property for an unlawful purpose, and gained the benefit, then a court might hold that he has waived his right to claim a resulting trust(i.e.:settlor)(inter vivos). In such situations, a court balances the transferee's unjust enrichment with the enablement of cheating by the transferor. Enabling a cheater to gain from his transaction would erode the legitimacy of the court.

Other jurisdictions may elect to disregard an unlawful purpose.

In situations involving illegality, it can become difficult to distinguish implementation of a resulting trust theory (implied by operation of law) from an oral express trust (one implied by the facts). A transferor failing upon one theory might still prevail upon the other.

Resulting trusts in English law

Classification

One attempt to classify resulting trusts was made by Megarry J in Re Vandervell's Trusts (no.2)[1974] Ch 269. According to Megarry J there are two sorts of resulting trusts in English law.

Presumptive resulting trusts

These are transfers made by A to B, where the law creates a rebuttable presumption of a resulting trust applying if the intention is not made clear by A.(written evidence produced)

For example, when A transfers property to B, unless the transfer was made by father to child or by husband to wife, in the absence of any other evidence the law presumes that a resulting trust has been created for A.(Y this category excluded:i.e.:A evidence cannot stand in Course of testimony & remains Hearsay)(A will not get the property if H&W/F&C can adduce evidence it is their property and resulting trust will not arise.

The main categories of fact situations giving rise to a presumption of a resulting trust are: - Where A makes a voluntary conveyance of property to B - Where A has made a monetary contribution to the purchase of property for B ( The Venture, [1908] P 218,(1907) 77 L.J.P. 105.)

The presumptions are, however, easily rebutted. In Fowkes v Pascoe (1875) LR 10 Ch App 343, evidence was shown that a woman had purchased stock in the names of herself and her grandson; evidence by the grandson and granddaughter-in-law that this had been done as a gift was admissible. On the other hand, the presumption is solely concerned with evidence of an intent to create a trust; ulterior motives to create a trust are not taken into account. In Tinsley v Milligan [1994] 1 AC 340, a woman transferred property to her business partner on trust in order to fraudulently claim social security payments; it was held that this did not defeat the presumption of a resulting trust.

The fact that is being proved by the presumption of a resulting trust is the intention to create a trust for the settlor. This view of presumed resulting trusts has been endorsed by Lord Browne-Wilkinson in Westdeutsche Landesbank v Council of London Borough of Islington [1996] AC 669);

"...the presumption of resulting trust is rebutted by evidence of any intention inconsistent with such a trust, not only by evidence of an intention to make a gift."

Some have argued that this presumption arises as a result of a lack of intention to transfer any beneficial interest,.^[3] This view has generally not received judicial endorsement.(obiter dicta)

Automatic resulting trusts

In these trusts " there is no mention of any expression of intention in any instrument, or of any presumption of a resulting trust: the resulting trust takes effect by operation of law,(by law:implied that property will revert back to you) and so appears to be automatic." ( per Megarry J, Re Vandervell's Trusts (No 2)) [1974]

Automatic resulting trusts can arise when the settlor tries to set up a trust for a third party, but there is an initial failure for want of objects; for example, by naming beneficiaries which cannot be defined, as in Morice v Bishop of Durham 1805 10 Ves 522, or when the objectives of the trust no longer become possible or relevant by the time of the transfer to the trustee, as in Re Gillingham Bus Disaster Fund [1958] Ch 300.

Settlor's intention in automatic resulting trusts

In relation to automatic resulting trusts, there is some difference in expressing the nature of the settlor's intention:

In Westdeutsche Lord Browne-Wilkinson stated that a resulting trust arises due to a legal "presumed intention to create a trust in favour of the donor"

It has also been suggested that it is the fact of a "lack of intention to benefit the recipient" that creates the trust.^[4] The settlor intends to retain the beneficial interest in the property, but transfers the legal title to someone else (for example, to let an active child manage the assets). The trust is implied by the settlor's lack of intention to transfer any beneficial interest^[5]

Although in many cases the outcome would be the same, the difference is significant. It is often difficult to prove intention, but easier to prove the circumstances when a legal presumption will arise. It may be more or less easy to rebut a presumption than to disprove an intention.

Lord Browne-Wilkinson was afraid that this would create a "floodgates" problem, by giving every claimant a proprietary right in bankruptcy - making many more claimants secured creditors, and thus making the position of a secured creditor much less valuable.^[6]

Resulting Trusts in South Africa

In South Africa there is no doctrine of resulting trusts. The main remedy if any of the trust purposes should fail would be through Unjust enrichment. (Westdeutsche Landesbank v Council of London Borough of Islington)

Notes

^ Gardner (Secret trust), An Introduction to the Law of Trusts
^ http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/californiastatecases/B203089A.PDF
^ Birks, Restitution and Equity: Resulting Trusts and Equitable Compensation (2000) ; Chambers, Resulting Trusts, (1997)
^ Chambers, Resulting Trusts, (1997)
^ Re Vandervell's Trusts (No.2) [1974] Ch 269
^ Westdeutsche landesbank v council of london borough of islington [1996] AC 669

UpToDate Contents

全文を閲覧するには購読必要です。 To read the full text you will need to subscribe.

1. 小児における不眠の問題をもたらす医学的障害 medical disorders resulting in problem sleeplessness in children
2. Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of chronic kidney disease resulting from atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis
3. 異文化間でのケアおよびコミュニケーション cross cultural care and communication
4. 小児における標準的な予防接種：親による接種控えと接種拒否 standard childhood vaccines parental hesitancy or refusal
5. ホームレスの健康管理 health care of homeless persons

English Journal

The development of endocrine therapy for women with breast cancer.

Sainsbury R.SourcePrincess Anne Hospital, Southampton University Hospitals Foundation NHS Trust, Southampton, UK. rmhkrsa@ucl.ac.uk
Cancer treatment reviews.Cancer Treat Rev.2013 Aug;39(5):507-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2012.07.006. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
The development of endocrine therapies has transformed the treatment of patients with breast cancer. The shift from ablative surgery and aggressive chemotherapies to more targeted, better tolerated therapy has improved both mortality and quality of life for patients with hormone-responsive disease.
PMID 23102614

The use of biodegradable stents in malignant oesophageal strictures for the treatment of Dysphagia before neoadjuvant treatment or radical radiotherapy: a feasibility study.

Krokidis M, Burke C, Spiliopoulos S, Gkoutzios P, Hynes O, Ahmed I, Dourado R, Sabharwal T, Mason R, Adam A.SourceDepartment of Radiology, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Trust, St Thomas' Hospital, 1st Floor Lambeth Wing, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK, mkrokidis@hotmail.com.
Cardiovascular and interventional radiology.Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol.2013 Aug;36(4):1047-54. doi: 10.1007/s00270-012-0503-0. Epub 2012 Nov 13.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical results of the use of biodegradable oesophageal stents in malignant strictures.METHODS: Eleven patients were included in this prospective analysis in which a woven polydioxanone biodegradable oesophageal stent was used. The inclusion criterion was that the patient u
PMID 23150121

Needs of children with a chronic bladder in preparation for transfer to adult care.

van der Toorn M, Cobussen-Boekhorst H, Kwak K, D'hauwers K, de Gier RP, Feitz WF, Kortmann BB.SourceRadboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, The Netherlands. Electronic address: marlousvandertoorn@gmail.com.
Journal of pediatric urology.J Pediatr Urol.2013 Aug;9(4):509-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2012.05.007. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
OBJECTIVE: Transfers to adult care can be problematic, resulting in postponement due to the protective nature of pediatric care and patient dependency. It is unknown whether these findings apply specifically to urology patients. Our department is taking part in a national general transition project.
PMID 22695375

Japanese Journal

ウズベキスタンにおけるバザールと生計戦略 : カシュカダリヤ州北部、手織り物売買の事例から

宗野ふもと
文化人類学 79(1), 1-24, 2014-06-30
本稿の目的は、ウズベキスタンにおける人々の生計戦略の一端を、バザールにおける手織り物売買に着目して明らかにすることである。1991年のソ連解体に端を発する社会経済状況の変容は、村落部の人々にとっては、集団農場の閉鎖とそれに伴う失業、年金制度などの社会保障の低下、継続するインフレなどの生活基盤を揺るがす問題をはらんだ20年来の経験だった。先行研究では、地縁・血縁に基づいた互酬ネットワークのセイフティ …
NAID 110009830311

〈論文〉地域協働型まちづくり事業を生み出す地域分権制度の運用に関する実証的研究--大阪府池田市の予算提案事業を事例とする

田中晃代
総社る: Social=近畿大学総合社会学部紀要 3(1), 13-20, 2013-09
… 6) With the creation of a volunteer community support system that instilled a mindset to serve the general public, the council was able to garner the trust and confidence of local and prefectural authorities. …
NAID 120005327313

助産事故により死産し紛争に至った女性の体験

高島葉子,中島通子
新潟県立看護大学紀要 2, 1-9, 2013-02-14
… for the stillborn baby, she remained unconvinced of the cause and was searching for the cause", "through participating in an association of parents who had suffered the loss of a child, she became aware of thedifferences between herself and other participants who had lost a child through purely accidental causes of no one's making", and "she lost her trust in midwives when neither her expectation that the midwife would carry out the contractual responsibilities agreed upon, nor her expectation of the midwife's competence as a professional, were …
NAID 120005268996

Related Pictures

Resulting Trust EQUITY AND TRUST - RESULTING TRUST Resulting Trust Definition

★リンクテーブル★

関連記事	「trust」「resulting」

「trust」

　　[★]

n.

信頼

v.

信頼する、信用する

関: confidence、credence、credibility、credit、faith、reliably、rely

「resulting」

　　[★]

adj.

結果として生じる

[1] Gardner (Secret trust), An Introduction to the Law of Trusts

[2] ttp://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/californiastatecases/B203089A.PDF

[3] Birks, Restitution and Equity: Resulting Trusts and Equitable Compensation (2000) ; Chambers, Resulting Trusts, (1997)

[4] Chambers, Resulting Trusts, (1997)

[5] Re Vandervell's Trusts (No.2) [1974] Ch 269

[6] Westdeutsche landesbank v council of london borough of islington [1996] AC 669

匿名

検索

案内

案内

resulting trust