A nuclear localization signal or sequence (NLS) is an amino acid sequence that 'tags' a protein for import into the cell nucleus by nuclear transport. Typically, this signal consists of one or more short sequences of positively charged lysines or arginines exposed on the protein surface. Different nuclear localized proteins may share the same NLS. An NLS has the opposite function of a nuclear export signal (NES), which targets proteins out of the nucleus.
Contents
- 1 Types
- 1.1 Classical
- 1.2 Non-classical
- 2 Discovery
- 3 Mechanism of nuclear import
- 4 See also
- 5 References
- 6 Further reading
- 7 External links
Types
Classical
These types of NLSs can be further classified as either monopartite or bipartite. The major structural differences between the two is that the two basic amino acid clusters in bipartite NLSs are separated by a relatively short spacer sequence (hence bipartite - 2 parts), while monopartite NLSs are not. The first NLS to be discovered was the sequence PKKKRKV in the SV40 Large T-antigen (a monopartite NLS).[1] The NLS of nucleoplasmin, KR[PAATKKAGQA]KKKK, is the prototype of the ubiquitous bipartite signal: two clusters of basic amino acids, separated by a spacer of about 10 amino acids.[2] Both signals are recognized by importin α. Importin α contains a bipartite NLS itself, which is specifically recognized by importin β. The latter can be considered the actual import mediator.
Chelsky et al. proposed the consensus sequence K-K/R-X-K/R for monopartite NLSs.[2] A Chelsky sequence may, therefore, be part of the downstream basic cluster of a bipartite NLS. Makkerh et al. carried out comparative mutagenesis on the nuclear localization signals of SV40 T-Antigen (monopartite), C-myc (monopartite), and nucleoplasmin (bipartite), and showed amino acid features common to all three. The role of neutral and acidic amino acids was shown for the first time in contributing to the efficiency of the NLS.[3]
Rotello et al. compared the nuclear localization efficiencies of eGFP fused NLSs of SV40 Large T-Antigen, Nucleoplasmin (AVKRPAATKKAGQAKKKKLD), EGL-13 (MSRRRKANPTKLSENAKKLAKEVEN), c-Myc (PAAKRVKLD) and TUS-protein (KLKIKRPVK) through rapid intracellular protein delivery. They found significantly higher nuclear localization efficiency of c-Myc NLS compared to that of SV40 NLS.[4]
Non-classical
There are many other types of NLS, such as the acidic M9 domain of hnRNP A1, the sequence KIPIK in yeast transcription repressor Matα2, and the complex signals of U snRNPs. Most of these NLSs appear to be recognized directly by specific receptors of the importin β family without the intervention of an importin α-like protein.[5]
A signal that appears to be specific for the massively produced and transported ribosomal proteins,[6][7] seems to come with a specialized set of importin β-like nuclear import receptors.[8]
Recently a class of NLSs known as PY-NLSs has been proposed, originally by Lee et al.[9] This PY-NLS motif, so named because of the proline-tyrosine amino acid pairing in it, allows the protein to bind to Importin β2 (also known as transportin or karyopherin β2), which then translocates the cargo protein into the nucleus. The structural basis for the binding of the PY-NLS contained in Importin β2 has been determined and an inhibitor of import designed.[10]
Discovery
The presence of the nuclear membrane that sequesters the cellular DNA is the defining feature of eukaryotic cells. The nuclear membrane, therefore, separates the nuclear processes of DNA replication and RNA transcription from the cytoplasmic process of protein production. Proteins required in the nucleus must be directed there by some mechanism. The first direct experimental examination of the ability of nuclear proteins to accumulate in the nucleus were carried out by John Gurdon when he showed that purified nuclear proteins accumulate in the nucleus of frog (Xenopus) oocytes after being micro-injected into the cytoplasm. These experiments were part of a series that subsequently led to studies of nuclear reprogramming, directly relevant to stem cell research.
The presence of several million pore complexes in the oocyte nuclear membrane and the fact that they appeared to admit many different molecules (insulin, bovine serum albumin, gold nanoparticles) led to the view that the pores are open channels and nuclear proteins freely enter the nucleus through the pore and must accumulate by binding to DNA or some other nuclear component. In other words, there was thought to be no specific transport mechanism.
This view was shown to be incorrect by Dingwall and Laskey in 1982. Using a protein called Nucleoplasmin, the archetypal ‘molecular chaperone’, they identified a domain in the protein that acts as a signal for nuclear entry.[11] This work stimulated research in the area, and two years later the first NLS was identified in SV40 Large T-antigen (or SV40, for short). However, a functional NLS could not be identified in another nuclear protein simply on the basis of similarity to the SV40 NLS. In fact, only a small percentage of cellular (non-viral) nuclear proteins contained a sequence similar to the SV40 NLS. A detailed examination of Nucleoplasmin identified a sequence with two elements made up of basic amino acids separated by a spacer arm. One of these elements was similar to the SV40 NLS but was not able to direct a protein to the cell nucleus when attached to a non-nuclear reporter protein. Both elements are required.[12] This kind of NLS has become known as a bipartite classical NLS. The bipartite NLS is now known to represent the major class of NLS found in cellular nuclear proteins[citation needed] and structural analysis has revealed how the signal is recognized by a receptor (importin α) protein[13] (the structural basis of some monopartite NLSs is also known[14]). Many of the molecular details of nuclear protein import are now known. This was made possible by the demonstration that nuclear protein import is a two-step process; the nuclear protein binds to the nuclear pore complex in a process that does not require energy. This is followed by an energy-dependent translocation of the nuclear protein through the channel of the pore complex.[15][16] By establishing the presence of two distinct steps in the process the possibility of identifying the factors involved was established and led on to the identification of the importin family of NLS receptors and the GTPase Ran.
Mechanism of nuclear import
Proteins gain entry into the nucleus through the nuclear envelope. The nuclear envelope consists of concentric membranes, the outer and the inner membrane. The inner and outer membranes connect at multiple sites, forming channels between the cytoplasm and the nucleoplasm. These channels are occupied by nuclear pore complexes (NPCs), complex multiprotein structures that mediate the transport across the nuclear membrane.
A protein translated with a NLS will bind strongly to importin (aka karyopherin), and, together, the complex will move through the nuclear pore. At this point, Ran-GTP will bind to the importin-protein complex, and its binding will cause the importin to lose affinity for the protein. The protein is released, and now the Ran-GTP/importin complex will move back out of the nucleus through the nuclear pore. A GTPase-activating protein (GAP) in the cytoplasm hydrolyzes the Ran-GTP to GDP, and this causes a conformational change in Ran, ultimately reducing its affinity for importin. Importin is released and Ran-GDP is recycled back to the nucleus where a Guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) exchanges its GDP back for GTP.
See also
- A nuclear export signal (NES) can direct a protein to be exported from the nucleus.
References
- ^ Kalderon D, Roberts BL, Richardson WD, Smith AE (1984). "A short amino acid sequence able to specify nuclear location". Cell. 39 (3 Pt 2): 499–509. PMID 6096007. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(84)90457-4.
- ^ a b Dingwall C, Robbins J, Dilworth SM, Roberts B, Richardson WD (Sep 1988). "The nucleoplasmin nuclear location sequence is larger and more complex than that of SV-40 large T antigen". J Cell Biol. 107 (3): 841–9. PMC 2115281 . PMID 3417784. doi:10.1083/jcb.107.3.841.
- ^ Makkerh JP, Dingwall C, Laskey RA (August 1996). "Comparative mutagenesis of nuclear localisation signals reveals the importance of neutral and acidic amino acids". Curr Biol. 6 (8): 1025–7. PMID 8805337. doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00648-6.
- ^ Ray M, Tang R, Jiang Z, Rotello VM (2015). "Quantitative tracking of protein trafficking to the nucleus using cytosolic protein delivery by nanoparticle-stabilized nanocapsules". Bioconjug. Chem. 26 (6): 1004–7. PMC 4743495 . PMID 26011555. doi:10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.5b00141.
- ^ Mattaj IW, Englmeier L (1998). "Nucleocytoplasmic transport: the soluble phase". Annu Rev Biochem. 67 (1): 265–306. PMID 9759490. doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.67.1.265.
- ^ Timmers AC, Stuger R, Schaap PJ, van 't Riet J, Raué HA (June 1999). "Nuclear and nucleolar localisation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae ribosomal proteins S22 and S25". FEBS Lett. 452 (3): 335–40. PMID 10386617. doi:10.1016/S0014-5793(99)00669-9.
- ^ Garrett RA, Douthwate SR, Matheson AT, Moore PB, Noller HF (2000). The Ribosome: Structure, Function, Antibiotics, and Cellular Interactions. ASM Press. ISBN 978-1-55581-184-6.
- ^ Rout MP, Blobel G, Aitchison JD (May 1997). "A distinct nuclear import pathway used by ribosomal proteins". Cell. 89 (5): 715–25. PMID 9182759. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80254-8.
- ^ Lee BJ, Cansizoglu AE, Süel KE, Louis TH, Zhang Z, Chook YM (August 2006). "Rules for nuclear localisation sequence recognition by karyopherin beta 2". Cell. 126 (3): 543–58. PMC 3442361 . PMID 16901787. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.05.049.
- ^ Cansizoglu AE, Lee BJ, Zhang ZC, Fontoura BM, Chook YM (May 2007). "Structure-based design of a pathway-specific nuclear import inhibitor". Nature Structural & Molecular Biology. 14 (5): 452–4. PMC 3437620 . PMID 17435768. doi:10.1038/nsmb1229.
- ^ Dingwall C, Sharnick SV, Laskey RA (September 1982). "A polypeptide domain that specifies migration of nucleoplasmin into the nucleus". Cell. 30 (2): 449–58. PMID 6814762. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(82)90242-2.
- ^ Dingwall C, Laskey RA (December 1991). "Nuclear targeting sequences--a consensus?". Trends in Biochemical Sciences. 16 (12): 478–81. PMID 1664152. doi:10.1016/0968-0004(91)90184-W.
- ^ Conti E, Kuriyan J (March 2000). "Crystallographic analysis of the specific yet versatile recognition of distinct nuclear localisation signals by karyopherin alpha". Structure (London, England : 1993). 8 (3): 329–38. PMID 10745017. doi:10.1016/s0969-2126(00)00107-6.
- ^ Conti E, Uy M, Leighton L, Blobel G, Kuriyan J (July 1998). "Crystallographic analysis of the recognition of a nuclear localisation signal by the nuclear import factor karyopherin alpha". Cell. 94 (2): 193–204. PMID 9695948. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81419-1.
- ^ Dingwall C, Robbins J, Dilworth SM, Roberts B, Richardson WD (September 1988). "The nucleoplasmin nuclear location sequence is larger and more complex than that of SV-40 large T antigen". The Journal of Cell Biology. 107 (3): 841–9. PMC 2115281 . PMID 3417784. doi:10.1083/jcb.107.3.841.
- ^ Newmeyer DD, Forbes DJ (March 1988). "Nuclear import can be separated into distinct steps in vitro: nuclear pore binding and translocation". Cell. 52 (5): 641–53. PMID 3345567. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(88)90402-3.
Further reading
- Görlich D (Jun 1997). "Nuclear protein import". Current Opinion in Cell Biology. 9 (3): 412–9. PMID 9159081. doi:10.1016/S0955-0674(97)80015-4.
- Lusk CP, Blobel G, King MC (May 2007). "Highway to the inner nuclear membrane: rules for the road". Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 8 (5): 414–20. PMID 17440484. doi:10.1038/nrm2165.
External links
- Eukaryotic Linear Motif resource motif class TRG_NLS_Bipartite_1
- Eukaryotic Linear Motif resource motif class TRG_NLS_MonoCore_2
- Eukaryotic Linear Motif resource motif class TRG_NLS_MonoExtC_3
- Eukaryotic Linear Motif resource motif class TRG_NLS_MonoExtC_4
