WordNet
- the property of providing useful assistance
- an inability to be helpful
Wikipedia preview
出典(authority):フリー百科事典『ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』「2015/08/14 12:29:31」(JST)
[Wiki en表示]
|
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (July 2012) |
In social psychology, the everyday concept of helpfulness is the property of providing useful assistance; or friendliness evidenced by a kindly and helpful disposition.
For many years, social psychologists have been searching for answers to these questions:
- Why, and when, will people help?
- Who will help?
- What can be done to lessen indifference and increase helping?
Contents
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Why Do People Help?
- 3 When Will People Help?
- 4 Who Will Help?
- 5 Whom to Help?
- 6 How To Increase Helping?
- 7 References
- 8 See also
Introduction
Rewards: Rewards can be internal or external. Internal rewards are rewards that increase our sense of self-worth. There are many different negative emotions that people try to reduce by performing good deeds. For example, people will do whatever can be done to expunge guilt, relieve their bad feelings, and restore their self-image (Meyers, 446). Being helpful helps to achieve these goals and can even offset other negative moods.
Feel Bad-Do Good Scenario: This effect states that those who feel bad for another person in a situation will be more likely to help compared to a person who feels bad for themselves in that situation. For example, a study was performed that had people imagine that their best friend had cancer. In this study, the researchers examined people's attention to grief. Those that were focused on the worries of the best friend were those that were more helpful compared to the people who had more selfish worries such as " I will have to act happy when really I am sad about my friends situation" (Meyers, 447).
Feel Good, Do Good Scenario: This scenario states that people who are in a good mood are more helpful. Thus, helping people enhances that positive feeling which creates positive thoughts and positive self-esteem.
Why Do People Help?
Several theories of helping agree that, in the long run, helping behavior benefits the giver as well as the receiver. One explanation involves actions guided by "social economics". This action is called the social exchange theory. It states that human interactions are transactions that aim to maximize one's rewards and minimize one's costs. We exchange not only material goods and money but also social goods - love, services, information status (Foa & Foa, 1975).
- Arousal: Cost-Reward Model. The arousal: cost-reward model suggests that people feel upset when they see a person in need and are motivated to do something to reduce the unpleasant arousal. People then weigh the costs of helping versus not helping. The clearer the need for help, the more likely people are to help. The presence of others inhibits helping behavior due to diffusion of responsibility, a belief that someone else will help. Environmental and personality characteristics also influence helping.
- Empathy-Altruism Theory. According to the empathy-altruism theory, helpfulness is seen in those who have empathy with the person in need.
- Evolutionary Theory. Evolutionary theories propose that people help others to ensure the survival of their genes, at the risk of endangering themselves. There are two specific types of helping in the Evolutionary Theory. One is kin protection, which claims that devotion goes to one's children before themselves. The other is reciprocity, which has the same components of the reciprocity norm. Basically, if you help someone, they will return the favor.
- The Reciprocity Norm. An expectation that people will help, not hurt, those who have helped them.
- Social Responsibility Norm. An expectation that people will help those needing help.
When Will People Help?
Circumstances that inhibit or enhance helpfulness include:
- Number of bystanders. The bystander effect states that victims are less likely to get help when many people are around (Latane & Darley, 1975).
- Helping when someone else does. People are more likely to help others if they have just observed someone else modeling that specific helping behavior, e.g. Los Angeles drivers offering help to a female driver with a flat tire (Bryan & Test, 1967), New Jersey Christmas shoppers dropping money in a Salvation Army kettle (Bryan & Test, 1967), British adults donating blood (Rushton & Campbell, 1977).
- Time pressures. People leisurely on their way to an unimportant appointment usually stopped to help, but those late for an important date seldom stopped (Batson et al., 1978).
- Similarity. People are more empathetic and helpful toward those similar to them (Miller et al., 2001), e.g. in dress (Emswiller et al., 1971; Gary et al., 1991), in race (Benson et al., 1976; Clark, 1974; Sissons, 1981), in beliefs (Myers, 2005).
Who Will Help?
- Personality traits. People high in positive emotionality, empathy, and self-efficacy are most likely to be concerned and helpful (Bierhoff et al., 1991; Eisenberg et al., 1991; Krueger et al., 2001). Those high in self-monitoring are attuned to others' expectations and are therefore helpful if they think helpfulness will be socially rewarded (White & Gerstein, 1987).
- Religious faith. People who rate religion as "important" are more likely to report working among the needy (Colasanto, 1989; Wuthnow, 1994; Deuser & DeNeve, 1995), to campaign for social justice (Benson et al., 1980; Hansen et al., 1995; Penner, 2002), and to give away higher percent of their incomes (Hodgkinson et al., 1990, 1992), especially over the long-term (Myers, 2005). Furthermore, they are likely to give money to missionary causes, rather than secular, objective organizations that have no motive of religious conversion.
Whom to Help?
- Victims of disaster, crime, and poverty
- People who are worse-off than the helper (to varying degree)
How To Increase Helping?
Research studies by social scientists have suggested that the following factors can help to increase helping:
- Reduce ambiguity, increasing responsibility. Personal appeals for help are much more effective than posters and media announcements (Jason et al., 1984). Nonverbal appeals can also be effective when they are personalized (Snder et al., 1974; Omoto & Snyder, 2002). So does reduction of anonymity (Solomon & Solomon, 1978; Solomon et al., 1981).
- Guilt and concern for self-image. People who have been reprimanded for their transgressions are more likely to offer help than those who have not been reprimanded (Katzev, 1978). People who have given door-in-the-face responses are likely to agree to a smaller and more reasonable request (Cialdini et al., 1975). Labeling people as helpful can also increase helpful contributions (Kraut, 1973).
- Teaching moral inclusion. Broadening the range of people whose well-being concerns us (Batson, 1983) and inviting advantaged people to put themselves in others' shoes, to imagine how they feel (Batson et al., 2003), helps.
- Modeling altruism. It's better not to publicize rampant tax cheating, littering and teen drinking, and instead to emphasize - to define a norm of - people's widespread honesty, cleanliness, and abstinence (Cialdini et al., 2003). Norms for generosity could perhaps be cultivated by simply including a new line on tax forms that requires people to compute - and thus to know - their annual donations as a percentage of income (Ayres & Nalebuff, 2003). Modeling effects were also apparent within the families of European Christians who risked their lives to rescue Jews in the 1930s and 1940s and of 1950s (London, 1970; Oliner & Oliner, 1988; Rosenhan, 1970; Staub, 1989,1991,1992).
References
- Bernstein, Penner, Stewart & Roy. Psychology, Sixth Edition (Online outlines). Houghton Mifflin.
- Myers, D. (2005). Social Psychology. 8th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
- Yang, F., & Chang, W. (2010). The effects of mood and objective self-awareness on helping intention and helping behavior. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 42(2), 339-358. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.
- Nadler, A. (2010). Interpersonal and intergroup helping relations as power relations: Implications for real-world helping. In S. Stürmer, M. Snyder, S. Stürmer, M. Snyder (Eds.), The psychology of prosocial behavior: Group processes, intergroup relations, and helping (pp. 269–287). Wiley-Blackwell. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.
- Stürmer, S., & Snyder, M. (2010). Helping 'us' versus 'them': Towards a group-level theory of helping and altruism within and across group boundaries. In S. Stürmer, M. Snyder, S. Stürmer, M. Snyder (Eds.), The psychology of prosocial behavior: Group processes, intergroup relations, and helping (pp. 33–58). Wiley-Blackwell. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.
- Law, B. F., & Shek, D. L. (2011). Validation of the cultural influence on helping scale among Chinese adolescents. Research on Social Work Practice, 21(2), 212-221. doi:10.1177/1049731510379817
- Poulin, M. J., Brown, S. L., Ubel, P. A., Smith, D. M., Jankovic, A., & Langa, K. M. (2010). Does a helping hand mean a heavy heart? Helping behavior and well-being among spouse caregivers. Psychology and Aging, 25(1), 108-117. doi:10.1037/a0018064
See also
- Altruism
- Bystander effect
- Diffusion of responsibility
- Guilt
- Little Miss Helpful
- Moral inclusion
- Obedience
- Self-image
English Journal
- [Satisfaction with perinatal care in Vysočina region in the period between October 2013 and September 2014].
- Takács L, Seidlerová JM, Smolík F, Hoskovcová S, Antonín P, Vařáková J, Valová A, Svoboda T, Dočkalová J.
- Ceská gynekologie / Ceská lékarská spolecnost J. Ev. Purkyne.Ceska Gynekol.2016 Dec;80(6):426-35.
- OBJECTIVE: To assess women's satisfaction with perinatal care provided in maternity hospitals in Vysočina region, to identify the areas with high satisfaction scores as well as those requiring improvement, and to describe the factors influencing women's satisfaction, i. e. dissatisfaction with the
- PMID 26741157
- An Audio/Video Reporting Workflow to Supplement Standardized Radiology Reports.
- Balkman JD1, Siegel AH2.
- Journal of digital imaging.J Digit Imaging.2016 Apr;29(2):153-9. doi: 10.1007/s10278-015-9821-5.
- Radiology studies are inherently visual and the information contained within is best conveyed by visual methodology. Advanced reporting software allows the incorporation of annotated key images into text reports, but such features may be less effective compared with in-person consultations. The use
- PMID 26370670
- Patient-centered outcome evaluation of the Rural Breast Cancer Survivors Intervention.
- Schoenberger YM1, Benz R2, McNees P3,4, Meneses K2.
- Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer.Support Care Cancer.2016 Apr;24(4):1841-8. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2974-4. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
- PURPOSE: Patient-centered evaluation is a critical but often overlooked component of intervention research. The Rural Breast Cancer Survivors (RBCS) Intervention is a survivorship education and support intervention designed for rural breast cancer survivors. Here, we describe evaluation of the RBCS
- PMID 26452487
Japanese Journal
- 須賀 万智,小田嶋 剛,杉森 裕樹,中山 健夫
- 総合健診 40(6), 593-603, 2013
- 【目的】健診結果票は各施設が独自に作成しており、様式が統一されていない。本研究では、デザインや表現方法を変えた5種類の健診結果票を作成して、ユーザーテストを行い、望ましい健診結果票のあり方を検討した。【対象】インターネット調査会社の登録モニターの35~59歳男女424名【方法】全国20施設の健診結果票を調査して、以下の5種類の健診結果票を作成した。票A:有所見項目を記号で示し、最後にアドバイスを記 …
- NAID 130003387878
- 高齢犯罪者・触法障害者への社会福祉の実践と刑事政策との連携
Related Links
- helpfulness 【名】助けになること、有用性 - アルクがお届けする進化するオンライン英和・和英辞書データベース。一般的な単語や連語から、イディオム、専門用語、スラングまで幅広く収録。
- helpfulness.jp Just another WordPress site メニュー コンテンツへ移動 test 日本語 検索: 見つかりません お探しのコンテンツを見つけられませんでした。検索をお試しください。 検索: 検索: 最近のコメント アーカイブ カテゴリー カテゴリーなし
Related Pictures