WordNet

a coefficient of agreement (concordance) between different sets of rank orderings of the same set of things
an index of all main words in a book along with their immediate contexts
a constant number that serves as a measure of some property or characteristic

PrepTutorEJDIC

《所有・所属》…『の』,…のものである,…に属する・《材料・要素》…『でできた』,から成る・《部分》…『の』[『中の』] ・《数量・単位・種類を表す名詞に付いて》…の・《原因・動機》…『で』,のために(because of) ・《主格関係》…『の』,による,によって・《目的格関係》…『を』,の・《同格関係》…『という』・《関係・関連》…『についての』[『の』],の点で・《抽象名詞などと共に》…の[性質をもつ] ・《『It is』+『形』+『of』+『名』+『to』 doの形で,ofの後の名詞を意味上の主語として》・《分離》…『から』・《起原・出所》…『から』[『の』](out of) ・《『名』+『of』+『a』(『an』)+『名』の形で》…のような・《『名』+『of』+『mine』(『yours, his』など独立所有格)の形で》…の…・《時》(1)《副詞句を作って》…に《形容詞句を作って》…の・《時刻》《米》…前(to,《米》before)
〈U〉《文》一致,和合 / 〈C〉(作家・著書の)用語索引
(数学で)係数,(物理で)係数,率
OLD French古[代]フランス語

Wikipedia preview

出典(authority):フリー百科事典『ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』「2017/03/13 03:26:45」(JST)

wiki en

Kendall's W (also known as Kendall's coefficient of concordance) is a non-parametric statistic. It is a normalization of the statistic of the Friedman test, and can be used for assessing agreement among raters. Kendall's W ranges from 0 (no agreement) to 1 (complete agreement).

Suppose, for instance, that a number of people have been asked to rank a list of political concerns, from most important to least important. Kendall's W can be calculated from these data. If the test statistic W is 1, then all the survey respondents have been unanimous, and each respondent has assigned the same order to the list of concerns. If W is 0, then there is no overall trend of agreement among the respondents, and their responses may be regarded as essentially random. Intermediate values of W indicate a greater or lesser degree of unanimity among the various responses.

While tests using the standard Pearson correlation coefficient assume normally distributed values and compare two sequences of outcomes at a time, Kendall's W makes no assumptions regarding the nature of the probability distribution and can handle any number of distinct outcomes.

W is linearly related to the mean value of the Spearman's rank correlation coefficients between all pairs of the rankings over which it is calculated.

Definition

Suppose that object i is given the rank r_i,j by judge number j, where there are in total n objects and m judges. Then the total rank given to object i is

R_{i}=\sum _{j=1}^{m}r_{i,j},

and the mean value of these total ranks is

{\bar {R}}={\frac {1}{n}}\sum _{i=1}^{n}R_{i}.

The sum of squared deviations, S, is defined as

S=\sum _{i=1}^{n}(R_{i}-{\bar {R}})^{2},

and then Kendall's W is defined as^[1]

W={\frac {12S}{m^{2}(n^{3}-n)}}.

If the test statistic W is 1, then all the judges or survey respondents have been unanimous, and each judge or respondent has assigned the same order to the list of objects or concerns. If W is 0, then there is no overall trend of agreement among the respondents, and their responses may be regarded as essentially random. Intermediate values of W indicate a greater or lesser degree of unanimity among the various judges or respondents.

Legendre^[2] discusses a variant of the W statistic which accommodates ties in the rankings and also describes methods of making significance tests based on W. Legendre compared via simulation the Friedman test and its permutation version. Unfortunately, the simulation study of Legendre was very limited because it considered neither the copula aspect nor the F test. Kendall W is a rank-based correlation measure, and therefore it is not affected by the marginal distributions of the underlying variables, but only by the copula of the multivariate distribution. Marozzi^[3] extended the simulation study of Legendre by considering the copula aspect as well as the F test. It is shown that the Friedman test is too conservative and less powerful than both the F test and the permutation test for concordance which always have a correct size and behave alike. The F test should be preferred because it is computationally much easier. Surprisingly, the power function of the tests is not much affected by the type of copula.

Correction for ties

When tied values occur, they are each given the average of the ranks that would have been given had no ties occurred. For example, the data set {80,76,34,80,73,80} has values of 80 tied for 4th, 5th, and 6th place; since the mean of {4,5,6} = 5, ranks would be assigned to the raw data values as follows: {5,3,1,5,2,5}.

The effect of ties is to reduce the value of W; however, this effect is small unless there are a large number of ties. To correct for ties, assign ranks to tied values as above and compute the correction factors

T_{j}=\sum _{i=1}^{g_{j}}(t_{i}^{3}-t_{i}),

where t_i is the number of tied ranks in the ith group of tied ranks, (where a group is a set of values having constant (tied) rank,) and g_j is the number of groups of ties in the set of ranks (ranging from 1 to n) for judge j. Thus, T_j is the correction factor required for the set of ranks for judge j, i.e. the jth set of ranks. Note that if there are no tied ranks for judge j, T_j equals 0.

With the correction for ties, the formula for W becomes

W={\frac {12\sum _{i=1}^{n}(R_{i}^{2})-3m^{2}n(n+1)^{2}}{m^{2}n(n^{2}-1)-m\sum _{j=1}^{m}(T_{j})}},

where R_i is the sum of the ranks for object i, and $\sum _{j=1}^{m}(T_{j})$ is the sum of the values of T_j over all m sets of ranks.^[4]

Notes

^ Dodge (2003): see "concordance, coefficient of"
^ Legendre (2005)
^ Marozzi, Marco (2014). "Testing for concordance between several criteria". Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation. 84 (9): 1843-1850. doi:10.1080/00949655.2013.766189. Retrieved 30 September 2016.
^ Siegel & Castellan (1988, p. 266)

References

Kendall, M. G.; Babington Smith, B. (Sep 1939). "The Problem of m Rankings". The Annals of Mathematical Statistics. 10 (3): 275–287. doi:10.1214/aoms/1177732186. JSTOR 2235668.
Corder, G.W., Foreman, D.I. (2009).Nonparametric Statistics for Non-Statisticians: A Step-by-Step Approach Wiley, ISBN 978-0-470-45461-9
Dodge, Y (2003) The Oxford Dictionary of Statistical Terms, OUP. ISBN 0-19-920613-9

^[1]

Legendre, P (2005) Species Associations: The Kendall Coefficient of Concordance Revisited. Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, 10(2), 226–245. [1]
Siegel, Sidney; Castellan, N. John, Jr. (1988). Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. p. 266. ISBN 0-07-057357-3.

^ Marozzi, Marco (2014). "Testing for concordance between several criteria". Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation. 84 (9): 1843-1850. doi:10.1080/00949655.2013.766189. Retrieved 30 September 2016.

UpToDate Contents

全文を閲覧するには購読必要です。 To read the full text you will need to subscribe.

1. 吸収不良の臨床的特徴および診断 clinical features and diagnosis of malabsorption
2. 血液透析装置の概要 overview of the hemodialysis apparatus
3. QRS幅の広い頻脈の診断および治療のアプローチ approach to the diagnosis and treatment of wide qrs complex tachycardias
4. 緊急血液透析 acute hemodialysis prescription
5. 持続的腎代替療法中の薬物除去 drug removal during continuous renal replacement therapy

English Journal

Quantitative bowel apparent diffusion coefficient measurements in children with inflammatory bowel disease are not reproducible.

Watson T1, Calder A1, Barber JL2.
Clinical radiology.Clin Radiol.2018 Jun;73(6):574-579. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2018.01.015. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
PMID 29499912

The Nepean Belief Scale: preliminary reliability and validity in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Brakoulias V1, Starcevic V1, Milicevic D2, Hannan A2, Viswasam K1, Brown C3.
International journal of psychiatry in clinical practice.Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract.2018 Jun;22(2):84-88. doi: 10.1080/13651501.2017.1374413. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
PMID 28885070

Linking data sources for measurement of effective coverage in maternal and newborn health: what do we learn from individual- vs ecological-linking methods?

Willey B1, Waiswa P2,3, Kajjo D2, Munos M4, Akuze J2, Allen E1, Marchant T5.
Journal of global health.J Glob Health.2018 Jun;8(1):010601. doi: 10.7189/jogh.08.010601.
PMID 29497508

Japanese Journal

重度・重複障害児の造形活動における意欲と能力発揮を基軸としたQOL評価法の開発

広島大学大学院教育学研究科附属特別支援教育実践センター研究紀要 (15), 1-9, 2017-03
NAID 120006221840

がん患者の抑うつ状態を早期発見するためのアセスメントツールの開発

日本がん看護学会誌 31(0), n/a, 2017
NAID 130006171621

大規模災害を想定した歯科用コーンビームCTを活用した身元特定に関する基礎的研究

歯科放射線 56(2), 83-89, 2017
NAID 130005509615

Related Pictures

Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance - YouTube Kendall’s coefficient of concordance Coefficient of concordance for scene x group. | Download Scientific Diagram The concordance correlation coefficient between the estimated and true | Download