ミカエリスメンテン定数、Michaelis-Menten定数

WordNet

steadfast in purpose or devotion or affection; "a man constant in adherence to his ideals"; "a constant lover"; "constant as the northern star"
a number representing a quantity assumed to have a fixed value in a specified mathematical context; "the velocity of light is a constant"
a quantity that does not vary (同)constant quantity, invariable
(Old Testament) the guardian archangel of the Jews

PrepTutorEJDIC

『不変の』,一定の / 『絶え間のない』,不断の,繰り返される / 《文》〈人が〉心変わりしない;(…に対して)誠実な,貞節な《+『to』+『名』》 / (数学で)常数;(化学・物理分析などにおける)定量
天使長ミカエル(旧約聖書「ダニエル書」)

Wikipedia preview

出典(authority):フリー百科事典『ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』「2014/08/07 05:56:54」(JST)

wiki en

[Wiki en表示]

An example curve with parameters V_max = 3.4 and K_m = 0.4.

In biochemistry, Michaelis–Menten kinetics is one of best-known models of enzyme kinetics. It is named after German biochemist Leonor Michaelis and Canadian physician Maud Menten. The model takes the form of an equation describing the rate of enzymatic reactions, by relating reaction rate to , the concentration of a substrate S. Its formula is given by

.

Here, represents the maximum rate achieved by the system, at maximum (saturating) substrate concentrations. The Michaelis constant is the substrate concentration at which the reaction rate is half of .^[1] Biochemical reactions involving a single substrate are often assumed to follow Michaelis–Menten kinetics, without regard to the model's underlying assumptions.

Model

Change in concentrations over time for enzyme E, substrate S, complex ES and product P

In 1903, French physical chemist Victor Henri found that enzyme reactions were initiated by a bond (more generally, a binding interaction) between the enzyme and the substrate.^[2] His work was taken up by German biochemist Leonor Michaelis and Canadian physician Maud Menten, who investigated the kinetics of an enzymatic reaction mechanism, invertase, that catalyzes the hydrolysis of sucrose into glucose and fructose.^[3] In 1913, they proposed a mathematical model of the reaction.^[4] It involves an enzyme E binding to a substrate S to form a complex ES, which in turn is converted into a product P and the enzyme. This may be represented schematically as

E + S \, \overset{k_f}{\underset{k_r} \rightleftharpoons} \, ES \, \overset{k_\mathrm{cat}} {\longrightarrow} \, E + P

where , , and denote the rate constants,^[5] and the double arrows between S and ES represent the fact that enzyme-substrate binding is a reversible process.

Under certain assumptions – such as the enzyme concentration being much less than the substrate concentration – the rate of product formation is given by

The reaction rate increases with increasing substrate concentration , asymptotically approaching its maximum rate , attained when all enzyme is bound to substrate. It also follows that , where is the enzyme concentration. , the turnover number, is the maximum number of substrate molecules converted to product per enzyme molecule per second.

The Michaelis constant is the substrate concentration at which the reaction rate is at half-maximum,^[1] and is an inverse measure of the substrate's affinity for the enzyme—as a small indicates high affinity, meaning that the rate will approach more quickly.^[6] The value of is dependent on both the enzyme and the substrate, as well as conditions such as temperature and pH.

The model is used in a variety of biochemical situations other than enzyme-substrate interaction, including antigen-antibody binding, DNA-DNA hybridization, and protein-protein interaction.^[6]^[7] It can be used to characterise a generic biochemical reaction, in the same way that the Langmuir equation can be used to model generic adsorption of biomolecular species.^[7] When an empirical equation of this form is applied to microbial growth, it is sometimes called a Monod equation.

Applications

Parameter values vary wildly between enzymes:^[8]

Enzyme	(M)	(1/s)	(1/M*s)
Chymotrypsin	1.5 × 10⁻²	0.14	9.3
Pepsin	3.0 × 10⁻⁴	0.50	1.7 × 10³
Tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase	9.0 × 10⁻⁴	7.6	8.4 × 10³
Ribonuclease	7.9 × 10⁻³	7.9 × 10²	1.0 × 10⁵
Carbonic anhydrase	2.6 × 10⁻²	4.0 × 10⁵	1.5 × 10⁷
Fumarase	5.0 × 10⁻⁶	8.0 × 10²	1.6 × 10⁸

The constant is a measure of how efficiently an enzyme converts a substrate into product. It has a theoretical upper limit of 10⁸ – 10¹⁰ /M*s; enzymes working close to this, such as fumarase, are termed superefficient.^[9]

Michaelis–Menten kinetics have also been applied to a variety of spheres outside of biochemical reactions,^[5] including alveolar clearance of dusts,^[10] the richness of species pools,^[11] clearance of blood alcohol,^[12] the photosynthesis-irradiance relationship, and bacterial phage infection.^[13]

Derivation

Applying the law of mass action, which states that the rate of a reaction is proportional to the product of the concentrations of the reactants (i.e.[E][S]), gives a system of four non-linear ordinary differential equations that define the rate of change of reactants with time :^[14]

\begin{align} \frac{d[E]}{dt} &= - k_f [E][S] + k_r [ES] + k_{cat} [ES] \\ \frac{d[S]}{dt} &= - k_f [E][S] + k_r [ES] \\ \frac{d[ES]}{dt} &= k_f [E][S] - k_r [ES] - k_{cat} [ES] \\ \frac{d[P]}{dt} &= k_{cat} [ES]. \end{align}

In this mechanism, the enzyme E is a catalyst, which only facilitates the reaction, so that its total concentration, free plus combined, is a constant. This conservation law can also be observed by adding the first and third equations above.^[14]^[15]

Equilibrium approximation

In their original analysis, Michaelis and Menten assumed that the substrate is in instantaneous chemical equilibrium with the complex, and thus .^[4]^[15] Combining this relationship with the enzyme conservation law, the concentration of complex is^[15]

where is the dissociation constant for the enzyme-substrate complex. Hence the velocity of the reaction – the rate at which P is formed – is^[15]

where is the maximum reaction velocity.

Quasi-steady-state approximation

An alternative analysis of the system was undertaken by British botanist G. E. Briggs and British geneticist J. B. S. Haldane in 1925.^[16] They assumed that the concentration of the intermediate complex does not change on the time-scale of product formation – known as the quasi-steady-state assumption or pseudo-steady-state-hypothesis. Mathematically, this assumption means . Combining this relationship with the enzyme conservation law, the concentration of complex is^[15]

where

is known as the Michaelis constant, where , , and are, respectively, the constants for substrate unbinding, conversion to product, and binding to the enzyme. Hence the velocity of the reaction is^[15]

Assumptions and limitations

The first step in the derivation applies the law of mass action, which is reliant on free diffusion. However, in the environment of a living cell where there is a high concentration of proteins, the cytoplasm often behaves more like a gel than a liquid, limiting molecular movements and altering reaction rates.^[17] Whilst the law of mass action can be valid in heterogeneous environments,^[18] it is more appropriate to model the cytoplasm as a fractal, in order to capture its limited-mobility kinetics.^[19]

The resulting reaction rates predicted by the two approaches are similar, with the only difference being that the equilibrium approximation defines the constant as , whilst the quasi-steady-state approximation uses . However, each approach is founded upon a different assumption. The Michaelis–Menten equilibrium analysis is valid if the substrate reaches equilibrium on a much faster time-scale than the product is formed or, more precisely, that ^[15]

By contrast, the Briggs–Haldane quasi-steady-state analysis is valid if ^[14]^[20]

Thus it holds if the enzyme concentration is much less than the substrate concentration. Even if this is not satisfied, the approximation is valid if is large.

In both the Michaelis–Menten and Briggs–Haldane analyses, the quality of the approximation improves as decreases. However, in model building, Michaelis–Menten kinetics are often invoked without regard to the underlying assumptions.^[15]

It is also important to remember that, while irreversibility is a necessary simplification in order to yield a tractable analytic solution, in the general case product formation is not in fact irreversible. The enzyme reaction is more correctly described as

E + S \, \overset{k_{f_1}} {\underset{k_{r_1}} {\rightleftharpoons}} \, ES \, \overset{k_{f_2}} {\underset{k_{r_2}} {\rightleftharpoons}} \, E + P

In general, the assumption of irreversibility is a good one in situations where one of the below is true:
1. The concentration of substrate(s) is very much larger than the concentration of products:

This is true under standard in vitro assay conditions, and is true for many in vivo biological reactions, particularly where the product is continually removed by a subsequent reaction.
2. The energy released in the reaction is very large, that is

In situations where neither of these two conditions hold (that is, the reaction is low energy and a substantial pool of product(s) exists), the Michaelis–Menten equation breaks down, and more complex modelling approaches explicitly taking the forward and reverse reactions into account must be taken to understand the enzyme biology.

Determination of constants

The typical method for determining the constants and involves running a series of enzyme assays at varying substrate concentrations , and measuring the initial reaction rate . 'Initial' here is taken to mean that the reaction rate is measured after a relatively short time period, during which it is assumed that the enzyme-substrate complex has formed, but that the substrate concentration held approximately constant, and so the equilibrium or quasi-steady-state approximation remain valid.^[20] By plotting reaction rate against concentration, and using nonlinear regression of the Michaelis–Menten equation, the parameters may be obtained.^[21]

Before computing facilities to perform nonlinear regression became available, graphical methods involving linearisation of the equation were used. A number of these were proposed, including the Eadie–Hofstee diagram, Hanes–Woolf plot and Lineweaver–Burk plot; of these, the Hanes–Woolf plot is the most accurate.^[21] However, while useful for visualization, all three methods distort the error structure of the data and are inferior to nonlinear regression.^[22] Nonetheless, their use can still be found in modern literature.^[23]

In 1997 Santiago Schnell and Claudio Mendoza derived a closed form solution for the time course kinetics analysis of the Michaelis–Menten kinetics.^[24] The solution, known as the Schnell-Mendoza equation, has the form:

where W[] is the Lambert-W function and where F(t) is

The Schnell-Mendoza equation has been used to estimate and from time course data.^[25]^[26]

The equation below, obtained by Berberan-Santos in 2010 (MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 63, 283), encompasses the Schnell-Mendoza equation, and is still valid when the initial substrate concentration is close to that of enzyme,

where W[] is again the Lambert-W function.

References

^ ^a ^b http://www.worthington-biochem.com/introbiochem/substrateconc.html
^ Henri, Victor (1903). Lois Générales de l’Action des Diastases. Paris: Hermann. Google books (US only)
^ "Victor Henri". Whonamedit?. Retrieved 24 May 2011.
^ ^a ^b Michaelis, L.; Menten, M.L. (1913). "Die Kinetik der Invertinwirkung". Biochem Z 49: 333–369 (recent translation, and an older partial translation)
^ ^a ^b Chen, W.W.; Neipel, M.; Sorger, P.K. (2010). "Classic and contemporary approaches to modeling biochemical reactions". Genes Dev 24 (17): 1861–1875. doi:10.1101/gad.1945410. PMC 2932968. PMID 20810646.
^ ^a ^b Lehninger, A.L.; Nelson, D.L.; Cox, M.M. (2005). Lehninger principles of biochemistry. New York: W.H. Freeman. ISBN 978-0-7167-4339-2.
^ ^a ^b Chakraborty, S. (23 Dec 2009). Microfluidics and Microfabrication (1 ed.). Springer. ISBN 978-1-4419-1542-9.
^ Mathews, C.K.; van Holde, K.E.; Ahern, K.G. (10 Dec 1999). Biochemistry (3 ed.). Prentice Hall. ISBN 978-0-8053-3066-3.
^ Stroppolo, M.E.; Falconi, M.; Caccuri, A.M.; Desideri, A. (Sep 2001). "Superefficient enzymes". Cell Mol Life Sci 58 (10): 1451–60. doi:10.1007/PL00000788. PMID 11693526.
^ Yu, R.C.; Rappaport, S.M. (1997). "A lung retention model based on Michaelis–Menten-like kinetics". Environ Health Perspect 105 (5): 496–503. doi:10.1289/ehp.97105496. PMC 1469867. PMID 9222134.
^ Keating, K.A.; Quinn, J.F. (1998). "Estimating species richness: the Michaelis–Menten model revisited". Oikos 81 (2): 411–416. doi:10.2307/3547060. JSTOR 3547060.
^ Jones, A.W. (2010). "Evidence-based survey of the elimination rates of ethanol from blood with applications in forensic casework". Forensic Sci Int 200 (1–3): 1–20. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.02.021. PMID 20304569.
^ Abedon, S.T. (2009). "Kinetics of phage-mediated biocontrol of bacteria". Foodborne Pathog Dis 6 (7): 807–15. doi:10.1089/fpd.2008.0242. PMID 19459758.
^ ^a ^b ^c Murray, J.D. (2002). Mathematical Biology: I. An Introduction (3 ed.). Springer. ISBN 978-0-387-95223-9.
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h Keener, J.; Sneyd, J. (2008). Mathematical Physiology: I: Cellular Physiology (2 ed.). Springer. ISBN 978-0-387-75846-6.
^ Briggs, G.E.; Haldane, J.B.S. (1925). "A note on the kinematics of enzyme action". Biochem J 19 (2): 338–339. PMC 1259181. PMID 16743508.
^ Zhou, H.X.; Rivas, G.; Minton, A.P. (2008). "Macromolecular crowding and confinement: biochemical, biophysical, and potential physiological consequences". Annu Rev Biophys 37: 375–97. doi:10.1146/annurev.biophys.37.032807.125817. PMC 2826134. PMID 18573087.
^ Grima, R.; Schnell, S. (Oct 2006). "A systematic investigation of the rate laws valid in intracellular environments". Biophys Chem 124 (1): 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.bpc.2006.04.019. PMID 16781049.
^ Schnell, S.; Turner, T.E. (2004). "Reaction kinetics in intracellular environments with macromolecular crowding: simulations and rate laws". Prog Biophys Mol Biol 85 (2–3): 235–60. doi:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2004.01.012. PMID 15142746.
^ ^a ^b Segel, L.A.; Slemrod, M. (1989). "The quasi-steady-state assumption: A case study in perturbation". Thermochim Acta 31 (3): 446–477. doi:10.1137/1031091.
^ ^a ^b Leskovac, V. (2003). Comprehensive enzyme kinetics. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Pub. ISBN 978-0-306-46712-7.
^ Greco, W.R.; Hakala, M.T. (1979). "Evaluation of methods for estimating the dissociation constant of tight binding enzyme inhibitors,". J Biol Chem 254 (23): 12104–12109. PMID 500698.
^ Hayakawa, K.; Guo, L.; Terentyeva, E.A.; Li, X.K.; Kimura, H.; Hirano, M.; Yoshikawa, K.; Nagamine, T. et al. (2006). "Determination of specific activities and kinetic constants of biotinidase and lipoamidase in LEW rat and Lactobacillus casei (Shirota)". J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 844 (2): 240–50. doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2006.07.006. PMID 16876490.
^ Schnell S, Mendoza C. A closed form solution for time-dependent enzyme kinetics. Journal of theoretical Biology, 187 (1997): 207-212 DOI
^ C.T. Goudar, J.R. Sonnad, R.G. Duggleby (1999). Parameter estimation using a direct solution of the integrated Michaelis-Menten equation. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Protein Structure and Molecular Enzymology 1429, 377-383.
^ C.T. Goudar, S.K. Harris, M.J. McInerney, J.M Suflita (2004). Progress curve analysis for enzyme and microbial kinetic reactions using explicit solutions based on the Lambert W function. Journal of Microbiological Methods 59, 317-326

UpToDate Contents

全文を閲覧するには購読必要です。 To read the full text you will need to subscribe.

1. サラセミア症候群の分子病理 molecular pathology of the thalassemic syndromes
2. 免疫不全症を引き起こすCD3／T細胞受容体複合体疾患 cd3 t cell receptor complex disorders causing immunodeficiency
3. サラセミアの臨床症状および診断 clinical manifestations and diagnosis of the thalassemias
4. ヘモグロビン変異の概要 introduction to hemoglobin mutations
5. 小児および思春期におけるサリチル酸中毒 salicylate poisoning in children and adolescents

English Journal

Quantitative electrochemical detection of cathepsin B activity in complex tissue lysates using enhanced AC voltammetry at carbon nanofiber nanoelectrode arrays.

Swisher LZ1, Prior AM1, Shishido S2, Nguyen TA2, Hua DH1, Li J3.Author information 1Department of Chemistry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, United States.2Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, United States.3Department of Chemistry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, United States. Electronic address: junli@ksu.edu.AbstractThe proteolytic activity of a cancer-related enzyme cathepsin B is measured with alternating current voltammetry (ACV) using ferrocene (Fc) labeled tetrapeptides attached to nanoelectrode arrays (NEAs) fabricated with vertically aligned carbon nanofibers (VACNFs). This combination enables the use of high AC frequencies (~1kHz) with enhanced electrochemical signals. The specific proteolysis of the Fc-peptide by cathepsin B produces decay in the ACV peak current versus the reaction time. The exponential component of the raw data can be extracted and defined as the "extracted proteolytic signal" which allows consistent quantitative analyses using a heterogeneous Michaelis-Menten model. A "specificity constant" kcat/KM=(3.68±0.50)×10(4)M(-1)s(-1) for purified cathepsin B was obtained. The detections of cathepsin B activity in different concentrations of whole lysate of human breast tissue, tissue lysate spiked with varied concentrations of cathepsin B, and the tissue lysate after immunoprecipitation showed that there is ~13.4nM higher cathepsin B concentration in 29.1µgmL(-1) of whole tissue lysate than the immunoprecipitated sample. The well-defined regular VACNF NEAs by e-beam lithography show a much faster kinetics for cathepsin B proteolysis with kcat/KM=9.2×10(4)M(-1)s(-1). These results illustrate the potential of this technique as a portable multiplex electronic system for cancer diagnosis by rapid protease profiling of serum or blood samples.
Biosensors & bioelectronics.Biosens Bioelectron.2014 Jun 15;56:129-36. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2014.01.002. Epub 2014 Jan 10.
The proteolytic activity of a cancer-related enzyme cathepsin B is measured with alternating current voltammetry (ACV) using ferrocene (Fc) labeled tetrapeptides attached to nanoelectrode arrays (NEAs) fabricated with vertically aligned carbon nanofibers (VACNFs). This combination enables the use of
PMID 24480132

Enzymatic reactivity of glucose oxidase confined in nanochannels.

Yu J1, Zhang Y1, Liu S2.Author information 1State Key Laboratory of Bioelectronics, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, PR China.2State Key Laboratory of Bioelectronics, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, PR China. Electronic address: liusq@seu.edu.cn.AbstractThe construction of nanodevices coupled with an integrated real-time detection system for evaluation of the function of biomolecules in biological processes, and enzymatic reaction kinetics occurring at the confined space or interface is a significant challenge. In this work, a nanochannel-enzyme system in which the enzymatic reaction could be investigated with an electrochemical method was constructed. The model system was established by covalently linking glucose oxidase (GOD) onto the inner wall of the nanochannels of the porous anodic alumina (PAA) membrane. An Au disc was attached at the end of the nanochannels of the PAA membrane as the working electrode for detection of H2O2 product of enzymatic reaction. The effects of ionic strength, amount of immobilized enzyme and pore diameter of the nanochannels on the enzymatic reaction kinetics were illustrated. The GOD confined in nanochannels showed high stability and reactivity. Upon addition of glucose to the nanochannel-enzyme system, the current response had a calibration range span from 0.005 to 2 mM of glucose concentration. The apparent Michaelis-Menten constant (K(m)(app)) of GOD confined in nanochannel was 0.4 mM. The presented work provided a platform for real-time monitoring of the enzyme reaction kinetics confined in nanospaces. Such a nanochannel-enzyme system could also help design future biosensors and enzyme reactors with high sensitivity and efficiency.
Biosensors & bioelectronics.Biosens Bioelectron.2014 May 15;55:307-12. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2013.12.042. Epub 2013 Dec 27.
The construction of nanodevices coupled with an integrated real-time detection system for evaluation of the function of biomolecules in biological processes, and enzymatic reaction kinetics occurring at the confined space or interface is a significant challenge. In this work, a nanochannel-enzyme sy
PMID 24412427

A simple hydrogen peroxide biosensor based on a novel electro-magnetic poly(p-phenylenediamine)@Fe3O4 nanocomposite.

Baghayeri M1, Nazarzadeh Zare E2, Mansour Lakouraj M2.Author information 1Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Hakim Sabzevari University, P.O. Box 397, Sabzevar, Iran. Electronic address: m.baghayeri@hsu.ac.ir.2Department of Organic-Polymer Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran.AbstractThe novel biocompatible poly(p-phenylenediamine) (PpPDA)-Fe3O4 nanocomposite (PpPDA@Fe3O4) was synthesized via emulsion polymerization. The PpPDA@Fe3O4 nanocomposite was characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectra (FT-IR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) and vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM). The PpPDA@Fe3O4 nanocomposite was then used as substrate for the immobilization of hemoglobin (Hb) and their bioelectrochemical behaviors were studied. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy was used to confirm the adsorption of Hb onto the surface of PpPDA@Fe3O4 nanocomposite. The Hb immobilized on PpPDA@Fe3O4 nanocomposite retained its near-native conformations as characterized by the FT-IR. A pair of well-defined redox peaks of Hb was obtained at the Hb-PpPDA@Fe3O4 modified glassy carbon electrode (Hb-PpPDA@Fe3O4/GCE) through direct electron transfer between the protein and the underlying electrode. The proposed biosensor showed good reproducibility and high sensitivity to H2O2 with the detection limit of 0.21 µM (S/N=3). In the range of 0.5-400.0 µM, the catalytic reduction current of H2O2 was proportional to its concentration. The apparent Michaelis-Menten constant of Hb on the PpPDA@Fe3O4 nanocomposite was estimated to be 0.088 mM, showing its high affinity.
Biosensors & bioelectronics.Biosens Bioelectron.2014 May 15;55:259-65. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2013.12.033. Epub 2013 Dec 22.
The novel biocompatible poly(p-phenylenediamine) (PpPDA)-Fe3O4 nanocomposite (PpPDA@Fe3O4) was synthesized via emulsion polymerization. The PpPDA@Fe3O4 nanocomposite was characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectra (FT-IR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), field emission scanning electron microscopy
PMID 24389389

Japanese Journal

界面活性剤ミセル溶液中におけるセリウム(IV)-チアカリックス[4]アレーン錯体のリン酸エステルに対する加水分解触媒活性

永井真二,松宮弘明,平出正孝
分析化学 = Japan analyst 61(8), 723-726, 2012-08-05
… The hydrolysis of p-nitrophenyl phosphate (NPP) was catalyzed at pH 9.5 and 40°C by a dinuclear Ce(IV)-thiacalix[4]arenetetrasulfonate (TCAS) complex in a Michaelis-Menten manner. … The Michaelis constant (Km) and turnover number (kcat) were 1.3×10－3 M and 5.5×10－3 s－1, respectively. …
NAID 10030495395

Fabrication and Electrochemical Characterization of Nanoporous Silicon Electrode for Amperometric Urea Biosensor

Yun Donghwa,Song Min-Jung,Hwang Sungwoo [他],Hong Suk-In
Jpn J Appl Phys 51(6), 06FG02-06FG02-4, 2012-06-25
… The Michaelis--Menten constant (K_{\text{m}}) was determined using the amperometric method. …
NAID 40019317356

「ミカエリスメンテン定数」

　　[★]

英: Michaelis-Menten constant
同: Michaelis-Menten定数
関: ミカエリスメンテン式

K_M

K_Mが基質濃度[S]より大きいとき、反応速度は基質濃度に依存的になる
K_Mが基質濃度[S]より小さいとき、反応速度は基質濃度に依存しにくくなる(酵素の飽和状態に近くなる)

「constant」

　　[★]

adj.

定常性の、一定の、普遍の

n.

定数

関: constancy、constantly、invariable、invariably、stationary、uniform

「Michaelis」

　　[★]

ミカエリス、ミハエリス

[Worthington-1] ttp://www.worthington-biochem.com/introbiochem/substrateconc.html

[henri03-2] Henri, Victor (1903). Lois Générales de l’Action des Diastases. Paris: Hermann. Google books (US only)

[whonamedit-3] "Victor Henri". Whonamedit?. Retrieved 24 May 2011.

[michaelis13-4] Michaelis, L.; Menten, M.L. (1913). "Die Kinetik der Invertinwirkung". Biochem Z 49: 333–369 (recent translation, and an older partial translation)

[chen10-5] Chen, W.W.; Neipel, M.; Sorger, P.K. (2010). "Classic and contemporary approaches to modeling biochemical reactions". Genes Dev 24 (17): 1861–1875. doi:10.1101/gad.1945410. PMC 2932968. PMID 20810646.

[nelson00-6] Lehninger, A.L.; Nelson, D.L.; Cox, M.M. (2005). Lehninger principles of biochemistry. New York: W.H. Freeman. ISBN 978-0-7167-4339-2.

[chakraborty09-7] Chakraborty, S. (23 Dec 2009). Microfluidics and Microfabrication (1 ed.). Springer. ISBN 978-1-4419-1542-9.

[mathews99-8] Mathews, C.K.; van Holde, K.E.; Ahern, K.G. (10 Dec 1999). Biochemistry (3 ed.). Prentice Hall. ISBN 978-0-8053-3066-3.

[stroppolo01-9] Stroppolo, M.E.; Falconi, M.; Caccuri, A.M.; Desideri, A. (Sep 2001). "Superefficient enzymes". Cell Mol Life Sci 58 (10): 1451–60. doi:10.1007/PL00000788. PMID 11693526.

[yu97-10] Yu, R.C.; Rappaport, S.M. (1997). "A lung retention model based on Michaelis–Menten-like kinetics". Environ Health Perspect 105 (5): 496–503. doi:10.1289/ehp.97105496. PMC 1469867. PMID 9222134.

[keating98-11] Keating, K.A.; Quinn, J.F. (1998). "Estimating species richness: the Michaelis–Menten model revisited". Oikos 81 (2): 411–416. doi:10.2307/3547060. JSTOR 3547060.

[jones10-12] Jones, A.W. (2010). "Evidence-based survey of the elimination rates of ethanol from blood with applications in forensic casework". Forensic Sci Int 200 (1–3): 1–20. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.02.021. PMID 20304569.

[abedon09-13] Abedon, S.T. (2009). "Kinetics of phage-mediated biocontrol of bacteria". Foodborne Pathog Dis 6 (7): 807–15. doi:10.1089/fpd.2008.0242. PMID 19459758.

[murray02-14] Murray, J.D. (2002). Mathematical Biology: I. An Introduction (3 ed.). Springer. ISBN 978-0-387-95223-9.

[keener08-15] ^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h Keener, J.; Sneyd, J. (2008). Mathematical Physiology: I: Cellular Physiology (2 ed.). Springer. ISBN 978-0-387-75846-6.

[briggs25-16] Briggs, G.E.; Haldane, J.B.S. (1925). "A note on the kinematics of enzyme action". Biochem J 19 (2): 338–339. PMC 1259181. PMID 16743508.

[zhou08-17] Zhou, H.X.; Rivas, G.; Minton, A.P. (2008). "Macromolecular crowding and confinement: biochemical, biophysical, and potential physiological consequences". Annu Rev Biophys 37: 375–97. doi:10.1146/annurev.biophys.37.032807.125817. PMC 2826134. PMID 18573087.

[grima07-18] Grima, R.; Schnell, S. (Oct 2006). "A systematic investigation of the rate laws valid in intracellular environments". Biophys Chem 124 (1): 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.bpc.2006.04.019. PMID 16781049.

[schnell04-19] Schnell, S.; Turner, T.E. (2004). "Reaction kinetics in intracellular environments with macromolecular crowding: simulations and rate laws". Prog Biophys Mol Biol 85 (2–3): 235–60. doi:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2004.01.012. PMID 15142746.

[segel89-20] Segel, L.A.; Slemrod, M. (1989). "The quasi-steady-state assumption: A case study in perturbation". Thermochim Acta 31 (3): 446–477. doi:10.1137/1031091.

[leskovac03-21] Leskovac, V. (2003). Comprehensive enzyme kinetics. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Pub. ISBN 978-0-306-46712-7.

[greco79-22] Greco, W.R.; Hakala, M.T. (1979). "Evaluation of methods for estimating the dissociation constant of tight binding enzyme inhibitors,". J Biol Chem 254 (23): 12104–12109. PMID 500698.

[hayakawa06-23] Hayakawa, K.; Guo, L.; Terentyeva, E.A.; Li, X.K.; Kimura, H.; Hirano, M.; Yoshikawa, K.; Nagamine, T. et al. (2006). "Determination of specific activities and kinetic constants of biotinidase and lipoamidase in LEW rat and Lactobacillus casei (Shirota)". J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 844 (2): 240–50. doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2006.07.006. PMID 16876490.

[24] Schnell S, Mendoza C. A closed form solution for time-dependent enzyme kinetics. Journal of theoretical Biology, 187 (1997): 207-212 DOI

[25] C.T. Goudar, J.R. Sonnad, R.G. Duggleby (1999). Parameter estimation using a direct solution of the integrated Michaelis-Menten equation. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Protein Structure and Molecular Enzymology 1429, 377-383.

[26] C.T. Goudar, S.K. Harris, M.J. McInerney, J.M Suflita (2004). Progress curve analysis for enzyme and microbial kinetic reactions using explicit solutions based on the Lambert W function. Journal of Microbiological Methods 59, 317-326

リンク元	「ミカエリスメンテン定数」
関連記事	「constant」「Michaelis」

匿名

検索

案内

案内

Michaelis-Menten constant